The audiophile preference for tube amps over solid state is based more on emotion than on science.
by Kevin Hoover
October 21, 2014
Podcast transcript | Download | Subscribe
Also available in Russian
Tube amplifiers. The 20th century dawned with an innovation that transformed communications and set today’s electronics industry in motion – vacuum tubes. Since succeeded by more efficient, miniaturized circuits, tubes still enjoy deep loyalty by musicians and the audio enthusiasts who spend to reproduce their music. Is the ardor for this antique appliance misplaced, with appreciation colored by extraneous associations? Or do the drab silicon successors to gleaming vacuum tubes fail to relate the magic in the music? Grab your headphones, settle into your favorite chair and crank up your hi-fi as we sound out the signal and the noise surrounding tube amplifiers.
But first, some science – and history.
When electronics pioneer and Marconi Company engineer John Ambrose Fleming invented the vacuum tube in 1904, he couldn’t have known that his new device, known as a “thermionic valve” in his native Britain, would one day allow people all over the world to talk to each other, make high fidelity music fill a living room or blast power chords across stadium arenas.
His two-electrode “Fleming Valve” was a simple diode, an advance over the primitive “cat whisker” devices that had gone before. Unencumbered by air, electrons leaped from one electrode to another across a gap, but only in one direction. Just one-half an of an alternating current’s waveform could pass through, coming out as rectified or DC – direct current.
Fleming, though honored as “the Father of Modern Electronics,” didn’t exploit the vacuum tube’s full potential. The new device was transformed a few years later by inventor Lee De Forest. He added a key component which changed the thermionic diode into a triode. De Forest called the new device an “Audion,” and it did much more than just switch current. But how?
In its simplest form, a triode vacuum tube is a glass bulb with all the air removed containing three central components known as electrodes. The negatively charged electrode, called the cathode, is the part that also makes light. When heated, the cathode boils off electron particles via thermionic emission, or the Edison Effect.
Those hot-to-trot electrons are drawn to a positively charged plate, or anode elsewhere in the tube. But first, they must first pass through a control grid. This is an electrode whose electrical properties can be controlled by any small input signal, and with considerable nuance and precision.
De Forest’s real game-changing innovation was to connect a telegraph key to the control grid, sending it low voltage pulses of varying duration – the dots and dashes that comprise Morse Code. These pulses modulate a variable electrostatic field around the control grid. The field acts as a traffic cop for electrons traveling from the cathode to the anode, allowing the small grid voltage to control a large current. In doing so, it transforms the feeble telegraph key input into a souped-up output signal, which can be sent over transmission lines to recipients elsewhere. Better yet, the grid can be modulated not just by a telegraph key, but by a microphone or recorded music.
This earned De Forest fame as the “Father of Radio,” a term he bestowed upon himself. In a famous, rather self-ennobling quote, De Forest proclaimed,
“Unwittingly then, had I discovered an Invisible Empire of the Air, intangible, yet solid as granite, whose structure shall persist while man inhabits the planet.”
The Audion was the first successful electronic amplifier, and in ensuing years, it was further developed with fresh variations and enhancements, such as multiple control plates. Initial uses included long-distance telephone circuits, radio transmission and by the 1920s, moving pictures with sound – the “talkies.”
World War II drove further innovation of tube amplifiers for radio and radar, and tube amps would reign supreme for decades.
“The output of a microphone must be amplified before it can produce an audible sound through a loudspeaker. A device used to accomplish this is a vacuum tube amplifier, which increases low energy to a higher level in an identical waveform, or as nearly as identical as possible.” [1962 U.S. Air Force Training Film]
Improvements in materials science soon lifted the concept to a new level. Though it had been theorized earlier, in was in the late 1940s that Bell Labs was able to fabricate a primitive transistor using germanium. This effort later won the research team the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics.
Transistors operate on the same principle as a triode vacuum tube. Instead of a cathode, anode and grid, transistors have a collector, emitter and base. Current flows into the collector, is modulated by the base – the equivalent of the tube’s grid – and then flows out through the emitter.
