The real facts behind the most notorious religion on Earth and its space opera backstory.

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Religion

Skeptoid #242
January 25, 2011
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

Today we're going to point the skeptical eye at perhaps the most notorious of all the world's religions, Scientology. Many people laugh at it, some people hate it, some even dedicate their lives to protesting it. What is it about this twentieth century creation that inspires such emotions?

Most people know the basics, that Scientology was invented by the science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard, and that he drew upon his creativity to fashion a space-opera legend upon which it's based, featuring evil galactic emperors, space battles, explosions, and reincarnated beings. Most know that they do some interview thing with a kind of electronic lie detector, and that they shrewdly recruit celebrities to increase their public profile. But how does the public perception compare to the reality of the Church of Scientology and its mysterious founder Lafayette Ronald Hubbard?

Hubbard grew up as a Navy brat, living wherever his dad was stationed, which was Guam in the late 1920s. In later life, Hubbard claimed that this somehow included being taught great wisdom by Chinese and Tibetan holy men, even being ordained by high priests; however no serious biographers or actual acquaintances ever took these stories seriously. As a boy he even claimed to have been made a blood brother of the Blackfeet Indians, for no clear reason. In other words, give an imaginative fiction writer a pen and who knows what you'll end up with.

He spent his twenties having a singularly undistinguished college experience, never achieving decent grades or a degree, in part because he spent so much time writing. Hubbard was not merely a prolific science fiction writer, he was outrageously so. The 2006 Guinness Book of World Records named him the most published and most translated author of all time, with 1,084 works translated into 71 languages. The vast majority of those were fiction that had nothing to do with Scientology. Whatever you may think of the quality of his writing — truly objective opinions are hard to come by with such a notorious author — it's hard to deny that the man put eyeballs on pages.

But despite his prodigious output, professional success as a writer did not come easily or soon, and the Navy ended up being his day job. By World War II he was a lieutenant in command of an anti-submarine ship off the U.S. west coast. As with so many aspects of his life, he greatly magnified his wartime career in his writings, and these exaggerations are still maintained by Scientology official records. They include his being injured in combat multiple times, having been the first casualty of the Pacific Theater, that he served in "all five theaters", that he received 21 medals and palms, and that he was a war hero who was twice declared dead. In fact he was never injured in combat, but only had pink-eye, bursitis, and an ulcer; he was relieved of the few commands he ever had for poor performance; and received only four medals, all four of which were given to every serviceman in the entire military stationed in the same theaters as he. Again, give an imaginative fiction writer a pen...

After the war was when Hubbard's future finally began to take shape. He spent a lot of time in the Los Angeles underground occult scene, living for a while in a sort of devil-worshipping commune with JPL founder John Parsons. This was a place where the dregs of the Hollywood elite hung out, experimenting with hallucinogenic drugs and hedonism. Much of these crazy times is documented in the Parsons biographies Strange Angel and Sex and Rockets. It was said that the women in the commune found Hubbard irresistible, and he went through them one by one, not necessarily ingratiating himself with all the guys. It was during these bizarre days that Hubbard openly began telling his friends that starting a religion was the way to make real money, and when he first began outlining his plans.

It began with Dianetics in 1950. Dianetics appeared simultaneously as the book Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health and as a chain of foundations around the United States to offer the treatments. Hubbard's basic idea of Dianetics is that negative experiences are stored in our minds as what he called engrams, and it's these engrams that are the source of all mental illnesses and other afflictions. He developed a process called auditing, where you are interviewed about your negative experiences by an auditor, until you no longer feel hampered by the engrams. The use of the E-meter, a simple galvanometer that Hubbard said should be held in the subject's hands, is alleged to allow the auditor to determine whether the subject has truly gotten over each engram. You are then what he called "clear" — free of engrams, and (supposedly) psychologically healthy.

