Was the Wow! Signal Alien?

A signal received by a radio telescope in 1977 may be the best evidence yet for extraterrestrial intelligence.

Filed under Aliens & UFOs, General Science

Skeptoid #342
December 25, 2012
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Wow! Signal

Jerry Ehman's original handwritten "Wow!"
Photo credit: The Ohio State University Radio Observatory and the North American AstroPhysical Observatory

It was August 15, 1977, when astronomer Jerry Ehman was examining data coming from Ohio State University's radio telescope, which was engaged in listening for signals from deep space, hoping to find something of intelligent origin. In a moment that's since become one of the most famous events in astronomy, he saw a sequence of six characters on the printout — 6EQUJ5 — which caught his attention. So much so, in fact, that he circled the text, and wrote "Wow!" in the margin.

It was, apparently, a signal from outer space. It came from the direction of Sagittarius. The strength of the signal was represented by the digits 0-9 and the letters A-Z, a scale of 36 levels of intensity, rising with 6EQ and falling with UJ5, a near-perfect bell curve of signal strength spread over 72 seconds. All speculation and hype aside, Wow! remains the strongest candidate ever detected for an alien radio transmission.

SETI stands for the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence, but there is no single SETI group. For a long time, many different organizations have engaged in their own searches, but there's no central authoritative project. Virtually every radio telescope is used at least part time by some group scanning the skies looking for signals that might come from some interstellar source. The longest single search project was carried out by Ohio State University, from 1972 to 1997.

When you hear about the Wow! signal, one of the most important and obvious questions to ask is where it came from, and what's there. To understand where the signal came from, and (at least as importantly) how we know where it came from, it's necessary to understand the workings of the interesting radio telescope that received it.

Ohio State's "Big Ear" radio telescope was, well, big. The telescope no longer exists, having been disassembled in 1998 and its acreage used to expand a neighboring golf course. Its main feature was a vast aluminum ground plane, 150 meters by 85 meters, about three times the area of an average professional soccer pitch, and aligned north-south. Near the middle of its north end were a pair of receiving horns, looking like giant foghorns, pointing south. They were at the focus of a great paraboloidal reflector, 110 meters by 21 meters, standing across the southern end like a giant curved movie screen. This reflector received the signal bouncing off a tiltable flat reflector spanning the north end, just beyond the receiving horns, 104 meters by 30 meters. As the Earth rotated, the Big Ear swept the sky in a single line. After a few days of data gathering, the flat reflector could be tilted a tiny bit, moving that line of study up or down across the sky. It had a total tilting range of 50°. The Big Ear's design was called a Kraus telescope, after Ohio State's Dr. John Kraus who designed it and came up with its $250,000 cost, including a $71,000 grant from the National Science Foundation. It was built by the students.

In 1980, a feature was added to the Big Ear that could have come in very handy when the Wow! signal was detected; and that was a set of tracks upon which the receiving horns could move east or west across the face of the flat reflector. This allowed the telescope to fix its view on the sky at any given point when an interesting signal was detected, compensating for the movement of the Earth's rotation, and allowing a single spot to be studied for a time. Crucially, this feature was not yet installed in 1977; so the telescope swept across the Wow! signal for the duration of its detection. It took 72 seconds for the Earth's rotation to move any given point in the sky across the Big Ear's reflectors, and that's why the recorded portion of the Wow! signal was 72 seconds long.

In 1977, there was no automated computer analysis of the Big Ear's recordings. Its data was printed out on paper, and volunteers looked it over manually. This is what Jerry Ehman was doing when he saw the data, circled it, and wrote "Wow!"

The Big Ear would alternate recording between the two receiving horns. Subtracting the signal from one horn from that of the other was a way to identify and reduce noise in the signal. This cleaned-up signal is what got recorded. The horns were physically right beside each other, so each was focused on a slightly different position in the sky — about two minutes apart, by the speed at which the sky rotates past. It's known that the Wow! signal was audible to only one of the two horns, but there was no way to tell which one because of the way the signal was recorded. The Wow! source either started or stopped inside the time gap between the two horns, and lasted less than 24 hours, since it was not detected at that same declination either the day before or the day after. So it's not known how long the actual signal lasted; somewhere between 72 seconds and 24 hours. When you look at a star map showing the location of Wow!'s origin, you see two little line segments, one from where each horn was recording at the time.

