More Medical Myths

More myths about the human body that you've always heard, and probably believe.

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Alternative Medicine, Consumer Ripoffs

Skeptoid #174
October 6, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
 

Once before we looked at medical myths perpetuated by movies and pop culture, but the sheer volume of misinformation can hardly be contained within a single episode. So today we're going to pick it up again, and look at some more stories about the human body that you've always heard and probably believe.

We'll begin with the age-old advice that you should drink at least eight glasses of water a day, or about two liters. If you're backpacking or bicycle racing, that's not really all that much. But for most people, who, like me, sit around watching TV and scratching their belly, this would merely lead to superfluous trips to the bathroom. The problem is that the advice is not only unsupported, it's also misrepresented. The original recommendation seems to come from the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Research Council, which, way back in 1945, said that you should do this. But what seems to have been forgotten is that the report added "Most of this quantity is contained in prepared foods." Omit that, and it appears that you're supposed to stand at the sink and fill your glass eight times a day; which, it turns out, nobody ever recommended in the first place. Whatever you drink normally, in the form of coffee, juice, soft drinks, whatever, probably satisfies most people's water requirements. The evidence for this is that we don't see suited businesspeople laying around on the sidewalks of New York City dying of thirst, stretching out their hands in appeal to passersby.

Just don't take this advice to the extreme. My dad and some friends once came home from college in the UK by buying a boat and sailing across the Atlantic, and they needed to stock up on drinking water. But they reasoned that any liquid was just as good, so they bought a couple kegs of wine instead of water. The wine quickly spoiled in the tropical doldrums and had to be discarded, leaving them stranded in the middle of the Atlantic with nothing to drink, and by the time they reached the New World they were practically dead. Moderation in all things is always better than complete reliance on anything.

Dying from thirst is just one thing that can be frightening. They say Marie Antoinette's and Sir Thomas More's hair turned white from terror the nights before they were executed. It also happened in Shakespeare, and it even happened to Jobeth Williams in Poltergeist, giving her some Cruella de Ville streaks of white overnight. Can a terrible shock turn your hair white? More to the point, can anything make existing hair strands change color? Discounting artificial coloring or sun bleaching, the answer is no. Hair is dead tissue, there is no metabolism or mechanism that could alter its pigmentation and change its color, no matter how big of a shock you receive. However there is a condition called alopecia areata, in which all your pigmented hair falls out, sometimes quite rapidly, leaving only any unpigmented hair you might have. On a person with salt and pepper hair, this could indeed have the apparent effect of turning your hair white overnight. But although the causes of alopecia areata are unknown (though it's suspected to be an immune disorder), attempts to link it to stressful events have been post-hoc rationalizations, and there is no good evidence that it can be caused by fright or stress.

But what about new hair growth? Can some frightening event change something in your body that changes the color of your new hair? People often talk about stressful relationships or projects giving them gray hairs; does this actually happen? Not really, no. The color of your hair, and the age at which it goes gray, is determined by your genes. However, the process is not completely uninterruptible. Certain chemotherapies and certain diseases can temporarily change the color of your new hair growth, but your color will return to normal after the episode. Ionizing radiation has been shown to bring on premature graying in mice due to genetic damage. But so far, no good evidence supports the idea that a sudden fright, or even years of stressful living, can prematurely cause your hair to start growing gray or white, or cause hair loss.

And what man wants to be bald or gray when he's trying to pick up women? We've all heard that men think about sex every eight seconds. Or seven seconds, or nine seconds, or whatever the number. They think about it a lot. And if you're a man, you've probably heard this, felt ashamed and less of a man, and concluded you need to get your game on and think about sex a lot more often just to keep up with your peers. This is the kind of thing that sounds like it must have come out of some study done in the 1970's. The fact is nobody's really sure where or how this claim got started. Researching the question usually yields the same source: A study published in 1994, The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. They conducted a large survey, and although the results depended on self-reported data by men, they found that 54% of men think about sex at least once a day, 43% at least once a month, and 4% less than once a month. Hundreds of times a day does not seem to be supported by any real data. So relax, your hormones are probably OK.

