The Case of the Strange Skulls

A collection of bizarre human skulls from around the world.

Filed under Aliens & UFOs, Ancient Mysteries, General Science

Skeptoid #144
March 10, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Is it an extraterrestrial alien? Is it an unknown subspecies of human? Is it a relic from a mysterious race of subterranean or Atlantean beings? Or, could there be some other, more natural explanation for the many strange misshapen skulls found throughout the world? Let's look at some of the most popular:

The Starchild Skull

Perhaps the most famous of the "strange skulls" is the so-called "Starchild Skull", the skull of a five-year-old child found alongside a normal adult in a cave in Mexico, carbon dated to about 900 years old. Although only the top half of the skull remains, its severe deformities are clear. The skull is exceptionally broad and bulbous, not unlike modern concept sketches of "gray aliens". For this reason, the skull's current owner, Ray Young and author Lloyd Pye promote the skull as alien, or possibly an alien-human hybrid.

Neurologist Steven Novella has pointed out the probable consensus among medical professionals who have seen pictures of the Starchild, that it is likely an unfortunate case of hydrocephaly. Hydrocephaly is a condition where too much fluid accumulates inside the skull of a young child, causing the skull (which is still pliable at that age) to expand. This condition is well established to produce precisely the type of deformity seen in the Starchild skull. Victims of hydrocephaly rarely live beyond the Starchild's young age. Of course it's not possible to make a conclusive diagnosis without a direct examination. Young and Pye list a handful of specialists who they say have viewed the skull or its X-rays, but none of them (so far as I could tell) concur with the speculation that the skull is alien.

The primary strike against them is the 2003 DNA analysis. The child had normal human DNA and was male, having both X and Y chromosomes, proving that it had a human female mother and a human male father. Young and Pye state that this is consistent with the alien-human hybrid theory, which it may be, who knows; no known alien DNA exists to use as a reference. But it is also consistent with a human child with a well documented and thoroughly understood illness.

The Peruvian Coneheads

Author Robert Connolly has collected and photographed a number of skulls from ancient Peru, skulls that are surprisingly elongated. In Peru, a practice called "skull binding" involved wrapping fabric or leather straps about a child's head, molding it as it grew into this strange oval shape. There's nothing mysterious or unknown about this; we have plenty of historical and archaeological data about this practice. But Connolly disagrees, stating that this explanation "has been rejected". Well, it has, by him; but not by the anthropologists who make Peru their business. The elongated skulls of Peru are certainly interesting, but their origin is well understood and no mystery exists outside of the delusions of those who insist on alien or supernatural explanations for just about anything.

Giant skulls

The next skulls I wanted to discuss were the strange giant skulls from Minnesota with double rows of teeth. But I quickly ran into a problem: For virtually the entire 19th century, people were reporting discoveries of skeletons with double teeth all over the United States. Double teeth sounds interesting. I found a number of repeated references that the Talmud states that some Biblical giants had double rows of teeth, but in an online searchable Talmud I found no such reference. It's also said that the Fomorians, an early Irish tribe, are known to have had double teeth. In fact, the Fomorians were a fictional race of ogres, and even so I found no mention of double teeth outside of web pages promoting strange skulls. Here are several of the double teeth stories:

Besides the extra teeth, all of these stories have one very important fact in common: A complete lack of evidence. No photographs, and certainly no skulls in museums or private collections, at least not that I could find any record of. If you found an extraordinary skull, wouldn't you keep it? Wouldn't you show it to some professors at the local college? At a minimum, wouldn't you sell such an amazing find to someone who would display it or preserve it? But in every one of these cases, no record of the skull exists at all. And although it seems every other thrust of a shovel used to turn one of these up, apparently not a single one has been found since 1892, despite far more extensive construction and excavation since then. Even if these were hoaxes, someone would have photographed it or sketched it or preserved it. For the double-toothed skulls, I've found no reason to move from the null hypothesis that no such skull has ever actually been found. I'd love to be proven wrong.

