Network Marketing

Call them Network Marketing, Multilevel Marketing, or MLM, these pyramid plans are proven not to work.

Filed under Fads

Skeptoid #176
October 20, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Today we're going to point our skeptical eye at network marketing plans, formerly known as multilevel marketing or MLM (name changed to escape the stigma). They say that when there's a gold rush, the way to make money is to sell shovels. Network marketing companies sell shovels, along with dreams of gold: All you have to do is go out there and dig, dig, dig, and buy more shovels, and get your friends to buy shovels too. Levi Strauss and other suppliers became millionaires, and hundreds of thousands of miners went broke.

Network marketing plans are started by a company selling some product — fruit juice, soap, vitamin pills, water filters; anything, it doesn't matter — through a network of independent distributors who are promised exponential commissions by recruiting multiple levels of other distributors beneath them. The company is guaranteed sales because the distributors are required to make minimum purchases, on which commissions trickle upward. There's little need to actually go out and try to sell the product to anyone; money is made by building your network of distributors beneath you, and their distributors beneath them. Soon the commissions trickling up from all those monthly purchases combine into a raging torrent of cash. And if you just buy a few more shovels, you're sure to strike gold.

Network marketing plans differ from illegal pyramid schemes only by one subtle point: Commissions can only legally be paid on sales of a physical product. If commissions are offered upon recruitment of new distributors, then it's defined as an illegal pyramid scheme. Pyramids are illegal because they necessarily collapse when nobody else can be recruited. However the illegal plans are pretty rare; most companies are smart enough to stay on the right side of the law. But the problem of community saturation, and inevitable collapse, remains.

A tipoff that should clue you into the wisdom of network marketing is that the companies themselves, who manufacture and sell the product, don't even eat their own dog food. They are making money the old fashioned way, by selling an expensive product. It's you whom they recruit to start a network marketing business. When an existing distributor pitches you and gets you to become a distributor yourself, you are required to make your initial purchase of "inventory" of whatever the product is. You either consume that product yourself or sell it to others. Your principal sales tool is the pitch that if your customers become distributors beneath you, they can buy the product at a discounted wholesale price. In most plans, in order to retain your distributor status and qualify for the wholesale discount, regular monthly purchases have to be made.

But even this discounted wholesale price is usually far higher than the market value of comparable products available from the supermarket. Participants nearly always find themselves in the unenviable position of having invested a lot of money in their own required inventory purchases, and desperately trying to recruit new distributors in an effort to earn commissions on their inventory purchases, and hopefully recover their own investment. So this raises the question: How often does it work out that way? How many MLM participants ever recover their own investments?

So if network marketing plans don't work, why do people buy into them? Network marketing plans are easily sold by simply laying out some compelling mathematics on a whiteboard. A typical program sets five downline members as the goal for each participant: To be successful, you need only recruit enough people to end up with just five who actively participate. Below those five are their five apiece, totaling 25. This is your network. Each downline of five are qualified by participating at the minimum required level, so this model already excludes everyone who is flakey or only half-hearted, leaving only the five good ones in each downline. Your commissions based on those minimum participation levels — where all five below you dutifully make their minimum monthly inventory purchases — guarantees you an impressive income. The mathematics are black and white, and it's so simple that nothing can go wrong. You'd have to be stupid not to do it.

But here is the problem that these whiteboard presentations always manage to omit. Of all the thousands of network marketing plans available now or in the past, if only one of them had ever had even a single line active to only 14 levels deep, that alone would have required the participation of more human beings than exist. That math is black and white, too. Level 14 is populated by 514, or about 6.1 billion people, the entire population of the planet, in addition to level 13 with 1.2 billion, all the way up to you and your original five. You can answer "Oh sure, but a lot of the people don't get all five or they flake somehow," but you forget that the entire premise has already eliminated those who flake or who don't get all five. The unfortunate conclusion is that a fully invested network, upon which the whiteboard presentations are dependent, has never actually happened.

A fundamental reason that such networks fail is that they depend upon recruiting people to compete with you. If you own a shoe store, and you pitch every customer on opening their own shoe store instead of being your customer, very soon you're going to have a neighborhood full of shoe stores, with everybody trying to sell and nobody left to buy. It doesn't take an MBA to see that this is pretty much the polar opposite of a sound business strategy.