Transistors offer a lot of advantages over tubes. They use much less power, run cooler, cost less and are generally more durable and thus, versatile. But the main advantage is that transistors can be vanishingly smaller.
The first mass-produced transistors were the size of a bean rather than a potato-sized vacuum tuber, er, tube. Soon, mass-produced products using electronic signal switching and amplification, such as the iconic pocket transistor radio, were flying off the assembly lines.
But as far as miniaturization, the best was still to come. While transistors were a great leap, they still required several support components such as resistors and capacitors to form a circuit in which they could function.
Enter integrated circuits, or ICs. Texas Instruments scientist Jack Kilby realized that all of the supporting components on a circuit were made of basically the same thing – semiconductor material. Why, he wondered couldn’t they be co-located or integrated into a much smaller circuit on the same hunk of stuff?
While such a thing had been previously theorized, in 1958, Kilby unveiled the first working model of an IC – an oscillator circuit on a tiny sliver of germanium measuring less than a half-inch across and just one-sixteenth of an inch thick. This highly engineered hunk of metalloid earned Kilby a Nobel Prize in Physics in the year 2000.
The IC’s early adopters were the 1960s military and space program, but it wasn’t long before consumer electronics started using them in audio applications and later, computers.
Today, thanks to photolithography, where circuits are simply printed, ICs integrate millions, even billions of transistors on a single chip. With recent advances in nanotechnology, molecular scale computing may soon provide functional transistors made of individual molecules that take advantage of quantum effects for switching and amplification. Even the silicon that ICs are made of could give way to newer, faster graphene.
All this great progress must mean that vacuum tubes, like buggy whips, wax cylinders and floppy disks, have wound up in the dustbin of technological history, right?
Wrong. Like wristwatches, vinyl records and even film cameras, there are those who eschew whiz-bang silicon for the comforting, bulky old-tech of yesteryear, and that includes vacuum tubes.
Tubes enjoy wide use today, and show no sign of disappearing. They offer powerful amplification at high frequencies and are used in radio and television transmitters, in microwave ovens, particle accelerators and other specialized applications.
But vacuum tubes’ fiercest defenders are those with an ear for music – those who appreciate it, and they who make it.
Manufacturers of home stereo equipment have invested heavily in perfect sound reproduction, and have all but achieved it. A textbook definition of sonic perfection might be the faithful replication of a signal – in this case, music – with no added distortion.
The sound coming from the speakers would be as true as possible to the original – a precise, magnified version of the waveform fed into the amplifier. Problem solved!
Or not. Take a look at the reader discussions on audiophile websites, and you’ll find that slavish accuracy in sound reproduction is exactly what many audio aficionados do not want. They tend to favor tube amplifiers, and will pay a pretty penny to get them.
Tube amps, they acknowledge, do add their own flavors to the music.
Tube fans might describe tube-amplified sound with terms reminiscent of wine reviews, such as round, syrupy, dimensional, swirling, creamy, full-bodied, seductive or even brown. Solid state amps might be dismissed as harsh, sterile, cold or soulless.
These highly subjective terms aren’t without a footing in fact. In tube amplifiers, distortion, or clipping as it is known, tends to come on gradually as signal amplitude increases, and consists of even-order harmonic frequencies. These signal processing artifacts resonate at integer multiples of the original frequency.
An even-order harmonic might be 200 percent of the original signal’s frequency, an octave up, and impart reinforcing qualities to the sound.
In harsh contrast, distortion in solid state amplifiers tends to come on abruptly at high power levels, and consists of odd-order harmonics, which, depending on the specific frequency, can sound harsh and buzzy, and have a deadening effect on music.
It all adds up to a complex equation, though diehards in each camp – solid state or tube – never tire of championing their preferred platform. The debate is a mash-up of philosophy, perception and platform passion.
A chip fan might point to stats and graphs that document the similarity of input signal to output signal. It seems logical that this precision sound reproduction better places the source material – the musician – into the listener’s presence.
But tube trumpeters call that listening with your eyes. Listening is done where music actually dwells – in the mind. Thus, they say, perception trumps data.
