Was the Wow! Signal Alien?
A signal received by a radio telescope in 1977 may be the best evidence yet for extraterrestrial intelligence.
Filed under Aliens & UFOs, General Science
| Skeptoid #342 December 25, 2012 Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe |
|
By Brian Dunning, Skeptoid Podcast
Episode 342, December 25, 2012
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4342
 |
Jerry Ehman's original handwritten "Wow!" |
It was August 15, 1977, when astronomer Jerry Ehman was examining data coming from Ohio State University's radio telescope, which was engaged in listening for signals from deep space, hoping to find something of intelligent origin. In a moment that's since become one of the most famous events in astronomy, he saw a sequence of six characters on the printout — 6EQUJ5 — which caught his attention. So much so, in fact, that he circled the text, and wrote "Wow!" in the margin.
It was, apparently, a signal from outer space. It came from the direction of Sagittarius. The strength of the signal was represented by the digits 0-9 and the letters A-Z, a scale of 36 levels of intensity, rising with 6EQ and falling with UJ5, a near-perfect bell curve of signal strength spread over 72 seconds. All speculation and hype aside, Wow! remains the strongest candidate ever detected for an alien radio transmission.
SETI stands for the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence, but there is no single SETI group. For a long time, many different organizations have engaged in their own searches, but there's no central authoritative project. Virtually every radio telescope is used at least part time by some group scanning the skies looking for signals that might come from some interstellar source. The longest single search project was carried out by Ohio State University, from 1972 to 1997.
When you hear about the Wow! signal, one of the most important and obvious questions to ask is where it came from, and what's there. To understand where the signal came from, and (at least as importantly) how we know where it came from, it's necessary to understand the workings of the interesting radio telescope that received it.
Ohio State's "Big Ear" radio telescope was, well, big. The telescope no longer exists, having been disassembled in 1998 and its acreage used to expand a neighboring golf course. Its main feature was a vast aluminum ground plane, 150 meters by 85 meters, about three times the area of an average professional soccer pitch, and aligned north-south. Near the middle of its north end were a pair of receiving horns, looking like giant foghorns, pointing south. They were at the focus of a great paraboloidal reflector, 110 meters by 21 meters, standing across the southern end like a giant curved movie screen. This reflector received the signal bouncing off a tiltable flat reflector spanning the north end, just beyond the receiving horns, 104 meters by 30 meters. As the Earth rotated, the Big Ear swept the sky in a single line. After a few days of data gathering, the flat reflector could be tilted a tiny bit, moving that line of study up or down across the sky. It had a total tilting range of 50°. The Big Ear's design was called a Kraus telescope, after Ohio State's Dr. John Kraus who designed it and came up with its $250,000 cost, including a $71,000 grant from the National Science Foundation. It was built by the students.
In 1980, a feature was added to the Big Ear that could have come in very handy when the Wow! signal was detected; and that was a set of tracks upon which the receiving horns could move east or west across the face of the flat reflector. This allowed the telescope to fix its view on the sky at any given point when an interesting signal was detected, compensating for the movement of the Earth's rotation, and allowing a single spot to be studied for a time. Crucially, this feature was not yet installed in 1977; so the telescope swept across the Wow! signal for the duration of its detection. It took 72 seconds for the Earth's rotation to move any given point in the sky across the Big Ear's reflectors, and that's why the recorded portion of the Wow! signal was 72 seconds long.
In 1977, there was no automated computer analysis of the Big Ear's recordings. Its data was printed out on paper, and volunteers looked it over manually. This is what Jerry Ehman was doing when he saw the data, circled it, and wrote "Wow!"
The Big Ear would alternate recording between the two receiving horns. Subtracting the signal from one horn from that of the other was a way to identify and reduce noise in the signal. This cleaned-up signal is what got recorded. The horns were physically right beside each other, so each was focused on a slightly different position in the sky — about two minutes apart, by the speed at which the sky rotates past. It's known that the Wow! signal was audible to only one of the two horns, but there was no way to tell which one because of the way the signal was recorded. The Wow! source either started or stopped inside the time gap between the two horns, and lasted less than 24 hours, since it was not detected at that same declination either the day before or the day after. So it's not known how long the actual signal lasted; somewhere between 72 seconds and 24 hours. When you look at a star map showing the location of Wow!'s origin, you see two little line segments, one from where each horn was recording at the time.
