Al-Ghazali and Arab-Islamic Science

Some say that Persian theologian al-Ghazali was solely responsible for the end of the Golden Age of science.

Filed under Logic & Persuasion, Religion

Skeptoid #316
June 26, 2012
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

A fact is the measurable, provable observation of something that happens, and a theory is our current best explanation for how and why the fact exists. The fact of the history of science in the Islamic world is that from about 750 CE to 1250 CE, the "Golden Age" of science was led by Arab-Islamic scholars. Following the Quran's advice that "The scholar's ink is more sacred than the blood of martyrs", Muslims gave us Arabic numerals, algebra, algorithms, and alchemy; they gave us our names of most of the stars visible to the eye: Aldebaran, the Andromeda galaxy, Betelgeuse, Deneb, Rigel, Vega, and hundreds more; following the Quran's teaching "For every disease, Allah has given a cure," Arab-Islamic doctors furthered the art of surgery, built hospitals, developed pharmacology, and compiled all the world's medical knowledge into comprehensive encyclopedias and the seminal Canon of Medicine; and they advanced art and architecture beyond what even the mighty Greeks and Romans had begun.

And yet, as so many of today's scholars rightly point out, this force of intellect and accomplishment is now all but gone. Pakistani physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy notes that since the end of the Golden Age, not a single major invention or discovery has come from the Muslim world. In the history of the Nobel Prize in sciences, only two have gone to scientists working in Muslim countries. Typically, every professor at a university will have publications; but in 2011, The New Atlantis pointed out that there are about 1800 universities in Muslim countries. Only about a sixth of universities have even a single faculty member who has ever published anything.

As is often the case on Skeptoid when we discuss specific ethnic groups, definitions are in order. Arabs are not precisely defined, but the word is almost always used to refer to native speakers of the Arabic language. Arab culture is believed to date to around 800 or 900 BCE. Muslims are adherents to Islam, the monotheistic religion defined by the Quran. The Quran was written by the man Mohammed over a period of about 20 years in the early 600s CE, through divine revelation according to Islamic faith. Thus, Arabs and Arabic predate Islam by about 1500 years.

Being an Arab and being a Muslim are two different things, so it technically doesn't make sense to use the term "Arab-Islamic" whether you're talking about science or anything else. About 90% of Arabs are Muslims, but that group of Arab Muslims make up only about 20% of the much larger world Muslim population. So the terminology is a bit loose and not perfectly accurate, but when historians use the term "Arab-Islamic science" they're speaking of what began as the Arab world centered around what's now Saudi Arabia, and has spread out to include countries worldwide that are predominantly Muslim even if they're not Arabic.

As the Golden Age ended, Islam spread, and science within died. The fact of the rise and fall of Islamic science is clear; but the theory of how and why it happened is anything but. Today we're going to point the skeptical eye at one of the more popular of these theories.

The theory is that it was the codification of the Islamic religion, essentially banning scientific research as being the work of the devil and contrary to the teachings of Mohammed, that was the primary cause of this stifling of one of history's greatest intellectual cultures. This abolition of science is said to have been primarily the work of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, an important philosopher, theologian, and mystic from 12th century Persia.

The role of al-Ghazali in Islam is not much different from the role of Socrates in western culture. He was, and still is, considered a giant in the history of philosophy. Many great European philosophers have relied upon al-Ghazali's writings as much as they have upon the Greeks. Al-Ghazali's single most important contribution was in the definition of Sufism, which is difficult to define in brief terms, but it's a rejection of worldliness and outside influences and a focus on inner spiritualism and complete devotion to God. Al-Ghazali's book Revival of Religious Sciences is considered his most important, and is the seminal work on Sufism.