The stories are symptomatic of a late 19th century fad. Strange skeletons and petrified people were quite popular in the United States in the 19th century, and it wasn't just limited to skulls with double teeth. It seemed that just about everyone with a circus tent or a traveling show had some enigmatic human remains, which always conveniently managed to be lost or destroyed before they could be properly scrutinized. Mark Twain lampooned these stories on a number of occasions. He once wrote:

In the fall of 1862, in Nevada and California, the people got to running wild about extraordinary petrifactions and other natural marvels. One could scarcely pick up a paper without finding in it one or two glorified discoveries of this kind. The mania was becoming a little ridiculous. I was a brand-new local editor in Virginia City, and I felt called upon to destroy this growing evil... I chose to kill the petrifaction mania with a delicate, a very delicate satire. But maybe it was altogether too delicate, for nobody ever perceived the satire part of it at all. I put my scheme in the shape of the discovery of a remarkably petrified man.

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

He then went on to describe the discovery of a petrified Indian making an obscene gesture. He also wrote a tale called A Ghost Story in which he is visited by the ghost of the Cardiff Giant, a 10-foot petrified man discovered in 1869 and proven to be a hoax. Twain explains to the ghost that he's been haunting P.T. Barnum's plaster copy of the Cardiff Giant instead of the original.

It's wise to understand the carnival-like atmosphere in which many of the 19th century freakshow skeletons are said to have been discovered, and the convenient lack of evidence. A few of the many stories that fit this model are:

Mound building was indeed common among early pre-Columbian cultures in North America, going back as far as 3,000 BCE. Thousands of such mounds have been discovered throughout the Ohio and Mississippi valleys. Metal artifacts and human remains have been discovered, but so far nothing that has surprised archaeologists: No double teeth, no pygmies, no giants. But in the midst of such intriguing mounds, it's easy to see how farmers and fortune seekers might try to generate a little sensationalism with a wild story or two. The anecdotal evidence in the form of stories has great value to investigators looking to support the claims, but so far, these stories have led to a grand total of strange skulls of exactly zero. Always remember: No matter how much poor-quality evidence you have, it does not aggregate into a single piece of good-quality evidence. You can stack cowpies as high as you want; they won't turn into a bar of gold. When you hear lots of stories that are supported by dubious or nonexistent evidence, no matter how many there are, you have good reason to be skeptical.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Castriota-Scanderbeg, A., Dallapiccola, B. Abnormal Skeletal Phenotypes. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2005. 3-100, 501-931.

Gerszten, P.C. "An Investigation into the Practice of Cranial Deformation Among the Pre-Columbian Peoples of Northern Chile." International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 27 May 2005, Volume 3, Issue 2: 87-98.

Hippocrates; translated by Adams, F. On Airs, Waters, and Places. Gloucester, UK: Dodo Press, 2009. 20.

Kirks, D. (Editor). Practical pediatric imaging: Diagnostic radiology of infants and children (3rd Edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998. 80-200.

Novella, S. "The Starchild Project." The New England Skeptical Society. The New England Skeptical Society, 1 Feb. 2006. Web. 14 Jan. 2010. <http://www.theness.com/index.php/the-starchild-project/>

Smith, B. et. al. "An anatomical study of a duplication 6p based on two sibs." American Journal of Medical Genetics. 3 Jun. 2005, Volume 20, Issue 4: 649-663.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Case of the Strange Skulls." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 10 Mar 2009. Web. 24 Apr 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4144>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 99 comments

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfhYKxfb_JaIz2aNT-2ZdaQ

Commonly known as Robert, Ashford,kent
January 06, 2014 4:09pm

Both skulls with horns and skulls with double rows of teeth are rare medical anomalies. I think the condition of having some kind of horn, or horns growing on the skull is called cernocephaly and it is a documented condition. I haven't seen any medical examples of hyperdontia, where a person has more than one set of teeth.

Debunking false claims is fine, but your research needs more effort if you missed the fact that such medical conditions exist. If there were skulls found with these medical conditions, they would not be considered evidence of a new species. They would simply be archeological evidence of how long such medical anomalies have been showing up in human physiology.

Michelle, Unalaska
January 07, 2014 11:12am

Kelly of St. Louis posts no source for his/her claims. Muggsy of Illinois posts no photos of what he/she claims to have seen with her/his own eyes. I'm sorry, we're supposed to believe you why?

