Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Real or Imagined?

Are sufferers of electrosensitivity reacting to electromagnetism, or just to simple stress?

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Alternative Medicine, Health

Skeptoid #72
October 30, 2007
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
 

You've seen them on the TV news and on the Internet: Thousands of people worldwide, though mostly concentrated in the United Kingdom and Sweden, who believe that their bodies are being afflicted by the electromagnetic radiation put out by computers, wireless data networks, cell phone networks, radio and television broadcasting, power lines, and virtually anything that uses electricity. Mass media trumpet the alarmist headlines, like one article that proclaims "For years, opponents of cell towers and wireless technology have voiced concerns about potential health effects of electromagnetic fields. Once ridiculed as crackpots, they're starting to get backup from the scientific community."

Generally called electrosensitivity or ES for short, the condition manifests itself in sufferers as skin sensitivity and blemishing, light sensitivity, fatigue, high blood pressure, headaches, joint pain, dizziness, and a whole array of associated symptoms. Interestingly, these are also the exact same symptoms caused by simple stress. We'll come back to that later.

There is no cure that is broadly accepted among ES advocates, but they do agree on one point: shielding or complete removal from the environment is the only sure-fire way to alleviate the symptoms. Breakspear Hospital, located in Hertfordshire, UK, advertises itself as the world's leading facility for the treatment of ES, among other things. On its list of treatments for ES, unfortunately, is chelation therapy, a dangerous and tedious drug-based treatment for removing heavy metal contamination from the body. People who choose this option should be aware that the drugs used in chelation therapy are approved only for use in cases where a blood test has proven acute heavy metal contamination. This is because chelation therapy ravages the body and can produce side effects as dangerous as liver failure. Any doctors or alternative practitioners who prescribe such therapy in the absence of its prescribed condition should be approached with extreme caution, and probably also reported to the relevant medical board. Other practitioners who claim to treat ES prescribe holistic treatments such as acupuncture, vitamin megadosing, chiropractic, exposure to energized crystals, reflexology, shiatsu, clay baths, and avoidance of genetically modified foods. The Environmental Health Center in Dallas, Texas, will even rent you their "safe vacation home" in Jamaica where you can be free of the causes of ES, although the pictures they post on their web site show it to apparently be as full of electrical appliances as any other home, including a TV and VCR, which are alleged to be among the worst causes of ES.

What does the medical establishment have to say about ES? Well, that depends on whom you ask. Electrosensitivity.org, a web site set up by Troy Knight, a young man suffering from ES, blames "great opposition from medical establishments and governments" for the lack of a definitive diagnosis of ES in mainstream science. I'm not sure how he defines "great opposition", or what form he believes such opposition might take, but quite to the contrary a number of studies have been done. Nobody doubts that a large number of people wordwide report this condition, and nobody doubts the reality of their symptoms or the suffering they endure. What falls under skepticism is their self-diagnosis that their condition is caused by the proximity of electrically powered devices.

Quite obviously, people in many countries around the world have been using electricity for over a century. And, in poorer regions like parts of Asia, Africa, and South America, there are populations who (even today) use no electricity at all. If normal levels of electromagnetic radiation were indeed harmful to the body, then we would see correlation on a massive scale between such physiological damage and geography. There is no such correlation, and no cases of observed physiological damage caused by electromagnetic radiation even in the most industrialized regions. Thus, there is very good reason for science to not simply accept this self-diagnosis without inquiry.

But the symptoms and suffering are still real, so what do we do? Well, we do science. One of the first steps in doing science is to throw out the anecdotal evidence of personal testimonials — with apologies to the people wearing tinfoil helmets — and design randomized controlled trials to test for the true causes of the ailment, and to test the efficacy of potential treatments. So, if it's not too politically incorrect to do so, let's take a look at some of these trials and see what's been learned.