So since you're not obligated to think about sex all day long, you'll need to find some other way to get knocked out. In movies it's really easy to knock someone out. If you're Bones McCoy, a couple quick karate chops to the shoulder and abdomen will do it; for anyone else, a solid punch or a sharp crack to the back of the head with a pistol will instantly drop your adversary to dreamland. 20 minutes later, they come to, perhaps feeling a bit bruised, but otherwise uninjured. Do people really have such an easily accessed and inconsequential on/off switch?

The actual injury needed to knock someone out is called a mild traumatic brain injury, or MTBI, more commonly called a concussion. Concussions are not caused simply by any blow to the head, though such a trauma can certainly cause other injuries. Concussions are produced by rapid brain acceleration, deceleration or rotation, anything that rapidly gives your brain a good squish. Grade I and Grade II concussions produce confusion and/or amnesia for up to 24 hours, but it takes a Grade III concussion to actually lose consciousness, and this rarely lasts more than five minutes. Symptoms sure to follow include headache, dizziness, confusion, nausea, slurred speech, lack of reasoning ability, amnesia and disorientation. In most patients, the symptoms resolve themselves within a matter of weeks. Rarely, surgery may be needed to relieve pressure or fix an intracranial hemhorrage. So if you're looking for that quick on/off switch for your movie plot, you need to invent your own imaginary clinical reactions.

But once you're unconscious, won't you get fat if you've recently eaten? Sumo wrestlers famously maintain their large bulk by napping after their meals. The idea is that food you eat before sleeping doesn't get as thoroughly metabolized as food you digest while being active, and so if you want to get fat, shift your meals toward bedtime. Lots of people try to avoid eating after dinnertime to stay skinny, but does this really do any good? Sadly for those looking for easy answers to the weight gain problem, this particular solution has been studied a lot, and found to be just another myth. There's certainly a correlation between people who eat late at night and obesity, but this is simply because people who eat at night are more likely to be those who overeat throughout the day. Similarly, those who skip breakfast are more likely to be those who power away too big of a lunch. Turns out it doesn't matter when you eat your calories, it just matters how many calories you eat in total. People who eat small meals spaced throughout the day are less likely to overeat at any given meal. So relax and don't shy away from that late-night snack, just be aware during your other meals that more calories are coming later.

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

But while you're snacking in bed, is it safe to pick up a book? Mom always used to warn me "Don't read in the dark, you'll ruin your eyes." And so, like most people, I've tried to avoid this. But then an opthalmologist friend assured me "You can't hurt your eyes by using them." Which do you trust, medical science or Mom wisdom? Can reading in dim light damage your visual acuity? There are two lines of evidence that support this: First, that using your eyes in difficult conditions can cause discomfort in the form of eye strain. That's a fact. Second, that smart people tend to wear glasses, presumably meaning that people who read a lot to achieve academic stature damaged their eyes in the process. That one? Not so much of a fact. Again, there may be an actual correlation: People who need to read a lot in their profession may be more likely to have gotten glasses to facilitate their reading, but there's no good evidence that one causes the other. Eye strain is not cumulative, and once you stop reading, the strain goes away and your eyes return to normal. It should be noted, however, that when you research this, you will find articles that do support the claim. But they are very much in the minority. It doesn't make them wrong, it just means that the experimental data has led the majority consensus of researchers to the opposite conclusion.

I say take your snack to bed with you, and read in the dark. If thinking about sex doesn't put you to sleep, a few sudden well-placed brain decelerations from smacking your head on the wall should do the trick. If it doesn't, then you should have known better than to listen to me or to anyone else. Always think for yourself, and never blindly accept what pop culture tells you.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Gardner, J. "Death by Water Intoxication." Military Medicine. 1 May 2002, Volume 167, Number 5: 432-434.

Hofmekler, Ori. "Diet Fallacy #3. Eating late will make you fat." DragonDoor.com For supreme fitness and well being. DragonDoor.com, 12 May 2005. Web. 9 Jan. 2010. <http://www.dragondoor.com/articler/mode3/318/>

Jelinek, J. E. "Sudden whitening of the hair." Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 1 Sep. 1972, Volume 48 Number 8: 1003-1013.

