Demystifying the Bell Witch
An exploration of the best way to evaluate an old, unsubstantiated folk legend like The Bell Witch.
Filed under Paranormal, Urban Legends
| Skeptoid #118 September 09, 2008 Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe |
|
By Brian Dunning, Skeptoid Podcast
Episode 118, September 09, 2008
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4118
|
Along Highway 41 in the hamlet of Adams, Tennessee, amid green fields and trees, stands Tennessee Historical Marker 3C38, entitled The Bell Witch. The solitary marker tells the following tale:
To the north was the farm of John Bell, an early prominent settler from North Carolina. According to legend, his family was harried during the early 19th century by the famous Bell Witch. She kept the household in turmoil, assaulted Bell, and drove off Betsy Bell's suitor. Even Andrew Jackson, who came to investigate, retreated to Nashville after his coach wheels stopped mysteriously. Many visitors to the house saw the furniture crash about them and heard her shriek, sing, and curse.
The Bell Witch story is frequently promoted with two popular claims: That it's the only haunting known to have actually killed a person, and that it's the only haunting to directly involve a US President. Let's briefly summarize the legend.
In 1817, John Bell encountered a strange animal in his field: It had the body of a dog, but the head of a rabbit. For some time thereafter, the Bell family was tormented by pounding on the outside of their farmhouse every night. They would rush out hoping to catch the strange animal, but never found anything. The noises moved indoors — scratching and slamming and strange whispers made sleep nearly impossible. Sometimes pillows and blankets were whisked away by an unseen force. The Bells' youngest daughter Elizabeth, nicknamed Betsy, got the worst of it. She was often slapped and had her hair pulled. Friends who spent the night with the Bells to help were subjected to the same torments. The whispers grew louder and became a disembodied female voice, singing hymns and quoting scriptures, and carried on conversations with the Bells and their guests. Word of the disturbances spread and in 1819 reached Andrew Jackson, a heroic Major in the US Army from the Battle of New Orleans.
Jackson and his men stayed at the Bell homestead to investigate. One of Jackson's men was physically attacked and beaten by an unseen force, and when Jackson himself finally gave up and fled the farm he said "I'd rather fight the entire British Army than to deal with the Bell Witch." Ten years later, he became our 7th President.
The witch's wrath focused increasingly upon John Bell himself, driving him into frail health, until one night in 1820, he was found on his deathbed with a vial of a strange potion. To see what it was, the family gave some of it to the cat, which immediately dropped dead. The witch laughed and sang, and boasted "I gave Ol' Jack a big dose of that last night, and that fixed him." John Bell was dead, but the hauntings continued, and the legend lived on.
If the name of the Bell Witch sounds familiar, it may be the similarity to the 1999 movie The Blair Witch Project, which is said to have been at least inspired in part by the Bell Witch story. Following the success of The Blair Witch Project, a rash of movies about the Bell Witch came out hoping to capitalize on the popularity: Bell Witch Haunting in 2004, An American Haunting in 2005, Bell Witch: The Movie in 2007, and IMDB lists a movie called simply Bell Witch as being in production.
Now a lot of listeners are probably saying something like "Oh, another old ghost story, whoop-de-do, Dunning, I wonder what your opinion is going to be on that." Well, I've been doing the skepticism thing a long time, and if there's one thing I've learned, it's that every story, no matter how familiar or seemingly obvious, presents some new challenge in honing your critical thinking skills. We've talked about two other popular hauntings on Skeptoid — Borley Rectory and The Amityville Horror — and both turned out to be fabrications by authors. You can't simply ask "Gee, the Amityville family found evil cloven footprints in the snow, how do you explain that?" because the question is based on a false presumption: That such an event actually took place. To use the scientific method to uncover the truth about the Bell Witch, you can't take anything for granted; and before you take the trouble to examine the specific claims, you need to look at the source of the claims to see if there's actually anything to examine.
We start by looking at the published accounts. There have been so many books written about the Bell Witch that I'm not even going to bother naming them. But, for their sources, they all draw upon the earliest book, Authenticated History of the Bell Witch from 1894, by Martin Van Buren Ingram, owner of a regional newspaper. This was the first book published about the Bell Witch, and it was published 75 years after the hauntings. That's a long time. Long enough that the author wasn't even born when the hauntings took place. So what was his source?