Well-performed trials always have a number of features in common. First, they do include subjects who objectively report themselves to be electrosensitive, and they also include people who do not. Second, all subjects are usually surveyed to gauge their own perceived sensitivity to various electromagnetic phenomena, whether they claim to suffer from ES or not. Third, the trials are blinded wherever possible. Test administrators never know anything about a given subject's claimed sensitivity. All subjects are randomly assigned to different test groups. Subjects typically do not know what is being tested. And finally, the statisticians who evaluate the results do not know the identity of any of the subjects, or about the procedures performed on each group. Statistical methods are employed to cancel out any bias wherever possible.

The first study we'll look at is one from 2005, by the UK Health Protection Agency, which found that a disproportionately large segment of self-reported ES sufferers also report suffering from other idiopathic symptom-based conditions. Now this doesn't tell us anything about ES, of course, but it does tell us that ES sufferers are more likely to also report other conditions that are commonly classified as psychosomatic, or as it's more politically correct to say, psychophysiologic illnesses. It's fair to note that some psychosomatic cases are people simply faking symptoms, and while some ES sufferers might be faking, probably the great majority are not, and are experiencing real symptoms; and now we know that many of these people also report conditions known to be psychosomatic in nature. Read between my lines at your own peril.

This finding is certainly consistent with the findings of other studies, which have tested various treatments for ES. What these studies have found is that the only successful treatment has been psychotherapy. A trial at Sweden's University of Uppsala's Department of Clinical Psychology took blood samples from subjects and analyzed them for indicators of stress, both before and after the test. Some subjects were secretly exposed to electromagnetic radiation, but there were neither any differences between ES sufferers and control subjects in how they reacted to it, nor were there any differences in stress among those who received radiation and those who did not. When subjects received psychotherapy, the patients who reported themselves as ES sufferers had a greater reduction in stress levels following psychotherapy than did subjects who did not report themselves as hypersensitive.

Another such trial was performed at the Environmental Illness Research Center in Huddinge, Sweden. Half the subjects reported themselves as hypersensitive, half did not. Half received cognitive behavioral therapy, half did not. All were evaluated for stress before the study, after the study, and six months later. Just like in the other trial, subjects with perceived hypersensitivity benefitted more from cognitive behavioral therapy than did those who were not hypersensitive. There were no other significant differences among any groups.

So before all of you ES sufferers band together and have me tarred and feathered for proclaiming that yours is not a physical condition, allow me to remind you that I'm not saying that. Psychological conditions do cause physical symptoms — like I said at the beginning of the episode, stress is a psychological condition, and it causes all the same symptoms that ES does. These conditions can be very traumatic, and at their most severe, even life threatening. So it's not to be taken lightly. But every reasonable person should agree that it's best to understand the condition's true nature.

A 2005 trial at the Psychiatric University Hospital in Germany found further support for the hypothesis that ES sufferers are not having a physiological response to electromagnetic radiation:

The major study endpoint was the ability of the subjects to differentiate between real magnetic stimulation and a sham condition. There were no significant differences between groups in the thresholds, neither of detecting the real magnetic stimulus nor in motor response. But the three groups differed significantly in differentiating between stimulation and sham condition, with the subjectively electrosensitive people having the lowest ability to differentiate and the control group with high level of EMF-related complaints having the best ability to differentiate. Differences between groups were mostly due to false alarm reactions in the sham condition reported by subjectively electrosensitives (SES). We found no objective correlate of the self perception of being "electrosensitive."

These results represent the preponderance of evidence from well-performed trials seeking to find whether ES sufferers can actually detect the presence of electromagnetic fields and react to them. Going back to Sweden again, a 2000 study at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine at the Center for Public Health Sciences found that ES sufferers were no better than the control group at deciding whether or not they were exposed to electric and magnetic fields. In this test, subjects were exposed to four provocations at irregular and unknown intervals over several days, with at least several days of recovery time between each provocation. Each subject received two real provocations of actual electromagnetic radiation, and two sham provocations. The study concluded that exposure to electromagnetic fields is not a sufficient cause of the symptoms experienced by ES sufferers.

