Email Myths

A look at some of those persistent hoax emails that you receive almost every day.

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Urban Legends

Skeptoid #57
July 25, 2007
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
 

You'll never believe what I got in my email this morning. Apparently Microsoft is going to send me $1 for every person I forward this email to! I didn't believe it at first, but then I learned that USA Today featured two whole pages about it. I'll get to it soon — but first little Jimmy with cancer is trying to set a world record for emailed Get Well wishes before he dies, so I've got to take care of him first. I'll just email my encouraging message to the address he provides, addmetospamlist@russianporno.com. I'll do it as soon as I've finished reading Robin Williams' poignant essay on patriotism.

Now, of course, the bastard granddaddy of email myths is the con known as the Nigerian 419 fraud, named after the section in the Nigerian criminal codes that it violates, which is superfluous because Nigeria has never prosecuted a single person for it. Nigerian 419 fraud has been Nigeria's second largest industry, after oil, since the 1980's. This is where you get a politely addressed email from a stranger, often a spouse, family member, or personal attorney of some African leader who has died, full of apologies for bothering you, stating that you seem like a trustworthy person, and for some generous piece of the action you can help them transfer some outrageously huge 8-figure sum out of the country. Of course it's just a con to get your advance fee payments. You may remember the woman who murdered her minister husband not too long ago, in part because she was afraid he'd find out how much money she had lost to this scam.

But most fraudulent emails are harmless hoaxes, or in many cases, accidental mistaken attributions. One of the favorite victims of these emailed essays is comedian George Carlin. If you use email at all, you've almost certainly received one or more essays attributed to George Carlin. One is called Hurricane Rules, a rant against the people of New Orleans, that's halfway decently funny. There's another one variously titled the Bad American or the Bad Republican which is completely random and pointless. There's a transcript of Bill Maher's New Rules from various episodes of his TV show which somehow got compiled and attributed as George Carlin's New Rules for 2006. There's a sappy social critique called Paradox of Our Time. There's a piece called The Stupid Sign suggesting that stupid people should be required to wear a sign identifying them as such. But these are just a sampling; the list goes on and on. In short, virtually every random essay commenting on some aspect of American society is eventually attributed to George Carlin, and this doesn't piss off anyone as much as it does George himself. George finally had to take matters into his own hands and put up a big disclaimer on his web site:

Because most of this stuff is really lame, it's embarrassing to see my name on it.

And that's the problem. I want people to know that I take care with my writing, and try to keep my standards high. But most of this "humor" on the Internet is just plain stupid. I guess hard-core fans who follow my stuff closely would be able to spot the fake stuff, because the tone of voice is so different. But a casual fan has no way of knowing, and it bothers me that some people might believe I'd actually be capable of writing some of this stuff.

Here's a rule of thumb, folks: Nothing you see on the Internet is mine unless it came from one of my albums, books, HBO shows, or appeared on my website.

There's a hardline conservative email essay called Robin Williams' Peace Plan, in which he advises getting rid of the UN, shipping all our illegal aliens to France, deporting foreign students, increasing domestic oil production, and ending foreign aid in a 10-point plan. If Robin Williams, who lives in San Francisco, were to write a peace plan, it would probably look nothing like this one, and it would probably be funny as hell. What seems to have happened in this case is that someone appended a real joke from Robin Williams as point #11, with his attribution, and from then on as the piece was forwarded around it looked like his name at the bottom was for the whole thing. This same mistaken attribution has happened to other people as well. Don't believe attributions on emails.

There is another popular hoax email that promises some reward, like a gift card or even cash, if you simply forward the email to a large number of people to assist with some experiment or test of some email tracking system. No such system exists. Today there is no practical way for anyone to determine whether you forward an email, whether anyone views it, or how many times "around the world" it has gone. Even if Bill Gates wanted to give everyone $1 for each email they forward, current technology prevents him from having any way to know who to pay or how much.

