Skeptoid: Critical Analysis Podcast 
About This Podcast
Subscribe
Subscribe to the Podcast
Episode Guide
Skeptoid Forum
Hosted by JREF
Skeptalk
Email Discussion List
Search:
What Is Skepticism?
Swag & Crap
One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge
Videos
Appearances
What People Are Saying...
Press Room
Contact
Subscribe with iTunes
Twitter
Skeptoid on MySpace Facebook

The real cause of the moving rocks, it turns out, carries a lot more punch than wind

- Living Stones of Death Valley
Recent Comments...

Super Sized Fast Food Phobia
by Max: "I got a definition of artifical vs. natural for you. Are you ready? Natural is food we evolved eating, or food that passed the test…"

SUV Phobia
by N Ring: "Sure I agree with a few of your points but ultimatly I think this is a document written to be skeptical for skeptic sake. …"

What You Didn't Know about the Stanford Prison Experiment
by N Ring: "Ironic that you are asking individuals to be skeptical about a book/professor/experiment that is skeptical. Indeed all scientists go in with a particular bias when…"

An Evolution Primer for Creationists
by neil griffiths: "Yeah! That's why it's called "MYTH"#2! Fr om the works of Darwin Himself-p419-"It is well known that several animals...which inhabit caves of Styria and Kentucky, are…"

Blood for Oil
by Damien: "I am not sure if someone has already made this point, but oil is a fungible comodity. Therefore it does not matter who one's suppliers are…"

Subliminal Seduction
by George Gillan: "New research that might bear on the subject: http://www.ni da.nih.gov/newsroom/08/NR 1-29.html Title: &q uot; Does the Desire for Drugs Begin Outside Awareness? For Release January 29, 2008 NIDA Research Reveals…"

Skeptoid

Irradiation: Is Your Food Toxic?

Skeptoid #61
August 14, 2007
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

Stumble This
Share on Facebook

Today we're going to critically examine a mysterious green logo on the side of a food container in the supermarket. Many people believe this means the food is radioactive or poisonous. Some trust that it's simply sterilized. Which is true?

My grandmother went to her grave with the firm belief that eating food that had been warmed in a microwave would give you cancer. The similarities between the terms "microwave radiation" and "radiation poisoning" were all she needed to form this opinion. And, unfortunately, hers was no less rigorous than the process most people follow to form opinions about technologies or methods that they don't thoroughly understand. I offer most Americans' opinion of nuclear energy as a perfect example: Chernobyl = danger = nuclear reactors are fundamentally bad. Yet, how many of them can tell you anything about the closed fuel cycle reactors being designed today? Ever since the aftermath of Hiroshima, there has probably never been any word that incites so much fear as radiation.

Radura
The Radura logo indicates food that has been irradiated.

Simply put, irradiation is the process of blasting food with a shot of ionizing radiation, killing any microbes that would contribute to the food going bad sooner than it needs to. Bacteria, viruses, and everything else are all sterilized by the radiation. Ionizing radiation is used because it's high energy, and is extremely dangerous to living tissue. Three types of radiation are used: high intensity x-rays, which are high energy and penetrating; gamma decay, which is really high energy and does great damage, and consists of electromagnetic radiation in the form of photons; and beta decay, which consists of electrons that are too big and slow to do much by themselves, and so they need to be accelerated into a high energy state at nearly the speed of light. All three types have different characteristics in terms of how far they penetrate and how long an exposure is required, so different types are used for irradiating different foods. Whatever the method, the food coming out the other end — be it bread, milk, meat, fruit, or cheese — is absolutely sterile and, if properly sealed, will last longer on your shelf than virtually anything else in the supermarket.

How is irradiation such an effective killer? The high energy of ionizing radiation creates ionization events within the cells of tissue that it strikes. These ionization events result in chemical and even some nuclear reactions among the affected molecules. When this happens in DNA, it causes damage that, if the cell survives, can become cancer. At higher levels, sufficient damage is done to the cell that it's almost always killed outright. Guaranteed no salmonella or E. coli.

Irradiation is a cheaper way to bring safer food to the market. It's common in Europe, where refrigeration infrastructure has historically not been so great, but it's rare in the United States. The circular green logo along with the words "Treated with irradiation" are so terrifying to much of the American public that the process has been put virtually out of business. Most Americans would prefer to accept a few E. coli deaths than have their food exposed to a sterilization procedure that involves nuclear physics.