Some researchers have turned their attention to causes that would correlate to the presence of common environmental EM sources like computers or offices, most notably flickering lights. In the United States, televisions flicker at 30 Hz, fluorescent lights at 60 Hz, and computer monitors at a variety of frequencies in the same approximate range. This flickering is usually imperceptible unless you look for it specifically, for example by waving your hand in front of a CRT monitor. Generally, if your brain can detect flickering light sources, it knows that there are probably electromagnetic sources nearby. Thus, an ES sufferer can correctly conclude that electromagnetic sources are irradiating them, and logically (if incorrectly) associate that with their symptoms.

This was evidenced by another study from Sweden in 1997, from the University of Umeå's Department of Environmental Medicine:

An increasing number of people in Sweden are claiming that they are hypersensitive to electricity. These patients suffer from skin as well as neurological symptoms when they are near computer monitors, fluorescent tubes, or other electrical appliances. Provocation studies with electromagnetic fields emitted from these appliances have, with only one exception, all been negative, indicating that there are other factors in the office environment that can effect the autonomic and/or central nervous system, resulting in the symptoms reported. Flickering light is one such factor and was therefore chosen as the exposure parameter in this study. Ten patients complaining of electrical hypersensitivity and the same number of healthy voluntary control subjects were exposed to amplitude-modulated light. A higher amplitude of brain cortical responses at all frequencies of stimulation was found when comparing patients with the control subjects.

The ability of a human brain to convince itself of just about anything is not to be underestimated. If you are experiencing stress (and just about everyone is experiencing some stress), whatever you attribute it to will inevitably create more stress whenever you encounter it. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you believe yourself to be electrosensitive, then you will be, quite literally, whenever you perceive the presence of electromagnetism. This doesn't mean that you have a paranormal ability to detect electromagnetic fields. You don't. But you might be able to hear the high-frequency ring of your neighbor's television set, or see the 60-Hz flickering of a fluorescent light bulb, or you might see that your computer has found a WiFi network or that your cell phone has four bars of signal. There are many ways that a person can detect the probable presence of electromagnetic radiation without the ability to directly sense it. And, if you've fallen into the self-fulfilling syndrome of believing yourself to be electrosensitive, you will actually suffer measurable physical symptoms and can potentially become acutely ill. By the same token, if you believe strongly enough that acupuncture or vitamins will cure your electrosensitivity, they probably will.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

But all this strategy accomplishes is to reinforce faulty assumptions, and leave you equally vulnerable to a recurrence in the future. A better strategy is to understand the true cause of your stress, possibly through psychotherapy or possibly on your own, and either solve it or simply find a way to relax and blow off some steam.

I'll close with an experience related by a listener who wrote in, that aptly illustrates this phenomenon:

We had an interesting incident near Humboldt State University. A new cell tower went up and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cell phone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health. To paraphrase the bottom line: "think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."

Brian Dunning

© 2007 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Andersson, B, Berg, M, Arnetz, BB, Melin, L, Langlet, I, Lidén, S. "A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electric hypersensitivity". Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study." J Occup Environ Med. 1 Aug. 1996, Volume 38, Number 8: 752-758.

Flodin, U, Seneby, A, Tegenfeldt, C. "Provocation of electric hypersensitivity under everyday conditions." Scand J Work Environ Health. 1 Apr. 2000, Volume 26, Number 2: 93-98.

Frick, U., Kharraz, A., Hauser, S., Wiegand, R., Rehm, J., Kovatsits, U., Eichhammer, P. "Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls." Bioelectromagnetics. 1 May 2005, Volume 26, Number 4: 287-298.

Hillert, L, Kolmodin Hedman, B, Dölling, BF, Arnetz, BB. "Cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with electric sensitivity - a multidisciplinary approach in a controlled study." Psychother Psychosom. 1 Jan. 1998, Volume 67, Number 6: 302-310.

Sandström, M, Lyskov, E, Berglund, A, Medvedev, S, Mild, KH. "Neurophysiological effects of flickering light in patients with perceived electrical hypersensitivity." J Occup Environ Med. 1 Jan. 1997, Volume 39, Number 1: 15-22.