These little dashes are in a part of the sky where there's nothing of much interest. No close stars, no other radio sources, just... well, space. There's nothing obvious there to listen for, but nevertheless, astronomers have on many, many occasions pointed telescopes at Wow!'s origin, hoping to hear it again; but nobody ever has ever heard even the slightest blip. Whatever Wow! was, it was transient. Try as we might, we've never been able to find it again, in over 100 different attempts.
Another question to which we might want to know the answer is what was interesting about the Wow! signal. Obviously there are many different types of radio signals bouncing around space all the time, so how do we know that there was anything special or unusual about this one? The solution to this lies in the signal's frequency. To understand why the Wow! frequency was noteworthy, we have to know a little about the cosmic radio environment.
There are different kinds of noise in different parts of the radio spectrum. Throughout the radio spectrum, there is a background level of about 3 Kelvins representing the leftover noise from the Big Bang. So that 3 Kelvin level is the quietest window we might hope to find. Below about 1 GHz, there's a lot of galactic noise, making it hard for an artificial signal to compete. And above about 10 GHz, something called quantum noise — in a nutshell, the uncertainty of photonic measurements — becomes too great to listen through. So we have a relatively quiet window between 1 and 10 GHz.
Not only is there noise at different frequencies, but planetary atmospheres like Earth's block out a lot of different chunks of the spectrum; absorbing some of it, and reflecting others. There are two great windows through which our atmosphere is more or less transparent to electromagnetic radiation. First is the visible spectrum, which is why our eyes evolved to see at the frequencies they do. Second is, coincidentally, that very same 1 to 10 GHz gap.
So, if you're an intelligent alien, and you want to attract the attention of another intelligent alien, you're going to try to do it on a frequency which, for one, is likely to be heard; and for another, is likely to be easily identifiable as artificial. So you're probably going to want to send your signal on a frequency that makes it through an atmosphere, and where there's a minimum of competing background noise, and — for extra measure — is right near the most universally recognized frequency of all: that of hydrogen, the universe's most abundant element.
Interstellar hydrogen precesses at 1.42 GHz. Precession can be thought of as the way a proton wobbles as it spins. The unfathomably massive quantities of interstellar hydrogen out there means that all that precession can actually be heard by sensitive radio receivers tuned to 1.42 GHz. Nearby on the spectrum is the frequency of interstellar hydroxyl, precessing at 1.66 GHz. We can see these two spikes when we look at the signal received by a radio transmitter pointed at any quiet region of space; in fact, any radio telescope anywhere in the galaxy will see exactly the same thing.
Astronomers call this frequency band the waterhole, for two very good reasons. First, hydrogen and hydroxyl are the disassociation products of water, the best environment for life. Second, these signposts are universal, and would be recognized by any civilization anywhere; and so, like the watercooler at the office that draws a crowd, the waterhole is nature's gathering point on the radio spectrum, a blatantly obvious place for interstellar communities to meet and greet.
The Wow! signal was squarely in the middle of the waterhole, at 1.42 GHz. It was the perfect storm of intelligent interstellar radio signals. If we ever do receive a deliberate alien transmission, Wow! was exactly what we'd hope and expect to find.
Wow! has tantalized by evading almost every suggestion put forth to explain it. For one reason, that frequency range is protected; nobody on Earth is allowed to transmit on that frequency. We know the signal did not come from an aircraft or spacecraft passing overhead, because the signal was consistent with a point in the sky that was not moving. No known planets or asteroids were in a position that they could have reflected the signal toward Earth. Any space debris would have had to be absolutely still in space relative to the Big Ear, which is unlikely, and not tumbling, which is also unlikely. Even complicated astronomical effects like gravitational lensing and interstellar scintillation (basically twinkling like that which we observe stars doing visually) have technical reasons that make them very poor candidates to explain Wow!
A radio transmission from a point in space in the direction of Sagittarius still remains the best technical explanation for Wow! Jerry Ehman, the astronomer who found the signal, has written that he chooses not to draw "vast conclusions from half-vast data".
In conclusion, yes, an alien intelligence is still a candidate explanation for the Wow! signal. But there's no evidence for this. A stronger candidate is the significantly more vague explanation of an interstellar radio source of unknown origin.
Meanwhile, Jerry Ehman's famous scrap of printout with his famous handwriting rests in the archives of the Ohio Historical Society. In these days of manufactured mysteries and sensationalized nonsense, Wow! remains the genuine article: a true mystery, with potential implications unlike anything else in history. It's quite possibly one of the most exciting unsolved mysteries that we have, and it lies quietly in the North American Astrophysical Observatory Records, with call number MSS 1151. Someday, someone will probably solve it. That's a treasure hunt worth waiting for.