Hoax emails will often say something like "This was featured on 60 Minutes this week" or "This had 2 whole pages in USA Today devoted to it." These are simply lies. I know you've seen that in emails you've received, and I know you've never gone to those sources to verify the claim. The people who send these know that nobody's going to verify anything so they make whatever ridiculous claims they want. "This email has gone around the world 3 times" — what does that even mean, and was that appended to the letter before it was sent or by some mid-level recipient? How was it determined? And who added all those testimonials, and when were they added? Did you add one? Did the person who sent it to you add one? Or is it possible that whoever started it wrote it all and is still laughing?

With all those emails flying around the world out there, the government better get in on the action and grab a piece of it. There have been perennial emails for 20 years now warning that the US Postal Service is going to charge a 5¢ fee on every email, or that Congress is trying to pass bill 602P to tax email delivery. This hoax has happened in the US, Canada, Australia, and probably other countries too. There's no truth to any of it, and the names, law firms, and bill numbers in the original emails were completely fictitious. No US government body has ever pondered such a thing. But the rumors fly so much that even Hillary Clinton was famously fooled by it, and spoke out against the non-existent bill on live television during the 2000 Senate race.

So back to the sick little child who hopes that you'll forward their email to set a record. Other versions of this groundless hoax claim that the American Cancer Society will donate a dime for every person you forward the email to. "All forwarded emails are tracked to obtain the total count." As we know it's not possible for all forwarded emails to be tracked. There are many, many variations on this theme where some company or celebrity promises to donate money for some sick child based on the number of emails forwarded, when in fact there is no possible way for such a count to be derived. You've probably seen a version of this email that starts with a touching little poem called Slow Dance written by a terminally ill little girl, advising us to slow down and smell the roses. That was the theme of the poem, but in fact it wasn't written by a little girl, it was written by a perfectly healthy psychologist who had dealt with such children. The name of the little girl in the email is a fictitious one. It's a touching poem misused in a stupid hoax.

As long as we're talking about stupid or harmless hoaxes, be aware that there are even stupider harmful hoaxes. One that's particularly messed up is a legitimate email about a real missing child, including her picture, and all the real information about the case. Sounds like a great use of email, right? Well, it would be. But in some cases, people change the contact information or phone numbers so that in the event the email is received by someone who may actually have helpful information to pass along, they end up calling some premium rate telephone number that has nothing to do with the missing child hotline, and end up surprised by a fat charge on their telephone bill. The lesson to be learned from this is to always be skeptical of contact information in emails asking for help. If you actually have some helpful information, call your local police department to be sure your information goes to the right place.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

And of course there are stupid hoax emails promising extraordinary events, like Mars appearing as large as the full moon in the sky. This one's been going around forever and still makes an appearance every year. "It will look like the Earth has two moons," the email promises. The original basis for this was an event in 2003 where the Earth and Mars actually did make a very close pass, and Mars actually did look as large as the full moon — so long as you were looking through a 75× telescope. The current iteration of the email typically leaves out that little detail. Remember: When you read a promise that sounds too good to be true, or that seems to violate the laws of the universe, you have very good reason to be skeptical.

How about that other email that just won't die: the warning that your cell phone number is about to be released to telemarketers unless you sign up for a cell phone Do Not Call registry. The Federal Trade Commission has talked themselves blue in the face trying to advise everyone that this is a hoax and it's simply untrue. Telemarketers are barred from calling your cell phone without your consent. There is only one Do Not Call registry, it's found at DoNotCall.gov, and although you are welcome to put your cell phone number into it, there is generally no reason to do so.