WHO. "Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health." World Health Organization. World Health Organization, 1 Dec. 2005. Web. 30 Oct. 2007. <http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs296/en/>

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Real or Imagined?" Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 30 Oct 2007. Web. 31 Oct 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4072>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 120 comments

I have been suffering with EMF sensitivity forever now. I have recently purchased this ADR MAT from Amazon http://www.amazon.co.uk/ADR-Technology-AM-03XL-Radiation-Protector/dp/B00BZVL8EK/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&qid=1380885303&sr=8-9&keywords=adr+mat it

It changed the way I function in everyday life. it helps me sleep and eases my headaches.
Give yourselfes a chance and get this mat for your bed. Its truely amazing.

Mary Wright, UK
October 4, 2013 4:17am

Surprised nobodie has mentioned the pseudo science about how cellphones and electromagnetic waves are believed by some people to interfere with the bodies ability to produce melatonin, there by greatly increasing people's risk of getting various forms of cancer. That's what I would like to hear debunked.

Sam Waters, In the mouth of Madness
October 4, 2013 10:41am

May I add some newer research to this discussion that will show why electromagnetic sensitivity is often thought to be "anxiety"? Please see "Increasing incidence of burnout due to magnetic and electromagnetic fields of cell phone networks and other wireless communication technologies" by Ulrich Warnke and Peter Hensinger. You will learn that emf exposure causes oxidative stress similar to anxiety. But that does not dismiss the biological reality that emf CAUSES these body processes and symptoms.
See also "ELECTROMAGNETIC HYPERSENSITIVITY: EVIDENCE FOR A NOVEL NEUROLOGICAL SYNDROME"
David E. McCarty, M.D., Simona Carrubba, Ph.D, et. al
Realize that Radiofrequency or Microwave Sickness is a historical, not hysterical, functional impairment. See Barrie Trower videos and Zory R. Glaser bibliography at Magda Havas site for tons of information over decades about the biological effects of low level RF/MW. To ignore this historical, and new research is not wise, nor compassionate, since the wireless explosion is created many more victims of this modern scourge, which rivals tobacco, and surpasses asbestos and lead paint for its lethal reach.
Thank you.

c zehfus, milwaukee
November 2, 2013 5:09pm

It amazes me how people can say that others aren't being affected just becasuethey, themselves, are not. I am very affected by resiofrerquency radiation. Not just my own phone, but others phones when used near me. I don't understand why pewople get so vicious about others having sensitivities to this stuff. Not one person affected by this wants to be affected. Most continue to use technology in some form or antoher. Itisn't anyonetryingto stop technologyu--only to try to live with it without being physically harmed. Time will show that this is real as more and more people become affected. Unfortunately it will do nothing to help those of us who are affected while t he truth is trying to be both discovered and disseminated. Please don't hate us because we are already dealing with so much. The proper resonse would be to try to help, understand, and sympathize. Not only is that the pro[er response, but this could happen to you or someone you love. Each and every person affected were, at one time, not affected. We didn't ask for it, don't want it, and try desperately to stop it and recover from it. Please be kind as things are already so very difficult. The response from those affected are likethe responses of people addicted to a drug who are told thta it is bad for them. They get angry, they deny, they attack. We aren't attcking you--we are simply just trying to survive. Thank you.

Veronica, Indiana
December 16, 2013 6:14pm

To: Nicole, Chicago: Your Prius definitely generates very powerful magnetic fields, when operating on the electric motor. The motor that drives the car is an AC (Alternating Current) motor of special design. It is driven by an electronic controller that generates high power (600 volt, 50 amp 3 phase AC) to drive the motor!! Also, when the gas engine is running a powerful alternator is recharging the battery, even if you are not moving. Other comments on here about the drive train of your vehicle are incorrect.

I suggest some experiments: Go to your dealer and ask if you can sit in a different prius to determine if it is just YOUR car or all prius's. Also go to Ford, try out their hybrids, they have very similar drive trains.

