The Secrets of MKULTRA

How true is it that the CIA conducted unethical mind control experiments on unwitting human subjects?

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Conspiracies, History & Pseudohistory

Skeptoid #373
July 30, 2013
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

CIA Logo
US Government image

It's one of the most ominous terms in the history of modern governments and intelligence, nearly on a par with the names of Josef Mengele and Pol Pot. For 20 years from 1953 to 1973, the American Central Intelligence Agency funded and conducted tests on human subjects, both with and without their knowledge, in an effort to control minds and personalities for the purpose of espionage. Most notorious for administering the psychedelic drug LSD to people without their knowledge or consent, MKULTRA has since become a cornerstone of conspiracy theorists flaunting it almost gleefully as proof of the government's misdeeds against its own private citizens. And the scary part is that it's completely true.

The short version of the MKULTRA story is that the CIA spent a long time trying to control minds. After performing all kinds of dastardly and unethical testing, they found they couldn't reliably achieve their goals, and terminated the program. That's it. It's important to keep it in context, both what it was and what it wasn't. It's evidence that the government tried something that didn't work. It's also evidence that the government has been proven willing to bend the rules; and by "bending the rules" I mean breaking laws and violating both civil rights and ethics at every level. But with this said, MKULTRA does not constitute evidence that similar projects continue today. Maybe they do, but logically, MKULTRA is not that proof.

So let's look at how this all came about and what exactly happened. The cold war started basically as soon as the smoke cleared from World War II, and the Western bloc and the Communist bloc immediately became suspicious of one another. In 1949, the highest ranking Catholic archbishop in Communist Hungary, Cardinal József Mindszenty, was marched into court where he had been charged with treason for trying to undermine the Communist government. Mindszenty, who was innocent, mechanically confessed in court to a long list of crimes including stealing Hungary's crown jewels, planning to depose the government, start World War III, and then seize power himself. The CIA watched this, noted his strange behavior while making the confessions, and concluded that he must have been brainwashed. They saw American prisoners of war in North Korea make anti-Amerian statements on camera. Clearly, some response was needed to this apparent Communist ability. They contrived to develop mind control techniques.

One such project was called MKULTRA. MK meant the project was run by the CIA's Technical Services Staff, and Ultra was a reference to the highest level of security. But although MKULTRA is the poster child, there were other similar projects. It had spawned from project ARTICHOKE, founded in 1951 to study hypnosis and morphine addiction. There was also MKSEARCH, MKOFTEN, project BLUEBIRD, a whole raft of related programs. The US military, separate from the CIA, also conducted its own research. Project CHATTER, part of the US Navy, ran from 1947 to 1953, when MKULTRA took over.

At the time, both psychology and psychopharmacology were in their infancies. We didn't really know whether the CIA's goals were achievable or not; whether it was or was not possible to exert a finely tuned influence on people's minds. During the cold war's golden era of espionage, this was a major national security question. The CIA had to know whether this was something they could do; because if it was, it was something the KGB could do right back at them. While nuclear physicists on both sides were building bigger and bigger hydrogen bombs, psychologists and chemists were working to fight the cold war on a much subtler front.

The CIA is not a scientific research organization, and so it needed to contract out the vast majority of this work. The CIA set up front groups, such as the Society for the Investigation for Human Ecology, to fund projects at universities and hospitals in such a way that nobody realized the CIA was involved. Some 86 such institutions are known to have received funding as part of MKULTRA. The vast majority of researchers were unaware that their programs were funded by the CIA, and accordingly, did their work as they normally would according to ethical standards of the day. Some researched forms of hypnosis, some did trials on a variety of drugs intended to work as truth serums, some did various psychiatric or psychological studies trying to learn what made people tick and how that tick might be manipulable. In fact, just about every bizarre experiment you might have read about probably was tried to some degree by some MKULTRA funded researcher. Granted the ethical standards of the 1950s and 1960s were not what they are today, but still there was very little intentional harm done by nearly all MKULTRA funded programs. Nevertheless, the exceptions were exceptional indeed.

Research done at McGill University by Dr. Donald Cameron took patients who came in with minor psychiatric complaints and subjected them to outrageous treatments. Some were given electroshock therapy at many times the normal voltage, some were given LSD, some were given other experimental or illegal drugs, all under the license granted by MKULTRA. Many reports state that some patients left with lifelong disabilities.

