The Exorcism of Anneliese

Can exorcisms such as the one that killed Anneliese Michel truly help critically ill people?

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Health, Paranormal, Religion

Skeptoid #248
March 8, 2011
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

It doesn't just happen in the movies. Throughout the centuries and in all countries, the faithful have practiced exorcism. It's a religious ritual intended to drive away demons who are possessing a victim's body. Its basic premise — that any such thing as demons or demonic possession even exist — places it outside the bounds of what can be tested or evaluated, let alone proven. But this has not stopped it from being employed in life-or-death situations: Medical emergencies entrusted to prehistoric superstition. Can exorcism truly treat severely disturbed individuals?

This was the question with Anneliese Michel, a young Bavarian woman born in 1952. Anneliese was raised in a profoundly devout Catholic home; three of her aunts were nuns and her father had studied to become a priest. But the Michel home had a profane secret: An illegitimate daughter, Martha, born four years before Anneliese. Martha died of kidney trouble when Anneliese was still a child, and compounded with the shame of the illegitimate birth, it rocked the pious family to its core. Anneliese performed constant penance for her sinful mother. The family turned to fringe extremist Catholic groups, forging their own form of deep religious piety. Anneliese's upbringing was one quasi-Catholic rite after another, a constant atonement for the sins of others.

At the age of sixteen she began having epileptic seizures. For the next few years, she was in and out of psychiatric hospitals, on and off of a half dozen antipsychotic and antiepileptic drugs, and her behavior spiraled worse and worse. Anneliese became obsessed with atonement and ritual, but it went much further than that. She reported visions of demonic faces and panicked and snarled at sacred images, and the seizures continued and became more bizarre. After exhausting all the medical options, the Michel family turned to the church for help. Over the final year of her life, Anneliese received no medical care (at her own demand) and was put through sixty-seven exorcism sessions, as codified in Roman Ritual. Two priests, Ernst Alt and Arnold Renz, grappled with her demons and recorded forty-two of the sessions on tape:

Some half-dozen or more demons within Anneliese spoke, and even identified themselves. The Biblical figures Lucifer, Cain, and Judas were there, as were the historical figures Emperor Nero, Adolf Hitler, and others. Daily she did hundreds of genuflections, dropping to her knees until the ligaments were permanently debilitated. She had open sores all over her body. She scratched herself and bled. Her mouth and nose were raw, her eyes deeply bruised, her hair shredded. She was unbathed and stank horribly. She urinated on the floor and licked it up. Always her voiced growled back at the tormenting priests.

She refused food and drink and became a scrawny, wild creature in her own home. Her own family was afraid of her. The thinner and smaller she got, the more like an animal she became.

And then, one morning, the house was silent. The demons were gone. Anneliese lay in her bed, dead. She weighed 31 kg, or 68 lbs. She was 23 years old, a ragged, crazed stick-figure caricature of what she had once been. The cause of death was starvation and dehydration.

To exorcise (from the Greek exorkizein) means to adjure, to make a formal command, which must be followed by oath of obedience. The exorcist thus commands the possessing entity to take an oath that they will leave the host body. The practice probably predates written history. Songs for charming demons away are recorded in the Book of Psalms and in the Dead Sea Scrolls dated from some two thousand years ago. Various forms of exorcism have been practiced in virtually all cultures for as long as we have history.

Today doctors can look at cases like Anneliese, and though we cannot make a reliable diagnosis without an examination, it seems clear that she suffered from a variety of conditions including dissociative identity disorder (formerly called multiple personality disorder). It's usually comorbid with other psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia, from which Anneliese probably suffered as well; and chronic stress is indeed one potential cause of her epileptic seizures. Although the psychiatric profession of the day had not been able to cure her conditions, it probably controlled them to some degree; as she didn't die until she stopped all medical treatment.

Belief is a key component of perceived possession and exorcism. If all parties believe that the sufferer is possessed, going through the motions of an exorcism may indeed solve the problem in some cases. And this is a serious problem, because that simple fact can be used to defend the practice; which sometimes results in preventable death.