I'll leave you with one final email myth, one you may have heard about recently. It's a proposal for consumers to take charge and actually reverse our high gasoline prices. This chain email, which purports to have originated from an economist or Fortune 500 financial executive, suggests that everyone boycott gas stations owned by the two largest oil companies, Exxon and Mobil (actually Exxon and Mobil are the same company now, the two biggest are really ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell). This boycott will force the largest companies to drop their prices more and more, finally forcing the little guys to drop their own prices to compete. In this manner, consumers can actually wield final control over industry prices. Sounds great, doesn't it? Everyone likes to hear that the big corporations can be bullied around by a guy on the street. Well, you're welcome to give this a shot, if you think it will do anything. Oil companies don't own the gas stations. They're franchises, owned by your neighbor down the street, your local small businessperson. Boycotting his station is only going to put your neighborhood buddy out of business. The competing gas stations, who are now getting all the business, will have to meet the new demand and will simply buy their gasoline from the boycotted producer's refinery. Oil companies do this all the time. It's a commodity, and it's sold on the commodities market, and they constantly buy from one another to meet changing demand. This boycott strategy, according to at least one real economist who has analyzed it, will have no effect on the big oil companies. Its effect will only be to injure the small independent station owner, and to actually raise prices at the busy gas stations who are struggling to meet the demand. Remember, simple chain emails are very unlikely to be the solution to problems that economists and professional analysts have been wrestling with for decades. When you see an unrealistic promise that seems too good to be true, be skeptical.

The take-home from all of this is that you should read every chain email with a grain of salt. Very few of them are true. Virtually all of them making heartwarming promises are false. There are plenty of perfectly good jokes and videos for people to send around that are well worth all of my spare email reading time, that I don't need any of the promises from Bill Gates or warnings that the solar system is about to be dissolved in a nebula. Email petitions are worthless. Emailed promises or claims are rarely worth the electrons they're printed on. Help cleanse the Internet of useless noise. Don't forward chain emails.

Brian Dunning

© 2007 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Anonymous. "'Hurricane Rules' by George Carlin." Urban Legends. About.com, 4 Sep. 2005. Web. 25 Jul. 2007. <http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_hurricane_rules.htm>

ICFNL. "Part 6 : Offences Relating to property and contracts." Division 1 : Stealing and Like offences. International Centre for Nigerian Law, 24 Mar. 2007. Web. 24 Jul. 2007. <http://www.nigeria-law.org/Criminal%20Code%20Act-Part%20VI%20%20to%20the%20end.htm>

Mayhew, Anne. Narrating the Rise of Big Business in the USA: How Economists Explain Standard Oil and Wal-Mart. New York: Routledge, 2008. 208.

The Silver Lake Editors. Scams & Swindles: Phishing, Spoofing, ID Theft, Nigerian Advance Schemes Investment Frauds: How to Recognize And Avoid Rip-Offs In The Internet Age. Aberdeen, WA: Silver Lake Publishing, 2006. 276.

Wall, David S. Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007. 288.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Email Myths." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 25 Jul 2007. Web. 22 Nov 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4057>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 18 comments

I too cannot get my Dad to ever check out Snopes/UrbandLegends/et al before sending something to his entire mailing list and have long given up sending him cites. Giant killer catfish pictures (actually a whale shark), transcriptions of a speech by Bill "Crosby", abduction warnings and of course all sort of unfunny nonsense written by George Carlin and Andy Rooney (someone else who has spoken out about the false attributes.)

Otherwise, I've been pretty effective at paring down the "FWD:FW:FW: this is to funnY" subject lines in my life.

BTW, another reason boycotts of gas stations other than what you mentioned is they continually circulate so people are randomly not buying gas on a given day after receipt which is fairly useless.

V, Columbus, Ohio
April 29, 2009 11:38am

V (and I hope you're not an alien lizard!) People stopped sending me offensive emails a very long time ago.

It was pretty easy. I too sent emails to all the people in the back chain telling them that they sent stupid emails during business hours on their company PC's.

The email thing jokes and "news gossip" appears to have come from a tradition. Quite a lot of people would collect photocopies of bad news items and really tastelee jokes and parade them out at morning tea time (yep count the scale rings) as a topic of dicussion.

Some were funny...once. The email is a logical progression.

Personally I like to harass folk on the internet in my own time.

Seeing Brian is an Oil company stooge, I am due for some Oil company subsidiary stooging money (or so Tom, Cam and I have been accused of lately).

Cheers.. I'll send you an email about the chicken crossing the road.. Its a compendium of 15,000 very similar jokes.

