The Mystery of the Mary Celeste
The facts, as we know them, about what really happened to maritime lore's most famous missing crew.
Filed under Ancient Mysteries, Urban Legends
| Skeptoid #289 December 20, 2011 Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe |
|
By Brian Dunning, Skeptoid Podcast
Episode 289, December 20, 2011
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4289
![]() |
| The Mary Celeste, in her earlier days as the Amazon (Public domain image) |
In 1872, a ship was found adrift in the Atlantic Ocean, in near-perfect condition but for one problem: there was nobody aboard. In time, the story of the Mary Celeste became one of the most famous riddles of the sea. Over the years, many have offered solutions for what happened to the crew. But are any of them correct?
As is the case with so many of the mysteries we examine here on Skeptoid, the story of the Mary Celeste was an actual event that was largely forgotten until an imaginative author revived and exaggerated it for popular audiences. This time, the author was a young man who would later be knighted as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle for his Sherlock Holmes books. It was a short story written under the pseudonym W. Small for the January 1884 issue of Cornhill Magazine, entitled "J. Habakuk Jephson's Statement". Conan Doyle dramatized the Mary Celeste's story, adding such touches as meals laid out on the table, tea boiling on the stove, and the ship sailing boldly into the harbor at Gibraltar with nobody at the helm. Today, most people who have heard of the ship think these details are part of what actually happened. They aren't.
Conan Doyle's was only the first of many such treatments. A 1913 magazine article was the forged account of a man named Fosdyk who claimed to have been a stowaway on board the Mary Celeste, witnessed the entire crew fall overboard as they pressed against the rail to watch three of the men have a swimming race, then managed to be the only one not eaten by sharks and eventually washed ashore on Africa. In the 1920s, an author named Keating forged an article for Chamber's Journal telling the story of a man named Pemberton who survived. Keating soon expanded the fictitious Pemberton's tale into a book called The Great Mary Celeste Hoax. Unfortunately, the book's success became its downfall: Interviews with Pemberton were widely sought. Keating tried to weasel his way out with excuses, and even offered a picture of his own father as a photograph of Pemberton; but it was soon discovered that he made the whole thing up.
The Mary Celeste was a small merchant brigantine of 33 meters and 282 gross tons. She'd just been acquired by a small group of investors, among whom was the ship's one-third owner, Captain Benjamin Briggs. Joining him on board were his wife and baby daughter, plus seven sailors. They left port from Staten Island, New York in November of 1872, fully laden with cargo bound for Genoa, Italy. The cargo was 1,701 wooden barrels of pure grain alcohol, intended to fortify cheap Italian wines. America's vast corn fields made it the cheapest producer of grain alcohol at the time, and it made good economic sense for Italy to buy it and ship it all the way from the United States.
The voyage was relatively uneventful according to Captain Briggs' log entries, and the fine weather was confirmed by the captain of another ship sailing one week behind. Captain David Morehouse commanded the Dei Gratia, a similar brigantine laden with petroleum. Briggs and Morehouse had sailed together for many years and knew each other well, and it was a happy coincidence that the two friends found themselves on nearly identical voyages.
But almost halfway between the Azore Islands and Gibraltar, Morehouse made an unhappy discovery. The Dei Gratia unexpectedly caught up with the Mary Celeste, finding her adrift. Morehouse sent a party to investigate, and found the Mary Celeste unmanned. It was a bizarre find; there were no obvious signs of trouble and all appeared to be in order. But there were a few interesting clues.
The Mary Celeste had been equipped with a yawl, and though that term usually describes a type of sailboat, in this case it refers to a ship's rowboat capable of being rigged for sailing. The yawl was normally stored atop the main cargo hatch between the two masts, but was gone; and the railings on one side of the ship had been lowered indicating that the yawl had been launched normally. The other two cargo hatches — the forehatch on the foredeck and the lazarette hatch, above a small compartment aft — had both been removed and were stowed, exposing the cargo of alcohol.
When Morehouse found the ship, it was flying minimal sails, the fore lower topsail and two jibs. Modern analysis has confirmed that Morehouse found it just about where it would have been expected to be, driven primarily by currents, if it had been under no helm control since passing the Azores. Interestingly, the main peak halyard, the stoutest line on the ship, was missing; and it was very likely the same rope that was found cleated off and trailing in the water behind the ship. There was a significant amount of water in the bilge and cabins of the ship, but this was believed to be consistent with the open hatches and an opened skylight. The Mary Celeste had tossed about for at least ten days since its last log entries, in freshening weather that had compelled the crew to shorten sail; and so it was not surprising that it had taken on some water. As its stores were in good shape and it was perfectly seaworthy, Morehouse sent a skeleton crew aboard the Mary Celeste and brought it to Gibraltar, where the loss was reported and investigations took place for purposes of insurance and salvage. When the cargo was unloaded and examined, nine of the barrels of alcohol were empty: undamaged, yet empty.