What Hubbard did was to simply take something that's fairly basic — the fact that talking openly about your problems and bad experiences is nearly always helpful — and pretended to have invented it, gilding it with his own terminology and accoutrements. I've no doubt that many people who undergo auditing find it a positive and empowering experience. But they could have gotten the same result from talking with a friend, counselor, or even a bartender. The formalized structure surrounding the auditing process is like a series of appointments with a therapist, ensuring that you'll complete the process; and the use of the E-meter makes it seem all the more dramatic and impressive. There's no evidence that auditing is useful by any recognized psychiatric standard, but that's a different question than whether the experience is personally fulfilling.

Hubbard and his followers went to great lengths to try and get Dianetics established as a professionally recognized mental health regimen, but this was met instead with prosecutions for practicing medicine without a license, and bankruptcy. Unfazed, Hubbard then "saw the light", so to speak, and in 1952 he reframed Dianetics as a religion that he called Scientology. In order to present a quack psychological therapy as a religion, he needed a spiritual element; and so he drew upon his science fiction and created the idea of thetans. Thetans are immortal, incorporeal beings, who are reincarnated infinitely. We're each a thetan, you see, and before our thetans came to Earth we lived lives as alien beings on other planets, billions of years ago, accumulating engrams all the way.

The history of the Church of Scientology since then has been an unending series of lawsuits surrounding its tax exempt status as a religious organization in various countries, the use of its E-meters as unapproved medical devices, trademark disputes, and just about anything else someone might sue someone else for. In the United States, Scientology's tax exempt status was the longest running and most expensive litigation in the Internal Revenue Service's history, and it was eventually decided in Scientology's favor.

How do they pay for all these lawsuits? Well, they have a lot of money. Auditing is absurdly expensive, costing up to thousands of dollars; and each time a new member completes one series there is another even more expensive series to which they can graduate. Despite Scientology's claims of much higher membership, worldwide census estimates show there are probably around 50,000 people who identify as Scientologists. The vast majority of them are ordinary people like you and I, living normal lifestyles, who believe in the system and who pay for the sessions as they can. This aggregates into an enormous income stream for Scientology.

The most dedicated individuals may choose to go full time, and this means joining the Sea Org. Originally founded aboard three ships by Hubbard, the Sea Org members mainly live on dry land now, living and working at centers in major cities and at Scientology's various "bases", where they do things like produce videos, learn to become auditors, manufacture E-meters, and preserve Hubbard's archives. Sea Org members are paid under the same tax laws as nuns and monks, which permits working hours for religious devotees far in excess of what labor laws normally allow, with minimal compensation. Their lifestyle is extremely structured. They wear uniforms, outside contact is prohibited or discouraged, daily routines are strictly regimented, and they are subject to all manner of surveillance and internal penal systems administered by higher ranking Sea Org members.

Perhaps one of the best descriptions of the Scientologist lifestyle and its effect on members was revealed in Rolling Stone magazine in an article called Inside Scientology by Janet Reitman, later expanded into a book. Reitman investigated by three paths: She walked in the front door to their Hollywood campus and had the experience of an everyday new recruit; she phoned them professionally as a reporter and received a tour of their Gold Base in Hemet, CA; and she spoke with many current and former Scientologists. What she found were a number of disillusioned former members, and plenty of perfectly satisfied current members.

Scientology is notorious for its litigious nature. Their lawsuits are usually directed at former members who speak out against the church. Members are required to sign contracts in which they agree never to do such a thing, so these lawsuits are rarely trivial. The reality of the threat of a lawsuit is very much part of the pressure that Sea Org members are faced with when they consider leaving. Ordinary members rarely have to worry about such things, but being in the Sea Org is an all-or-nothing proposition. It's often compared to being in the military. You sink or swim. The structured environment better work for you, because if it doesn't, you'll find yourself on thin ice.