© 2012 Skeptoid Media, Inc.
References & Further Reading
Alexander, A. "The Quest for the "WOW!": one man's search for SETI's most promising signal." Guest Blogs. The Planetary Society, 27 Jan. 2012. Web. 17 Dec. 2012. <http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/amir-alexander/20120127.html>
Andersen, R. "The 'Wow!' Signal: One Man's Search for SETI's Most Tantalizing Trace of Alien Life." The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group, 16 Feb. 2012. Web. 22 Dec. 2012. <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/the-wow-signal-one-mans-search-for-setis-most-tantalizing-trace-of-alien-life/253093/>
Condon, J., Ranson, S. "Introduction to Radio Astronomy." Essential Radio Astronomy. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 13 Mar. 2007. Web. 12 Dec. 2012. <http://www.cv.nrao.edu/course/astr534/Introradastro.html>
Ehman, J. "The Big Ear Wow! Signal: What We Know and Don't Know About It After 20 Years." Big Ear Radio Observatory. Big Ear Radio Observatory and North American AstroPhysical Observatory, 1 Sep. 1997. Web. 17 Dec. 2012. <http://www.bigear.org/wow20th.htm>
SETI League. "What Is the Water-Hole?" SETI League: General Information. The SETI League, Inc., 4 Jan. 2003. Web. 18 Dec. 2012. <http://www.setileague.org/general/waterhol.htm>
Wood, L. "WOW!" Ohio Historical Society Collections Blog. Ohio Historical Society, 3 Jul. 2010. Web. 16 Dec. 2012. <http://ohiohistory.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/wow/>
Reference this article:
Dunning, B.
"Was the Wow! Signal Alien?" Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc.,
25 Dec 2012. Web.
19 Jun 2013. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4342>
Discuss!
10 most recent comments | Show all 88 comments
The article states that the noise could have been no longer than 24 hours, "...since it was not detected at that same declination either the day before or the day after." Actually, it could have been as long as almost 48 hours. You have the prior day, the day of the recording and the following day. if it had started immediately after the prior day's recording and ended immediately before the following day's recording it would have lasted close to 48 hours.
Tim, Troy, MO
May 01, 2013 1:23pm
Darren you make in intersting argument.
The problem is (taken at face value) is there is no evidence given of any reasonable ufo involvement.
Now where it could be considered a viable option is in the case of the walton experience.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walton_Experience
If one of them had not returned with the evidence gathered yes then your abduction option could be considered.
Let me restate again the facts in the wowl
A signal was recieved that matched a critera recognised by a scientist that could be a signal.
Everything from satalites, man made and natural has been tried for 35+ years WITH NO SUCCESS or even a close match.
The idea of alien life is not only an accepted theory but the reason for the signal search.
So given that both natural/man made and ailen are acceptable theories but NONE OF THEM has had proof given it is scientifice disengenuous to claim one has more weight than the other.
One thing I have mentioned why an alien signal may not be repeated is the simple reason the universe is vast, the earth is in constant motion, and the antenne scan area is relatively small.
Unless (unlike natural reason) the "alien" stayed on course with the earth it could have already passed thinking "no answer ill just keep going".
In short one cannot have 35 years of failure of trying to disprove and somehow give it more credit.
I have an open mind, just refuse to use bias for proof one theory is better than another.
Eric, Northern IL USA
May 04, 2013 1:56am
Eric, Northern IL USA, we have precedent, before Quasars were understood their signals were thought to be alien by people. So, in human history we have evidence that an unknown not understood happening was explained.
In human history we have NO similar precedent for advanced aliens 'beaming' out into the cosmos, or that they do actually exist.
Going by weight of evidence the balance does swing in favor of a 'natural' explanation.
Links to Wiki {SMDH} are bad enough, but Travis Walton? You can't be serious? That's been debunked enough for anyone with a rational mind and critical thinking skills to accept.
We also do not have evidence for unicorns or Santa beaming out the signals either, does your conjecture also accept them as credible sources?
OK, the game is up, it was me, all those years ago I tied 280 helium filled party balloons to a harness to floated over the horns with my Radio-shack transmitter. There is as much evidence for my act as there is for your bias towards an alien hypothesis for the signal.
There is a difference between bias and weighting, Eric, and you are showing bias.
The weight of all human experience indicates that an unknown natural event was the source of the signal, that is the null hypothesis, the preponderance of human knowledge and history says so, as do the majority of scientists in the field.
The alien hypothesis is contrary to the null hypothesis, it is for believers of Bambi, Santa, aliens or me and my 280 balloons to prove it wrong.
