Student Questions: Light Therapy, the Bermuda Triangle, and Isaac Newton

Skeptoid answers another round of questions submitted by students.

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Feedback & Questions

Skeptoid #136
January 13, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

I'm taking student questions again today, so everyone please take your seats and let's get started. Today's topics cover light therapy, the Bermuda Triangle, jumping to throw the Earth off its axis, vaccinations and autism, and environmental estrogens. Someone asked me why I only take student questions, and not questions from just anyone. The reason is that by reaching out to students, I imply an educational mission, thus endowing Skeptoid with "apparent" authority via the argumentum ad verecundiam logical fallacy. And I'll take any that I can get. Shall we proceed?

Hi, Brian. I go to school at Ohio University in Athens, Ohio. There's a lot of discussion around here about Seasonal Affective Disorder. What are your thoughts on light therapy as a treatment for this kind of depression?

Seasonal Affective Disorder is basically a depression that some people get during dark winter months, but there's more to it than that. In many cases, it's not a purely psychological condition. Some evidence suggests one cause could be an imbalance in melatonin, which is produced by the pineal gland during darkness; an actual biochemical response to the strange schedule of daylight and darkness.

Light therapy, which exposes the patient to bright short-wavelength blue light at a carefully timed interval each day, usually in the morning, has proven to be an effective treatment for most sufferers. Whether it's just a mild clinical depression caused by all the darkness or an actual hormone imbalance caused by the interruption of circadian rhythm, light therapy does make rational sense as a treatment. However, most patients report that it's inconvenient and few stick with it on their own. Other treatments include melatonin supplementation, antidepressants, and cognitive therapy.

Light therapy is also employed by alternative practitioners for a whole range of conditions for which it has no plausible clinical value. No matter what illness or New Age energy imbalance some naturopath tells you you have, somebody offers light therapy as a quack cure for it. Don't confuse light therapy's actual benefits with its fraudulent pseudoscientific misuse.

As you might suspect, seasonal affective disorder incidence is strongly correlated with latitude, but with one interesting exception. For reasons not well understood, people in Iceland or with Icelandic heritage seem virtually immune to the condition. A cheerful group in the wintertime, those Icelanders.

Hi, Brian, I'm Sonya. I go to James Madison University in Virginia and I wanted to know what's really behind the strange disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle?

The same causes that are behind disappearances anywhere else. Sometimes planes crash and ships sink, and although writers of scary books and producers of creepy TV shows like to adorn those in the Bermuda Triangle with mystery, the Coast Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) treat them the same as any other accidents. For every allegedly "mysterious" disappearance dramatized on television, there is generally an NTSB accident report detailing the actual cause determined (see official reports here for ships and aircraft). That's not to say some aren't explained; sometimes wrecks are never found and investigators are unable to determine a cause, as happens everywhere in the world. However the Coast Guard does say:

The Coast Guard does not recognize the existence of the so-called Bermuda Triangle as a geographic area of specific hazard to ships or planes. In a review of many aircraft and vessel losses in the area over the years, there has been nothing discovered that would indicate that casualties were the result of anything other than physical causes. No extraordinary factors have ever been identified.

Whether accidents actually do happen in this area at a higher rate than in other places is known with certainty: They do not. Lloyd's of London, the largest insurer of shipping traffic, confirms this in its records, as does the US Navy. So to directly answer your question, what's really behind the Bermuda Triangle mystery is just a lot of pop fiction.

You've probably heard stories about mysterious fogs in the Bermuda Triangle, or compasses going crazy, or rogue waves, or mysterious upwellings from the deep. These are the types of tales that the sea has always produced, all over the world. Anyone who thinks the Bermuda Triangle has a monopoly on mysterious stories of the sea has not traveled or read very much. Like most stories, probably a lot of these have some basis in fact, but it is well established by a century of modern seafaring and oceanic surveying that no unexplained anomalies exist in the Bermuda Triangle.

Hi, my name is Will, a university student in England, and i was wondering if there is actually any truth in the idea that if everyone jumped at the same time would the world end or go off its axis?

Although it would be fun if this were the case, Newton's first law makes it simply not so. Even if you gathered everyone together on one side of the planet, and they all jumped, they would indeed push the Earth away with a force equal to that which launched them into the air; but gravity would pull them and the Earth together again and they'd be right back where they started, in the same state of motion and with the same angular momentum. Only an external force, like an asteroid collision, could have the effect you describe.

This is Dan from North Carolina, my wife and I just had a baby girl, and we have to decide if we want to give her immunization shots, I have heard rumor that some people believe that Autism is directly related to immunizing a child too early. Is this true?