Early theories quickly focused on the relationship between Briggs and Morehouse, and charges of conspiracy and insurance fraud were flung about; but these theories made no sense from a profit standpoint. For a while, some believed piracy had taken place, or that perhaps Briggs' crew had drunkenly mutinied against him; but all of these stories crumbled under scrutiny and lack of evidence that would have been expected.
Since then, even more suggestions have come from the fringe, pointing to exotic causes for the abandonment, like waterspouts and rogue waves. One in particular, David Williams, proposes that a "seaquake" struck the ocean floor. He states that the US and British navies know that such quakes can destroy surface vessels with powerful shockwaves, but that they cover it up so it's not generally known. Williams' theory is that this sudden shaking released embers from the ship's stove, so the crew fled the ship fearing the embers would ignite the store of alcohol. Williams states that there are numerous examples of ships sustaining heavy damage from such shockwaves, but as no damage was noted on the Mary Celeste, his seems an arbitrary explanation.
A few pieces of physical evidence strongly suggest what has emerged as the favorite theory, based on those nine empty barrels discovered in Gibraltar. The reason they were empty would have been clear to any cooper. All of those many barrels were of white oak, except for those nine, which were of red oak. Of the species of wood sold as white oak, the majority have occluded pores. This makes the wood watertight, which is why white oak is used for wine barrels and other barrels intended to hold liquid. The pores in the wood of the twenty or so species of red oak, on the other hand, are open; allowing liquids to seep through the wood. Consequently, red oak barrels should only be used for dry goods. But, for some reason, Meissner Ackermann & Co. (owner of the alcohol) used nine of the wrong type of barrel.
At some point in the voyage, or possibly even before, these barrels would have become soaked through. Alcohol evaporates quite quickly, so the smell would have permeated the ship's cargo hold. No record remains of where in that vast pile of 1,701 barrels the nine red oaks were found, but chances are that most of them were hidden from view. A visual inspection of the cargo hold probably would have found nothing, making it impossible to tell the extent of the leakage, but that smell would have been everywhere. This is also evidenced by the removed deck hatches; the crew were undoubtedly trying to vent the flammable fumes. But alcohol vapor is heavier than air, so it's unlikely that venting the deck hatches would have done much to dispel it.
The crew had to have feared that an explosion or fire was imminent. The yawl was launched and everyone on board removed to it. This was not done in a panic or haphazardly, but rather urgently and efficiently. The captain had the sense to collect his sextant and marine chronometer, necessary for navigating; but everything else on board that was not essential was left behind. No strong evidence suggests an answer to the question of whether they intended to completely abandon the ship, or to simply sit at a safe distance until they figured the danger was past. They took the precaution of using the strongest line they had to secure the yawl to the Mary Celeste, but in some unknown circumstance, the line was not secure or became severed. The few sails still set on the ship were enough that the yawl's rowers could not keep up. Once he saw they would not be able to catch the ship, the captain headed for Santa Maria Island in the Azores. And, as was all too often the end of such deep sea open boat voyages in those days, they never made it, and were ultimately swallowed by the Atlantic Ocean.
Over the next ten days, the Mary Celeste rocked in the breeze with its open hatches. The last of the alcohol evaporated away, and no one in Morehouse's party reported smelling anything. It's a certainty that all nine barrels, some 450 Imperial gallons, escaped as fumes while the Mary Celeste was at sea.
In 2006, Dr. Andrea Sella, a chemist at University College London, conducted an experiment to recreate conditions that he believes may have prompted Briggs to evacuate. Sella filled a compartment with cubes of paper and butane gas, then sparked it. The resulting combustion produced a sudden flash of flame that was visually dramatic, but was cool and quick enough that the paper was not scorched. Dr. Sella theorized that perhaps such a flash had happened in the Mary Celeste's cargo compartment, frightening the crew into fearing that a much larger explosion may well have been imminent. The ethanol vapors in the Mary Celeste's hold would burn even cooler and quicker than butane, though probably much less dramatically, with a blue or invisible flame, unlike like the butane's yellow flash. But it certainly would have been every bit as alarming to the crew, if it had happened.
Without any reasonable doubt, the cause of the disappearance of the Mary Celeste's crew was voluntary abandonment. We can't be certain what prompted the evacuation, but there seems little reason to speculate beyond what's best supported by the evidence: powerful and dangerous fumes from the alcohol-soaked red oak barrels. Briggs' action, though ultimately disastrous, was more than reasonable at the time.
© 2011 Skeptoid Media, Inc.
References & Further Reading
Begg, Paul. "The Classic Case of the Mary Celeste." The Unexplained Mysteries of Time and Space. 1 Jan. 1982, Volume 4, Issue 48.
Blumberg, J. "Abandoned Ship: the Mary Celeste." Smithsonian. 1 Nov. 2007, Volume 38, Number 8.
Corrado, J. "What Really Happened to the Mary Celeste?" The Straight Dope. Creative Loafing Media, Inc., 16 Oct. 2001. Web. 17 Dec. 2011. <http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1962/what-really-happened-to-the-em-mary-celeste-em>
Doyle, A. "J. Habakuk Jephson's Statement." Cornhill Magazine. 31 Dec. 1884, Volume 2, Number 7: 1-32.
