The Face on Mars Revealed

Is the face on Mars an artificial sculpture made by alien hands, or merely a natural hill?

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Aliens & UFOs

Skeptoid #97
April 22, 2008
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
 

Rhonda Byrne - The Secret
The original photograph of the Cydonia Face on Mars
Rhonda Byrne - The Secret
Current high resolution image of the face
Rhonda Byrne - The Secret
3D image incorporating elevation data. Still look like an artificial sculpture?
Rhonda Byrne - The Secret
The Cydonia Mensae region (Hoagland's "ruins of an ancient civilization"). The face is highlighted at bottom right
Rhonda Byrne - The Secret
The Badlands Guardian, complete with iPod courtesy of an oil well and service road

Imagine yourself in a NASA control room, late at night. The coffee's cold and, outside, the rain drums steadily against the window. You start to drowse off in your chair, when suddenly the teletype jumps to life with a loud mechanical bang. You're startled, but annoyed; and as it starts hammering out its latest data, you try to go back to sleep. You've heard this all before and seen a million badly printed images. But then, as it finishes printing the second page, your eye catches that long sheet of perforated printer paper folding into a pile on the floor, and you see something unbelievable. There, in yet another series of photographs from Mars, is a distinct human face.

It was 1976, and Viking I was sending its latest images. Among a number of similar hillocks and mesas in a region of Mars called Cydonia Mensae, one feature stood out. It was a clear rendering of a human face! NASA engineers loved it; they passed it around, put it out for publication, and had all sorts of fun with it. But what they hadn't anticipated was that some in the public thought it was actually an artificially carved human face, despite the accompanying explanation that it was just a hill that happened to have this funny resemblance to a face when the light was at a certain angle. One of it most important distinguishing features, a nostril, was only one of many black dots that actually represent missing data in the image. Before long, to the dismay of astronomers worldwide, there was a firmly established pop-culture belief that there was a real gigantic human face on Mars, carved in perfect detail by aliens.

As the decades wore on, better cameras took better images, finally culminating in the 2001 image taken by the Mars Global Surveyor, with a super high resolution of about six feet per pixel. As you can see on the Skeptoid.com web page, the Cydonia "face" turns out to be merely an unremarkable hill, with plenty of natural random variations on its surface, and no longer looks anything remotely like a face or any other kind of carving. However you can see the general contours that made up the facial features in the original image. While those black dots of missing data in the original image gave the illusion of sharp focus, the image is now shown to have been extremely blurry. Although a two-dimensional view of the hill does have the appearance of some symmetry, the improved image shows that it's nowhere near as symmetric as it appeared to be in the original blurry image.

The popular belief in an artificial sculpture would probably have never emerged if not for the writings of conspiracy theorist Richard Hoagland. Hoagland saw the original image, immediately concluded that an artificial carving was the only reasonable explanation, and wrote the book Monuments of Mars claiming that the Cydonia face is only one of many artificial structures on Mars, including pyramids and whole cities. He claims that NASA has exhaustive photographic evidence of all such structures, but that they cover them up and suppress them to avoid the mass panic that would inevitably ensue should Hoagland's claims be proven. Other claims of Hoagland's include taking credit for designing the plaque that was on Pioneer 10, which was done by Carl Sagan and which Hoagland had nothing to do with; that he first conceived the idea of subsurface oceans on Europa in a 1980 article, even though scientists including Isaac Asimov had been proposing this throughout the 1970's; and that a concept involving trans-dimensional energy that he calls "hyperdimensional physics" is correct and that every educated and professional scientist is wrong about the nature of the universe. Since he has positioned himself as the leading public advocate for NASA's evil coverups and the "truth" about Martian civilization, I recommend that you at least read through the Wikipedia entry about Richard Hoagland to see just how disconnected this guy really is. And then, you might want to reconsider your sources if you take seriously any claims that Hoagland has promoted. Of course, this ad-hominem attack against Hoagland personally says nothing directly about the validity of his claim that the face is an artificial structure, so I'll refer you to the high resolution photos on the Skeptoid.com web site to make up your mind about that for yourself.

Geological features that happen to look like faces, people, or other objects are not rare. In Alberta Canada, there's a figure called the Badlands Guardian that, when viewed from the air, looks astonishingly like a Native American wearing a full headdress and listening to an iPod. In fact, it looks way more like a person than the Cydonia face ever did on its best day. Why hasn't Richard Hoagland claimed that somebody carved the Badlands Guardian? That would be a lot more plausible. He probably doesn't make that claim because it would be testable and easily falsified.

But the Badlands Guardian is only one example. The Old Man of the Mountain in New Hampshire looked just like the profile of a man jutting out from a cliff until it collapsed in 2003. North Carolina has a giant head sitting on a cliffside ledge called the Devil's Head. Sundance, Wyoming is home to the Old Man of the Park, and the Absaroka Range in Montana features an amazingly lifelike face called the Sleeping Giant near Livingston. Pictures of all of these are posted on the Skeptoid.com web site. But, these are all newcomers. From the day the first protohuman looked into the sky, we have marveled at the Man in the Moon, the largest facelike structure known.

