New Age Energy

An examination of energy, as new agers use the term.

Filed under Fads, General Science, Paranormal

Skeptoid #01
October 03, 2006
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Also available in Japanese
Bookmark and Share

I'm feeling a little low today, so let's tap into a source of energy from a neighboring dimension as a quick upper.

Faith in pseudoscience is rampant. Everywhere you turn, intelligent people fully accept the existence of anything from psychic phenomena, to angels, to new age healing techniques, to ancient health schemes based on mysterious energy fields not understood by science. Most of these paranormal phenomena rely on "energy," and when the performers are asked to explain, they'll gladly lecture about the body's energy fields, the universe's energy fields, Chi, Prana, Orgone, negative energy, positive energy, and just about anything else that needs a familiar sounding word to explain and justify it. Clearly, there are too many loose interpretations of the word energy, to the point where most people probably have no idea exactly what energy really is.

I believe that if more people had a clear understanding of energy — and it's not complicated — there would be less susceptibility to pseudoscience, and more attention paid to actual technologies and methods that are truly constructive and useful.

A friend told me of her ability to perform minor healings, and her best explanation was that she drew energy from another dimension. She had recently rented What the Bleep Do We Know, so she was well prepared to explain that alternate dimensions and realities should be taken for granted, since science doesn't really know anything, and thus those things cannot be disproven. That's fine, I'll concede that she can make contact with another dimension: after all, the latest M theories posit that there are probably ten or eleven of them floating around, and I'll just hope that my friend's is not one of those that are collapsed into impossibly small spaces. What I was really interested in was the nature of this vaguely defined energy that she could contact.

I asked what type of energy is it, and how is it stored? Is it heat? Is it a spinning flywheel? Is it an explosive compound? Is it food? These are examples of actual ways that energy can be stored.

In popular New Age culture, "energy" has somehow become a noun unto itself. "Energy" is considered to be literally like a glowing, hovering, shimmering cloud, from which adepts can draw power, and feel rejuvenated. Imagine a vaporous creature from the original Star Trek series, and you'll have a good idea of what New Agers think energy is.

In fact, energy is not really a noun at all. Energy is a measurement of something's ability to perform work. Given this context, when spiritualists talk about your body's energy fields, they're really saying nothing that's even remotely meaningful. Yet this kind of talk has become so pervasive in our society that the vast majority of Americans accept that energy exists as a self-contained force, floating around in glowing clouds, and can be commanded by spiritualist adepts to do just about anything.

There is well known authority for the simple, concrete, scientific definition of energy. Take Einstein's equation, E=mc2, that every schoolchild knows but so few spend the 30 seconds it takes to understand. Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. Simplify it. Mass can be expressed in grams, and speed can be expressed in meters per second. Thus, an object's energy equals the amount of work it takes to move a few grams a few meters in a few seconds. Energy is a measurement of work. If I lift a rock, I'm inputting enough potential energy to dent the surface of the table one centimeter when I drop it. The calories of chemical potential energy that my bloodstream absorbs when I eat a Power Bar charge up my muscles enough to dig two hundred pounds of dirt in my garden. Nowhere did Einstein discuss hovering glowing clouds, or fields of mystical power generated by human spirits.

When spiritualists discuss energy, don't blindly accept what they're saying simply because energy is a word you're familiar with, and that sounds scientific. In many cases, their usage of the word is meaningless. When you hear the word "energy" casually used to explain a mystical force or capability, require clarification. Require that the energy be defined. Is it heat? Is it a spinning flywheel?

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

Here's a good test. When you hear the word "energy" used in a spiritual or paranormal sense, substitute the phrase "measurable work capability." Does the usage still make sense? Are you actually being given any information that supports the claim being made? Remember, energy itself is not the thing being measured: energy is the measurement of work performed or of potential.

Take the following claim of Kundalini Yoga as an example: "The release and ascent of the dormant spiritual energy enables the aspirant to transcend the effects of the elements and achieve consciousness." This would be a great thing if energy was indeed that shimmering cloud that can go wherever it's needed and perform miracles. But it's not, so in this case, we substitute the phrase "measurable work capability" and find that the sentence is not attempting to measure or quantify anything other than the word "energy" itself. We have a "dormant spiritual measurable work capability," and no further information. That's pretty vague, isn't it? For this claim to have any merit, they must at least describe how this energy is being stored or manifested. Is it potential energy stored in the chemistry of fat cells? Is it heat that can spread through the body? Is it a measurable amount of electromagnetism, and if so, where's the magnet? In any event, it must be measurable and precisely quantifiable, or it can't be called energy, by definition.

There's a good reason why you don't hear medical doctors or pharmacists talking about energy fields: it's meaningless. I think it's generally good policy to remain open minded and be ready to hear claims that involve energy, but approach them skeptically, and scientifically. The next time you hear such a claim, substitute the phrase "measurable work capability" and you'll be well equipped to separate the silly from the solid.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2006 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

CEC. "Energy Story. Chapter 1. What is Energy?" Energy Quest. California Energy Commission, 22 Apr. 2002. Web. 6 Dec. 2009. <http://www.energyquest.ca.gov/story/chapter01.html>

Duff, M. The world in eleven dimensions: supergravity, supermembranes and M-theory. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing, 1999. 1-4.

Hoffman, F., Bailey, W. Mind and Society Fads. Binghamton: The Haworth Press, 1992. 198-201.

Kurtz, P., Stenger, V. Skeptical Odysseys: Personal accounts by the world's leading paranormal inquirers. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2001. 363-374.

