Magic Jewelry

All sorts of marvelous health claims are made for jewelry such as the Q-Ray bracelet.

by Brian Dunning

Filed under Alternative Medicine, Consumer Ripoffs, Paranormal

Skeptoid #84
January 22, 2008
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe

Today we're going to try to heal our bodies through one of the simplest methods imaginable: We're simply going to slip on an ionized bracelet. It's going to correct our bodies' natural electrical fields, and anything that's wrong with us will be healed naturally.

Does that sound a little suspicious to you? Well, it did to me too when I first heard it. But it sounds perfectly reasonable to a lot of people. Start paying attention and you'll notice that plenty of people still walk around wearing a Q-Ray bracelet. I have several friends who wear them. Once I asked one of them what it does, and he said he wasn't sure but he felt better whenever he wore it.

The Q-Ray bracelet is the best known and most popular of the so-called ionized bracelets on the market. It's actually a knockoff of the original, called the Bio-Ray bracelet, developed in 1973 by Spanish chiropractor Manuel Polo. Polo's idea was based on his belief that general wellness could be achieved through proper balancing of positive and negative ions in the body. Now, a vague claim like this might sound reasonable to an uninformed person, but run it past any electrical engineer. There's no plausible way that any type of bracelet could have such an effect, unless it's grounded. Walking across a carpet and scuffing your feet will have a dramatic effect on your body's static electrical charge (which is the technically correct way to refer to your body's "balance of positive and negative ions"), and this is unaffected by any jewelry you might be wearing. Being indoors or outdoors during a thunderstorm will produce the same difference. People riding in a car have a different static charge than people outside the car who are grounded. None of these conditions have ever been shown to have an affect on a person's general well-being, nor can they be mitigated by jewelry.

It's easy to poke holes in the technical claims made by the Q-Ray people, but their satisfied customers aren't interested. They feel better when they wear it, and that's all they need to know. Fortunately, that's a claim that someone finally decided to put to the test. The Mayo Clinic took 710 people and, in a fully blinded and randomized clinical trial, gave half of them Q-Ray ionized bracelets, and half of them identical looking "placebo" bracelets. As you can probably guess, there was no difference in the amount of pain reduction reported by either group.

I was curious to see exactly what the makers of Q-Ray claim on their web site. I went to and found, quite anticlimactically, that they make no claims of any kind whatsoever. The bracelet's only characteristic that they discuss is its design. They don't even call it ionized any more. They simply sell them as metal bracelets, in various colors and styles ranging from $60 to $300. Turns out there's a very good reason for this. In 2003, the Federal Trade Commission nailed them for false advertising, and ordered them to stop. Unfortunately they didn't stop, and in 2006, the courts brought the hammer down hard. QT Inc., the makers of Q-Ray, were ordered to turn over $22.5 million in profits, and also provide $64.5 million in refunds. This ruling was upheld by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in January 2008.

I wanted to see what these false claims had been, so I turned to the Internet researcher's favorite tool, the Wayback Machine at, which archives old versions of web sites. But, I was thwarted once again. QT Inc. had had their site removed from the Wayback Machine's archives. Happily, there are even better archives out there. In this case, I found many of their claims preserved for the ages on Dr. Stephen Barrett's irreplaceable Let's hear some of them. Cue the New Age music:

The Q-RAY bracelet is designed to achieve many of the same goals as traditional Chinese acupuncture. Acupuncture was developed to balance the body's Yin (negative ions) and Yang (positive ions), the two inseparable, complementary energies that permanently circulate in the human body. When these energies become unbalanced, the body's functioning is thought to be altered—which can be at least very annoying and at worst debilitating, depending on the size and nature of the energy imbalance. Oriental medicine, through acupuncture, is believed to regulate these two energies, discharging from the body excess positive ions and providing access to blocked negative ions, by stimulating meridian acupuncture points.

In the human body, which is electromagnetic by nature, biomagnetic alpha and beta waves circulate throughout the vital centers. When the flow is cut off and these alpha and beta waves become stagnant in one particular area of the body, bioelectrical alterations and ionic imbalances can result. Designed by Dr. Polo with polarized multi-metallic metals, the Q-RAY bracelet's circular form and spherical terminals offer low resistance to the bioelectrical conductibility of the alpha and beta waves, facilitating the discharge of excess positive ions or static electricity. Excess of positive ions is associated with poor nutrition, incorrect breathing, sedentary life style, and the use of electrical instruments or exposure to EMF (Electronic Magnetic Field). Loss of negative ions is associated with symptoms such as anxiety, stress, fear, hatred, and physical exhaustion.

Judge Frank Easterbrook aptly described these claims as "poppycock", "techno-babble", and "blather." He remarked that the "Defendants might as well have said: 'Beneficent creatures from the 17th Dimension use this bracelet as a beacon to locate people who need pain relief, and whisk them off to their home world every night to provide help in ways unknown to our science.'"