It is true that some people believe that, which is tragic because there's a growing trend among misinformed parents to refuse to allow their children to be vaccinated, and new outbreaks of potentially fatal diseases like measles, whooping cough, diphtheria, hepatitis B, and polio have been the direct result. Among the worst offending communities is Ashland, Oregon, where 30% of kindergartners have been granted "personal belief" exemptions from the state, thus effectively eliminating "herd immunity" from the population. Only two US states require you to have a medical reason if you want to be exempted from the vaccination requirement to attend public school. A number of epidemics have broken out in communities with low vaccination rates, of diseases that had been otherwise largely eradicated by childhood vaccination.

The so-called "link" between autism and vaccines is a particularly bizarre superstition. It's an unfounded supposition depending on a chain of connections in which every single link is conclusively broken. Mythical link #1 is that autism can be caused by mercury. Autism is genetic, it has no environmental causes; at least none after the first trimester of gestation. Mythical link #2 is that mercury is found in the preservative thimerosal. In fact thimerosal contains ethylmercury, which is not absorbed by the body and is harmless; not methylmercury, which is the form responsible for mercury poisoning. Mythical link #3 is that thimerosal is found in vaccines. In fact thimerosal has not been an ingredient in childhood vaccines for over a decade.

Some parents also have been convinced that vaccination presents a dangerous immunological challenge, and so it's risky regardless of autism. This is a question that you should ask your pediatrician, not Jenny McCarthy. It's just not true. Even the common cold is a greater immunological challenge to the body than the full spectrum of early childhood vaccinations, and as you know, your child gets colds all the time and always manages to pull through. But you shouldn't get your children's medical advice from some random podcast any more than you should get it from deluded, uneducated celebrities. All you need to do is look at the data of disease rates among vaccinated and non-vaccinated children to answer any question about what you should do. There's no correlation between autism and vaccination rates, but there's huge correlation between vaccination and rates of diseases that the vaccines prevent.

Update. I did receive the following email from Dr. David Gorski at the Science Based Medicine blog, which is appropriate to include here:

Point one:

You said that ethyl mercury is not absorbed and is harmless. While it is true that ethyl mercury is fairly rapidly excreted and appears to be harmless at the doses previously used in vaccines, it is not true that it is not absorbed. It is certainly absorbed into the bloodstream at easily measurable levels and can be incorporated into growing hair in mice and humans. It is also detectable in the CNS of experimental mice and monkeys. Also, thimerosal is toxic at higher doses. Basically, methyl mercury and ethyl mercury differ in pharmacokinetics, with ethyl mercury peaking early and then being rapidly excreted and methyl mercury having a more prolonged course of excretion and greater tissue buildup. You correctly said that methyl mercury is responsible for mercury poisoning, but inorganic mercury can also poison. These are not minor points. In any case, it would have been much better to say that the dose makes the poison and that numerous studies show that even the highest amount of thimerosal to which children were exposed (the late 1990s and early 2000s) was not associated with autism. Saying that it is "harmless" implies that thimerosal is completely harmless. It's not. It just is at the doses in vaccines. This is not just semantics. Another useful point is that it is a very effective preservative, and removing it means either accepting an increased risk of contamination of vaccines or finding another preservative, which may have problems we don't know about.

Point two:

The first point may have been more a matter of emphasis, but this second point is not. You said that thimerosal has not been an ingredient in childhood vaccines in over a decade. This is simply not true, at least not in the U.S. Other countries removed thimerosal over a decade ago, but not the U.S. In fact, it was only towards the end of 1999 that the CDC and AAP recommended that thimerosal be removed from vaccines. Then, thimerosal was not removed from common childhood vaccines until the end of 2001, seven years ago. Finally, it is not true that no childhood vaccine contains thimerosal. True, the vast majority of them do not and have not since early 2002, but the flu vaccine, even vaccines marketed for children, still contain thimerosal. See:

There is more and more availability of flu vaccines that are thimerosal-free, but as of 2009 the majority still contain thimerosal. I expect that fewer and fewer thimerosal-containing vaccines will be marketed.

To his point about the vaccines that do still contain thimerosal, I was referring only to the scheduled early childhood vaccines, which apparently was not clear enough. So we're both right.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

Hi Brian, my name is Jack Freedman from Canada. I'm 15 and my question is: What are environmental estrogens?

Environmental estrogens, more properly called endocrine disruptors, are compounds that chemically bind to a living cell's hormone receptors, thus taking the place of the body's natural hormone that would normally bind there. This interferes with the body's normal hormone action. Endocrine disruptors are found throughout nature and the environment, but recent years have seen the Internet come alive with alarmist articles (like this and this and this) that they are all around us at dangerous levels, often in household chemicals or everyday products. These articles tend to mention all the "usual suspects": dioxin, DDT, BPA, PCBs, etc. and often blame these as a cause of breast cancer, ADHD, autism... again, all the usual suspects.