Martin Ingram's book is based entirely upon the handwritten diary of Richard Bell. Richard Bell, one of John Bell's sons, was born in 1811, so he was about six years old when the hauntings began. According to Ingram, Richard waited until 1846, more than 30 years, before he actually wrote down the events in his diary. He recorded his 30 year old memories of being a six year old child. Ingram goes on to say that in 1857 Richard gave the diary to his son, Allen Bell, who subsequently (and quite inexplicably) gave it to Ingram, with instructions to keep it private until after the deaths of the immediate family. That happened around 1880, when Ingram began writing his book. Conveniently, every person with firsthand knowledge of the Bell Witch hauntings was already dead when Ingram started his book; in fact, every person with secondhand knowledge was even dead.
Martin Ingram never said anything about what became of this alleged diary. There is no record of anyone else having seen it, and logically, Ingram should have promoted the diary's existence in his newspaper to publicize his book. He did not. I am certainly not convinced that the diary ever existed at all. Why would Richard Bell wait 30 years to write down such an incredible story? Why would Allen Bell give away such a unique heirloom to Ingram? Those are big questions, and Ingram had every reason to falsify the diary's existence.
Ingram's book also falsified at least one other source. His book claims that in 1849, the Saturday Evening Post ran a story about the Bell Witch, blaming the crazy daughter Elizabeth for everything, and then retracted the story shortly thereafter once she threatened to sue. People have looked for such an article and none was ever found. I called the Saturday Evening Post, and was told that their microfilmed archives for that period no longer exist. Researcher Jack Cook went through other microfilms of the Post for several years on either side of 1849 and confirmed that no such article was ever published. Even people looking for it in 1894, following the publication of Ingram's book, failed to find such an article; which casts doubt on Ingram's own ability to have found it. Without exception, all of Ingram's sources for his book were conveniently untraceable.
Historians have found only one printed reference to the Bell Witch that predates the publication of Ingram's book, and it's a brief one-paragraph blurb in the 1886 first edition of Goodspeed's History of Tennessee in its chapter on Robertson County, which reads as follows:
A remarkable occurrence, which attracted wide-spread interest, was connected with the family of John Bell, who settled near what is now Adams Station about 1804. So great was the excitement that people came from hundreds of miles around to witness the manifestations of what was popularly known as the "Bell Witch." This witch was supposed to be some spiritual being having the voice and attributes of a woman. It was invisible to the eye, yet it would hold conversation and even shake hands with certain individuals. The freaks if performed were wonderful and seemingly designed to annoy the family. It would take the sugar from the bowls, spill the milk, take the quilts from the beds, slap and pinch the children, and then laugh at the discomfiture of its victims. At first it was supposed to be a good spirit, but its subsequent acts, together with the curses with which it supplemented its remarks, proved the contrary.
Notice the two most significant events are missing: The witch's murder of John Bell, and Andrew Jackson's involvement. No newspapers described either event. No court records or recorded minutes from churches described either event. The story of John Bell's murder at the hands of the Bell Witch was never described in any published account, nor placed into the pop culture version of events by the frightened family's reports. It seems almost incredible ...unless Ingram made it up.
Ingram almost certainly made up the entire Andrew Jackson incident. Andrew Jackson's whereabouts between 1814 and 1820 are well documented, and there is no known record of his having visited Robertson County during those years. In all of his own writings and in all of his many biographies, there is not a single mention of his alleged Bell Witch adventure. The 1824 Presidential election was notoriously malicious, and it seems hard to believe that his opponent would have overlooked the opportunity to drag him through the mud for having lost a fight to a witch. All known documentation shows Jackson elsewhere during the period in question, and all published material about his encounter with the Bell Witch relies on Martin Ingram's book as its sole source.