After Anneliese's death, some within the Catholic church made an almost scientific effort to reform church laws governing the use of exorcism. When an exorcist speaks imperatively to the demon, instead of to the patient (to say "I command thee, unclean spirit," or some such thing), it confirms the patient's belief that they are indeed possessed by a demon. This confirmation by an authority makes the psychological problem much worse. Aware of this complication, a commission of conscientious German theologians petitioned the Vatican in 1984 to ban this part of the ritual. It took 15 years for the Vatican to render a decision. When they finally did revise the exorcism formula in 1999 (the first time it had been reviewed since the 17th century), it still allowed for exorcists to directly address the alleged demon. Thus, the Catholic exorcism rite remains contemptuous of basic ethics and any pretense of considering the patient's welfare to be important.

The commission had the additional motivation for reform when Anneliese's parents and both Alt and Renz were charged with negligent manslaughter for failing to call a doctor. During her final days, Anneliese's internal organ shutdown was probably irreversible, but a week before she could have been saved by even the simplest medical care. Recognizing that her parents had tried for many years to give every possible type of care for her episodes, the prosecution asked only for a fine for the priests and a guilty verdict but no punishment for the long suffering parents.

Before the trial, the parents had their daughter's body exhumed, based on a tip from a nun who claimed that she saw Anneliese's body was incorrupt in a vision. If true, it would confirm the supernatural nature of the case, proving that the exorcism was indeed the proper course of action. When the casket was opened, she was found to be decomposed as expected. The court found all four defendants guilty, but went further than the prosecution asked and gave suspended prison sentences plus three years probation. The Michels remained convinced that they'd done the right thing.

Of course, Anneliese was not the only victim of exorcism. The excellent website lists over a thousand such cases, most from the recent decade, and most from Western countries. It is not ancient history and it is not limited to developing countries. Hundreds of professional exorcists walk among us, today, seeking critically ill psychiatric patients upon whom they can shout charms and sprinkle water. Many of these cases recount shocking tortures. Drownings, crucifixions, burnings, stabbings, all in the name of exorcism, and most to innocent children or the mentally ill.

When The Exorcist came into theaters, just as Anneliese was entering the worst of her final years, "possessed" people joined werewolves and zombies as favorite cinema monsters. It seemed that neither audiences nor filmmakers saw the patients as the victims, but as scary new antagonists to be feared. This perception has almost certainly hampered the efforts of those who want exorcism banned.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

The exorcism dramatized in the movie was based on a real case. An anonymous young boy, given the pseudonyms Robbie Mannheim or Roland Doe, was exorcised by three priests in 1949. He survived, and went onto to have a successful family and career, but this is largely because his condition and exorcism were far less dramatic than the fictionalized version presented in the book and subsequent movie. One of the priests, Rev. Walter Halloran, gave a 1999 interview to Strange Magazine in which he revealed never having witnessed the bizarre incidents attributed to the boy: speaking Latin in a strange voice, having extraordinary strength, vomiting, markings appearing spontaneously on his skin. He did say the boy spat a lot and he saw the bed move once, but only when he leaned against it (it was on wheels). Nevertheless, the movie character based on this boy is one of cinema history's all-time most infamous monsters.

Anneliese had been a pretty young woman with striking black hair. As a child, she often played at her father's sawmill, and by all accounts her childhood was largely normal and happy. Even through the early years of her seizures, she was studying to become an elementary school teacher. Anneliese might be teaching in a Bavarian schoolhouse today, had she not been one of the unlucky few who were unable to make it through a troubled youth. She was a complex and talented person, who had humor and love and flaws and dreams.

I've given an example in this episode of exploiting her torture and manslaughter to make a scary sounding podcast. Filmmakers have exploited these victims to make not just The Exorcist, but a slew of other copycat films based on specific individuals, including Anneliese. Every time Linda Blair's head spun around, or she spat green vomit, we laughed and had a riotous old time at the theater. Would the same movies have been made exploiting the victims of other true-life crimes, and would we have laughed at the depictions of those actual victims in their dramatized death throes? For some reason, exorcism seems to have been given a pass, on the mistaken presumption that it is the victim who is the monster. These victims are often critically ill individuals — they may have medical or psychiatric problems that need treatment — they deserve neither to be tortured, killed via negligent manslaughter, nor to have their ordeal glorified as some kind of pop-culture horror story.