Sanatan Society. "Raising Kundalini energy with Kundalini Yoga through the chakras." Kundalini Yoga. Sanatan Society, 8 Apr. 2004. Web. 13 Dec. 2009. <http://www.sanatansociety.org/chakras/kundalini_yoga.htm>

Reference this article:
Dunning, Brian. "New Age Energy." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 3 Oct 2006. Web. 4 Feb 2012. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4002>

Discuss!

5 most recent comments | Show all 77 comments

Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.

From your first sentence your dripping sarcasm was not overly amusing. It showed point blank you did not take your topic very seriously.

TO be abundantly clear - I do not approve of 'new age' why? because most westerners rape eastern teachings. At best its mostly a misunderstanding, but usually a perversion of what ever is being taught.


Lets look at 'para normal' something that is 'extra' than 'normal' Chi is not considered 'extra' (in certain circles of course)


Back to this 'energy' you are confused about. Lets go back to physics. Everything, on the atomic level is moving, active, - energetic. Quite simple. (last time I checked these things were capable of being measured)

When you say spinning fly wheel, it sounds like you are describing chakras- how can you - a living being- fully in motion at all times (never mind the cellular and atomic level) not have lingering energy? The only way for that is to be dead.

Its obvious you dont practice kundalini yoga from any one from India, but you sure take the time to mock it with your limited capacity of understanding. If Yoga (a spiritual practice at any rate) could be 'easily' understood by looking at a 'definition' we would all be kundalini masters wouldnt we? No one would actually have to shut up, stop typing, and meditate. At this point I feel like sarcastically saying ALERT THE BUDDHISTS he figured out ENLIGHTENMENT - just refer to the textbook definition !

Nef, Kingsport
May 18, 2011 5:58am

"When you say spinning fly wheel, it sounds like you are describing chakras- how can you - a living being- fully in motion at all times (never mind the cellular and atomic level) not have lingering energy? The only way for that is to be dead."

Brian did not arguye that the human body does not contain energy, only that the energy is in forms recognised by science and not Chakras or any other philosophical version. Dead things have energy stored in them too, if we consider real energy. So do things that were never alive. The state of life has nothing to do with the capacity of energy.

"Its obvious you dont practice kundalini yoga from any one from India, but you sure take the time to mock it with your limited capacity of understanding." Just as you seem to be ready to get angry with out understanding that Brian was not commenting on personal philosophy, but those who use scientific terms (like energy) the wrong way to describe their beliefs.

Tom H, Kent
May 18, 2011 11:03am

Dear Nef, could we just have a bit of proof and a bit ls spray?

Deepak chopra and I play quantum tennis. The rule being, I am not allowed to teleport.

Nobody rapes any position here. But Brian is fair on stating that view is never opinion and you can never debate fact.

Could we have a rewrite without invective...otherwise, I have a skip full of invective. Damn, I'll rephrase that "a skip full of facts to counter invective".

Reads the same...

Henk v, Sydney Australia
August 01, 2011 6:09am

I may not be the most well-educated person out there, but in my opinion, I'd have to disagree that "energy" is just a measure of work - and I do understand the scientific definition of it. Energy in the form of a noun I think is very plausible. Energy to me is something that an object has that gives or takes power to or from. I've heard that energy is really just a type of electricity, which I think is pretty accurate. On the atomic level, why do atoms move? Electromagnetism? Magnetism in general is a phenomenon that can't be explained fully. As far as science has gone with the explanation, is probably just on a atomic scale. There's probably a deeper reason why all that works the way it does, but we won't find it. Energy could be more than just electricity. If you want to find another word for the context of energy that I and others use, please do. And like I said, I'm not highly educated, so if you dudes reply with an explanation or anything related, please be respectful, I'm pretty open.

Justin W, NB, Canada
October 20, 2011 5:12pm

Justin - Welcome. For a good definition of the electromagnetic force, see the Wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism

If you're concerned that it's not well understood, which is a common misconception, try the linked article "History of electromagnetic theory".

Energy is not a type of electricity; rather, electricity is a type of energy. It can be stored and expressed in many ways besides electricity. Again, the Wiki article is pretty comprehensive. See the first two sentences at a minimum:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy

Brian Dunning, Laguna Niguel, CA
October 20, 2011 5:48pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 3 + 2 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Finding Amelia Earhart
Skeptoid #295, Jan 31 2012
Read | Listen (13:05)
 
Skeptoid 300th Episode Party
Jan 26 2012
Listen (:55)
 
Frequent Listener Feedback
Skeptoid #294, Jan 24 2012
Read | Listen (12:13)
 
Wunderwaffen: Nazi Wonder Weapons
Skeptoid #293, Jan 17 2012
Read | Listen (13:48)
 
The Grey Man of Ben MacDhui
Skeptoid #292, Jan 10 2012
Read | Listen (12:26)
 
Newest
#1 -
How to Debate a Young Earth Creationist
Read | Listen
#2 -
The Real Philadelphia Experiment
Read | Listen
#3 -
Medical Myths in Movies and Culture
Read | Listen
#4 -
Kangen Water: Change Your Water, Change Your Life
Read | Listen
#5 -
HAARP Myths
Read | Listen
#6 -
MonaVie and Other "Superfruit" Juices
Read | Listen
#7 -
Religion as a Moral Center
Read | Listen
#8 -
Apocalypse 2012
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS  
   


"Immune System Boosting"
inFact with Brian Dunning