Ghost Hunting Tools of the Trade

Why the use of electronic equipment by TV ghost hunters is so stupid.

Skeptoid #81
January 01, 2008
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Television shows about ghost hunting have been popular for over 50 years, and though the basic concept is the same, recent decades have seen the hunt become less about psychics and séances and more about electronic detection gear. Just about every TV show about ghost hunting sends a crew of investigators into a building, armed to the teeth with all sorts of equipment.

The use of any kind of measuring equipment to detect ghosts is fundamentally, and completely, bogus. How can I make a blanket statement like that? Measuring equipment detects what it is designed to detect, whether that's light, heat, electromagnetism, or whatever. Thus it will only detect things that emit measurable amounts of those energies. For us as viewers to accept that some piece of handheld measuring equipment has a useful function in detecting a ghost, we must base our acceptance on the premise that ghosts are known to emit those types of energies in measurable amounts. If there were any truth to this, science would have discovered it long ago. Hospital operating rooms would have ghost detection equipment built in. Mortuaries and crematoriums would have ghost detection equipment at the top of their list. Search and rescue crews would use ghost detection equipment. If ghosts did exist and were detectable, you can bet that there would be huge industries behind it. I can't think of anything that would attract more venture capital dollars from Silicon Valley. However, no rigorous research has ever shown that ghosts can be reliably detected with hardware. It's easy to disbelieve me, but it's much harder to disbelieve the lack of interest from greedy corporate America.

So now let's look at the popular tools of the trade of ghost hunting. The important takeaway is to understand what these devices are actually detecting when the ghost hunters point them around the room, and why their crazily jumping needles and indicators are perfectly consistent with, and explained by, the absence of ghosts.

When you turn on the television and you watch people pointing their gizmos around the room, acting all dramatic and pretending to detect ghosts all around them, any intelligent adult should laugh out loud. Or better yet, change the channel. Of course an intelligent adult should be free to watch whatever they want, and that's fine — but one place I will draw the line is the point where you let your children watch one of those shows and allow them to accept the silly claims as fact. Watch it and enjoy it as entertainment, if you find those people truly engaging and clever enough to be entertaining; but please, explain to your kids the science behind what they're seeing. Or, as the case may be, the lack of science behind it.

Brian Dunning
Brian Dunning

References
© 2009 Skeptoid.com

Discuss!

5 most recent comments | Show all 92 comments

Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.

And ghost hunter should continue to be mocked and laughed at, until they can reproduce their 'proof' in a controlled environment. Heck, i'd be impressed if they could produce any kind of testable theory or proof that cannot be explained by a far simpler theory.

If spirits exist, as many believe they do, then for a researcher to reproduce their "proof" in a controlled environment would be impossible. To do that the researcher would have to have physical control of the spirit and the ability to make it do what they wanted it to. I don't see that happening if spirits exist.

If science only accepts what it can control, then it can't ever expect to grow and discover new things. There's a great big world out here. Take a look outside the lab sometime.

Linda, Kentucky
May 20, 2009 7:29pm

Occam's Razor, kids. Learn it, live it, love it.

Davin, New York CIty
June 11, 2009 12:31am

I have a HUGE problem believing in any EVP, especially after listening to the "When People Talk Backwards" episode.(http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4105)

For the orb fans, I can't sway their belief here. But for those who disbelieve in orbs, but believe in EVPs, just try to drop your belief for a few seconds:

An orb is usually a dust particle in the flash. Why can't an EVP be a stomach gurgling, or the wind as a person walks by, or even the general creaks of the human body and the shuffle of clothes? I remember silently hiccupping while recording a video, only to hear the hiccups loud as day on the replayed tape.

What if the reason EVPs only supposedly are on one mike is because that's where the little burst of wind was?

PLEASE go listen to the "Backwards" podcast and think about all your EVPs - all your proof. Isn't the proven scientific phenomenon of pareidolia give you pause on your proof? Can you say that you have carried on a real conversation with someone in an EVP? Or did "they" just kind of respond to a single question and the effect sounds logical (again, see pareidolia)?

Now, I'm not trying to insult you, but now think about the dogs on Youtube and various home video shows that can "say" "I love you."