Let's say you tried to make it sound, and said "Forget the multilevel recruiting, I'm going to focus on selling the product." Is anyone doing that successfully? It would not appear so. During yet another lawsuit in the UK, the government found that less than one in ten participants ever sold even a single product to another person. Since the company has its distributors as a captive audience required to make regular purchases, the products are typically grossly overpriced compared to similar products available in supermarkets. This makes their sale a dubious prospect for those few distributors who ever do attempt retail sales to customers. Surveys show that nearly all products purchased by network marketers are consumed by the distributors themselves.

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

This fact is rarely mentioned in the sales pitches. Instead, they typically promote the merchandise (referred to as "lotions & potions" by MLM critics) as wonderous super products that will be in high demand. But, you should always beware of success stories coming from MLM distributors. Most MLM companies pay shills who lie about having had multimillion dollar success with the scheme. These are typically the ones who travel around giving seminars, pitching motivational materials, and putting on recruiting extravaganzas that have been criticized by the Federal Trade Commission for promoting an almost cult-like religious mania as a substitute for sound business practices.

I've spoken with enough friends and other people who are into network marketing to know that the default response to this is "Oh, but this plan is different." Sure, every plan has different tweaks and details, but fundamentally they are all the same. The company is going to make tons of money selling an outrageously overpriced product every month to their captive audience buyers: You, and any friends you recruit. Not one of you has any realistic hope of coming out ahead. My advice to everyone involved in network marketing: Simply stop now. Stop convincing yourself that profits are just around the corner if you just buy a few more cases of expensive product. Just stop now, walk away, consider it a lesson well learned, and don't give them another dollar.

One final tidbit I'll leave you with. On average, 99.95% of network marketers lose money. However, only 97.14% of Las Vegas gamblers lose money by placing everything on a single number at roulette. So if you're thinking about joining a network marketing plan, and aren't dissuaded by the facts I've presented, consider instead going to Vegas and placing all your money in a single pile on number 13. Sooner or later you're going to have to take my advice and just stop now.

No. Pyramid schemes won't make you rich.
Just Say No and make the facts known with a Skeptoid T-shirt. Includes complete references! Get it now.
(See the full design)

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Bloch, Brian. "Multilevel marketing: what's the catch?" Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1 Oct. 1996, Volume 13, Issue 4: 18-26.

Coward, C. "How to Spot a Pyramid Scheme." Black Enterprise. 1 Feb. 1998, Volume 28, Number 7: 200.

Dokoupil, T. "A Drink’s Purple Reign." Newsweek. Newsweek Inc., 11 Aug. 2008. Web. 22 Aug. 2008. <http://www.newsweek.com/id/150499/page/1>

FTC. "The Bottom Line About Multilevel Marketing Plans and Pyramid Schemes." Protecting America's Consumers. Federal Trade Commission, 1 Oct. 2009. Web. 13 Oct. 2009. <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/invest/inv08.shtm>

Vander, N., Peter, J., Keep, W. "Marketing Fraud: An Approach for Differentiating Multilevel Marketing from Pyramid Schemes." Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 1 May 2002, Volume 21, Number 1: 139-151.

Walsh, J. You can't cheat an honest man: How Ponzi schemes and pyramid frauds work and why they're more common than ever. Aberdeen, WA: Silver Lake Publishing, 1998. 183-202.

Reference this article:
Dunning, Brian. "Network Marketing." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 20 Oct 2009. Web. 3 Feb 2012. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4176>

Discuss!

5 most recent comments | Show all 72 comments

Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.

Also: The model of the Greek Easter that Phi describes does not refelect a MLM either.

Maybe Phi just found religion and is repenting for all the times he called it evil and abhorant to society?

What makes a MLM stand out in the definition is the exponentlial profit sharing. If you just have customers you are a franchise. If you have customers you push to make new groups to pass their profits down through you, it is a MLM. Just spreading word of mouth and generating support is not "Pyramiding". Having ost of a confined community support a single event, is not pyrammiding.