These little dashes are in a part of the sky where there's nothing of much interest. No close stars, no other radio sources, just... well, space. There's nothing obvious there to listen for, but nevertheless, astronomers have on many, many occasions pointed telescopes at Wow!'s origin, hoping to hear it again; but nobody ever has ever heard even the slightest blip. Whatever Wow! was, it was transient. Try as we might, we've never been able to find it again, in over 100 different attempts.

Another question to which we might want to know the answer is what was interesting about the Wow! signal. Obviously there are many different types of radio signals bouncing around space all the time, so how do we know that there was anything special or unusual about this one? The solution to this lies in the signal's frequency. To understand why the Wow! frequency was noteworthy, we have to know a little about the cosmic radio environment.

There are different kinds of noise in different parts of the radio spectrum. Throughout the radio spectrum, there is a background level of about 3 Kelvins representing the leftover noise from the Big Bang. So that 3 Kelvin level is the quietest window we might hope to find. Below about 1 GHz, there's a lot of galactic noise, making it hard for an artificial signal to compete. And above about 10 GHz, something called quantum noise — in a nutshell, the uncertainty of photonic measurements — becomes too great to listen through. So we have a relatively quiet window between 1 and 10 GHz.

Not only is there noise at different frequencies, but planetary atmospheres like Earth's block out a lot of different chunks of the spectrum; absorbing some of it, and reflecting others. There are two great windows through which our atmosphere is more or less transparent to electromagnetic radiation. First is the visible spectrum, which is why our eyes evolved to see at the frequencies they do. Second is, coincidentally, that very same 1 to 10 GHz gap.

So, if you're an intelligent alien, and you want to attract the attention of another intelligent alien, you're going to try to do it on a frequency which, for one, is likely to be heard; and for another, is likely to be easily identifiable as artificial. So you're probably going to want to send your signal on a frequency that makes it through an atmosphere, and where there's a minimum of competing background noise, and — for extra measure — is right near the most universally recognized frequency of all: that of hydrogen, the universe's most abundant element.

Interstellar hydrogen precesses at 1.42 GHz. Precession can be thought of as the way a proton wobbles as it spins. The unfathomably massive quantities of interstellar hydrogen out there means that all that precession can actually be heard by sensitive radio receivers tuned to 1.42 GHz. Nearby on the spectrum is the frequency of interstellar hydroxyl, precessing at 1.66 GHz. We can see these two spikes when we look at the signal received by a radio transmitter pointed at any quiet region of space; in fact, any radio telescope anywhere in the galaxy will see exactly the same thing.

Astronomers call this frequency band the waterhole, for two very good reasons. First, hydrogen and hydroxyl are the disassociation products of water, the best environment for life. Second, these signposts are universal, and would be recognized by any civilization anywhere; and so, like the watercooler at the office that draws a crowd, the waterhole is nature's gathering point on the radio spectrum, a blatantly obvious place for interstellar communities to meet and greet.

The Wow! signal was squarely in the middle of the waterhole, at 1.42 GHz. It was the perfect storm of intelligent interstellar radio signals. If we ever do receive a deliberate alien transmission, Wow! was exactly what we'd hope and expect to find.

Wow! has tantalized by evading almost every suggestion put forth to explain it. For one reason, that frequency range is protected; nobody on Earth is allowed to transmit on that frequency. We know the signal did not come from an aircraft or spacecraft passing overhead, because the signal was consistent with a point in the sky that was not moving. No known planets or asteroids were in a position that they could have reflected the signal toward Earth. Any space debris would have had to be absolutely still in space relative to the Big Ear, which is unlikely, and not tumbling, which is also unlikely. Even complicated astronomical effects like gravitational lensing and interstellar scintillation (basically twinkling like that which we observe stars doing visually) have technical reasons that make them very poor candidates to explain Wow!