Laumann, Edward O., Gagnon, John H., Michael, Robert T., Michaels, Stuart. The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Levy, Janey. Alopecia Areata. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group, 2007.

Pearce, J.M.S. "Observations on Concussion." European Neurology. 1 Feb. 2008, Volume 59 Number 3-4: 113-119.

Ropper, Allan H., Gorson, Kenneth C. "Concussion." The New England Journal of Medicine. 11 Jan. 2007, Volume 356 Number 2: 166-172.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "More Medical Myths." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 6 Oct 2009. Web. 31 Oct 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4174>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 56 comments

The greatest myths of all lie in the field of so called psychosomatic medicine. Building on a correct simple concept that mental illness CAN manifest itself as physical symptoms a monstrous disproportionate professional edifice has been constructed that accumulates for itself vast proportions of the health budget, and has carved out for itself areas of medicine more appropriately left to physical medicine

During the fiasco of Agent Orange syndromes and Gulf War Syndromes, in which hundreds of thousands of returning soldiers were categorised as having psychosomatic problems - a whole literature of this nonsense was created - it is time to clean house of the offending mythology

What was a worldview that assisted in very useful counselling, came to regard itself as part of qualified medical practice adding childhood problems such as ADD and "Aspergers" to its repertoire. Well GWS as a psychosomatic problem or a form of depression has been all but thrown out. Aspergers is progressively being returned to the fields of ADD and autism. But the rest has to be purged too

No longer should physically ill people be hag-ridden with the unscientific concept that your physical symptoms are all in your head. People who are ill should be properly assessed and treated - adequate rather than minimal pathology testing needs to take place. The science of physical medicine needs to research further into the real causes of these items dismissed as psychosomatic.. The myth has to go!

phi, Sydney
April 30, 2011 10:57pm

If you wanted to prove "physically ill" people are being "hag ridden" with apparently unscientific concepts would it not be a good starting place to show that the people ARE in fact physically ill?

The vast majority of people who are suffering from mental health issues that manifest physical symptoms do not suffer from GWS, nor Agent Orange exposure or Aspergers (oh look, you decided it was real again! An actual varient of autism as the psychologists said, and not something they "invented" any more). They suffer from Stress, PTSD, Depression, or other common ailments.

Yes, there have been some cases where illness thought to have been mental has been shown to be physical, as with GWS. There are other cases where it went the other way too. We could as easily claim "as it has been proven Stress can manifest physical symptoms we must throw away this myth of physical illness and ONLY treat for psychiatric issues!" Because you know, it doesn't matter that cancer is a different beast entirely apparently...

Or, you could stop spouting utter nonsense, and actually consider the fact that there are many different forms of illness, with many different cause. That GWS and Depression may infact be entirely different from each other and from Cancer or Atheletes Foot, and advocating innapropriate treatments with out evidence, to suit your ideology is pretty stupid of you Phi. Or prove it, with evidence of physical cause/cure! Evidence! Data! Facts! Not your opinion AGAIN.

Tom H, Kent
May 11, 2011 9:03am

Nearsightedness is correlated with spending less time outdoors according to this article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/21/opinion/21wang.html

"In the early 1970s, 25% of Americans were nearsighted; three decades later, the rate had risen to 42%, and similar increases have occurred around the world...
Among children who spend the same amount of time outside, the amount of near work has no correlation with nearsightedness. Hours spent indoors looking at a screen or book simply means less time spent outside, which is what really matters."

Max, Boston, MA
July 6, 2011 12:17am

I am afraid Tom is right... malfunction of cerebral or mid brain function is "all in your head" Phi.

I have absolutely no doubt that there was a gulf war syndrome but not for all the insane reasons we thought 15 years ago.

secondly, I have yet to be made aware of a consistent disease underlying GWS or its apparent symptomology. The media has poisoned that well.

If gulf war syndrome is classified as a single disease as you intimate, can you please elaborate?

Phi, you seem to get very agressive on this and some very odd food issues. Could you at least explain this current predilection of yours.

Trust us, we are all doctors here!