According to Dr. Barrett, one of QT Inc.'s owners testified in the 2006 trial that he could not define the term "ionization" but picked it because it was simple and easy to remember. The court concluded that his testimony on ionization was "contradictory and full of obfuscation". Did QT Inc. try to support their claims in court? No, they did not. Under oath, they testified that the only healthful effect produced by the Q-Ray was the placebo effect. That's right, sports fans: When under the gun, the Q-Ray's manufacturers stated that all the claims they've ever made about positive healthful effects from using their product are bogus. At best, it is a placebo. Just not a very useful one, according to the Mayo Clinic.

Dr. Barrett also archived claims from QT Inc. that the Q-Ray bracelets could restore health, relieve cancer pain, improve muscle flexibility, improve sports performance, restore energy, and provide other health benefits. A 2000 TV infomercial for Q-Ray stated: "When you have a severe injury or a chronic injury or a chronic problem like arthritis, you have build-up of positive ions. Wherever that is, you are going to have pain. In order to remove this pain, Q-Ray bracelet rips it right out of the body!" Needless to say, medical science has never found any correlation between pain or injuries, and build-ups of positive ions.

Q-Ray has not been completely neutered, though. A Google search returns a number of third party resellers of the bracelet still making all kinds of meaningless techno-babble claims., for example, still calls it "ionized" and backhandedly implies that the Q-Ray has extremely powerful effects by warning that you should contact your doctor before wearing one if you're pregnant, that you should not allow the ends of the bracelet to contact each other, and that you should not wear a Q-Ray if you use a pacemaker or other medical device. says that the Q-Ray causes your body to "realign and balance its energies", and that it balances your body's yin and yang to "flood your system" with "increased amounts of natural pain relief compounds." says these are "the same bracelets you've seen in doctors' offices."

Tip Skeptoid $2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

But there's little need for these marketers to rely on the Q-Ray. ValueHealth2000 also sells the Q-Link pendant, another knockoff that the FTC doesn't seem to have caught up with yet. They claim the Q-Link strengthens you against electromagnetic radiation, and also make the following statement that Judge Easterbrook would really love: "Doctors who tested the Q-Link Pendant with Sympathetic Resonance Technology™ found that it very quickly amplifies healthy energy states — and decreases energy drains caused by a wide variety of stressors." The FTC has, however, caught up with yet another knockoff company. They have a suit similar to the one against QT Inc. pending against the makers of an identical so-called "ionized" bracelet, the Balance Bracelet.

Unless you're trying to allege yet another pharmaceutical conspiracy, you have to think that any true healing powers of simple jewelry would have become a fundamental of medical science long ago, and would be first on your doctor's prescription pad. Just remember what we always recommend here: When you hear any claim that sounds far fetched or goes against your understanding of science or the natural world, you have very good reason to be skeptical.

Brian Dunning

© 2008 Skeptoid Media Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Barrett, Stephen. "Q-Ray Bracelet Marketed with Preposterous Claims." Quackwatch. Quackwatch, 6 Jan. 2009. Web. 9 Nov. 2009. <>

Bratton, Robert L. et al. "Effect of “Ionized” Wrist Bracelets on Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial." Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 1 Nov. 2002, Volume 77, Number 11: 1164-1168.

CBC. "Buying Relief: A Q-Ray timeline." Marketplace. CBC, 14 Nov. 2007. Web. 9 Nov. 2009. <>

Denlow, Morton. "FTC v. Qt Inc." case Watch. Case Watch, 8 Sep. 2006. Web. 20 Oct. 2009. <>

Easterbrook, Chief Judge. "FTC v. Qt Inc US 7th Circuit of Appeals." Case Watch. Case Watch, 3 Jan. 2008. Web. 19 Oct. 2009. <>

Qray. "Q-ray Website." Official home of the Q-ray bracelet. Q-Ray, 9 Nov. 2009. Web. 9 Nov. 2009. <>

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "Magic Jewelry." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, 22 Jan 2008. Web. 4 Oct 2015. <>


10 most recent comments | Show all 25 comments

Actually, copper is an essential mineral of the body. The skin absorbs things topically. You can see this realization now in the modern pharmacutical industry, they now produce many topical medicines. Wearing a bracelet may not be a cracked up as people are inflamed to believe.
Also, many different people have many different healing needs. Everyone's body is different. A bracelet may help some people and not others. It depends on the need. No need to get inflamed and freaked out over people who experience healing by less chemical means. It is not your body after all. It is as if I were to tell you that you could absolutely NOT experience pleasure or fun playing golf because I think it is so boring and stupid, yet, people love golf and they do experience pleasure and fun from it.
So much hot-headed dribble-drabble here! I thought this was supposed to be a discussion not a board full of personal attacks!?

astrid, san fran., CA, USA
June 7, 2011 11:33am

Astrid, there are many transdermal medicines and therapies available now.

If the makers of a bracelet think they are on the same level as pharceutical delivery research and implementation they are clearly wrong and have never bothered to prove otherwise.

If you have a valid product why court the woo to sell it?

As for copper being helpful for various processes, obviously but the bit we get from our diet hasnt been proven to be suprassed by transdermal powers. the sets copper and bracelet clearly do not produce a synergystic effect to give people added powers of disease resistance, luck, sports performance etc.