Virtually the only case you ever hear cited is one in Florida where alligators in Lake Apopka were found to have abnormal genitalia, linked to endocrine disruptors in the water. These reports often neglect to mention that the lake is an EPA Superfund site, meaning it's a known heavily contaminated toxic waste site. But if you don't live in and drink heavily contaminated toxic waste water, what kind of exposure to endocrine disruptors do you really have? Well, to put it in perspective, you get more from a single serving of sunflower seeds, soybeans or alfalfa sprouts than you do from a lifetime use of water bottles containing BPA.

Endocrine disruptors are in the environment. Most that humans and animals do now and always have consumed come from normal dietary and environmental exposure, such as the vegetables just mentioned. You would need to have a dose orders of magnitudes higher than that for it to have any adverse effect, and these consumer products mentioned in the headlines simply don't have that. Yes, endocrine disruptors are found in these products, but at dosages orders of magnitude below safe levels. The same can be said of virtually any dangerous compound you like. There have yet to be any documented cases of humans being affected by endocrine disruptors in consumer products, so until there are, you can chalk it up to more sensationalist reporting on an otherwise slow news day.

If you're a student and would like to have your question answered on Skeptoid, please come to and click on Student Questions. I'm ready to tackle all the stories you've heard, from urban legends to consumer frauds to the paranormal to conspiracy theories. So keep them coming; the only stupid question is the one you didn't ask.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media Copyright information

References & Further Reading

AAP. "Facts for Parents About Vaccine Safety." American Academy of Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics, 1 Mar. 2008. Web. 26 Dec. 2009. <>

Kusche, Larry. The Bermuda Triangle Mystery Solved. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 1986.

Mooney, Chris. "Why Does the Vaccine/Autism Controversy Live On?" Discover. Discovermagazine, 6 May 2009. Web. 26 Dec. 2009. <>

Offit, Paul A. Autism's False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.

Rosenberg, Howard L. "Exorcizing the Devil's Triangle." Sealift. 1 Jun. 1974, Number 6: 11-15.

Rosenthal, Norman E. Winter Blue, Everything you need to know to beat seasonal affective disorder, Revised edition. New York: Guilford Press, 2006. 113-165.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Student Questions: Light Therapy, the Bermuda Triangle, and Isaac Newton." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, 13 Jan 2009. Web. 10 Oct 2015. <>


10 most recent comments | Show all 31 comments

"Why hasn't anybody tried to explore a theory that maybe this Bermuda Triangle and Dragon's Triangle are quite possibly a previous North and South Pole on Earth? "

In the last few million years they haven't been. We have a pretty good handle on where the poles were, and they were nowhere near the tropics. Further back than a few million years the question becomes much less meaningfull, due to continental drift (ie, in the Messozoic the world was a very different planet, and the rock for the Bermuda Triangle may not have even been formed yet).

Gregory, Alabama
May 17, 2010 11:19am

"Only an external force, like an asteroid collision, could have the effect you describe."

The earth could also be moved by converting potential chemical or nuclear energy into vectored kinetic energy... However the amount of energy would have to be extraordinary to have any measurable effect.

August 11, 2010 11:55am

I'm 8 years old and I go to Village Park Elementary. Where did the story of Bloody Mary come from, and how to I prove it's not real without trying it? I've heard lots of things, but I don't know if one or of any of them are true.

(note from mom, this is the story that if you say "bloody mary" three times and turn in a circle that something will come out of the mirror at you. She won't try it on her own to disprove it, because she thinks it's real)

Anna, Pennsylvania
November 30, 2010 5:08pm

Well Anna I was eight once and heard a lot of stories too. Many were quite funny but sometimes they could be a little scary. Like not stepping on cracks in the sidewalk. And then you get older and realise they are just games

Anyway why should you have to prove bloody Mary wrong. So I did you a favour in case you are still worried about something you wrote in November. I tried it out for you and I'm still here - nothing happened except my lawyer wife looked at me with a very puzzled look.

I explained and she said i hadn't done it right - so she stood there and made me do it all over again.

Anyway your post was November so you probably have a new game now. I didn't like a prime minister in England when I was a growing up so I put a photo in the freezer to give her a cold. That didn't work either. She was PM for over ten years..

Phi, Sydney
March 27, 2011 4:56am

What really concerns me about issues like vaccine fears and drinking unpasteurized juice is that even in the face of very real and quantifiable dangers from preventable diseases (even when it kills children!), some people still cling to an irrational overweighting of a specific consequence (like autism) which leads them to very poor choices. I wish that you could address this dangerous cognitive bias in a way that can help these people learn how to properly weigh the relative risks so they can better protect their families.

This same attitude, when applied to the amorphous fears concerning radiation exposure, has cost our country dearly. I wish that someone would advocate for all of the lives saved and lung diseases that never happened and wars that were never fought - all due to nuclear power. So that when a major mishap does occur, at least we will have a few witnesses for the defense . . .