Henk V., sydney, Australia
September 1, 2011 7:28am

If, as Phi suggested we "cleaned house of the offending mythology" it would be interesting to see how many of the "facts" supporting GWS remain. There is an important discussion that needs to be had about the possible side effects of some medications given to service men, but pretending that:
a) There was a single bogey man side effect called GWS
b) That a large portion of those who suspected they had the disease were more accurately diagnosed as PTSD.
And most importantly:
c) That Phi not happening to like psychology somehow grants him the right to declare what is, or is not "real" with out supplying realistic evidence

-are all going to muddy the water of reasonable discussion.

Simply pretending that psychology is some kind of fad wont make the overwhelming number of PTSD diagnosises go away, or make them untrue.

There IS a physiological cause to the disorder by the way: It is the neurons firing in your brain as it processess information of your experiences. No agent orange, no disease that surgery can counter. To use a crude analogy, you can't prevent your PC getting a computer virus by maintaining the circuit boards, it is an internal process of the software.

Describing psychology as an ehtic or mythology is just another layer of ignorance I'm afraid.

Tom H, Kent
September 1, 2011 9:33am

Tom, I thoroughly concur. PTSD has affected a number of returned servicemen I have met.

The question remains, If GWS sufferers did not see action or horrendous events and there is a claim on some biochem contamination of service men, why dont we see it now and why hasnt medicine produced a single emphatic study the porcupines in the media can run with?

I have heard ebery excuse being gutted because media has its opinion. There may be very many returnees whose cases will never be examined because of ridiculous reporting poisoning the response of fine medicos.

Unbelievable we may say?

Look at the number of medicos believing in believable woo. Surely 60 minutes has its effect on them as well.

PS, Thanx Tom for all the stimulation over the past few years. I miss Cam. Where did he go? I hope it wasnt over an irreverent dig at his profession. Try being a paid geek who can only lecture and whiteboard the simplest things.

Try being a geek and getting lucky!

Henk V., sydney, Australia
September 1, 2011 12:46pm

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your work. Here you say

"Turns out it doesn't matter when you eat your calories, it just matters how many calories you eat in total."

The belief that calories in minus calories out equals weight gain/loss was debunked long ago. Here's a good explanation:

http://garytaubes.com/2012/11/what-would-happen-if-thoughts-and-thought-experiments-on-the-calorie-issue/

David Siegel, New York
June 2, 2013 7:15am

Thanks for the lookey see David.

Folk tend to forget we are omnivores.

Moral Dolphin Back in Mud Suit, Greenacres by the sea Oz
June 5, 2013 3:17pm

Re: knockouts - -

I have not only experienced the "single blow to unconsciousness", but I have also seen many "knockouts" in person in which the person was "dead to the world" yet recovered within 3 minutes with *no* problems and were able to continue on as if nothing had happened. No loss of reflexes, no memory problems, no nausea, no dizziness, etc.

So, yes, the "hollywood knockout punch" *is* real.

Just my .390 percent worth.

Mad Mac, Somewhere in Colorado, I think
August 9, 2013 6:15pm

thanks for the information.I regret that many professionals offer many terms as a form of professional exclusion for others who are only the sufferers.How about someone offering PTSD and depressed folk a cure.
Anyone offering rather than debating.Mo

Mo Bon, northern england
June 15, 2014 10:56am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply

 

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 

Newest
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Skeptoid #438, Oct 28 2014
Read | Listen (11:56)
 
Tube Amplifiers
Skeptoid #437, Oct 21 2014
Read | Listen (14:57 )
 
Ionithermie
Skeptoid #436, Oct 14 2014
Read | Listen (10:11)
 
The St. Clair Triangle UFO
Skeptoid #435, Oct 7 2014
Read | Listen (13:56)
 
The Braxton County Monster
Skeptoid #434, Sep 30 2014
Read | Listen (11:26)
 
Newest
#1 -
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Fukushima vs Chernobyl vs Three Mile Island
Read | Listen
#4 -
The Baldoon Mystery
Read | Listen
#5 -
Listeners Have Another Say
Read | Listen
#6 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen
#7 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#8 -
6 Problems with Wind Turbine Syndrome
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


Follow @BrianDunning

Tweets about "skeptoid"

Support Skeptoid

Name/Nickname:  
City/Location:
Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
Comment:
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.