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

A radio transmission from a point in space in the direction of Sagittarius still remains the best technical explanation for Wow! Jerry Ehman, the astronomer who found the signal, has written that he chooses not to draw "vast conclusions from half-vast data".

In conclusion, yes, an alien intelligence is still a candidate explanation for the Wow! signal. But there's no evidence for this. A stronger candidate is the significantly more vague explanation of an interstellar radio source of unknown origin.

Meanwhile, Jerry Ehman's famous scrap of printout with his famous handwriting rests in the archives of the Ohio Historical Society. In these days of manufactured mysteries and sensationalized nonsense, Wow! remains the genuine article: a true mystery, with potential implications unlike anything else in history. It's quite possibly one of the most exciting unsolved mysteries that we have, and it lies quietly in the North American Astrophysical Observatory Records, with call number MSS 1151. Someday, someone will probably solve it. That's a treasure hunt worth waiting for.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2012 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Alexander, A. "The Quest for the "WOW!": one man's search for SETI's most promising signal." Guest Blogs. The Planetary Society, 27 Jan. 2012. Web. 17 Dec. 2012. <http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/amir-alexander/20120127.html>

Andersen, R. "The 'Wow!' Signal: One Man's Search for SETI's Most Tantalizing Trace of Alien Life." The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group, 16 Feb. 2012. Web. 22 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/the-wow-signal-one-mans-search-for-setis-most-tantalizing-trace-of-alien-life/253093/>

Condon, J., Ranson, S. "Introduction to Radio Astronomy." Essential Radio Astronomy. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 13 Mar. 2007. Web. 12 Dec. 2012. <http://www.cv.nrao.edu/course/astr534/Introradastro.html>

Ehman, J. "The Big Ear Wow! Signal: What We Know and Don't Know About It After 20 Years." Big Ear Radio Observatory. Big Ear Radio Observatory and North American AstroPhysical Observatory, 1 Sep. 1997. Web. 17 Dec. 2012. <http://www.bigear.org/wow20th.htm>

SETI League. "What Is the Water-Hole?" SETI League: General Information. The SETI League, Inc., 4 Jan. 2003. Web. 18 Dec. 2012. <http://www.setileague.org/general/waterhol.htm>

Wood, L. "WOW!" Ohio Historical Society Collections Blog. Ohio Historical Society, 3 Jul. 2010. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. <http://ohiohistory.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/wow/>

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Was the Wow! Signal Alien?" Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 25 Dec 2012. Web. 24 Apr 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4342>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 115 comments

Hi, Eric;

The fact that they updated their program means that we can't go through the the old program to look for a bug; that's all. There's one possible source of a spurious signal that can't be ruled out.

I don't know what "main stream science" you're reading, but I haven't seen anything which excludes the possibility of an alien beacon. The problem, as Dr Ehman puts it, we can't draw vast conclusions from half-vast data.

Nobody knows. And unless we get another signal or something else turns up in the relevant area of the sky - and there's been a LOT of looking - there's nothing we can do with it.

That's the mainstream position. It's identical to yours, as far as I can see.

Stuart Frankel, New York
December 05, 2013 9:01am

What was the wave length of the Wow signal ? There are countless radio waves in the Universe. Radio Waves have a certain limit to their wave length. It was obviously an ultra high frequency signal. And not a radio wave. Because otherwise it would have been probably captured otherwise.
A transmission between two space ships was a theory that intrigued me to this comment.

Daniel, Greensboro
January 15, 2014 2:47pm

Daniel, the signal was transmitted at 1420mhz, that signal is banned for use on Earth because of it's significance in astronomy.

Jacob, NC, USA
January 17, 2014 1:13pm

I stumbled upon this conversation after googling "5 real planets way weirder than sci-fi" article. Can't believe I've read all 180 posts most by my state neighbor eric. I admire then enthusiasm for the topic but i support the majority view for phenomenon we know that create waves as succinctly stated by Darren of Liverpool and Kephan reality. Scientifically speaking outside the laboratory when conjecturing on phenomenological data we must rely that much more on 'weighting' of possibilities and avoid bias. Great things come from these such discussions. Thank you all.

