Close

What's the Most Important Thing about Skeptoid?

Think you know? Click here to find out:

skeptoid.com/important.


Ghost Hunting Tools of the Trade

Why the use of electronic equipment by TV ghost hunters is so stupid.

You should follow me on twitter here.

Skeptoid #81
January 01, 2008
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Television shows about ghost hunting have been popular for over 50 years, and though the basic concept is the same, recent decades have seen the hunt become less about psychics and séances and more about electronic detection gear. Just about every TV show about ghost hunting sends a crew of investigators into a building, armed to the teeth with all sorts of equipment.

The use of any kind of measuring equipment to detect ghosts is fundamentally, and completely, bogus. How can I make a blanket statement like that? Measuring equipment detects what it is designed to detect, whether that's light, heat, electromagnetism, or whatever. Thus it will only detect things that emit measurable amounts of those energies. For us as viewers to accept that some piece of handheld measuring equipment has a useful function in detecting a ghost, we must base our acceptance on the premise that ghosts are known to emit those types of energies in measurable amounts. If there were any truth to this, science would have discovered it long ago. Hospital operating rooms would have ghost detection equipment built in. Mortuaries and crematoriums would have ghost detection equipment at the top of their list. Search and rescue crews would use ghost detection equipment. If ghosts did exist and were detectable, you can bet that there would be huge industries behind it. I can't think of anything that would attract more venture capital dollars from Silicon Valley. However, no rigorous research has ever shown that ghosts can be reliably detected with hardware. It's easy to disbelieve me, but it's much harder to disbelieve the lack of interest from greedy corporate America.

So now let's look at the popular tools of the trade of ghost hunting. The important takeaway is to understand what these devices are actually detecting when the ghost hunters point them around the room, and why their crazily jumping needles and indicators are perfectly consistent with, and explained by, the absence of ghosts.

When you turn on the television and you watch people pointing their gizmos around the room, acting all dramatic and pretending to detect ghosts all around them, any intelligent adult should laugh out loud. Or better yet, change the channel. Of course an intelligent adult should be free to watch whatever they want, and that's fine — but one place I will draw the line is the point where you let your children watch one of those shows and allow them to accept the silly claims as fact. Watch it and enjoy it as entertainment, if you find those people truly engaging and clever enough to be entertaining; but please, explain to your kids the science behind what they're seeing. Or, as the case may be, the lack of science behind it.

You should follow me on twitter here.

Brian Dunning
Brian Dunning

© 2008 Skeptoid.com

References & Further Reading

Barušs, Imants. "Failure to Replicate Electronic Voice Phenomenon." Journal of Scientific Exploration. 1 Jul. 2001, Volume 15, Number 3: 355-367.

Fraden, Jacob. Handbook of Modern Sensors: Physics, Designs, and Applications. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., 2004. 243-251.

Juliano, David. "Ghost Hunting 101." Ghost Hunting 101. The Shadowlands, 1 Jan. 2009. Web. 2 Nov. 2009. <http://www.ghosthunting101.com/>

Knoll, Glenn F. Radiation Detection and Measurement. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000. 29-57, 103-119, 201-215.

Lipták, Béla G. Instrument Engineer's Handbook: Process measurement and analysis. Stamford: CRC Press, 2003. 575-578.

Reference this article:
Dunning, Brian. "Ghost Hunting Tools of the Trade." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 1 Jan 2008. Web. 9 Feb 2010. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4081>

Discuss!

5 most recent comments | Show all 119 comments

Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.

This is one of my favorite Skeptoid topics. I feel that people like a good ghost story (or investigative TV show) for the same reason they like roller coasters, they like to be scared. People like to allow themselves to be scared albeit in a safe way. We know the coaster is fundamentally safe but will serve to frighten the crap out of us for a few minutes. We also know deep down that ghosts are not real (at least that we have proven scientifically) but allowing ourselves to believe in them permits us to be frightened to the extent that it is entertaining. It is all about suspension of disbelief.

Does anyone else find it to be ironic that ghost hunters are using tools of science to forward the purpose of their pseudoscience?

Guy, FL
November 23, 2009 2:04pm

""The field of Paranormal Investigation is not just about proving or disproving the exsistance of ghosts...it is wholly about investigating the paranormal.""

Ie. ghosts.

""The paranormal is anything not normal, and almost everyone has experienced something they could not consider normal and could not explain, even those who say thay dont believe.""