Exorcism is a brutal, heinous, medieval torture ritual justified only by ignorance. Its roots as a religious rite are irrelevant; a crime is still a crime. In this century, we have the means to actually help sick people. Do not condone the primitive obscenity that is exorcism.

Brian Dunning

© 2011 Skeptoid Media Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Day, E. "'God told us to exorcise my daughter's demons. I don't regret her death'." The Telegraph. 27 Nov. 2005, Newspaper.

Editors. "The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel." Online Demon Encyclopedia. Demonicpedia, 7 Feb. 2010. Web. 6 Mar. 2011. <>

Farley, T. "What's the Harm in Exorcisms?" What's The Harm?, 7 Jan. 2008. Web. 6 Mar. 2011. <>

Goodman, F. The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel. Garden City: Doubleday, 1981.

Hansen, E. "What in God's Name?" The Washington Post. 4 Sep. 2005, Newspaper.

Opsasnick, M. "The Haunted Boy of Cottage City." Strange Magazine. 1 Jan. 1999, Number 20.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Exorcism of Anneliese." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, 8 Mar 2011. Web. 10 Oct 2015. <>


10 most recent comments | Show all 388 comments

watch zeitgeist movie, its certain that there is no god, and never existed a jesus... so when there was no jesus how could people made those stupid rituals and exorcisms...there is no such thing like demons...its just what people want to believe when they have such a low self confidence.. its just brain playing with them. i saw this movie called exorcism of emily rose, and i woke up 5 times at 3 am not because of the demon factor but for the fact that i actually saw that movie thoroughly and my brain remembered that time, and it set an alarm for 5-6 days.. and being an indian where there are 33 million god goddess, i think that stop frickkin believing in god, believe in yourself.

karan, india
May 8, 2013 4:20am

Karan, whilst your sentiment is commendable your reference is appalling...

If Zeitgeist tells us anything at all it tells us,

Laziness should not be rewarded..

Zeitgeist is a conspiracy on a conspiracy.. Neither of which is useful.

Magnanamous Dinoflagellate, sin city, Oz
July 2, 2013 10:40pm

I'm not defending the practice, but Anneliese was an adult at the time and was insisting on this treatment. Are the parents criminally responsible for their adult daughter's decisions?

If she was still a child, I agree that her parents would have some responsibility for what they allowed her to go through.

Also, it sounds like the psychiatric treatments were not working and that she continued to get worse, even under conventional medical techniques. Isn't it possible that she would have continued to "spiral" down to the point where she died with or without the exorcisms? So I'm not convinced that the practice was the cause of her dying.

Instinct tells me that antagonizing her delusions with this practice probably didn't help, though.

I noted that the parents did try conventional methods first, and probably went to exorcism as a last desperate resort.

If Anneliese truly believed she was possessed, the exorcism may have been effective (as you mentioned they sometimes are).

It sounds like there are different exorcism techniques that me be less scary and harmful than this particular case (like the case of Robbie Mannheim you mentioned). So I don't know if categorically dismissing the practice as a "brutal, heinous, medieval torture ritual" is justified.

Anyway, just my thoughts.

Thor, Califorinia
July 12, 2013 10:45am

Russel, you're an SQL professional aren't you?

Denis Solaro, Nice, France
July 24, 2013 6:41am

I cannot say 100% that demonic possession is real.

Nor can I say that exorcism is a barbaric practice and should be banned.

First I would say that if ANYBODY uses the movies as a case for or against possession/exorcism is a fool.

Saying based on a true story should be called false adv. It should say "true story changed for a movie and any relation to the origional story is purely coincidental.

Lets deal in facts.

Catholic exorcism is highly uncommon in the last century. In fact there are strict guildelines of REQUIRING medical examination and treatment first.

Even then they are very hesitent to perform one.

Second I find it being TOTALLY HYPICRITICAL that (especially when this happened) when someone does not get better or dies under conventional medical (psychological) care (which included very barberic treatments/ treatment of patients in mental hospitals) its readily accepted.

If you think mental heathcare( esp at that time) was civilized try doing a little research. You may be sickened. Especially in mental hospitals (where she did go).