The Addiction Research Center at the Public Health Service Hospital in Lexington, KY was also secretly on the CIA's payroll. Dr. Harris Isbell took patients who came in to seek treatment for drug addiction and gave them massive doses of LSD, heroin, methamphetamine, and psychedelic mushrooms. In one experiment he put seven patients on LSD for 77 days straight.

I could fill a month of episodes giving such brief examples of the MKULTRA projects that are known. The main thing we know is that it didn't work.

Nothing that came out of MKULTRA panned out as very useful from an espionage perspective; in short, the CIA was never able to achieve the type of mind control that it wanted, and so the program was eventually terminated (other related programs from other agencies continued for some time with similar results). Because of the secrecy and ethical violations, the CIA destroyed all the documents, with the exception of a few that have turned up here and there over the years from misplaced archives. What remains has all been declassified, and can now be freely downloaded. From a purely scientific perspective, there's nothing there that isn't old hat to modern psychiatry and psychopharmacology; MKULTRA never learned anything that we don't know now. From an ethical perspective, documents of some cases exist, and some don't. It's probable that we don't know the worst of the ethical violations, and possible that we never will.

So as you can easily imagine, conspiracy theories surrounding MKULTRA are nearly endless. One of the most common pertains to a village in France which experienced an epidemic in 1951. Seven people died and a few hundred were sickened, scores of whom were committed to insane asylums. Some conspiracy theorists insist that it was a test of both aerial spraying of LSD and a foodborne toxin, however the scientific finding — published as early as that same year in the British Medical Journal — is that it was a case of ergot fungus contaminating the food supply. Ergot contamination of rye wheat causes convulsions, insomnia, pain, hallucination, and delirium. These symptoms might last hours or months. Considering that this happened two years before MKULTRA was funded, and that the effects were identical to those expected from the known ergot contamination, no introduction of a conspiracy theory is needed to explain the event.

The other most popular claim concerns Dr. Frank Olson, a microbiologist who worked in MKULTRA and its predecessor programs. He fell from a 13th floor hotel window and died in 1953 after expressing misgivings about MKULTRA, prompting claims that he was murdered by the CIA. In 1975 the CIA revealed that they had indeed spiked Dr. Olson's drink with LSD nine days before his death, then sent him to New York for psychiatric treatment. What happened in that hotel room remains a mystery to this day. The Olson family accepted a settlement offer in 1975, but tried to have the case reopened following a 1993 exhumation and autopsy that revealed blunt force trauma alleged to be consistent with by-the-book CIA assassination techniques. In 2012 the family sued the CIA seeking additional damages, but the court dismissed the suit in 2013 as the family had already settled.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

Most of the rest of the MKULTRA conspiracy theories consist of vague assertions that similar unethical research continues and that the CIA still experiments on innocent subjects. At some level, they almost certainly do. But logic dictates that one cannot take a specific conspiracy claim — for example, that Denver International Airport is secretly set up to be an extermination camp for American citizens — and cite MKULTRA as evidence. It is not evidence of that. I'll also hear from 9/11 conspiracy theorists who cite MKULTRA as evidence that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. No, it's not evidence of that either. Such comparisons are logical non-sequiturs. Saying "MKULTRA happened, therefore Denver Airport is an extermination camp" is saying "A, therefore B," and this is logic that does not hold up. Real as MKULTRA was, and real as other still-unknown CIA projects might be, one does not prove the other.

It was 1948 when Communist Hungary banned the Church, and Cardinal Mindszenty — as an outspoken critic of Communism — feared that he was likely to be arrested. He wrote that he had not conspired against the government, and said that if he later made any confessions to the contrary, that they would be the result only of coercion. After his arrest and conviction, he spent about 8 years in prison until being freed as a result of the Hungarian Revolution, at which point he was finally able to reveal the details of how and why he had made his bogus confessions in court. His confessions were not the result of psychoactive drugs, hypnotism, or any other type of mind control. He'd simply been beaten with rubber truncheons until he agreed to confess.