Gregory Dodds, scottsburg/IN USA
January 26, 2014 4:21am

Gregory I do agree with your statement

"when conjecturing on phenomenological data we must rely that much more on 'weighting' of possibilities and avoid bias".

For example the theory (before landing on the moon) that it was made of green cheese was not taken seriously baised on "weighting of possiblities".

The reason I have stated an alien source is as (at minimum) as viable as a non alien source is this (again).

For the last 30+ years people with more scientific knowlege (than the both of us), access to equipment we only dream about and a burning desire to prove it man-made, natural, hoax or even technical error HAS FAILED and to this day CONTINUE to fail.

But common after 30+ years of trying everything under the sun by die hard (one could say driven) skeptics of alien source is not proof it is, but must be taken as giving weight to the alien source theory.

That is all I am trying to say is if you failed to find a logical, natural, or man-made reason for the signal to say that alien is a low priortiy/low chance is not reasonable.

Although its a literary quote (sherlock holmes) it is very accurate.

How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?'

Or to state again if you have tested all possiblities for 30+years and have gotten no matches you must consider IT MAY be alien.

Eric, Northern IL USA
January 30, 2014 2:24am

If the signal was natural like a super nova or whatever wouldn't we have detected something in that area on the next pass? If it was "empty" space then it seems like we should have had another signal in the same area. If it was inteligent it makes sense that we caught a signal from something that can move so we wouldn't get another signal form that position. Natural noise wouldn't move so it seems like we should get something. It may be a different signal by the time we "look" there again but it should be in the same position. That's what I get from the discussion here at least.

Craig,, WA, USA
February 12, 2014 11:38pm

..possibly the last transmission from a distant planet, the last attempt of an intelligent civilization to contact anybody who might be listening, a message of "Is there anybody out there?"
Civilizations, old and new, crossing paths as they give up and we start to listen.
Romantic? yes.
Likely? No.
Would I like to believe it was alien Intelligence? Yes.
Do I believe it was? No.

Henry, Minnesota USA
February 22, 2014 7:43pm

Maybe this is off-topic, but I think SETI is a complete waste of time and MONEY because it's way too anthropomorphic.
The "researchers" appear to be looking for beings just like us, but maybe with some latex on their faces as seen on that silly Star Trek.

Who says alien intelligences would be anything like us?
Would we even recognize them as intelligent?

We don't even know if they'd use radio frequencies as we know them.
There's probably forces and energies in the universe that we haven't discovered yet; and might not even be able to concieve of. "Alien" minds just might be using them, and not even considering something like us.

You'll never convince me that ALIEN minds, motivations, and agendas are even remotely like ours.

I'll bet they'd make a cockroach look like a close relative.

Ron, Calgary Alberta Canada
February 28, 2014 11:20am

What's anthropomorphic about the precession of hydrogen?

Brian Dunning, Laguna Niguel, CA
February 28, 2014 11:47am

Wouldn't the possible signal length have been closer to 72 seconds, up to about 48 hours? Including the 23 hours, 58 minutes, and 48 seconds before and after the signal? Just nitpicking really. But this would be correct wouldn't it?

John Head, Saint Cloud, Fl
April 18, 2014 5:42am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 5 + 6 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Your Body's Energy Fields
Skeptoid #411, Apr 22 2014
Read | Listen (12:50)
 
The Black Eyed Kids
Skeptoid #410, Apr 15 2014
Read | Listen (11:18)
 
Oil Pulling
Skeptoid #409, Apr 8 2014
Read | Listen (12:24)
 
Skeptoid Media is a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
Apr 4 2014
Listen (1:13)
 
15 Phreaky Phobias
Skeptoid #408, Apr 1 2014
Read | Listen (12:44)
 
Newest
#1 -
Listener Feedback: Alternative Medicine
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Asking the Socratic Questions
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 False Arguments for Raw Milk
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake
Read | Listen
#6 -
The Riddle of the L-8 Blimp
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Secrets of MKULTRA
Read | Listen
#8 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


"The Philadelphia Experiment"
inFact with Brian Dunning


Support Skeptoid