Henk van der Gaast, Sydney
November 30, 2010 2:48am

Whenever I get these emails, I alter all the numbers, change citations, edit paragraphs for humour value and send it on.

When I worked in an insurance company for a temporary office job, I wrote a couple poems for a child amputee who suffers phantom limb pain), a little girl with lymphoma who's pet dog died in tragic circumstances and a couple others and sent them out, office wide.

I understand it's an annoyance, but I also feel that anything that makes people emote, whether true or not, is only good and worthwhile.

Mike, Melbourne, Australia
December 2, 2010 5:22pm

Sure Mike, remind me not to invite you over when you get your Royal Childrens hospital album together.

Henk van der Gaast, Sydney
December 2, 2010 11:10pm

There are a few other people to whom many misattribute quotes...St. Francis and Mother Teresa come to mind. Annoying.

Julie, north woods, WI uSA
April 11, 2013 6:55pm

what can destroy a Diamond

Leo Cantin, Penticton B C Canada
April 30, 2013 5:11pm

My favorite is the Proctor & Gamble Satanism hoax. This one gets forwarded all over by the christians of the world.

Ben, Columbus OH
May 2, 2013 10:22am

What? the xtians do what?

By the unholy goat, the jig is up.

Christians may do that but it would be christians who have never read the bible..

Good point. Christians who read the bible tend to become atheists

Midrash Delinquent, Gerringong NSW Oz
July 26, 2013 7:40am

A clarification about the "Do Not Call Register" - the laws must be different in Australia, because tele-marketers here are allowed to call any phone (including mobiles) unless the person registers on the Australian government's "Do Not Call Register."
If you want to check it out, here is the link to the Web site: http://www.dbcde.gov.au/communications_for_consumers/telephone_services/do_not_call

Greg Neilson, Sydney, Australia
August 16, 2013 1:04am

I listed my phone numbers with DoNotCall.gov.

Now the only telemarketing calls I get are from groups researching radio listening behaviors, and one about every other week from a supposed Windows security service that I have supposedly covering my my home computer for virus, spam, malware and so on. Clue: the name of the tech calling me calls me Mrs. (I've been divorced for 30 years and the lazy sob died 5 years ago), the tech is named Patrick or Frank or similar but has a very strong Indian accent, and I don't have a home computer. Lately I play along with the caller until I get bored and stoop to rude comments and blue language that I learned from sweet little old ladies when I was a customer service clerk at a bank.

Nobody should believe in the authenticity of any unsolicited phone call, letter, or email from anybody ever. And if you do get a phone call or letter or email from somebody you know telling you he/she has been arrested in the Dominican Republic or whatever, I recommend you ignore it or take it to local law enforcement before you break out the credit card. Anybody I know would mention to be the proposed trip to the Dominican Republic before he/she left.

Swampwitch, Gainesville Fl
February 25, 2014 11:07am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply

 

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 

Newest
The Skookum Cast
Skeptoid #441, Nov 18 2014
Read | Listen (12:30)
 
That Elusive Fibromyalgia
Skeptoid #440, Nov 11 2014
Read | Listen (12:17)
 
A Skeptical Look at the News
Skeptoid #439, Nov 4 2014
Read | Listen (12:07)
 
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Skeptoid #438, Oct 28 2014
Read | Listen (11:56)
 
Tube Amplifiers
Skeptoid #437, Oct 21 2014
Read | Listen (14:57 )
 
Newest
#1 -
Read | Listen
#2 -
Fukushima vs Chernobyl vs Three Mile Island
Read | Listen
#3 -
The Baldoon Mystery
Read | Listen
#4 -
Listeners Have Another Say
Read | Listen
#5 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#6 -
Hemp, Hearst, and Prohibition
Read | Listen
#7 -
Aromatherapy: Sniffing Essential Oils
Read | Listen
#8 -
Solving the Lead Masks of Vintem Hill
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Name/Nickname:  
City/Location:
Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
Comment:
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.