Chemtrails: Real or Not?
by Brian Dunning
Filed under Conspiracies, Environment, General Science, Health, Urban Legends
February 15, 2007
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Today we're going to put on our Men In Black suits, buy a plane ticket, and spray
the world with mysterious chemicals as part of an evil government conspiracy.
For today's subject is chemtrails.
Wow. Where to begin. I read a fair amount of skeptical, paranormal, and conspiracy
web sites, but I don't recall ever reading so much vituperation, anger, and
name calling as when I read a few forums discussing chemtrails. If you're not
familiar with the term, chemtrails are what some conspiracy theorists call
aircraft condensation trails. Most of them don't believe that conventional
contrails exist, and that when you see one, you're actually seeing a trail
of mysterious airborne chemicals sprayed from the aircraft. Those who do concede
the existence of contrails often claim subtle differences in appearance or
behavior between a condensation trail and a chemical trail.
First, let's discuss exactly what a contrail is. A condensation trail, also
called a vapor trail, forms at altitudes above 25,000 feet in temperatures
below -40 degrees when engine exhaust condenses into ice crystals, creating
an artificial cirrus cloud. Water is produced by hydrocarbon burning engines
in about the same quantity as fuel consumed, and in the right conditions, this
extra addition of water into the air pushes the water vapor past the saturation
point, and condensation occurs. It takes a moment to happen, which accounts
for the contrail appearing a short distance behind the aircraft, rather than
immediately, like you'd see from a smoke pod on an aerobatic plane, or like
when a crop duster releases chemicals. Contrails can also be caused at high
altitudes by the extreme low pressure areas created by wingtip vortices, which
reduce the temperature enough to condense the existing moisture in the air.
As previously mentioned, many chemtrail believers claim that there is no such
thing as a condensation trail. Since they're well understood, 100% reproducible,
and observable practically any time you look into the sky, the onus is really
on the believers to prove that no such thing is possible. In my opinion they
have quite an uphill battle on this one.
By the way, in case you're wondering whether I meant Celsius or Fahrenheit
when I said -40 degrees, here's a bit of science trivia for you. -40 is the
point where the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales are the same. If you can figure
out where Fahrenheit and Kelvins intersect, go to Skeptoid.com and post it
in the forum.
Some chemtrail believers say that the population is being gassed with some
unknown chemical for an unknown reason. Others tie into pop culture, suggesting
that chemtrails are the active manifestation of one proposal to combat global
warming by placing dust into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight. One
guy told me "You guys are so full of yourselves just can't conceive of
spiritual warfare can you? Try this fact: malevolent interdimensional entities
are involved — project keep the human slave race suppressed."
Like all conspiracy theories, chemtrails require us to accept the existence
of a coverup of mammoth proportions. In this case, virtually every aircraft
maintenance worker at every airport in the world needs to be either part of
the conspiracy, or living under a threat from Men in Black, with not a single
whistle blower or deathbed confession in decades. Yet the threats are not frightening
enough to prevent stories like the following from appearing on the Internet:
For reasons you will understand as you read this I can not divulge my
identity. I am an aircraft mechanic for a major airline. I work at one
of our maintenance bases located at a large airport. One day last month
I was called out from our base to work on a plane for another airline.
When I got to the plane I found out that the problem was in waste disposal
system. When I got into the bay I realized that something was not right.
There were more tanks, pumps, and pipes then should have been there. As
I tried to find the problem I quickly realized the extra piping and tanks
were not connected to the waste disposal system, at all. To my amazement
the manuals did not show any of the extra equipment I had seen with my
own eyes. I even tied in to the manufacturer files and still found nothing.
I could trace the control wires from the box to the pumps and valves but
there were no control circuits coming into the unit. The only wires coming
into the unit was a power connection to the aircraft's main power bus.
The system had 1 large tank and 2 smaller tanks. It was hard to tell in
the cramped compartment, but it looked like the large tank could hold about
50 gallons. The tanks were connected to a fill and drain valve that passed
through the fuselage just behind the drain valve for the waste system.
I discovered that the pipes from this mystery system lead to every 1 out
of 3 of the static discharge wicks. These wicks had been "hollowed
out" to allow whatever flows through these pipes to be discharged
through the fake wicks.