So what evidence of the Bell Witch are we left with? Vague stories that there was a witch in the area. All the significant facts of the story have been falsified, the others come from a source of dubious credibility. Since no reliable documentation of any actual events exists, there is nothing worth looking into. Ingram also wrote that the Bell Witch promised to return in 1935, and since nothing happened in that year either, I chalk up the Bell Witch as nothing more than one of many unsubstantiated folk legends, vastly embellished and popularized by an opportunistic author of historical fiction.
© 2008 Skeptoid Media, Inc.
References & Further Reading
Cook, Jack. "The Spirit of Red River." Bell Witch Legend. Jack Cook, 1 Sep. 2006. Web. 16 Jan. 2010. <http://bellwitchlegend.blogspot.com/>
Fitzhugh, P. The Bell Witch: The Full Account. New York: The Armand Press, 2000. 21-28.
Goodspeed Brothers. History of Tennessee. Nashville: Goodspeed Publishing Co., 1886.
Hudson, A., McCarter, P. "The Bell Witch of Tennessee and Mississippi: A Folk Legend." American Folklore Society. 31 Mar. 1934, Volume 7, Number 183: 45-63.
Ingram, Martin Van Buren. An Authenticated History of the Bell Witch. Clarksville: M. V. Ingram & Co., 1894.
Middle Tennessee Skeptics. "Bell Witch." Middle Tennessee Skeptics. Middle Tennessee Skeptics, 21 Aug. 2008. Web. 14 Feb. 2010. <http://mtskeptics.homestead.com/>
Reference this article:
Dunning, B.
"Demystifying the Bell Witch." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc.,
9 Sep 2008. Web.
21 May 2013. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4118>
Discuss!
10 most recent comments | Show all 29 comments
The Bell Witch doesn't appear to be a ghost or a poltergeist but a "boggart," insofar as one may classify creatures that don't exist.
I grew up with the legend of Grace Sherwood, the Witch of Pungo (Virginia Beach.) As a teenager my friends and I tried to hunt her down.I wrote a little memoir about it. Truth is often disappointing, although the search for it can be a fine adventure. Thanks for another good article. http://www.philosophersdog.com/blog/2011/06/29/Ghost-hunter-1970.aspx?alt_id=DMGT0-BA011-8N5&ts=634775202759995509
Nancy Rector, Marietta, GA
July 10, 2012 9:35am
"I am a direct descendent of John Bell Sr. through the marriage of his oldest daughter Esther to Alexander Bennett Porter."
*eyeroll*
"The Bell Witch doesn't appear to be a ghost or a poltergeist but a "boggart," insofar as one may classify creatures that don't exist."
You want to go to Hogwarts sooo badly, don't you.
Government Goodies, Secret Government Lab
July 13, 2012 9:19am
Some people can count all their great grand parents on one hand Goodies.
You shouldn't be so dismissive...
Mud, back in Sanity, NSW
August 01, 2012 5:33am
*brandishes his skeptological dismissivesness in a florid manner*
Government Goodies, Secret Government Lab
August 06, 2012 9:45am
I can relate to this story because I have a great grandmother from West Virginia. I have never met her but in my family they call her a witch. My aunt is scared to talk about her. I asked about her on yahoo answers before. Just said her name and county and nothing else. I got three replies.All three said never heard of her,But the one reply contacted me by email and said his wife was her great granddaughter and her mother granddaughter and they could do weird magic witch shit. I looked up based on what I was told by my family of what she could do and found I believe she could have been into something called Pow Wow. Not a Native American thing. Just me, I went by one name and what county she lived in and came up with evidence supporting my families claim. What I assess of it is this. What document is there that Ingram based his book? He based it on a diary,but where is the diary? The diary has never been found so the book is based on unfounded evidences. Could a haunting have really happened? It sure could have. I believe a haunting happened but nowhere near what is in the books. I believe that a traumatic experience can attract demons and even little things we hold onto like a momento or a picture that can lead to a demon being attached to it. Like the golden calf it would be something we hold dear to our hearts and wont let go leading to demonic activity. She could have been raped by her dad causing this. Unforgivness for that gives it power then crazy stuff goes down.
Kevin Barnett, Pittsburgh,Pa
August 20, 2012 1:13am
Kevin, you lost me with, "Like the golden calf". Apart from that, many credible skepticisms here, obviously.