But al-Ghazali's influence was not limited to the elucidation of Sufism; an equally important part of his work was the unification of competing schools of thought. He unified the tenets of Sufism with those of sharia, the moral and religious law of Islam. Sharia governs nearly all aspects of human behavior, including not just religious law but also personal matters and secular matters. Al-Ghazali made these compatible. He also unified Sufism with Sunni Islam, the orthodox version of the religion. By bolstering Sunnism, sharia, and Sufism within a philosophical strongbox, al-Ghazali necessarily drew boundaries that excluded competing philosophies. A large part of this was the rejection of the great Greek philosophers. Their application of philosophy was to understand the world; al-Ghazali's was to understand God.

The Golden Age of Arab-Islamic science ended during al-Ghazali's lifetime. That's a historical fact. Al-Ghazali's philosophy was certainly compatible with the abandonment of science, but was he truly the cause?

To understand why the Golden Age ended, we must first understand why it rose in the first place. Arabs and Muslims were not especially more gifted intellectually than any other societies, but they did have at least one very important asset: their geographic location. The city of Mecca was a major trading hub. Piracy had made trade routes at sea dangerous, and overland trade routes gained popularity. Complex issues of governments, religions, and various wars combined to fortuitously leave Mecca as one of the safer destinations. Mohammed, the founder of Islam, began his career as a merchant, and lived and died during these years of Mecca's early growth. Mecca's influence grew, and it grew by acquisition of knowledge and technologies brought in from all the corners of Eurasia. Those great Arabic numerals were actually based on imported decimal systems from India. The famous libraries in Baghdad, translation capital of the world, consisted largely of books that were imported and translated, making them quite literally the world's central libraries. Trigonometry was refined, having been imported from Greece.

And then one day, it was all wiped from the Earth. The Golden Age was ended not by the pen, but by the sword. Destruction came from the west, a wave of iron and blood, and it bore the banner of a rosy red cross on a field of white. Throughout the Golden Age, Muslim Conquests had been stretching the hand of Islam over Asia and Africa, even touching Europe. Indeed, al-Ghazali's homeland of Persia was part of the Muslim world because it had been conquered 500 years before his birth. The growing empire began to crumble under its own weight, as geopolitical factionalization and fragmentation took their toll. Mongols fought back in the east, stretching Muslim armies thin. When the Muslim Conquests reached too far, an enraged Pope Urban II declared the First Crusade at the request of the Byzantine emperor in the year 1095, and overwhelming armies of Christians and barbarians, knights and peasants, overran and destroyed the great Arab centers. The great irreplaceable libraries were burned, the universities leveled, and the Holy Land fell. Muslims and Jews alike throughout the region were killed by the tens of thousands.

For centuries thereafter, Muslim Conquests and Christian Crusades swept back and forth across the land, trading territories. Europe plunged into the Dark Ages, and Muslims saw the death of their Golden Age. But as the skies began to clear in the middle of the second millennium, Europe entered its Renaissance, while the Arab-Islamic world did not. Why did this happen? Historians have puzzled over this for centuries; there is no single Skeptoid-sized reason for it. But when one compares the dominant ideologies, we're back again to the observation that Europe's application of philosophy was to understand the world; al-Ghazali's was to understand God.

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

Al-Ghazali may have had little to do with the death of science in the Islamic world, but it's certain that his teachings were compatible with science's failure to stage a revival after the great religious wars.

The reasons why it happened are important, but not as important as solving the problem. Unfortunately, the outlook going forward remains pretty bleak. Brain drain is a major complication; scholars in Islamic countries nearly always emigrate to other countries where the educational and research opportunities are. In 2006, the Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology published an article on the subject that concluded as follows:

We are persuaded that the scientific community as well as the public and private funding organizations of Arab countries share the responsibility of increasing the funding for biomedical research and for improving the research infrastructure of each Arab country. Also, increased collaboration between Arab countries and their neighbours will offer a considerable benefit to those involved. Moreover, wealthy nations and regions, such as the USA and Europe, have the responsibility to assist Arab countries in their efforts to increase research productivity. This may be accomplished by incorporating well-trained Arab scientists in international research networks, and by helping them to stay in their home countries, thus increasing the local research productivity. Arabs have a long history of contribution to science, especially during the Arabic-Islamic Golden Age. However, political, social and economic problems have hampered scientists in Arab countries, making it difficult to optimize their capacity in research productivity in most scientific fields.