At this point in the podcast, some of you are tuning out and saying "Oh, there he goes again, towing the line of his corporate paymasters, saying whatever Halliburton is paying him to say, and talking down to people who question authority." Questioning authority is wonderful, and more people should do it. Unfortunately, most of those who claim to question authority are really just rejecting authority, for the sake of doing so. To truly question something, you have to listen, learn, and analyze.

During the anthrax scare of 2001, the US Postal Service had a lesson in analyzing. As an emergency measure, they contrived to irradiate the mail, as this would effectively kill any anthrax that anyone might be sending. Well, apparently they turned up the volume too high. They killed the anthrax, all right, but they also nuked the hell out of a lot of mail. Some stationery darkened horribly. Stamps were ruined, to the dismay of collectors. Photographic film was destroyed. Plans to irradiate all mail eroded, and now only mail to certain government offices gets this treatment. Apparently, you can overnuke stuff. Don't tell my paymasters I said this, but irradiation can be done wrong, and can have disastrous results.

Critics have pointed out that new, unexpected chemicals can be formed during irradiation, and this is true. Ionization is a chemical reaction. However, cooking, and most other food preparation techniques, cause the formation of new chemicals in dramatically higher concentrations, and this has never posed a problem. Every test ever done has found irradiated food to be safe.

But that doesn't mean they're always good. Some foods don't tolerate irradiation well. Some foods, most notably romaine lettuce, can smell bad, taste funny, or have their texture affected if they get overnuked. This is not a health concern, it's a culinary problem. The trick is to find the right dosage to kill any organisms and yet not affect the food. Almost all foods tolerate irradiation with no noticeable effects, but for some, the food gets ruined at doses too low to effectively sterilize it, and so these foods are not candidates for irradiation. For any food you see bearing the irradiation logo, you can be sure that it's been tested and its quality has been found to be unaffected by the dosage used. Not that this will satisfy consumers.

You see, a principal misconception held by many opponents of food irradiation is that the process of applying radiation leaves the food radioactive. This is completely false. This would be analogous to turning off the light in a room, and expecting the room to be residually contaminated with light radiation and still glowing. Obviously, this isn't what happens. Once the source of the radiation is removed or deactivated, there is no more radiation. It's like turning off a light. Food that's been irradiated is not radioactive.

Does this mean that you can take a fish fillet and set it outside your nuclear bomb shelter, let it marinate in the radiation, then bring it back inside and enjoy a healthy meal? No. In this case, heavy radioactive elements in the fallout dust would contaminate the fillet. When you brought it back inside, you'd bring in radioactive dust along with it, and you'll all get fried. The irradiated fillet won't hurt you, but the heavy radioactive metals sitting on its surface, still emitting particles, will. Food irradiation, and for that matter microwaving as well, does not place radioactive material onto the food. The food is placed in the radiation field, and then it's removed. Run a Geiger counter over it, and it shows zero. Food that's been irradiated is not radioactive.

Nobody has ever been sickened or harmed in any way by eating properly irradiated food, despite a few untrue claims made by the Sierra Club and others. However, many people die or catch severe bacterial infections from eating food that is not irradiated. Next time we have an E. coli breakout, step up to the plate and point out the benefits of irradiation. When lives are on the line, we should use every means at our disposal to properly sanitize our food supply.

And also use every means at our disposal to get Halliburton to finally send me my check.

Stumble This

Brian Dunning
Brian Dunning

References
© 2008 Skeptoid.com

Discuss!

5 most recent comments | Show all 9 comments

Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.

they were not things i disagree with, actually they were missed opertunities to further support your point:

1. Cooking with heat HAS been shown to be harmful, cooking above the boiling point of water (frying, baking, grilling, roasting, over-doing in the microwave etc.) produces chemicals in the food which have been shown to be carsinogenic (but stuff that! i'm still eating my steak black!). So in some ways, irradiating food would be SAFER than cooking (depending on how you cook it).