Lee, A. "Solved: The Mystery of the Mary Celeste." UCL News. University College London, 20 May 2006. Web. 17 Dec. 2011. <http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/inthenews/itn060522>
Wengert, G. "Red Oak, White Oak, Black Oak, and More." WoodWeb. WOODWEB Inc., 20 Jun. 2005. Web. 17 Dec. 2011. <http://www.woodweb.com/knowledge_base/Red_Oak_White_Oak_Black_Oak_and_More.html>
Reference this article:
Dunning, B.
"The Mystery of the Mary Celeste." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc.,
20 Dec 2011. Web.
23 May 2013. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4289>
Discuss!
10 most recent comments | Show all 32 comments
I appreciate the stripping down of the myth and providing just the facts as available at the time.
Where I take issue with your well thought out theory is basing it on that scientist who used butane to "recreate conditions" on the ship.
Sorry but if you did not even start out using alcohol but butane (which even he admits later) is different and has different characteristics but then use it as an example of what could happen is not good science.
Its like trying to recreate a car cash, but using pickups instead of cars and saying "here is how it could have happened".
I don't know what happened, but if one wants to try to find out use the actual cargo for a start, the setup of the ship, similar sea conditions then experiment to the results.
I think the captain, crew and his family deserve that at least.
The results may be more facinating than the myths
Eric, Northern IL USA
August 26, 2012 11:53pm
I find this explanation incomplete. The exact kind of alcohol needs to be identified. This must be known, in delivery and salvage records or by deduction from similar ships and cargoes. Whether it's methanol or ethane or butane makes all the difference. Next, is the theory fumes or flames? The confusion here shows that no one has really researched how the alcohol in question would perform if it leakedin into sea water, or onto a dry hold and evaporated. Suggesting the metal staves caused a spark is a stretch that should only be considered after "fumes" have been investigated. 450 gallons isn't that much, and I question the kind of fumes that would be generated. A test could be done on this pretty easily.
SB, Massachusetts
October 19, 2012 11:33am
SB, I think you will find it was ethanol to be used to fortify wines.
I see no relevance to the type of combustible, we do not know the conditions and any flammable or combustible liquid can brought to flame or explosion with the right conditions. Same for any source of ignition. All we can say is that the cargo was volatile say compared to a cargo of water!!!
In the past I have known and seen people put out a cigarette in the gas tank of their motorcycle, the conditions obviously were not right for combustion.
Even when we have an explosive mixture we can't be sure of ignition, look at the Zeppelin Hindenburg, that was designed not to spark and ignite, yet it did.
All the article is doing is setting out a feasible series of events to explain the loss of the crew, it goes a long way to 'solving' it than others, imo.
Over the centuries thousands of ships have 'disappeared' in the oceans, what makes the Mary Celeste different is that the ship was still afloat, who knows how many other crews met a similar fate to the Mary Celeste - whatever that fate was - but had their ship founder and sink? Back in the day, keeping a ship afloat was pretty much a big part of the job of a sailor, leave alone get it pointing in the right direction!
Today, even with all the GPS and mayday technology, we still get crew go missing and leave behind an empty ship, usually small ones, but it hardly makes the news.
It's one of those tales that only a time machine will resolve..
Eriq, somewhere on Earth
November 04, 2012 9:23am
best story of a ship ever
grace, in
November 16, 2012 5:45am
OK Mr Dunning, now for the REAL answer provided by the Goon Show in 1954.
Just have a look at this for the real answer!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f58tnD_4ZIg
Try disproving THAT Mr Dunning! :)
Stuart, Wellington Point
November 18, 2012 1:47pm
stuert i really need to tallkkkk to you at 10.am tomarrow morn. ill be getting on
chris, col.canon
November 18, 2012 9:10pm
I READ THE SYORY ABOUT MARY CELESTE. I ALSO READ ABOUT THE OCEAN GARBGE PATCH. THE OCEAN GARBGE PATCH SAID THAT ALL THE GARBGE GOES TO THAT SPOT. IN THE MARY CELESTE THEY HAD A SAIL BOAT. SENSE WOOD IS GARBGE WOULD THAT WOOD BE IN THE OCEAN GARBGE PATCH? BY THE WAY I AM 9 YEARS OLD. PLEASE RESPOND QUICKLY. P.S. WOOD DISINTEGRATES BY ITS SELF.
anna, box elder
December 08, 2012 8:00am
lol this is so funny good job at filling us with lies. the people on the shp were just pulling a prank and the people on ths ship are actually in las vegas having a wonderful life
boe buture, dallas texas
December 17, 2012 9:10am
good
g, africa
March 11, 2013 7:51am
Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:
You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.
What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?










would you have a Crew Record list from the second last voyage of the Mary Celeste please- My great Grandfather worked on it for a number of years, would love some information please
Sharon, Australia
July 26, 2012 7:08pm