First of all, I am a full on believer in the scientific method, and would applaud everyone here's sober consideration.
Two problems, if you will, purely personal. It would be refreshing to find a skeptic, or debunker ANYWHERE who isn't batting a thousand, or claiming (even by their omission of such) to have "succeeded again". Just as "conspiracy theorist" is bandied about to brand anyone with an open mind and the willingness to hold uncomfortable things up to a light a kook, or a paranoid, I find it equally amazing how a majority of people find it plausible that they could indeed be living in a world utterly devoid, by thier way thinking, of conspiracy.
Having said that, I just flat saw a ghost when I was 14 years old, among other strange, related matters. And while not completely sure if I saw what I THOUGHT I saw at the moment, later, when I asked the person who had been with me, "Hey T--, did you see anything odd/weird when we were walking through the woods to get to the house?", this person looked up at me, with a straight face, and confirmed the old man in the window, leaning on the window cill."He stood up, & walked off to his left".
Still gives me goosepimples. Skepticism says it was an old man, in a T-shirt, dead of winter, in an abandoned house...a homeless man, right? Without even an old jacket...in a house where the owner FACTUALLY hung himself.
Chris The Greek, Northern California
September 29, 2012 1:27am
Thanks Brian for the great story. Just in time for Halloween I got this article and one from Ben Radford onto the Bell Witch Wikipedia page. Now over 100K people visiting that Wikipedia page per year will be exposed to your podcast. Enjoy!
http://guerrillaskepticismonwikipedia.blogspot.com/2012/10/happy-halloween-bell-witch-page.html
Susan Gerbic, Salinas
October 29, 2012 6:13pm
@Chris the Greek
We're "batting a thousand" because romantics like yourself haven't been able to succesfully demonstrate ANY supernatural phenomenon.
Maybe you can prove me wrong and break the streak by going back to the abandoned house and setting up cameras to catch your ghost? Certainly that's a sure bet considering he "FACTUALLY" hung himself there. Given all the gravity that capitalization can lend your argument, you should have your evidence in no time.
Government Goodies, Secret Government Lab
November 13, 2012 10:55am
Well, An American Haunting was on last night-really, stupid movie. Anyways I like "Chris the Greeks" story. My husband is super-science oriented and sucks most of the fantasy out of me; but whos to say "seeing" spirits isn't a time/space warp thing. Don't any of you science guys believe in time as being fluid. My father killed his 2nd wife and then himself but if I want to visit him he's not @ the cemetary or in the basement of the 4 story house where the murder/suicide took place. But ONCE I was sitting on a huge rock in a state park and all of a sudden I felt his presence and it was gently flowing from the trees and the sky and the breeze and the river down below and it wasn't tortured or angry, like when he died, it was a peace, of which I've never felt on this earth before. A non-superstitious family bought his house @ a great discount and are very happy there.Even though, when my sister lived there before my father died, she would tell me about all kinds of "events," that went on there-she even moved out in the middle of the night and came to my place and slept on my hallway floor when my father was out of town, because she was being "tormented," by evil spirits in the house. But, she suffers from mental illness. So, you'd get 2 different stories about the same house from 2 different family members-haha and she really believes what she sees and hears, she's not trying to sell anything. She wants no part of it. :)
SRPKH, central coast ca
February 09, 2013 2:01pm
Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:
You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.
What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?










I am a direct descendent of John Bell Sr. through the marriage of his oldest daughter Esther to Alexander Bennett Porter.
You have hit many nails on the head and I understand your skepticism.
Much remains to be explained, and much is misunderstood by others.
Most of the family even today (especially Betsy's family) does not discuss this issue.
I grew up with "Kate" and have always been curious about the entire situation.
I am in full and absolute agreement with the fact that Andrew Jackson never came to Adams as claimed, and that The "Saturday Evening Post" never published any article on the event. I very much respect the research of Jack Cook and while, I have a slightly different take on the issue, I agree with all of his findings.
John C. Cox, Laurel, MS USA
February 19, 2011 2:07pm