Do you believe they are REALLY saying those WORDS? Or is it just that their owners have reinforced the behavior of that specific whine of theirs and now have them do it as a trick?

I still want to believe in ghosts, but the evidence is against me.

Scott, California
June 12, 2009 10:32am

Some people try so hard to prove ghosts they will take the recording of wind escaping someones back side along with a cold spot or stray EMF field and say it's proof. Granted, those people need to be made fun of. Others, like myself though, actually try to do paranormal investigating with some intelligence and only after we go over evidence with a fine tooth comb several times, and subject it to others for advice, and then go through it again and try our hardest to prove it ISN"T paranormal, do we present it to the world as a POSSIBILITY of ghosts. For every one person who may actually listen with an open mind and consider it, there are 3 or 4 others like some of you on here that will refuse to even consider it.
I find it funny how many people wish to try to discredit paranormal investigating, talk like you know so much, yet I bet most (if not all) of you have never actually tried it to see for yourselves if there is actually anything to it. At least a possibility of there being ghosts.If you don't actually have the experience from both sides of the issue, then I think it is kind of hard to act like you know for sure one way or the other. In fact, dare I say, it's kind of moronic to even open your mouths.
Seeing as I have actually had experiences, I can actually say that there are ghosts. If you want to argue about it fine, but if you have never tried to prove there isn't, other than making fun of Ghost Hunters, you are hurting your cause more than helping it.

Chris, Indiana
June 12, 2009 7:12pm

I completely agree with the comment above. We could capture Bigfoot, and still sceptics would find something to cast doubt. It is absolutely rediculous that every time a Ghost Hunter comes up with any kind of evidence, it is immediately attacked.
To say that the equipment we use does not help produce evidence because it is not mass marketed, and thay we don't know how to properly use it, sounds like something a politician would say. Perhaps you should use the equipment for yourself in a paranormal setting, or read up on how it's made before you cast judgment.
First of all EMF stands for Electromagnetic Fluctuation, not "Field"...we are not measuring "Fields" in the paranormal but "Fluctuation", which is what an EMF Meter does. Second, to say that a digital voiced recorder picks up harmonics that the human ear can't hear is not correct. There have been many EVP's that I have captured I could hear at the time of recording. In fact, it's the inner electronic sounds that all recorders produce that enable a spirit to communicate, not the misconception it is picking up frequencies we can't hear. Any electronic device can be used for an EVP to come through..the recorder simply picks up these sounds better, and if you look at any popular recorder's schematics, you would see an amplification chip in the dynamic microphone circut, which makes this possible.
We can go back and forth all you want, but perhaps you should try it for yourself before discrediting the work of others.

Scott Trulove, Nevada
June 15, 2009 4:55pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks, advertisements, and other useless posts will be deleted. TO POST A URL, PLEASE USE A URL SHORTENING SERVICE LIKE TINYURL.COM.
Answer 9 + 1 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid for just 99¢ per download
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is written and produced
by Brian Dunning


Newest
Sarah Palin Is Not Stupid
Skeptoid #160, Jun 30 2009
Read | Listen (10:26)
 
The Mothman Cometh
Skeptoid #159, Jun 23 2009
Read | Listen (11:15)
 
Student Questions: Swine Flu and Depleted Uranium
Skeptoid #158, Jun 16 2009
Read | Listen (13:07)
 
High Fructose Corn Syrup: Toxic or Tame?
Skeptoid #157, Jun 9 2009
Read | Listen (12:32)
 
Falling into Mel's Hole
Skeptoid #156, Jun 2 2009
Read | Listen (11:03)
 
Newest
#1 -
How to Argue with a Creationist
Read | Listen
#2 -
The Detoxification Myth
Read | Listen
#3 -
Apocalypse 2012
Read | Listen
#4 -
Religion as a Moral Center
Read | Listen
#5 -
An Evolution Primer for Creationists
Read | Listen
#6 -
New Age Energy
Read | Listen
#7 -
World Trade Center 7: The Lies Come Crashing Down
Read | Listen
#8 -
The Devil Walked in Devon
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

[Valid RSS]

ZIP Code Database

Skeptoid Podcast Skeptoid Podcast   Skeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on MySpace   Skeptoid on Twitter

Skeptoid is not responsible for the content of the ads below. Supporters help reduce the need for them.