The Bible Code: Enigmas for Dummies
Do messages hidden within the Bible really predict the future?
by Brian Dunning
June 5, 2007
Podcast transcript | Download | Subscribe
Also available in Russian
Today we're going to load some cheap software onto our laptop and decode that
silliest of modern pop phenomena, the Bible Code.
In 1994, an American journalist named Michael Drosnin visited Israel and told
a poet friend, Chaim Guri, that he had a letter for prime minister Yitzhak
Rabin. In his letter, Drosnin wrote that according to an obscure code embedded
within the Torah, the Hebrew version of the first five books of the Old Testament,
Rabin would be assassinated. Guri passed the letter along to Rabin, but alas,
no heed was taken, and Rabin was in fact assassinated — a year later.
Convinced that his prediction must have been divinely inspired, Drosnin wrote
a book called The Bible Code in which he detailed his coding methodology.
It was based on the work of Israeli-Latvian mathematician Eliyahu Rips, who
had based his work in turn upon that of school teacher Avraham Oren. Others
throughout history had dabbled in similar pattern finding, including Isaac
Newton. Drosnin's book was a major success, and is about to be followed by
its second sequel.
The codes in The Bible Code are what's called Equidistant Letter Spacing,
or ELS. A very simple example of this is the word troops. Take every
other letter, and you'll get the word top. The word top is
said to be encoded within the word troops as an ELS with a "skip"
of 2. That's all there is to it. Now imagine a sentence written out in a grid,
without spaces or punctuation, like a giant crossword puzzle with no black
squares. A word encoded in this manner will appear in a line, vertically, diagonally,
or horizontally, and it can even skip squares. It will often be at an angle
something like a knight's move, like 4 squares up and 1 square to the left.
With a large enough block of text, it's possible to find just about any word.
Add a computer to the mix to do brute force crunching of all the possibilities,
and you'll be surprised at how many words crop up. Short words are everywhere.
Each time you add a letter to make your target word longer, the number of hits
drops dramatically. It's rare to find a word of 7 or more letters.
Now that you know how to find words encoded within a text, what about sentences?
Followers of the Bible Code methodology take a pretty liberal approach to this.
It is not necessary to find the entire sentence as one long ELS string; that's
impossible. All you have to do is find words that appear on the grid near each
other, usually near enough to all be viewed on the same grid (but you can make
your grid as large as you prefer). Words can go in different directions with
different skips. Picture a word search puzzle with a whole bunch of words circled
in it, and this is how sentences are found using the Bible Code methodology.
There are no rules governing this process, it's completely up to the individual
to decide which words to search for within a text, and then place them in the
desired order. There are always many other extra words, especially shorter
words, scattered through a given grid, so the researcher has plenty of words
to choose from to form the desired sentence.
That's how the Bible Code works. If it seems pretty weak and loose, well,
you're right, it is. It seemed that way to me, too, so I looked around and
purchased a commercial software program that performs these searches. It's
called CodeFinder and it cost around $70. There are several available and this
was one that looked decent. CodeFinder came with a number of source texts,
including the New and Old Testaments, and also War and Peace. Really any long
text will do, including completely random text. I generated a large file of
random text and did some searches on that as well. First I found my name, which
is liberally scattered throughout all texts; maybe I'm holy. CodeFinder works
in such a way as to store the locations of each word found to facilitate the
building of sentences. If you're patient enough, and willing to try all sorts
of alternate wordings, and stick with as many short words as possible, you
can find just about any sentence you want in any text. Don't get me wrong,
it's not quick and easy, you will have to spend significant time building a
decent sentence. I played with it long enough to find "I will die on Friday"
and "Brian is a cool guy" in the Bible, in War and Peace, and in
my own random text file. That was enough for me.
The Bible Code proponents have another secret weapon up their sleeve, and
that's the Hebrew language. CodeFinder also comes with a copy of the Old Testament
in Hebrew. Remember the Indiana Jones movie where he almost steps through the
wrong floor tile because of an ambiguity about the spelling of Jehovah? Hebrew
has different forms and different spellings of the same word, in some cases
a number of different spellings. When Drosnin wrote The Bible Code, he
took full advantage of these ambiguities to find the maximum number of matches
for a given word in constructing his sentences. He has been widely criticized
for this. If he'd have stuck to one form of Hebrew or another, many of Drosnin's
sentences would be considered misspelled. Even so, to find the name Yitzhak
Rabin in Hebrew, he had to use a skip value of 4,772 characters. That covers
a massive block of text in which it's possible to find just about any other
So, clearly, it is possible to find almost anything you want in almost any
text using the ELS method. The nature of entropy means that there will be accidental
words and sentences everywhere. When Bible Code proponents find a sentence,
how do they know that this sentence was placed there deliberately by some higher
power, and was not just another accidental hit? Proving this distinction is
really the key to proving that there's any substance to Bible Code claims,
and so far, nobody has put forward any reasonable suggestion of what form such
proof might take.