But when (in this particular case) they tried everything with no effect to the patient getting WORSE so they tried this as last resort with the outcome being death everyone is screaming against religion and calling it barbaric.

All I am saying is don't base your opinions on religious bias or hatred or on movies but look into the ACTUAL CASES/FACTS.

Eric, Northern IL USA
August 1, 2013 2:54am

Thats easy, practising barbarism in a time where mental health issues were treated in an almost equally bizarre fashion may have just squeaked in for some.

Just for some who probably were doing it for self edification rather than any concern for the person who was a patient in an intolerable system.

Exorcism is a bit of a problem with critical thinking now and then but the options and respect for the diseased has changed in medical terms.

But not for those who still practice exorcism.

You can say that about acupuncture, homeopathy, naturopathy and spiritual "awareness".

Its a bit late to be foisting these on the unsuspecting public.

I forgot chiropracty..include that in the above..

Think about it, are acupuncture, homeopathy, naturopathy and chiropracty "theory and practice" any better than a "nice easy exorcism"?

Its only those who want some cheap recognition to themselves who would advise those as well.

Marked Duopoly, sin city, Big IL, USO
October 15, 2013 11:46am

Exorcism may or may not have been the most humane treatment for psychiatric conditions (there was a book and a movie based on an official Vatican priest that lived in both channels), but some current medical and psychotronic treatments by 'humans' are no less barbaric.
The following is a short article on the topic: ######## SOME UNKNOWN FACTS ON THE 1949 DEMON CASE:
(Edited and Updated Comments on the 1949 St. Louis Possession Case)
Steve Erdmann

The outreach to darken and besmirch this man's character, family history, innocence - not just in his adulthood but also as a child - continued with innuendo and incantations.

Do you believe that the boy in the book and the movie 'The Exorcist' was possessed? I understand his real name was mentioned on the Net and that he later worked for the space program. What do you hear?

My history on this case goes back much earlier when I first discovered the case around 1973. The late Father Eugene Gallagher of Georgetown University sent me a copy of an original "The Exorcist Diary". Consequently, I wrote about three articles (One article: "The Truth behind the Exorcist," FATE Magazine, January, 1975) and one booklet ("Anatomy of a Demon Possession": available from Luminist Publications, P.O. Box 20256, Minneapolis, MN, 55420. info @ based on my initial encounter with the environment back in the 1970s. Through the years, I att

Steve Erdmann, St. Louis, Mo.
January 6, 2015 10:06am

(Sorry - space limitations does allow me to reproduce the entire article on the 1949 demon possession case. I will try to get it to Brian in some other way. Or, if you would send your email address to me, I will download the entire article on my connection to the 1949 demon possession case.....send to:

Steve Erdmann, St. Louis, Mo.
January 6, 2015 10:15am

As to Karen-from-India's comment that there is no proof that Jesus existed, I do believe most historians agree that he did, indeed, exist. The controversy is over what his true identity was. The nonexistence of Jesus is but another myth:

Steve Erdmann, St. Louis, Mo.
January 6, 2015 10:33am

The following are some You tube presentations related to and explaining the movie and book I referenced above, for your information and background:

Steve Erdmann, St. Louis, Mo.
January 7, 2015 4:52pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply


What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid

About That 1970s Global Cooling...
Skeptoid #487, Oct 6 2015
Read | Listen (12:13)
The Flying Saucer Menace
Skeptoid #486, Sep 29 2015
Read | Listen (12:29)
Holocaust Denial
Skeptoid #485, Sep 22 2015
Read | Listen (12:54)
More Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #484, Sep 15 2015
Read | Listen (12:56)
Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #483, Sep 8 2015
Read | Listen (13:13)
#1 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#2 -
Read | Listen
#3 -
That Elusive Fibromyalgia
Read | Listen
#4 -
SS Iron Mountain
Read | Listen
#5 -
A Skeptical Look at the News
Read | Listen
#6 -
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Read | Listen
#7 -
Ancient Astronauts
Read | Listen
#8 -
Myths of Alcatraz
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal


Follow @skeptoid

Tweets about skeptoid

Support Skeptoid

Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.