But such lawsuits are not the only reason that criticism of Scientology is justified. Their principal vehicle for attracting new income-generating members is a "free stress test" or "free personality test" offered out in the public, with no mention of Scientology, designed to be a quick, positive first experience with auditing. Then they draw you in with more such offers. As auditing purports to be a replacement for the sciences of psychology and psychiatry, Scientology often promotes a strong anti-psychiatry message, which is right up there with anti-vaccine quackery.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

While I certainly don't hold to any of the Scientology philosophy, and I think their science fiction thetan story with Lord Xenu is as ludicrous as anyone, I'm puzzled by the strong anti-Scientology passion expressed by its opponents such as the loosely organized group called Anonymous. I'm not Amish but I harbor no resentment to those who choose the Amish lifestyle, and I have no problem with people electing to dress in naval uniforms and live in regimented barracks. Whether Anonymous likes it or not, there are people who thrive in such a rigidly structured environment. It works for them, and it's as valid a lifestyle as any other. It's available for those who want it, and if you don't, nobody's trying to force it down your throat.

There is no group of people in the world that's either completely perfect or completely evil. There are things about Scientology worthy of abhorrence, most notably their anti-science stance on psychology and psychiatry, and there are things about it that work great for those who choose that lifestyle. And so, although it may pain many of my regular listeners to hear it, Scientology is not on my list of the worst things in the world. Keep your skepticism healthy.

[A followup to this episode is at addressing much of the criticism. - BD]

Brian Dunning

© 2011 Skeptoid Media Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Ludwig, S. "Guinness Gracious." Vox. Columbia Missourian, 7 Dec. 2006. Web. 17 Jan. 2011. <>

Miller, R. Bare-Faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard. London: M. Joseph, 1987.

Ortega, T. "Scientology's Crushing Defeat." Village Voice. 24 Jun. 2008, Newspaper.

Pendle, G. Strange Angel: The Otherworldly Life of Rocket Scientist John Whiteside Parsons. Orlando: Harcourt, 2005. 252-274.

Reitman, J. "Inside Scientology." Rolling Stone. 9 Mar. 2006, Issue 995: 55-67.

Streissguth, T. Charismatic Cult Leaders. Willits: Oliver Press, 1995. 66.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Scientology." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, 25 Jan 2011. Web. 1 Sep 2015. <>


10 most recent comments | Show all 168 comments

I know several people in scientology and they seem as happy as can be with it, despite all the money they've spent. For them, it works and has really healed their lives. Whether scientology actually helps people or is simply a form of "brain washing" I can't say for sure, but it's certainly not any more of a brain wash than any of the other religions out there. What's more, I haven't seen any scientologist running into abortion clinics to murder the doctors lately, nor have I seen any blowing themselves up in the name of their God. Actually their body count is pretty low in comparison to all those other better, "real", non-brain-washing religions but I don't see anyone mentioning that part. This entire argument is ridiculous, and frankly, what a scientologist chooses to believe in, or spend their own money on, is neither your business nor should it be any of your concern.

Annoyed, Nowhere
October 29, 2012 2:57am

I'm creating a religion based on the dungeons and dragons game. Who's in? Just as ridiculous. Pisses me off that they get tax exemptions and arent considered a cult. Where's the federal agents waiting to bust down their door? A religion based on a fictional book? Are you fucking kidding me?

Jeremy, Kentucky
November 7, 2012 7:38pm

Skeptoid has a habit of taking the time to debunk even the most fringe beliefs and explain the science behind the phenomena that convinces people of some woo; from Shadow people to the most obscure myths, cryptids and UFO stories, from hypnogogic sleep to the Placebo effect to debunking claims about Kangean water.

And here, you touched upon auditing, and that's better than most Scientology criticism, but this was an opportunity to go all out; to explain how past life memories can be formed in auditing or a look at alleged exteriorization, to explain stories and testimonials of OT powers, a good debunking of the reactive mind, the works.

I've never seen a skeptical source do that. This would've been a great opportunity to approach Scientology the way you've done shadow people, fringe conspiracy theories, etc.

