Binaural Beats: Digital Drugs

The science behind binaural beats: What they are, what they are claimed to do, and what they can actually do.

Filed under Alternative Medicine, Consumer Ripoffs

Skeptoid #147
March 31, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Also available in Russian
Bookmark and Share

Today we're going to put on our headphones, kick back in the beanbag, and get mellow to the soothing sounds of the latest digital drug: binaural beats. These computer generated sound files are said to massage your brain and produce all sorts of effects, everything from psychedelic experiences to behavior modification. Let's point our skeptical eye at the science of binaural beats, and especially at some of the claims made for them.

First of all, I'm sure you're curious right off the bat to hear what binaural beats sound like, so let's take a listen:

A binaureal beat is created by playing a different tone in each ear, and the interference pattern between the slightly differing frequencies creates the illusion of a beat. It's intended to be heard through headphones, so there's no cross-channel bleed across both ears. Listen to this, I'll play a simple binaural beat, and I'll slide the pan control back and forth from one ear to the other. You can see that there isn't actually any beat, it's just an acoustic illusion:

If you search the Internet for "binaural beats" you'll quickly find there's a whole industry built on the idea that listening to binaural beats can produce all kinds of desired effects in your brain. It can alter your mood, help you follow a diet or stop smoking, get you pumped up for a competition, calm you down, put you to sleep, enhance your memory, act as an aphrodisiac, cure headaches, and even balance your chakra. Binaural-Beats.com offers a $30 CD that they call the world's first "digital drug". They claim it can get you drunk without the side effects. I-Doser.com offers a range of music tracks that they say simulates a variety of actual pharmaceuticals, such as Demerol, Oxycontin, and Vicodin. Suffice it to say that no matter what superpower you're looking for, someone on the Internet sells a binaural beat audio file claimed to provide it.

You don't have to buy one, though. It's not too hard to make your own binaural beat, and free software is widely available to do just that. The one that I used to make that little sample is an open-source program called Gnaural, available on the Sourceforge web site. It's pretty easy to use, though it takes some practice before you can generate some of the really cool, more professional sounding beats. A binaural beat consists of two simple tones, and most people add that background pink noise. Nothing special.

But the question is: Does it have a special effect on the brain? A lot of people think so. The basic claim being made for binaural beats is "resonant entrainment". Entrainment, in physics, is when two systems which oscillate at different frequencies independently are brought together, they synchronize with one another, at whatever the combined system's resonant frequency is. Examples of entrainment occur in animals in nature; for example the chirping of crickets or the croaking of frogs. Synchronization of menstrual cycles in women is another example. Even people coming together and dancing with one another is a type of entrainment. The basic claim for binaural beats is that the perceived low-frequency beat will entrain your brain wave pattern, thus forcing your brain into some desired state.

Most of these web sites give some brief explanation of entrainment. The example you hear most often is that of Dutch polymath Christiaan Huygens, who in 1665, hung two pendulum clocks next to each other on a wall. He noticed that the pendulums eventually matched each others' frequency, but always in antiphase, opposite to each other, as if canceling each other out. He'd try disturbing one or setting them in sync, but they'd always return to the same antiphase synchronization. Huygen's experience is widely touted on binaural beat websites as a demonstration of how systems can become spiritually connected through some energy field. However, they misunderstand what happened, and have not read the full story. Huygens also tried taking one clock off the wall, and as soon as they were no longer physically connected to one another via the actual wall, the effect disappeared. It was not the proximity of the clocks to one another that created the entrainment; it was their physical, mechanical connection to one another. As each pendulum swung it imparted an infinitesimal equal and opposite reaction to the wall itself. With two clocks on the wall, the system naturally sought the lowest energy level, according to the laws of thermodynamics; and both pendulums would thus swing exactly counter to each other, minimizing the system's total energy.