Kephan, Reality
May 10, 2013 2:04pm
1) It was an unknown natural source (coming from an empty part of the sky. One would expect at least a few more similar signals over the last decades)
2) It was some sort of alien signal (stationary, not even tumbling. Nothing else natural in the sky does this)
3) Hoax. (there is a pretty good post on here detailing how that could have been done)
4) Mud has added "equipment artefacts". (I'm sure this has precedent)
The weight of all human experience DOES NOT indicate that an unknown natural event was the source of the signal, because it was a single isolated event, and was even outside the parameters of detected objects in space (not moving, not tumbling).
Given the uncharacteristic behaviour of the "contact" there is more evidence for a human/alien construct of some sort, than a natural (never-to-be-repeated, non-moving) event source.
Given all that, my opinion (not assertion) was that it was either a hoax, or like Mud said, an equipment artefact.
That does not rule out 1) and 2), but I think that it's more likely that 3) or 4) was the source of the signal.
Macky, Auckland
May 10, 2013 5:43pm
Kephan.
No matter how you present it precedent IS NOT FACT OR PROOF.
We had precedent the smallest elements were protons, electrons, and neutrons.
We has precedent that we could not go faster than sound.
Both of those were proven WRONG because people did not lock there mindset into precedent.
Again I am NOT saying FOR SURE its an alien signal.
But what you and others here keep wilfully denying is this.
For 35+ years people who are more skeptical than you, with knowledge that is so beyond the two of us, and using equipment we wish we had have found (listen closely) NOTHING man made or natural that even comes close.
No satellite, no man made signal (past or present), no natural phenominom, NOTHING.
Even the scientific skeptics cannot point to something that is close. Or they would have by now.
You cannot use the "excuse" that because there is natural phenominon in space as proof this is.
Its like saying we have strange aquatic life and humans so there must be mermaids (due to precedent), we just have to find them.
On the other side of the coin if as kephan said "In human history we have NO similar precedent for advanced aliens 'beaming' out into the cosmos, or that they do actually exist"
Then WHY are we spending billions of dollars on recievers, satellite to outerspace with records.info on us, and probes to other planets?
Are we the only advance life in the cosmos?
Talk about bias indeed.
Eric, Northern IL USA
May 15, 2013 3:19am
Since we know it wasn't from Earth, it was either:
1. Artificial in nature (extra-terrestrial)
2. A (likely very rare) unknown natural phenomena
What really makes me think it is alien is that it is smack dab in the middle of the waterhole. It is exactly what we would expect it to be (very strong signal in the waterhole)
What makes me think it is not alien is that we have never seen it or anything like it again.
Perhaps it was an ET space craft sending a signal to another craft, and we happen to be in the way and captured it? Amazingly, this is probably the only time that this explanation has ever been a possibility!
Chad, Wisconsin
May 17, 2013 2:58pm
But we don't know it wasn't from Earth, Chad. We don't have a clue what it was.
Hoax and equipment artefact are still in the list of possibilities.
There was no precedent before, and no repetition of it since.
Refering to Kephan's post, some things like quasars may well have been thought to be aliens for a time, but they are now well known not to be, and quasars are themselves a repeatable signal source, unlike the Wow signal.
As Brian states, the Wow signal is a true mystery, and it remains the subject of pure speculation as to what it was, with all sorts of sensible arguments for and against at least four possibilities.
Macky, Auckland
May 18, 2013 3:55pm
Any one ever think it night be God? Just saying xx
J. Christ, USA
June 11, 2013 11:49am
J. Christ has just posted a fifth possibility.
Macky, Auckland
June 12, 2013 7:09pm
Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:
You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.
What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?
![[Valid RSS]](/images/valid-rss-rogers.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=small}
Eric,
Let's say you're a cop investigating a disappearance. There are no witnesses and no clues but you know from experience there are 3 likely scenarios :
1) abduction for ransom or by a serial killer.
2) the person has run away to start a new life under a new name.
3) they've had an accident-lost their memory perhaps, or fallen down an old mineshaft/into a river and died.
Then someone tells you that there was a UFO sighting the night of the disappearance and you should also consider they may have been taken by aliens. Being a fair-minded person you put it on the list of possibilities.
35 years later, the missing person has never turned up and you're writing your memoirs. How much space do you devote to the 'alien abduction' theory and how much credence do you put in it, given that there is NO PROOF that anybody has ever been abducted by aliens, whereas there is ample evidence that all the other scenarios have occurred?
Darren, Liverpool, UK
May 01, 2013 12:05pm