It's weird, no skeptic treats Scientology as they would any other alternative medicine or new age belief; debunking the specific claims. Skeptic's just seem to stop at "Hubbard was a sci-fi writer."

Jonathan, Southern California
April 3, 2013 12:25am

I agree with Brian from Miami.

Kristopher Price, Port Republic , Maryland
July 25, 2013 6:06am

Critical analysis means you STUDY both sides, not write a bunch of rehashed lies and falsehoods coming from other people who never read a source book on the subject. Your purpose is to be a sceptic which blinds you to any truth. No original thinking here.

Lucile, Mashville
October 15, 2013 10:18am

Yes it's just another cult like the moonies or christians or buhdists or free masons etc. We have our own called Hillsong. Lonely people desperate to be part of a group.
cest la vie

peter, Newcastle
November 26, 2013 6:36pm

Thank you for this podcast. You did a good job of summarizing the complexities of Scientology. As a former Scientologist I have to tell you Scientology is much worse than your what you conclude in the final paragraphs. Regardless, thanks for the podcast and I hope it helps others stay far away from this harmful group.

Spectator, Los Angeles
July 16, 2014 1:15am

As to Hearsts timber holdings, why woulnt he want anoyher pulp industry? Its like having a restaurant and opening another.By the way, its Cannabis Indica, not India. At one time some people thought that it and C.Sativa were different species.Back to Hearst, to know that some one did something, it is not enough to say woulda-coulda-shoulda based on what they owned. You need a record of actual deeds.

Daniel Gautreau, wainfleet ontario
November 25, 2014 1:22pm

My fave comment was from jeremy of kentucky, about a "religion based on a fictional book?". Uh, that would be pretty much ANY religion, eh?

tomwelsh3, Portland, OR. USA
November 25, 2014 2:32pm

i think you didn't take such a close look on the subject
i've spent a few weeks researching scientology....
(books of some who left, various websites, leaked documents nearly EVERYTHING is availeable, research in "mind-control practises used by vvarious cults etc..)

the whole rpocess of auditing is, to put it simply, conditioning and an implementig of ideas, getting the audditee to thinnk in the wanted way

the "ethics" will handle thoughts that do not comply with CoS doktrin and there is also severe punishment for those who are "out-ethics" .from having to buy more auditing up to RPF which is pretty much like a gulag or chinese "re-education"

there are a lot of unexplained deaths (from suicide to murder! )
everyone who leaves scientology or is oppesed to it is declared a "supressive peron" and though he/she is purely evil is "fair game"
quote:"ENEMY - SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed."
despite CoS telling this was discontinued evidence showed up that this isn't true, we are not sccientologists so its np that they lie to everyone outside

following there where many crimes commited by CoS members by GO which was banned (leaders convicted) and its action continued by OSA (their intelligence agency... BlackPR,fair game, unameit)

in my opinion its the single most malicious, degrading, mindcontrolling cult ever known
peace out!

this is NUTS, europe
December 10, 2014 3:13pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply


What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid

Captain Kidd's Treasure
Skeptoid #481, Aug 25 2015
Read | Listen (12:07)
The Nazi of Nanking
Skeptoid #480, Aug 18 2015
Read | Listen (13:49)
Skeptoid #479, Aug 11 2015
Read | Listen (14:28)
Listener Feedback: Natural History
Skeptoid #478, Aug 4 2015
Read | Listen (11:36)
Wag the Dogman
Skeptoid #477, Jul 28 2015
Read | Listen (13:03)
#1 -
Read | Listen
#2 -
Harry Houdini and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Read | Listen
#3 -
The Death of Rasputin
Read | Listen
#4 -
The Water Woo of Masaru Emoto
Read | Listen
#5 -
The St. Clair Triangle UFO
Read | Listen
#6 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Braxton County Monster
Read | Listen
#8 -
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.