As far as I know neither the Greek candle display, or Alchoholics Anonymous works that way. I have never known anybody to pay for, or make a profit from AA, or any other support group.

Illuminatus, ReptoidWorld
August 18, 2011 12:39pm

I recently had a friend try to rope me into the Monavie scheme by ambushing me at their house with a promise of showing me something "really cool". I had to press them hard to get any details on the actual business side of it. They were constantly focusing on "dreams" and how I would spend my life if I never had to worry about money ever again.
They gave me CDs to listen to claiming they were all about the program but they turned out to be complete hot air motivational speaking.
They kept bringing up some guys that ran the program and pretending to be surprised that I had never heard of them. I told them no but they still invite me to their seminars and rallies and now are making claims about this new product coming out in November that will "change the world".
It wasn't hard for me to see through the program after all this.

Brad, Grandville, MI
August 24, 2011 1:29pm

I'm sure your math may work for some companies which are not MLM, but Pyramid Schemes. There is other serious MLM companies that your math doesnt apply, not on the paper and specially on the field. They have different rules and compensation plans. You can't check just one or two companies and claim that you know everything. Word of mouth made Facebook a giant with more than 700.000 million subscribers.
You have to understand and separate what is good and bad in the market, like every product and brands on the stores.

Vedison, New Jersey
September 21, 2011 11:31am

Would T-Zone Vibration Machines fall under MLM?

To become a distributor you pay a small fee, take out a business loan, to rent a "studio", you purchase machines @ cost $1000.
You sell memberships to clients to use the machines @ $50 per month.
And you sell machines for approx, $500 over cost, which you claim as profit.

Marc, Ontario, Canada
December 07, 2011 6:39pm

I was an Amway UK member for 5 years. I contacted everyone I knew (relatives, friends, my garage mechanic, doctor, dentist, bank manager, postman etc etc etc) and then resorted to handing out leaflets out on street corners in an attempt to build my ever fluctuating network. Between 1992 to 1997 I LOST nearly £2000. My upline was the now infamous IBS group which was closed down by Amyway UK a couple of years back. I could tell you about all of my trials and tribulations as a happy MLM go-getter, but having had exposure to 5 MLM companies (most recently Forever Living) I've come to the following conclusions: All MLM businesses are based on recruiting new members by selling them the dream. Anyone who says they got in to MLM to just earn 'a little extra income' is a liar. People are drawn in to earn the 6 figure incomes that are banded about and as far as I'm concerned that is unethical.
If over 95% of new members quit after the first year, that's a huge amount of starter packs turning over year in, year out (the Forever Living kit is £200 in the UK). So how much does the company make on thousands of people who start, try a few products and quit?
Secondly, the products are grossly overpriced and the main reason our friends, relatives and work colleagues buy them is because they are ‘soft targets’. Forever do not offer any products which cannot be bought for much less elsewhere. So, MLM is an insidious money making machine that only works for 1 in every 1000 of its members.

John, Swindon, UK
January 17, 2012 3:35pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 8 + 1 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Finding Amelia Earhart
Skeptoid #295, Jan 31 2012
Read | Listen (13:05)
 
Skeptoid 300th Episode Party
Jan 26 2012
Listen (:55)
 
Frequent Listener Feedback
Skeptoid #294, Jan 24 2012
Read | Listen (12:13)
 
Wunderwaffen: Nazi Wonder Weapons
Skeptoid #293, Jan 17 2012
Read | Listen (13:48)
 
The Grey Man of Ben MacDhui
Skeptoid #292, Jan 10 2012
Read | Listen (12:26)
 
Newest
#1 -
How to Debate a Young Earth Creationist
Read | Listen
#2 -
The Real Philadelphia Experiment
Read | Listen
#3 -
Medical Myths in Movies and Culture
Read | Listen
#4 -
Kangen Water: Change Your Water, Change Your Life
Read | Listen
#5 -
HAARP Myths
Read | Listen
#6 -
MonaVie and Other "Superfruit" Juices
Read | Listen
#7 -
Religion as a Moral Center
Read | Listen
#8 -
Apocalypse 2012
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS  
   


"The Philadelphia Experiment"
inFact with Brian Dunning