Whether help from outside is the best way to address a problem that stems from inside is debatable. The seeds planted by al-Ghazali 900 years ago may not have had much impact at the time, but they've bloomed into a deep-rooted system that remains disinterested in scientific achievement. A critical analysis of the theories explaining why science has not recovered is important, but it is only important so far as any interest exists in reviving the spirit of the great Arab-Islamic scholars of the Golden Age.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2012 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

al-Ghazali, A. "Revival of Religious Science." al-Ghazali Website. Muhammad Hozien, 11 Jun. 2004. Web. 16 Jun. 2012. <http://www.ghazali.org/site/ihya.htm>

Falgas, M., Zarkadoulia, E., Samonis, G. "Arab Science in the Golden Age (750-1258 CE) and Today." Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 1 Jan. 2006, Volume 20: 1581-1586.

Haddad, F. "Pioneers of Arabian Medicine." Bulletin of the Lebanese Society for the History of Medicine. 1 Jan. 1993, Number 3: 74-83.

Hoodbhoy, P. "Science and the Islamic World: The Quest for Rapprochement." Physics Today. 1 Aug. 2007, Volume 60, Number 8: 49.

Maziak, W. "Science in the Arab World: Vision of Glories Beyond." Science. 1 Jun. 2005, Volume 308, Number 5727: 1416-1418.

Ofek, H. "Why the Arabic World Turned Away from Science." The New Atlantis. 1 Jan. 2011, Number 30: 3-23.

Shaban, S., Abu-Zidan, F. "A Quantitative Analysis of Medial Publications from Arab Countries." Saudi Medical Journal. 1 Mar. 2003, Volume 24, Number 3: 294-296.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Al-Ghazali and Arab-Islamic Science." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 26 Jun 2012. Web. 23 Apr 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4316>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 61 comments

@Paul S. -- Brian said no such thing. If that's what you think he said, you seriously need to spend such time making comments working, instead, on your issues.

Richard, Dallas
September 29, 2012 7:24am

I have always wondered what happened after the Golden Age, why the Arab world was so far ahead in science and thinking and then - well....

As far as I can make out the Qur'an has all the answers so Muslims don't need science, some clerics look through the book and see if they can find support for new discoveries in it,

I was debating/arguing with an Afro-centric Muslim recently about the Moon landings and what we have found out about the solar system - the guy started denying that "pink-genetic-mutants" {his words lol} ever walked on the Moon and that the Qur'an already explains how the Moon came from the Earth and left behind the Pacific ocean, that the west didn't have to spend billions on science because it was all in his book - the difference in science and his version of the Moon events is about 4 billion years lol !!

He told me how the west stole all the knowledge of better peoples and burnt down the library of Alexander - I then pointed out that the last time that library was burnt down was by Muslims in the conquest, when it was decreed that the Qur'an had all the knowledge they needed and so the books and scrolls should be burnt - to heat the bath water if I recollect correctly.

Revisionist history keeps blaming the west of the past for all the ills of today and bury their heads from the reality. As mentioned above by folks, what happens when the oil is gone? Will the home of Islam just become another dust covered ruin?

They really need to embrace modernity...

David "sheeple" Healey, Maidenhead, UK
October 13, 2012 6:11am

1250, the end of the golden age is about the time that the Mongols came in and wiped out the Khwarezmian Empire and destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate. They also destroyed numerous large population centers and sacked Baghdad and burned the great library to the ground. I think it is likely a combination between Al-Ghazali and the utter devastation the Mongols brought.