Michelle of Unalaska, I thought of that too, that hyperdontia is a real condition. I think the point though, and I could be wrong here, was that the skulls reported in these cases as evidence of alien races or some such, have not been documented or preserved. We cannot verify they even exist, so are evidence of nothing. They don't prove these conditions have always existed (probably true) or that they are aliens (probably not, but who knows) or that they are a short lived branch of the human family tree (DNA evidence?). The point here is that there is simply insufficient evidence of anything but normal humans and occasional medical conditions or abnormalities. This doesn't prove aliens don't exist, or didn't exist. It merely shows a lack of evidence in support of wild theories. And as long as people like Kelly and Muggsy continue to make claims without evidence, this will continue to be the case.

Pamela Wright, watertown, NY
January 21, 2014 10:56am

My turns are twice the normal size with double rows of teeth and horns!!!

cletus, yazoo
January 22, 2014 10:42am

i have reading over 20 reports from dubious 'publications' that claim that the elongated skulls from Peru have had DNA testing proving that they are NOT human.

Please tell me where to find what the testing found out, if it was done at all - i can't find it in science journals available on line anywhere (e.g. Science News"). As you pointed out, rumors can just run amok amongst 'true believers'.

Help? it's driving me nuts, especially since i know some people who really believe this junk!!

thanks much :]

alexa, NY, NY
February 09, 2014 3:54pm

This article is useless and the author is employing selective material to prove his point. Not all the available data is used and some is simply rejected (I guess if it doesn't agree with author's reasoning). Not to go either way or claim anything, but it is complete and utter trash.

John, Los Angeles
February 10, 2014 12:24pm

I always enjoy it when the True Believers show up.

Daniel, Upper Eastern Tennessee
February 12, 2014 6:14am

Brien Foerster & LA Marzulli will be on Paradigm Unhinged March 5th!
http://paradigmunhinged.com/brien-foerster-la-marzulli-the-elongated-skulls-of-peru-and-the-trail-of-the-nephilim/

Todd Knurr, Colorado
February 13, 2014 5:18pm

The key issue I understand on the Peru skulls is that the bone plate is single while human skuls have 2 plates, this is unrefutable. Also the volume of the skulls is reported to be 25% more, the skull binding does not add volume ?? How do you respond to these aspects ?

Stewart, Brisbane Australia
February 26, 2014 11:39pm

Interesting read. I was hoping for something more scientific to dispute the skulls. Seems the only problem here, is that they are only reports. No physical evidence to go off. So the reports cant be debunked, just dismissed. It seems tho that there are way to many 'reports' from around the world for it just to be hoaxes. Impossible for all the reports to be hoaxes or something of the kind. So clearly there must be some physical basis for at least some of the reports. They must of saw something, which may be misinterpreted, but still something. I was hoping to see how they are disputed, assuming the reports are accurate. You are familiar with the long held conspiracy theory that organizations like the Smithsonian have been covering up there giant skeletons. skulls? It is said they have been sent giant bones on multiple occasions, only for them to report they never arrived,or they are missing.

Anyway, thanks for the article. I had stumbled across a few things about giants lately. A "Forbidden History' episode or week or so ago. A lecture on mound builders i watched. And some other things in recent weeks So it was interesting to stumble across this, while not looking for it.

Jeff, Vancouver,Wa
March 24, 2014 12:05pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 7 + 3 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Your Body's Energy Fields
Skeptoid #411, Apr 22 2014
Read | Listen (12:50)
 
The Black Eyed Kids
Skeptoid #410, Apr 15 2014
Read | Listen (11:18)
 
Oil Pulling
Skeptoid #409, Apr 8 2014
Read | Listen (12:24)
 
Skeptoid Media is a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
Apr 4 2014
Listen (1:13)
 
15 Phreaky Phobias
Skeptoid #408, Apr 1 2014
Read | Listen (12:44)
 
Newest
#1 -
Listener Feedback: Alternative Medicine
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Asking the Socratic Questions
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 False Arguments for Raw Milk
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake
Read | Listen
#6 -
The Riddle of the L-8 Blimp
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Secrets of MKULTRA
Read | Listen
#8 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


"Vaccine Ingredients"
inFact with Brian Dunning


Support Skeptoid