Although some of these features are pretty astonishingly realistic, they don't even have to be. Your brain will still say "Face", even if it's as indistinct as the Cydonia face. This is a perceptual phenomenon called pareidolia, which is the tendency for the brain to see order in randomness. The famous Rorschach inkblot test is based on pareidolia. Pareidolia causes cryptozoologists to see crouched Bigfoots in forest photographs. It causes us to see a face made of headlights and grills on the front of a train or a truck, or the face of the Virgin Mary on a piece of toast. Pareidolia means that any two dots and a line, like those on the Cydonia face, will shout "eyes and mouth" to a human brain. Carl Sagan proposed that brains are hardwired to see faces. Without the phenomenon of pareidolia, no drawing less than a Rembrandt masterpiece would be recognizable as a face.

But let's even set pareidolia aside, and just look at the original blurry photograph of the Cydonia face. The face is about one square kilometer. The entire surface of Mars is about 150 million square kilometers. Thus, if we postulate that the Cydonia face is about a one-in-a-million oddity, probability dictates that somewhere on the surface of Mars, some 150 one-kilometer areas bear some equally improbable likeness. How many fist-sized rocks are there in a square kilometer of Martian surface? A million, maybe? If one in a million fist sized rocks bears some resemblance to J. Edgar Hoover, we should expect to find 150 million fist-sized rocks on the surface on Mars that look like J. Edgar Hoover. By the sheer weight of large numbers, it's a virtual certainty that the surface of Mars has natural structures that look like human faces, elephants, and Ferraris, when viewed from certain angles. By the same law, you'll also find these things on Venus, Titan, Pluto, and Halley's Comet.

So let's collect all of our evidence about the Cydonia face:

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time
  1. It doesn't actually look anything like a face.
  2. Pareidolia gives us pretty loose parameters to decide what qualifies as a face.
  3. Probability absolutely requires hundreds of startlingly good faces on Mars, and on any other planet.
  4. We've never found any evidence of sculptor civilizations on Mars.

So, are the conspiracy theorists right, that an artificial sculpture is the most likely explanation for the Cydonia face? Well, I have to conclude that the evidence for that is pretty thin. A much better alternate explanation is available: That it is a simple natural structure, which when viewed with the details blurred out and with right lighting conditions, can look like a face, much like countless natural structures on Earth. What do you think?

Brian Dunning

© 2008 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Hoagland, Richard C. The Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books, 1987.

Morrison, D. "MGS Photographs 'Face on Mars'." Skeptical Inquirer. 1 May 1998, Volume 25, Number 3: 65.

Philips, Tony. "Unmasking the Face on Mars." Science@NASA. The Science and Technology Directorate at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, 24 May 2001. Web. 13 Nov. 2009. <http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast24may_1.htm>

Posner, G. "The Face Behind the Face on Mars: A Skeptical Look at Richard Hoagland." Skeptical Inquirer. 1 Nov. 2000, Volume 24, Number 6: 20.

Robert, F., Robert, J. Faces. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 2000.

Sagan, Carl. The Demon Haunted World. New York: The Random House Publishing Group, 1995. 41-60.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Face on Mars Revealed." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 22 Apr 2008. Web. 31 Oct 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4097>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 68 comments

The particular letter asks nearly two-dozen questions including precisely why your current inspections are probably being conducted, practical ideas on how many tours acquire occurred but also whether these businesses end up with resulted over any enforcement activities.
?¡ãNebraskans will definitely be rightfully skeptical related to an agency

[url=http://www.raybanaviatorsusa.com]ray-ban[/url]
I would say the Environmental Protection Agency uses aerial surveillance across a fabulous swath on the Midwest know as Section 7 ¡§C which unfortunately includes Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas and / or Missouri -- which has defended most of the practice as cost-efficient.
[url=http://www.raybanaviatorsusa.com]ray ban clubmaster[/url]
Generally name honors you see, the Flerov Laboratory including Nuclear Reactions, about 80 miles north to do with Moscow, where superheavy elements, including element 114, were synthesized. Georgiy N. Flerov (1913-1990) was most the physicist who perfected all the spontaneous fission related to uranium.
http://www.buyraybanwayfareruk.com

Cligegragnore, Freising
June 25, 2012 1:47pm

Possible minor correction

While there may be a sleeping giant formation near Livingston, MT, I believe you are referring to the Sleeping Giant just north of Helena, MT. We call them the "North Hills." They are probably part of the Belts Mountains or Little Belt Mountains.

Bill Crane, Helena, MT
August 27, 2012 4:04pm

G'day, here is some new evidence about the Face on Mars you all might not be aware of.