Bible Code proponents often point out that Eliyahu Rips co-authored an article
about his discovery which was published in a legitimate peer-reviewed mathematical
journal, Statistical Science, in 1994. What they fail to point out
is that this publication was in no way an endorsement of Bible Codes as predictors
of future events, let alone divine inspiration. Statistical Science is
a mathematics journal, it has nothing to do with religion or predictions, and
it does not publish research. The ELS article was published simply as a mathematically
challenging word puzzle, a definition under which Bible Code style ELS findings
are perfectly legitimate.
But Drosnin says that it's more than that. Much more. Astronomically more.
At least, astronomic in terms of its origins. In his first sequel book, The
Bible Code II, Drosnin states that the Bible was written by — wait
for it — aliens. The same aliens, in fact, who brought DNA to Earth and
caused life to first develop here. Drosnin believes that the aliens left the
key to decoding the Bible Code inside a steel obelisk buried near the Dead
Sea, and Drosnin even claims to have gone searching for it himself. Why an
elaborately buried key is necessary is unclear, since cheap $70 software off
the Internet decodes it just fine.
So what about Drosnin's famous prediction of Yitzhak Rabin's assassination?
It does sound impressive, but consider three points. First, it was only one
of innumerable predictions that Drosnin made, the rest of which turned out
to be nonsense — such as the nuclear destruction of civilization in both
2000 and 2006, and the devastation of Los Angeles by a meteor in 2006. This
is the typical tool of the celebrity psychic: Remembering only the hits and
ignoring the misses.
Second, at the time that Drosnin made the Rabin prediction, it was a practical
certainty that Rabin was going to be assassinated. The hardcore right-wing
Jews were as angry with Rabin as were the Palestinians he was trying to make
peace with. Pundits said at the time that it was only a question of which anti-peace
group was going to get him first. Psychics all over the world predicted his
assassination, and Drosnin was lucky enough to be the one who was invited onto
the Oprah Winfrey show, even though his prediction provided no useful information
about the date or place of the assassination. This PR is the reason that Drosnin
is the one whose book became popular, and not some other psychic.
Third and finally, the actual prediction that Drosnin found contained simply
the name "Yitzhak Rabin" and a Hebrew word that can mean "assassinate".
Shortened, it can also mean "assassin". In a block of text that massive,
innumerable shorter words are found, so Drosnin chose "will". Drosnin
selected a few words from his palette and arranged them into "assassin
will assassinate Yitzhak Rabin", using the word for assassin twice. Note
that it could also be arranged into "assassin Rabin will assassinate Yitzhak" or
any of numerous other names also found within the block. In short, it's very
hard for a critical thinker who understands the ELS coding to conclude that
Drosnin found a definitive prediction that Rabin would be killed. Either deliberately
or through gross negligence, Drosnin put this foolishness forward as a prediction,
and it remains the strongest evidence in favor of the Bible Code.
By Brian Dunning
Please contact us with any corrections or feedback.
Cite this article:
Dunning, B. "The Bible Code: Enigmas for Dummies." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media,
5 Jun 2007. Web.
30 Sep 2016. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4048>
References & Further Reading
Brant, D. "Fun with the Bible Code." DmitryBrant.com. DmitryBrant.com, 30 Apr. 2006. Web. 5 Jun. 2007. <http://dmitrybrant.com/fun-with-the-bible-code>
Jackson, A. "The Bible Code." Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 1 Sep. 1997, Volume 44, Number 8: 935-939.
McKay, B., Bar-Natan, D., Bar-Hillel, M., Kalai, G. "Solving the Bible Code Puzzle." Statistical Science. 1 May 1999, Volume 14, Number 2: 150-173.
Singh, S. The Code Book: Science of Secrecy from Ancient Egypt to Quantum Cryptography. New York: Anchor Books, 2000. 373.
Thomas, D. "Hidden Messages and The Bible Code." Skeptical Inquirer. 1 Nov. 1997, Volume 21, Number 6.
Witztum, D., Rips, E., Rosenberg, Y. "Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis." Statistical Science. 1 Aug. 1994, Volume 9, Number 3: 429-438.
©2016 Skeptoid Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rights and reuse information
The Santa Barbara Simoom of 1859
Who Are the Raelians, and Why Are They Naked?
The Rothschild Conspiracy
Killing Faith: Deconstructionist Christians
Organic vs. Conventional Agriculture
Binaural Beats: Digital Drugs
Facts and Fiction of the Schumann Resonance
Solving the Haunted Hoia-Baciu Forest