About 30 minutes later I was paged to see the General Manager. When
I went in his office I found that our union rep and two others who I did
not know were waiting on me. He told me that a serious problem had been
discovered. He said that I was being written up and suspended for turning
in false paperwork. I sat at home the first day of my suspension wondering
what the hell had happened to me. That evening I received a phone call.
The voice told me "Now you know what happens to mechanics who poke
around in things they shouldn't. The next time you start working on systems
that are no concern of yours you will lose your job! As it is, I'm feeling
generous, I believe that you'll be able to go back to work soon." CLICK.
Well that's it. Now I know 'THEY' are watching me.
Another forum poster replied:
I, too, work for an airline, though I work in upper management levels.
I wish I could document everything I am about to relate to you, but to
do so is next to impossible and would result in possible physical harm
to me. Airline companies in America have been participating in something
called Project Cloverleaf for a few years now. The earliest date anyone
remembers being briefed on it is 1998. I was briefed on it in 1999. The
few airline employees who were briefed on Project Cloverleaf were all made
to undergo background checks, and before we were briefed on it we were
made to sign non-disclosure agreements, which basically state that if we
tell anyone what we know we could be imprisoned. About twenty employees
in our office were briefed along with me by two officials from some government
agency. They didn't tell us which one. They told us that the government
was going to pay our airline, along with others, to release special chemicals
from commercial aircraft. When asked what the chemicals were and why we
were going to spray them, they told us that information was given on a
need-to-know basis and we weren't cleared for it. He seemed perturbed at
this question and told us in a tone of authority that the public doesn't
need to know what's going on, but that this program is in their best interests.
He also stated that we should not tell anyone, nor ask any more questions
I take back my comment about the lack of whistle blowers. It seems that just
about everyone is discussing it freely, and since the government is openly
laying out virtually all the essential details to 20 people in every airline
office in the world with complicity from all the union reps, why the secrecy?
If we're truly on the edge of a global warming catastrophe and a worldwide
cooperative effort to spray reflective dust into the atmosphere is the only
way we can save ourselves, wouldn't a little glasnost be a more effective
approach? Of course it would, but then we wouldn't have had those two very
exciting and original stories.
If the goal was to drug a population, you'd put the gas where it could reach
people, you wouldn't release a minute quantity into the jet stream where it's
going to be diluted to undetectable levels and eventually rain into the oceans.
If the goal is to put reflective dust into the atmosphere to fight global warming,
you'd need to plant it a lot higher than commercial jets can travel if you
don't want it to rain right back to earth (in fact you need to put it well
up into the stratosphere, not just at the top of the troposphere), and you'd
need a lot more than can ever be delivered with 50 gallon tanks. But then,
the arguments in favor of chemtrails don't appear to be based on any kind of
logic. They appear to be based on nothing more than imagined conspiracies and
sightings of visible contrails, which are well understood, and are being left
by planes every hour of the day over every city in the world, and have been
for over 50 years. It's how the malevolent interdimensional entities remind
us of their ominous presence.
By Brian Dunning
Please contact us with any corrections or feedback.
Cite this article:
Dunning, B. "Chemtrails: Real or Not?" Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media,
15 Feb 2007. Web.
26 Nov 2015. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4027>
References & Further Reading
Anonymous. "An Airline Manager's Statement." Aerosol Crimes & Cover Up. C.E. Carnicom, 22 May 2000. Web. 11 Nov. 2009. <http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm>
Anonymous. "A Mechanics Statement." Aerosol Crimes & Cover Up. C.E. Carnicom, 19 May 2000. Web. 11 Nov. 2009. <http://www.carnicom.com/mech1.htm>
Bruce Conway. "The Chemtrail Smoking Gun - Proof of Global Geoengineering Projects." Lightwatcher. Illumina Publishing, 20 Jun. 2003. Web. 22 Nov. 2009. <http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/smoking_gun.html>
Hope, Ray. America Sold Out. Longwood, FL: Xulon Press, 2003. 145-152.
Ludlum, David M. National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Weather. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1991. 24-26.
U.S. Air Force. "Contrails Facts." Official website of the U.S. Airforce. U.S. Air Force, 13 Oct. 2005. Web. 5 Nov. 2009. <http://www.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-051013-001.pdf>
United States Environmental Protetion Agency. "Aircraft Contrails Factsheet (EPA430-F-00-005)." United States Environmental Protetion Agency. 1 Sep. 2000, EPA430-F-00-005.
©2015 Skeptoid Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rights and reuse information