Check it out at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1L5_tbF5Oc

Dan, Australia
February 7, 2013 3:43am

Australians using youtube as evidence..That's a bit unusual normally our loons use 2GB..

Magnanamous Dinoflagellate, sin city, Oz
June 29, 2013 1:47am

Have you ever heard of remote viewing? It is basically "psychic spying" with a scientific protocol that was used by the U.S., Soviet, and Chinese governments (among others). Among its most notable successes was the revealing of the cause of the explosion of Pan-Am flight 103. IT WORKED, and if it didn't the government would have abandoned it long before the Clinton Administration (it is believed that it is still used, though more secretly).

I have to laugh every time NASA propagates their typical "trick of light and shadow/pareidolia" crap like this. When the images from Viking first came back, there was an effort coordinated among some NASA scientists and our remote viewers to reveal more detail in the appearance of "artificial" structures on Mars. The results were astonishing - they found that an ancient civilization flourished on Mars millions, perhaps billions of years ago.

It is very foolish to believe that we are alone or maybe that nothing out there compares to our greatness. I have little doubt that the face on Mars is artificial - it just has too many symmetrical and intelligent features. I am not sure what to think about the Badlands Guardian at this point, but I have to admit that it's quite intriguing. But regarding our so-called human greatness, I have to say give our planet a few million or billion years and we'll see what still stands. It's remarkable that the face on Mars still does. The more I think about it, the human race is pretty arrogant and stupid.

Curtis C. Flush, Chicago, IL
July 13, 2013 3:41pm

I dont know what to say.. With the face on mars being a declared a psychic spy (by Curtis) and god watching me rifle though the laundry pockets and under the passenger car mats for dollar coins I dont even know if I am going to hell anymore.

Imagine sitting there for millions of years and not being able to put a lottery entry in for a holiday on Uranus with Neptune..

I'd have a Saturnine expression too..

I could have used Jovial, Mercurial and Venereal in another paragraph but never Platonic! Not a planet!

I think the face is certainly thinking about somebody else after that..

Multerlingerar Dailama, sin city, Oz
August 20, 2013 1:35am

All over the world, ours. Rock formations resemble the indigenous peoples of any given region.
We probably evolved from rocks, I know many people with that ancient vestige still rolling around in they're heads.

jtuaim@gmail.com, Cleveland, Ohio
January 15, 2014 3:15pm

Article is heavily flawed. modelling software has been used and can be seen doing the reverse effects, that the modern imagery is altered to hide the features.

Re the odds, it has been calculated and you are way off. WAY OFF;

"the combined odds against all of these features being present and having all expected characteristics to the degree actually present, when taken together with the absence of similar features in the background, exceed a thousand billion billion to one". In scientific terms that means, it is absolute fact it is artificial and not naturally occurring.

Like every other article on here, spun with bias and factually weak on evidence.

ritler, uk
March 3, 2014 4:57pm

It would be nice if you could tell us where you got your quotes from. For all we know, you wrote that yourself. I also want some sort of source for your claim that the images are manipulated by modern software.

Øyvind, Grong
April 16, 2014 12:21pm

Mr. Dunning,

I became a skeptic very early when I discovered my brothers copy of Randi's "The Truth about Uri Geller". I was about 14, but that book planted a seed that fixed my thinking at an early age, and immunized me against magical thinking and the supernatural. I cannot over state the impact it had on my life.

You must be a man of great patience, as even I get very annoyed reading some of your feedback, like the one above where the user is convinced remote viewing is real.

I am enjoying your podcast to such an extent, that I am feeling guilty of not supporting you. So I will make that right today, with a recurring micro-payment.

Keep up the excellent work, you have my many thanks for your important work. I am always stunned by how many educated, professional people I encounter, from doctors to professors, who routinely engage in magical thinking.

Thank you for your work, and I hope my contribution to your endeavor helps in at least a little way.

Sincerely,
Peter D. Gutierrez
Walker, LA

Peter D. Gutierrez, Walker, LA
April 29, 2014 10:55am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply

 

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 

Newest
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Skeptoid #438, Oct 28 2014
Read | Listen (11:56)
 
Tube Amplifiers
Skeptoid #437, Oct 21 2014
Read | Listen (14:57 )
 
Ionithermie
Skeptoid #436, Oct 14 2014
Read | Listen (10:11)
 
The St. Clair Triangle UFO
Skeptoid #435, Oct 7 2014
Read | Listen (13:56)
 
The Braxton County Monster
Skeptoid #434, Sep 30 2014
Read | Listen (11:26)
 
Newest
#1 -
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Fukushima vs Chernobyl vs Three Mile Island
Read | Listen
#4 -
The Baldoon Mystery
Read | Listen
#5 -
Listeners Have Another Say
Read | Listen
#6 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen
#7 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#8 -
6 Problems with Wind Turbine Syndrome
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Name/Nickname:  
City/Location:
Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
Comment:
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.