The lesson learned from a skeptical study of MKULTRA is that this was experimental research done within the context of what we knew in the 1950s and 1960s. We have 50 years of knowledge built up since then, and we now know that just about everything they tried wouldn't have worked. The human brain is just a little too complex for the type of precise control the CIA had hoped for. The best type of mind control, as Cardinal Mindszenty discovered, is the good old rubber truncheon.

Brian Dunning

© 2013 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

CIA. Brainwashing from a Psychological Viewpoint. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1956. 45.

Gabbai, Lisbonne, Pourquier. "Ergot Poisoning at Pont St. Esprit." British Medical Journal. 15 Sep. 1951, Volume 2, Number 4732: 650-651.

Lux. "MKULTRA: Psychedelic Mind Control and Its Legacy." The Vaults of Erowid., 1 Jun. 2007. Web. 25 Jul. 2013. <>

Marks, J. The Search for the Manchurian Candidate. New York: Times Books, 1979. 203.

Select Committee on Intelligence, and Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Human Resources. Project MKULTRA: The CIA's Program of Research in Behavioral Modification. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1977.

Streatfeild, D. Brainwash: The Secret History of Mind Control. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2007.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Secrets of MKULTRA." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 30 Jul 2013. Web. 29 Mar 2015. <>


10 most recent comments | Show all 148 comments

Hello I'm just sending this from being a witness to disturbance within people Idk know if it's weapons of mass destruction or government corruption but from personal observation of 7 plus years I believe that crystal methamphetamine plays a role in something I would likend it to monarch programming which is taken place right here in the central valley (fresno area) and I'm willing to provide all i know if nessessary but I feel as a citizen it's my duty to heightened awareness of this particular concern... rather to aid in the silence. Please look into it and GOD BLESS!

Christopher l. Daniels, fresno ca
May 11, 2014 8:42pm

"MK/ULTRA was one of a concatenated variety of designations for experiments that began no later than the attachment of paperclips to the files of certain Nazi scientists; Bluebird, Artichoke, et al."

As I said in not as erudite fashion as Kurt, "For whatever reason MKUltra was conceived and put into action, certain individuals of the American administration and agencies organized, funded, and covertly conspired to commit acts of physical, mental, and emotional violence against innocent citizens of their own country, and in so doing, took up right where the 1600-1800 Nazi and Japanese war criminals the US harboured after WW2 left off."

Had MKUltra never been exposed, at least in part, the whole thing would have been the Mother Of All Conspiracy Theories, with the "skeptics" labeling the proponent of such Nazi-inspired and aided goings-on, the rantings of tinfoil hat-wearers and conspiracy nuts.

This should serve as a serious warning to any so-called skeptic not to lump all conspiracy theories into one basket and then redefine them under a blanket term as having "never been proved" under doubtful and sometimes outright wrong logic.

What Kurt has pointed out re name-changing of such heinous projects against unwitting citizens and soldiers in order to frustrate FOIA and Congress enquiries raises the distinct probability that such projects continue, and the sooner genuine skeptics turn their critical analysis to such matters in a proper exercise of their intellect, the better.

Macky, Auckland
May 12, 2014 1:35pm

If it was exposed in part by people worth believing, Barack Obama would be in a bunker surrounded by twenty heavily armored guards.

Bill, Canberra
May 14, 2014 3:10am

And that's another important question.

Who do you believe ?

That's why critical analysis, solid evidence, and paying attention to history is so crucial to understanding what has gone on, and what is now going on.

Macky, Auckland
May 16, 2014 3:29am

I wonder if some of these people even read the article.

Also Skeptoid does not "lump all conspiracy theories into one basket". If they did that they wouldn't have a show. They tackle each one individually, and if they say a given theory isn't proven...maybe it's because it isn't proven?

And Mark, you aren't fooling anyone...except perhaps the fools.

Daviticus, Sydney, NS Canada
August 20, 2014 2:32pm


The appearance of conspiracy theories being treated individually on and by Skeptoid is only illusionary.

There are articles where the term "conspiracy theory" and conspiracy theorists themselves take up over half the contents of said articles, and the results are always pretty much the same i.e. the downcrying of any conspiracy theory to have been proven, and illogical observations of what conspiracy theorists and their assertions are supposed to be, by Skeptoid's own constructed rules.