On the point of sports performance, the only folk that would need supplements are super atheletes. By and large the rest of us get by on added food in a balanced diet.

Wearing a bracelet and living on fried chicken and cheese burgers is not a health choice.

Henk V, sin city, Oz
September 5, 2011 8:00pm

I really enjoyed the episode and it ties into something that I just recently heard a lot about recently. My wife heard about hazelwood necklaces and how they supposedly remove excess acidity from the body while being worn. I did a quick search about them and found the same quote again and again about aboriginal peoples using them in the past, but no research at all. Have you heard anything about this? Thanks.

holykhakis, Louisiana
November 23, 2011 7:20pm

how does "remove excess acidity from the body while being worn" even begin to help when the amount of water being removed to carry that "acidity" be equivalent to having your excretory organs under your chin?

Surely urogenital surgery would require such a necklace to be worn.

as I said before; Wearing a bracelet and living on fried chicken and cheese burgers is not a health choice.

I now add;

Mayonnaise neck is not a good look..

Mud, Sin City, Oz
January 10, 2012 8:17pm

I'm bored so a bit of thread necrophilia- Interpretation of Astrid's post:

Copper is an essential mineral of the body.

The skin absorbs [minerals] topically.

Drug companies produce topical medicines.

Therefore a copper bracelet is equivalent to clinically produced topical medication.

People are different.

Some people may be deficient in Copper mineral and therefore will experience better results from a Copper bracelet than others who do not.

Your exhibition of scorn for the lack of any evidence that Copper bracelets perform as asserted renders your arguments and credibility invalid.

I am supposed to be able to advertise my bracelets here and not be attacked as a charlatan.

Government Goodies, Secret Government Lab
March 6, 2013 9:25am

I love it when someone brings up an anecdote as if it's compelling. Sure, I'll trust your unblinded, uncontrolled study with a sample size of one over those multiple, sound studies by qualified people.

You act like skeptics are trying to ruin everyone's fun, when they're actually trying to protect consumers from companies that make false claims. I have no problem with what jewelry you choose to wear, and you're free to believe anything you want about the jewelry, but it's not okay for a company to lie to you and tell you they have magic powers.

Yabeen Sees, Tooleedoo
April 10, 2013 8:15am

What's scarier than these 'miracle' bracelet companies trying to rip millions of people off is that MILLIONS of people are stupid enough to buy one.

Fact not Fiction, Canada
September 8, 2013 9:45am

It may just be fashionable Fact or Fiction.

Magic sports tape is now very fashionable, mood rings were fashionable.

Desirability is in question. Its not whether any of us can be cajoled into buying a worthless product that may be just like the one your friend has. Is it desirable to be seen spruiking garbage to be fashionable?

That is where woo has a basis. Come to think of it, so is any conspiracism. Its ok to be ignorant and its ok to be a consumer without any level of discernment.

"People ask me why I pray. Its just as effective as any alternative medicine and frankly, I like talking to myself".

There is magic in that...

Mula Doola, Sin City Oz
September 24, 2013 10:04pm

I personally like to use magents in jewelry: magnetic semi-precious gem stones are an amusing novelty that is popular right now.

I have no data to support the claim that magnets have healing potential as used in the jewelry that is so popular. I do know for a fact that jewelry grade magnets can turn some medical machinery off or interfere with function, such as pacemakers or insulin pumps.

So if you's like a necklace or bracelet made of magnetic hematite just ask. If you turn off your life support with it....well, I guess you won't be asking for a second one.

Swampwitch, Gainesville Fl
October 24, 2013 9:03am

Hey Brian, now they've got a new bracelet called iRenew!
I saw a commercial for it on a NEWS channel, of all places.

It gives you "instant energy", "balance", and "improves" a whole bunch of your physical stuff - or something.

I'd love to see an article/ podcast on THAT one in the near future! :D

Here's a website:


Ron, Calgary Alberta Canada
March 31, 2014 11:43am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point).

Post a reply


What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid

The Flying Saucer Menace
Skeptoid #486, Sep 29 2015
Read | Listen (12:29)
Holocaust Denial
Skeptoid #485, Sep 22 2015
Read | Listen (12:54)
More Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #484, Sep 15 2015
Read | Listen (12:56)
Unsung Women of Science
Skeptoid #483, Sep 8 2015
Read | Listen (13:13)
Sir Franklin's Cannibals
Skeptoid #482, Sep 1 2015
Read | Listen (12:13)
#1 -
The St. Clair Triangle UFO
Read | Listen
#2 -
Tube Amplifiers
Read | Listen
#3 -
Read | Listen
#4 -
That Elusive Fibromyalgia
Read | Listen
#5 -
SS Iron Mountain
Read | Listen
#6 -
A Skeptical Look at the News
Read | Listen
#7 -
The War of the Worlds Panic Broadcast
Read | Listen
#8 -
Ancient Astronauts
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid on Stitcher   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal


Follow @skeptoid

Tweets about skeptoid

Support Skeptoid

Email: [Why do we need this?]To reduce spam, we email new faces a confirmation link you must click before your comment will appear.
characters left. Abusive posts and spam will be deleted.