Andy Siegel, Lexington, MA
April 27, 2011 1:58pm

You know Andy, you can come to my church of energy sensibility ay time you want.

I'll have the kids pasteurised and the food vaccinated..dang!

Well spoken.

Now as to dubious claims of contibutors ages I note;

"Anyway your post was November so you probably have a new game now. I didn't like a prime minister in England when I was a growing up so I put a photo in the freezer to give her a cold. That didn't work either. She was PM for over ten years.."

I didnt know Winston wore a dress. I take it it was during his second term..

Muddie, Waiting for rugby Semi\'s, Oz
October 15, 2011 12:14am

On the subject of seasonal affective disorder, I've seen it explained that it is primarily due to vitamin D deficiency, which some sources have linked to more general depression. We normally get a good amount of vitamin D from sunbathing, assuming that we aren't cleaning off the oil on our skin shortly afterwards, but this is blocked by clothing. In the winter months, most sane people wear a lot more clothing, leaving very little skin exposed to sunlight, so our production of vitamin D is greatly reduced.

It was also explained that the Icelandics aren't affected because they frequently consume cod liver oil, a typical daily dose providing enough pre-formed D3 to prevent the disorder. While I haven't checked on the accuracy of this claim or the claim that all of them don't suffer from the disorder, it seems to be a good enough explanation.

As for vaccines, there was another concern that aluminum-based adjuvants combined with thimerosal would cause more harm than either one given alone. This seems to fit well with the idea that aluminum and mercury are synergistic toxins (example given was that the LD1 of both metals given together was a LD100). I have yet to see this concern addressed by non-anti-vaccination literature.

Lastly, on endocrine disruptors. I don't think Brian has given the issue enough examination. The fact that doses from different sources have a cumulative affect is not well addressed, nor the possibility of protective factors in food sources.

Jonathan S., Toronto
October 29, 2011 1:08pm

Hmm, you know, the way you write things and copy things have led me to doing a thorough web search.

Aou havent given much consideration to anything you have ever posted. Your charge, copied from another forum post, hardly applies to Brian.

You claim many things but also admit you refuse to do any searches to verify anything you say.

This is born out by the schizophrenic positions you take (diametricaly opposed to what you have written in a previous post). Its clear you have copied something from a woo site (that are easily searched from your copied material) and not even understood what the woo artist has said.

Given your badly interpreted statement (above) clealy shows your touring of a standard woo site has not even resulted in understanding what the woo artist is saying, I'd suggest give up.

If you really are 17 (which I now doubt from reading forum posts) you have a career of bad advise ahead of you.

If you are parading as a school student, please, just try and understand what the woo is saying when you try to explain your post when challenged.

Your MD in a clinic gaff was one of the funniest things I have eve read. The thing was, it was exactly what the woo artist you quoted two posts later said. Surely parrotting doesnt require that degree of diligence when you miss their simplistic points and argue (accidentally) a different point when challenged.

It makes it easy to find out who you are copying.

Mud, Back in Sin City, Oz
November 12, 2011 11:39pm

Unless you make your charges a little more specific, I can't respond because I do not know what exactly you are referring to.

I suspect you are again making incorrect assumptions about my sources. Care to name a few and see if they actually match?

I have not admitted that I refuse to do any searches to verify anything I say, that is a gross misinterpretation. I have admitted to not doing any searches to verify things I say where I also mention *in the same post* that I have not yet attempted to verify them.

If you were referring to the error of the LD1 and LD100, I had noticed that error shortly after I made that post. As you know, however, we don't have the option of editing past posts on Skeptoid pages. I had intended to correct that as "the LD1 of both metals given simultaneously killed 100% of the test population".

Why do you doubt my age? Is it my way of writing?

Jonathan S., Toronto
November 13, 2011 12:45pm

At least you are consistent.

Mud, Back in Sin City, Oz
November 13, 2011 4:40pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply


What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid

About That 1970s Global Cooling...
Skeptoid #487, Oct 6 2015
Read | Listen (12:13)
The Flying Saucer Menace
Skeptoid #486, Sep 29 2015
Read | Listen (12:29)
Holocaust Denial
Skeptoid #485, Sep 22 2015
Read | Listen (12:54)
More Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #484, Sep 15 2015
Read | Listen (12:56)
Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #483, Sep 8 2015
Read | Listen (13:13)
#1 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#2 -
Read | Listen
#3 -
That Elusive Fibromyalgia
Read | Listen
#4 -
SS Iron Mountain
Read | Listen
#5 -
A Skeptical Look at the News
Read | Listen
#6 -
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Read | Listen
#7 -
Ancient Astronauts
Read | Listen
#8 -
Myths of Alcatraz
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal


Follow @skeptoid

Tweets about skeptoid

Support Skeptoid

Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.