So to summarize their claim, they're saying that entrainment means that a binaural beat will cause your brain's electroencephalogram to match the pattern of the phantom beat. Well, if it did, entrainment certainly doesn't apply and would not be part of the equation, so we can scratch that off the list. But it doesn't make the claimed observation wrong. We do know that certain electroencephalogram waveforms are often associated with certain kinds of activity. For example, physical activity or REM sleep often produces an electroencephalogram with a sine wave of between 4 and 8 Hz, which we term a theta pattern. Waking relaxation with eyes closed often produces a pattern from 8 to 12 Hz, which is called an alpha pattern. There are only a few characterized patterns, and pretty general descriptions of what kinds of activities go with them. The claim made by the binaural beat sellers depends on much more granular and specific matches. For example, the claim that a binaural beat with a frequency of X produces the same effect in your brain as Vicodin is wholly implausible. Such claims presume that we know the exact frequency of the electroencephalogram in each of these desired conditions, and the fact is that brain waves don't work that way. It is wholly and absolutely implausible to say that desired brain condition X will occur if we get your EEG to read exactly X Hz.

Not only that, binaural beats presume that brain waves work in the opposite way that they do. Certain brain states produce certain brain waves; brain waves don't produce brain states. You just don't turn a dial to 6.5 Hz and induce instant happiness.

And so, while the claimed science behind binaural beats is unfounded, this doesn't mean that the effect isn't real and simply unexplained. Maybe you can listen to a certain binaural beat and induce a desired state, but for reasons we don't yet understand. So let's take a look at the research, and see if such an effect has actually been observed.

A 2008 study at Hofstra University played two different binaural beats and a control sound (a babbling brook) to patients with high blood pressure. There was no difference between the groups. In one small study from Japan that was published in the Journal of Neurophysiology in 2006, they played various binaural beats to nine subjects, and observed the resulting EEGs. They found great variability in the results. Their conclusion was that listening to binaural beats can produce activity on the human cerebral cortex, however the cause was more likely a conscious auditory reaction and was not correlated to the frequency of the binaural beat. However, a 2005 study published in Clinical Neurophysiology found that they were able to induce a desired frequency in the EEG matching the phantom beat frequency encoded in a binaural beat, however this was with a single subject and was neither blinded nor controlled.

But we don't need any studies to tell us that different people can listen to different kinds of music and be affected. A lot of people who work out have a workout playlist on their iPod that keeps them energized. Some people listen to certain music to help them fall asleep. The Muzak company has built an industry on relaxing music that will keep people in the mood to shop. Music does affect our mood, and so we already have every reason to expect binaural beat recordings to produce the same effect. Different people may find certain binaural beats to be relaxing or energizing. But, we've never found any reliable indication that a binaural beat's connection to our brain is any deeper or more meaningful than any other music track. We do know for a reasonable certainty that specific claims made by most sellers of binaural beats are not credible, and that there is no reason to think that the effect they're claimed to produce will work for you.

Well, except for one reason: The power of suggestion. If I give you a music track and tell you that it will cure your headache, you're more likely to report that it cured your headache than you are to say "Well it didn't effect my headache, but it made my short-term memory better." An interesting experiment would be to buy a binaural track claimed to induce drunkenness, for example; play it for five friends without telling them the claim, and then ask how it made each of them feel. Give them multiple choices to select from. Chances are they're going to respond all over the map. If you have a friend who is a believer in binaural beats, I suggest going ahead and setting up this little test.

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

So, in summary, binaural beats certainly do not work the way the sellers claim, but there's no reason to think they're any less effective than any other music track you might listen to that effects you in a way you like. If they make you sleepy (like they all do for me), use them to go to sleep. If they relax you or get you amped, use them for that. But don't expect them to be any more effective than regular music. If someone you know claims that they are, put them to the test, and bust the myth.

 

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Adams, C. "Can Binaural Beats Improve Your Mood?" The Straight Dope. Creative Loafing Media, Inc., 30 Jul. 2010. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2949/can-binaural-beats-improve-your-mood>

Carter, C. "Healthcare performance and the effects of the binaural beats on human blood pressure and heart rate." Journal of Hospital Marketing and Public Relations. 1 Aug. 2008, Volume 18, Number 2: 213-219.