2. Unless you have a geiger-counter which automatically subtracts background radiation (i'm not even sure if they make them) it will NOT read zero, it would read a small number which should be alost exactly the same as the number it showed you BEFORE you irradiated the food. ALL FOOD IS RADIOACTIVE! everything is radioactive! Many of the naturally ocouring isotopes around us are unstable. Just look at the decimal places in the molecular weight section of your periodic table ;-) As a point of interest, if this wasn't that case that food naturally contained radioactive elements we wouldn't be able to do carbon 14 dating.

Irradiation is an important way to make food safer, but if you Americans knew how to cook a bloody hamburger (i.e. cook it till it's no-longer bloody!) then it would just be important, not a life and death issue. Do you really eat hamburger meat rare (little bit ofpink in the middle)? or is that just a myth we Aussies tell each other to make you guys look bad?

Kirstin, Queensland, Australia
August 15, 2007 3:34am

Kirstin, it's not just a myth: plenty of high-end burger places in the US do indeed offer you the option for medium-rare, which is what you described. Rare would be substantially red in the middle. But not all of us are fool enough to do that.

Jenny, Tualatin, OR
August 16, 2007 11:05am

My fear related to irradiated foods is that if producers rely on irradiating to kill bugs, they won't bother to keep the food supply clean in the first place. I'd really rather they kept the raw manure off my food than that they zap it to kill the e. coli. In addition, irradiation does little to address chemical contaminants. And studies have repeatedly shown that fresher food is more nutritious, so zapping our produce to make it look good longer--essentially, to increase its shelf life--is not an unmixed blessing. (And I'm a chemist--I'm only afraid of the kinds of radiation that are actually dangerous.)

What would be great is if we could only somehow get fresh food from responsible growers, maybe someone who lives close by and will let you come have a look at their farm. Oh wait--I can, and I do, at my local farmer's market. And I eat my hamburgers pink--but only when I cook them at home.

karol, louisville, ky
August 17, 2007 11:29am

Karol - You are truly fortunate to have such options. What is your recommendation for people living in Africa or other remote places who don't have daily fresh farmer's market produce?

Eric Shultheiss, Corona, CA
August 18, 2007 6:54pm

Karol - I understand your concern about the producers standards dropping if they think that there is a magic fix for all bugs on food. In reality, I believe it is still in the growers best interests to keep their produce as clean and high quality as possible. This allows them to turn the greatest profit from their crops which is pretty important for all commercial growers. The irradiation is just a method that catches the few bugs that slip through an already established process of cleaning the food.

Kirstin - The burger you described is actually what I would call medium well, just a touch of pink left in the middle. Rare is quite a bit different than that and very few people would enjoy a rare hamburger. On the other hand, I consider any steak cooked past medium to be a glorified piece of leather. I prefer mine medium rare.

Steve Loeffelholz, Iowa City, IA
December 13, 2007 7:20am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. If you paste in more than 1500 characters, it will be truncated. You cannot comment the same episode twice in a row. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other posters will be deleted.
Answer 9 + 8 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

Skeptoid book:
Now available!
 
Skeptoid: Critical Analysis of Pop Phenomena, by Brian Dunning
Watch Here Be Dragons, the 40-minute video introduction to critical thinking. Based on the Skeptoid podcast.
 
Skeptoid Widget
Newest

Spy Radio: Numbers Station
Skeptoid #107
July 1, 2008
Read | Listen (10:28)
King Tut's Curse!
Skeptoid #106
June 24, 2008
Read | Listen (10:43)
When People Talk Backwards
Skeptoid #105
June 17, 2008
Read | Listen (11:10)
Yet More Winning Listener Feedback
Skeptoid #104
June 10, 2008
Read | Listen (12:43)
Should You Take Your Vitamins?
Skeptoid #103
June 3, 2008
Read | Listen (10:12)
Newest
#1 -
The Detoxification Myth
Read | Listen
#2 -
An Evolution Primer for Creationists
Read | Listen
#3 -
Religion as a Moral Center
Read | Listen
#4 -
World Trade Center 7: The Lies Come Crashing Down
Read | Listen
#5 -
Apocalypse 2012
Read | Listen
#6 -
Super Sized Fast Food Phobia
Read | Listen
#7 -
Killing Faith: Deconstructionist Christians
Read | Listen
#8 -
New Age Energy
Read | Listen
[Valid RSS]
ZIP Code Database