Hybrid amplifiers try to combine the best of both worlds, but, depending on your sonic philosophy, they may strike you as either a compromise or a synergy. A hybrid amp might include a tube preamplifier to imbue the music with the desired euphony, then send the sweetened signal to a solid state output stage to pump it up with clean, accurate power.
Tube amps are especially prized by today’s electric guitar players. Whether they’re looking for the lovelorn liquidity of pedal steel or the crunch of metal, guitarists are among the most impassioned tubists.
Shredders especially. For them, distortion is an essential tool of the trade, if not a basic human right. Achieving the suitably torrid tone takes the right guitar, effects pedals and outboard equipment, and typically a tube amplifier, sometimes turned up to 11, to fully infuse it with what’s been called the “positive menace” of heavy rock guitar.
Multiple major manufacturers service the music industry with ever-evolving lines of tube, solid state and hybrid amps. There are scores of A-list, household-name guitar players in both camps, who will mix and match their gear to create a signature sound.
Adding yet another layer of complication – and controversy – to the mix, is the advent of amp modeling. Digital Signal Processors, or DSP chips, can digitally shape a signal and allow a solid state amp to emulate tube amplifiers. A musician may choose tone characteristics of individual amplifier brands, generic tone styles such as surf or metal guitar, or eras in which a certain tone was introduced.
DSPs can also mimic the characteristic tones imparted by specific guitars, effects pedals and speaker cabinets, albeit with varying degrees of soundalike success. YouTube is loaded with A/B comparisons, and they sometimes confound expectations.
Still the basic tube amp soldiers on.
Even the fanciest of today’s guitar amps, with all their add-ons and digital enhancements – still rely at their heart on the basic thermionic valve.
In both guitar and home stereo amps, many factors can affect sonic performance and perception, including other components, their quality and interaction, room and equipment temperature, radio frequency interference, vibration and limitless unquantifiable factors.
Sentiment is one, when a type of device or brand holds fond associations with a classic artist or memorable experience.
Coolness can’t be discounted either. Tubes carry the cachet and romance of old-time radio and early rock and roll. Their retro, totally tubular look and comforting orange glow present a pleasing visual, one maximized by some manufacturers. To enhance the cosmetics and buyer appeal, amp makers sometimes mount the Jules Verne-like glass tubes in prominent, needlessly exposed locations that make them susceptible to interference and damage. Listening with the eyes, it turns out, goes both ways.
If you’re agnostic as to platform, a well-made product of either type could be right for you – or maybe you don’t care at all. In the end, it’s a personal choice as to whether you use a sheet of silicon or a glowing glass tube to attain mastery of the Invisible Empire of the Air.
Sound effects from https://www.freesfx.co.uk
Musical excerpt from "Nothing Could Be Sweeter" by The Virginians, 1929.
Excerpt from "Basic Amplifiers," U.S. Army training film, 1963.
By Kevin Hoover
Please contact us with any corrections or feedback.
Cite this article:
Hoover, K. "Tube Amplifiers." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media,
21 Oct 2014. Web.
21 Oct 2017. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4437>
References & Further Reading
Barbour, Eric. "The Cool Sound of Tubes." IEEE Spectrum. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 4 Jan. 1999. Web. 8 Oct. 2014. <http://spectrum.ieee.org/consumer-electronics/audiovideo/the-cool-sound-of-tubes>
Hamm, Russell O. "Tubes Versus Transistors – Is There an Audible Difference?" Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. The Internet Archive, 1 May 1973. Web. 8 Oct. 2014. <https://archive.org/details/TubesVersusTransistors-IsThereAnAudibleDifference>
Monteith, Dwight O. "Transistors Can Sound Better Than Tubes." Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 1 Mar. 1977, Volume 25, Issue 3: 116-120.
Morton Jr., David L., Gabriel, Joseph. The Life Story of a Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press;, 2004. 1-100.
Pittman, Aspen. The Tube Amp Book. Milwaukee: Backbeat Books, 2003.
Tino Zottola. Vacuum Tube Guitar and Bass Amplifier Theory. Westport: Bold Strummer, Ltd., 1996.
©2017 Skeptoid Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Rights and reuse information