Karino, S., Yumoto, M., Itoh, K., Uno, A., Yamakawa, K., Sekimoto, S., Kaga, K. "Neuromagnetic responses to binaural beat in human cerebral cortex." Journal of Neurophysiology. 21 Jun. 2006, Volume 96, Number 4: 1927-38.

Padmanabhan, R., Hildreth, A.J., Laws, D. "A prospective, randomised, controlled study examining binaural beat audio and pre-operative anxiety in patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day case surgery." Anaesthesia. 7 Jul. 2005, Volume 60, Number 9: 874-877.

Pratt H., Starr A., Michalewski H.J., Dimitrijevic A., Bleich N., Mittelman N. "Cortical evoked potentials to an auditory illusion: Binaural beats." Clinical Neurophysiology. 1 Aug. 2009, 120, 8: 1514-1524.

Schwarz, D.W., Taylor, P. "Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats." Clinical Neurophysiology. 1 Mar. 2005, Volume 113, Number 3: 658-668.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Binaural Beats: Digital Drugs." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 31 Mar 2009. Web. 25 Apr 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4147>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 153 comments

Astro, Yes "not real" things have effects, like a fake gun still causes fear. heck you can kill someone with it. And yes the placebo or suggestion effect or belief is real and calculated and repeated. binaural beats could be a placebo. please site your new studies you would want the author and us to look at.

Ben, Wilmington
July 01, 2013 9:11pm

Real or Placebo? doesn't make any difference, the mind can be tricked by hypnosis, alcohol, music and several other methods.
hypnosis: controlled by another
alcohol: blocks inhibitions
music: creates a mood
etc...etc...
Why not BB.
But, there may be a problem.
I have an average of 80% hearing loss, due to jet engines, more in my left ear. Most of the younger generation have varying degrees of hearing loss due to the loud music of today. Therefore, do we not receive the required 'dosage' of beats per ear? I have read quite a bit about BB and nowhere have I seen anyone address this issue. What is my point? If you have a frequency loss in one ear over the other, then what you intend as an Alcohol beat could be a Viagra trip.

jake, lake-o-the-pines
July 22, 2013 8:26am

Astro, your definition of the placebo effect sounds a lot like something you just pulled out of your head. The classic example of the placebo effect would be when a group of people with a *real* condition are given a treatment that is not real (for example, a simple sugar pill) and they show some improvement. Although not fully understood, this has to do with the interplay between expectations and physiology.

As for the "outdated" studies, you can't just blow off the studies because they're somewhat old. You have to actually provide references to new studies that prove your claim. Otherwise, the old studies still hold up. The passage of time doesn't magically invalidate scientific papers - it's not like a car that depreciates in value. As for the size of the study, if the effect of the binaural beats is so strong, why wouldn't it show up in a sample of nine people? See, the way science works is that it requires strong proof to validate a claim. And saying that the sample was too small is nowhere near proving that binaural beats work - you have to *actually demonstrate they work*.

Finally, just because pharmaceutical companies might not want to have to compete with binaural beats doesn't mean that binaural beats actually work. You structured the comment like you could logically deduce your conclusion from what you said, but that's not the case at all. This is the kind of linguistic alchemy typical of pseudoscience.

W, Durham
September 21, 2013 5:13pm

Not only are you ignorant, you're a hypocrite. Look at your ads up top advertising the very same thing you say doesn't work and then try to demonstrate an ounce of credibility. People like you and your followers are the reason that mankind is not progressing.

Bryan, Arizona
October 08, 2013 8:30am

The science of placebo is very real. The power of the 'mind' over the body is incredible, though is evidently limited.

To those who do not believe that methods of treatment which incorporate 'pseudoscience' can effect physiological changes that heal, I suggest reading Anne Harrington's The Cure Within.