Andrew Pennock, Peoria, United States
October 29, 2012 12:06pm

The new generation of Muslims is educated, curios, and hungry to renew the spirit of Islamic discovery into the Muslim world. The mystic brand of Islam has lost its sway, and what remains of it is struggling to embrace a more modernistic world-view. However, without comprehensive political reform in the Muslim world, nothing good will come.
By this I do not mean an imposition of Western secular democracy in the Muslim world. The Muslim world has never accepted this model of government, not even in its heyday. Instead, a just and representative government that both embraces the modern world while embodying the values of Islamic tradition is necessary for the cultivation of a second golden age. I think even Ghazzali wouldn't find that too objectionable.

Khan, Hamilton, Canada
February 04, 2013 2:02am

So the concept of secular democracy hasnt caught on with the "new generation of Muslims that are educated, curios, and hungry to renew the spirit of Islamic discovery into the Muslim world".

Things really haven't changed much have they?

Mud, Sin City, Oz
February 26, 2013 6:01am

If you spend the rest of your life just by reading Al Ghazali; it won’t be a life wasted. ( Hamza Yusuf ) ; http://islamiceconomy.net/al-ghazali/

ahmet, karachi
June 30, 2013 5:45am

"They really need to embrace modernity....."

They are - because the West is stupid enough to bestow it upon them.
They're using 21st century Western technology to try and drive the whole world back to the 8th century with all its evils, including "the rule of kings".

If we, in the West, keep ignoring the elephant in the living room, it'll soon crush us.

Of course, if we withold modern weapons and/or technology from them, they'll get "offended", and the lib-left will feel guilty about it and continue to appease them - probably with more and better weapons to make them love us.
I call that High Treason.

Ron, Calgary Alberta Canada
November 01, 2013 12:50pm

@Mud - Considering that the concept of secular democracy didn't contribute at all to the successes enjoyed during the Golden Age, and in addition to the destruction of the Mongol horde, was felled with the ridiculous philosophy suggesting humans can somehow "know God," it was the changes from what they knew in the earliest days of Islam that was primarily responsible for the downfall.

M. Rasheed, Raleigh, NC
March 18, 2014 6:26am

I acknowledge that Islamic scientific interest and curiosity declined as wars and distress forced Muslims to adhere to more urgent matters. But Europe too had its own Ghazalis and similar wars.

So I don't think science in Islamic world just plainly stopped but was instead increasingly on decline and overshadowed by rising European Renaissance due to Gutenberg's invention of mechanical printing which was suitable for latin alphabet, hence enabling the wide spread of learning to the Europeans and created a critical mass of scientists in Western world who started a chain reaction of progress completely avoiding the uneducated Muslim populations.

Anis Matar, Jordan
March 27, 2014 12:44pm

In the golden age of Islam, Muslim leaders encouraged progressive thinking (this is also why Renaissance began in Muslim Spain-and moved on from there after the onslaught of Catholic fundamentalists Ferdinand and Isabella).
Spain became major colonial power under Ferdinand and Isabella;but did not nurture science and other breakthroughs because of fundamental mentality. Spain has been entrapped since then so today it is one of the basket cases of Europe-outside the Basque and Catalonia regions, where entrepreneurial spirit is there in some form (far from area where Renaissance began and led Europe).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM8HnvuKbAo

Winston, Greenwich
April 07, 2014 12:10pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 7 + 5 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Your Body's Energy Fields
Skeptoid #411, Apr 22 2014
Read | Listen (12:50)
 
The Black Eyed Kids
Skeptoid #410, Apr 15 2014
Read | Listen (11:18)
 
Oil Pulling
Skeptoid #409, Apr 8 2014
Read | Listen (12:24)
 
Skeptoid Media is a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
Apr 4 2014
Listen (1:13)
 
15 Phreaky Phobias
Skeptoid #408, Apr 1 2014
Read | Listen (12:44)
 
Newest
#1 -
Listener Feedback: Alternative Medicine
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Asking the Socratic Questions
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 False Arguments for Raw Milk
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake
Read | Listen
#6 -
The Riddle of the L-8 Blimp
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Secrets of MKULTRA
Read | Listen
#8 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


"Network Marketing"
inFact with Brian Dunning


Support Skeptoid