For some reason you have convinced yourself it is an EMF problem, but it really could be any number of things. Maybe you just don't like your Prius? (sorry,a little levity). It could be EMF, or even Ozone, which can be generated by high voltage fields. LIghtning generates ozone. It could be some chemical vapor too. Any number of things. Do the experiments logically and do a process of elimination. Otherwise, you will continue to dwell on the problem, it will get worse in your mind, and you'll never know.

Only you can solve your problem!

Good luck!!

Phil, Morgan Hill, CA
February 17, 2014 12:36pm

People who are discussing this subject evidently don't know there are 4 types of sensitivity and subdivisions. The scientists seem to want people to believe there is only on kind of reaction... like the bee sting kind that some people have.. And Obama and the general public are science illiterate. Sad, sad situation.

Letta Mego, Oklahoma City, OK
April 19, 2014 10:04am

It baffles me, that in the comment-section, below an article that points to SEVERAL tests done over many years, who conclude that ES is psychosomatic and that "ES-sufferers" are shown not to be able to detect radiation, people STILL insist of being an ES sufferer.

What the heck is wrong with you all, can't you read? These people must be on the lower end of the intelligence scale, on the same level as which-burning pitch-fork farmers in the goddamn 12'th century.

Get some counseling and get on with your lives for Christ sake.

OhMyWord, Oslo
June 19, 2014 2:49am

To OhMyWorld: For example, when I look at wiki for fibromyalgia cause, the first sentence is "The cause of fibromyalgia is unknown". So as for many other health problems. Often specialist just says 'Observe what you eat, or in which environment do you live, is there some dust?, then avoid it' Btw, dust, how long is it known, that oak dust can cause cancer?
It can be, that all researches use wrong methodology, simply time after ones body reacts to EMF irritation can be different, or other aspects are not taken into consideration.
In replies to Nicole, you can find: 'the EMF created by a conventional car's alternator is going to be WAY'. Has someone thought about where is conventional car's alternator placed - most often, it is placed behind metal motor block, by which the EMF is shielded.
Few days back I bought my first smartphone, I activated mobile data (had no fear, I was also little bit skeptic about EMF harmfulness). My problems with fibromyalgia worsened, say, three times. Now I switched off smartphones internet connection, I'll see whether problems disappear (this can take days).

oskar, Bratislava
September 11, 2014 1:55am

The thing I find most intriguing about the reports from sufferers is that they always blame relatively new tech that doesn't produce much EMR. (cell phones) Back in the days of CRT screens and valve electronics we were exposed to EMR hundreds of times stronger than we are today but the occurrence of this disorder seems to go up as exposure to the cause goes down.

Peter, Newcastle
September 15, 2014 7:36pm

Of course there are always skeptics and the article sheds light there. But here's some research on the effects EMF from a cell phone...basically the brain heats up:
http://vitalforcetechnology.scarabmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/EMF-FINAL-Whitepaper-5-29-14.pdf

On another note -- not everybody is sensitive to electricity...according to the FCC 9.8 million Americans are allergic to electricity and electricity emits EMFs. They get headaches and other ailments. It's truly been amazing how my headaches (migraines) are gone now that I curtail EMFs from my cellphone. I use EMF Transformers from ETI.

Kelly Chambers, San jose, CA
October 9, 2014 9:30am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply

 

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 

Newest
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Skeptoid #438, Oct 28 2014
Read | Listen (11:56)
 
Tube Amplifiers
Skeptoid #437, Oct 21 2014
Read | Listen (14:57 )
 
Ionithermie
Skeptoid #436, Oct 14 2014
Read | Listen (10:11)
 
The St. Clair Triangle UFO
Skeptoid #435, Oct 7 2014
Read | Listen (13:56)
 
The Braxton County Monster
Skeptoid #434, Sep 30 2014
Read | Listen (11:26)
 
Newest
#1 -
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Fukushima vs Chernobyl vs Three Mile Island
Read | Listen
#4 -
The Baldoon Mystery
Read | Listen
#5 -
Listeners Have Another Say
Read | Listen
#6 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen
#7 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#8 -
6 Problems with Wind Turbine Syndrome
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Name/Nickname:  
City/Location:
Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
Comment:
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.