An example of such a constructed rule is Skeptoid's assertion that it must be about some event in the future. This has already been proven erroneous in at least one case, as some conspiracy theories by their proponents were about events that lay in the past at the time the CT was doing the rounds.

In addition, Skeptoid's Rules 1 & 2 in 4416# are so tight that practically no conspiracy theory could ever be proven correct under such definitions. Not only are those definitions in fact out of order in the real world re #1, they are patently wrong in #2.

Because Skeptoid maintains this unassailable position re its own constructed definitions of what a conspiracy theory actually is, (despite being proven wrong on occasion), the result of Skeptoid's treatment of conspiracy theories is the virtual lumping together of all conspiracy theories into one basket, as I said.

Re Mark, I don't understand your comment. I'm sure you wouldn't be saying that if you were a victim of MKUlta.

Macky, Auckland
October 2, 2014 9:32pm

I saw a documentary that reported one of the hotel staff was listening on an extension and heard two CIA operatives confirming they'd dealt with Olsen. I'm not trying to imply that that's true, I'd just like to hear that particular myth get the Skeptoid treatment.

C.K. Nash, London
October 30, 2014 11:37am

Its amazing how ex-CIA operatives have publicly admitted to controlling the manufacture, importation, and distribution of heroin; murdering leaders of countries as well as corrupting world leaders; and working on MK/ULTRA in recent years yet you are saying that its all BS and the CIA doesn't do that kind of thing and they aren't capable. So who to believe, the one's admitting they are guilty of it or outsiders that say no it can't be?

Barney deDinosore, Remote Island
January 19, 2015 3:10am

The CIA are nothing but thugs. They do not answer to any democratic process, they indulge in criminal actions that would land any other thug in jail for a long time, or worse.

They are not there to protect the ordinary citizen from terrorism and other half-imagined enemies of "freedom and democracy".

They are there to engineer and manipulate and overthrow democratically elected countries who wanted to be self-governing, and the CIA helped to install vicious fascist-style dictatorships that were more friendly to American corporate interests.

Here's a list here of such activity

In addition, the CIA has preyed on its own citizens, and took off right where the Nazi's left off after WW2.

The CIA is nothing less than the enforcement wing of the Powers That Be, a gang of lawless thugs engaged in all the dirty tricks, torture, and criminal activity there is a name for.

They are a disgrace to any legitimate democratic process, and although they are certainly not alone in the world, the BS that America is a free and democratic country along with the other members of the five eyes group, NZ included, is nothing but a façade, and is used as an excuse for more war and pillaging of other countries worldwide, and of course the money that is generated by said wars for the benefit of as few.

Macky, Auckland
March 5, 2015 4:54pm

If you ever want to speak of a victim of this. I now believe what I thought was true to be an implanted memory or just plain crazy. It started back in the mid to late 90's in Chicago, Illinois. =-I'm not really scared anymore because when they decide to attempt another "look like suicide" death, they will be releasing me from the pain and suffering they've caused. I can give you detailed information on what they have been doing for a decade, how they planned and waited years to amp up the treatment, and that they made sure I was isolated in the end so there were no witnesses to my problems. If you are interested and want to take me seriously, please get a hold of me.

GS or SG, Illinois for a little while longer
March 11, 2015 8:41am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply


What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid

Listener Feedback: The Environment
Skeptoid #459, Mar 24 2015
Read | Listen (11:54)
Science Fails
Skeptoid #458, Mar 17 2015
Read | Listen (14:11)
Forgetting the Alamo
Skeptoid #457, Mar 10 2015
Read | Listen (19:37)
Cattle Mutilation
Skeptoid #456, Mar 3 2015
Read | Listen (13:00)
Ghost Photography
Skeptoid #455, Feb 24 2015
Read | Listen (15:30)
#1 -
The Baldoon Mystery
Read | Listen
#2 -
Listeners Have Another Say
Read | Listen
#3 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 Conspiracy Theories that Turned Out to Be True... Maybe?
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Legend of the Flying Dutchman
Read | Listen
#6 -
In Which I Am the Very Picture of Error Personified
Read | Listen
#7 -
Lie Detection
Read | Listen
#8 -
The Santa Barbara Simoom of 1859
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.