Colleen Wong, Boston, MA
October 09, 2013 8:38pm

Thanks Brian for a very clear explanation of BB and the evidence that debunks many extravagant claims for its use. I can understand how certain frequencies may resonate with brain waves to help relax or study or enliven, just as with music. Think Mozart will continue to tickle my fancy.

Paul, Auckland, NZ
October 13, 2013 10:56pm

Bryan, the ads are adsense. They're based on YOUR browsing history and don't discredit anything.

dennis, boston
January 01, 2014 9:09am

Some of the most interesting research on placebo effects is the study of which medical conditions seem to be more influenced by them. For example I seem to recall that high blood pressure was affected by placebos, but heart disease was not.
There IS evidence that expectations can have some influence on parts of our physiology, but not on everything. It's not black and white.
So the reason they often use placebos in double blind studies is because they CAN sometimes have an apparent effect through non pharmaceutical pathways, which they want to distinguish from per se pharmaceutical effects. If there was never any placebo effect because it was not "real", there would be no need to bother with placebos in such studies.

Zeph, DryNorCal
February 19, 2014 2:49pm

I spent one week at the Monroe Institute for OBE studies using bb as a method. I can truly say that using the various bb combos that I went into a meditative deeper state much more rapidly than I could have done without it. Often within 8-10 minutes my right and left side of my brain were entrained and I had some interesting experiences through guided and not guided meditations. Furthermore I was able to reach those deep states more easily without the use of bb after I left the training one week later. There were about 60 people there in that group and I would say that almost everyone achieved a rapid state of deep meditation using bb.
Later on I bought a tape from another source for healing purposes to bring me quickly down to desired level and that also induced that state where I employed a healing using a method that worked for me. I know that this method worked for me and I am very skeptical of claims by anyone out there and like to corroborate my information with multiple sources.

The conscious mind is amazing but the subconscious mind will blow you away once you realize its power and influence over our lives.

Good luck to all, Richard

Richard, burlington, vermont
March 14, 2014 10:21am

Resonance ? Interference? Acoustics? Please go through references you have cited non of these physics terms define BB phenomenon. The brain produces brain waves by itself In a region also responsible for audio perception there for alex is right that all music can alter mood also by involving battery of other centers of brain due to lyrics, past listening experience, rhythm or suggestive imagination;
But BB have a unique way of altering the mood as bb are actually brain waves or illusion waves that are not supplied in the audio. Two similar frequencies heard in each ear: Brain responds by correcting and generating the gap frequency to perceive it. This gap frequency is BB which is so far most powerful brainwave modulator. But the practical application definitely needs more research but trying is not harmful (just time wastage if you experience nothing). But certain mental problems that have connection with brainwaves such as insomnia, ADD/ADHD. Stress, Night Terrors, Sleep walking and addiction/state of mind dependency may have a positive impact. Skeptics are also called illuminati as they move from darkness (superstition) towards light (Truth) but don't be so skeptic that your move away from light again in opposite direction into darkness (Pyrrhonism)

Yahool, New Delhi, India
April 19, 2014 3:28am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 2 + 5 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Your Body's Energy Fields
Skeptoid #411, Apr 22 2014
Read | Listen (12:50)
 
The Black Eyed Kids
Skeptoid #410, Apr 15 2014
Read | Listen (11:18)
 
Oil Pulling
Skeptoid #409, Apr 8 2014
Read | Listen (12:24)
 
Skeptoid Media is a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
Apr 4 2014
Listen (1:13)
 
15 Phreaky Phobias
Skeptoid #408, Apr 1 2014
Read | Listen (12:44)
 
Newest
#1 -
Listener Feedback: Alternative Medicine
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Asking the Socratic Questions
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 False Arguments for Raw Milk
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake
Read | Listen
#6 -
The Riddle of the L-8 Blimp
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Secrets of MKULTRA
Read | Listen
#8 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


"Nuclear Energy"
inFact with Brian Dunning


Support Skeptoid