Just that you can't explain something doesn't support the idea of ghosts one bit, more than it supports the existence of elves, unicorns, trolls, dragons or other things people have used as explanations for mysteries in the past.

""If these television shows had people going in and investigating using only their senses the skeptics would be fired up about them not using tools.""

The problem isn't that they use tools, the problem is that they use the wrong tools for the job and don't know how to properly use them.

""We can not use tools to prove or disprove the exsistance of God but yet over 2 billion people believe.""

Which is immaterial because it says nothing about whether or not God actually exists.

""You can not discount a persons experiences, and their desire to use all the tools they can to understand those experiences and expose them to others.""

No one is "discounting personal experiences", we're trying to explain them in a rational, empirical manner. Walking around in the house with a Geiger counter is as meaningless as trying to use a compass to detect wolves.

Safe-Keeper, Bergen, Norway
December 28, 2009 4:04pm

The study of the paranormal does not only mean the study of ghosts. It's a wide gulf of the unexplainable, or the yet to be explained.

Brett- "Paranormal" defined according to Webster is "not scientifically explainable." Well, science is not law, it is a constant update - what we call fact one day can be falsified the next or embellished upon for further understanding. Much of what we explore and/or take for granted today in a number of scientific studies was once paranormal as there was nothing more than hypotheses to account for the subject matter.

You went to great length to list the "tools" of ghost hunters and say that the items are misused and that each instrument is useless for such a field of "research."

First, misuse, well that can be debated depending upon circumstance and the awareness of the "researcher" in how the instrument is meant to function. I won't dispute that a number of people purchase these devices and lack the knowledge in utilizing them properly -- but that cannot account for an entirety.

Secondly, if you are absolutely steadfast in your assumption that the devices are useless, then please, by all means, provide a list of possibility and under what context/use they can be managed.

If spirits exist and can possibly be measures or registered legitimately by some fashion, until we know what defines them we must allow for trial and error in researching them. Much like all sciences, it is a progress report which evolves through study.

Sheri, Seattle, Wa
January 01, 2010 4:30pm

Paranormal investigations are more psychological than scientific. The use of these "tools" only stimulates the subjects into fear, a basic primal instinct. They are also feeding off each others fears and then label their unexplained "research" as ghosts. It would make just as much sense to call their findings as an alternate reality or dimension or voices from an alien life form on another planet. (sound, radio and emf waves do travel through space) People believe what is being told to them, because they have a device designed for something completely different telling them this is so. I am suprised they haven't implemented radar into "ghost hunting" yet. Just think about all of those ghosts that are flying through our skies.

Melissa, McKinney, TX
January 02, 2010 9:46am

Sheri,

I cannot agree with you more on your introductory paragraph to your posting. However- on the subject of use/misuse...

How much use (or misuse) of the aforementioned "equipment" necessitates falsifiability with regards to the detection of paranormal activity? Will the same [experimentation] that has zero plausible mechanisms [to detect] that fails today to show results... provide for astounding, revolutionary discoveries tomorrow?

There is a laundry list of industries that use these instruments to measure dosimetry, noise, safety tolerances, etc. Food service, medical services, power generation, telecommunications, aerospace...the list goes on.

Brett Hansen, Chicago, IL
January 03, 2010 5:17am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks, advertisements, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 9 + 1 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.

Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid for just 99¢ per download
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is written and produced
by Brian Dunning


Newest
Did Jewish Slaves Build the Pyramids?
Skeptoid #191, Feb 2 2010
Read | Listen (12:30)
 
The Bell Island Boom
Skeptoid #190, Jan 26 2010
Read | Listen (12:02)
 
Martial Arts Magic
Skeptoid #189, Jan 19 2010
Read | Listen (11:57)
 
Student Questions: String Theory, the Asian Flush, and the Peltzman Effect
Skeptoid #188, Jan 12 2010
Read | Listen (12:21)
 
Emergency Handbook: What to Do When a Friend Loves Woo
Skeptoid #187, Jan 5 2010
Read | Listen (11:58)
 
Newest
#1 -
How to Argue with a Creationist
Read | Listen
#2 -
The Real Philadelphia Experiment
Read | Listen
#3 -
The Devil Walked in Devon
Read | Listen
#4 -
The Detoxification Myth
Read | Listen
#5 -
Apocalypse 2012
Read | Listen
#6 -
Religion as a Moral Center
Read | Listen
#7 -
Medical Myths in Movies and Culture
Read | Listen
#8 -
MonaVie and Other "Superfruit" Juices
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

[Valid RSS]

ZIP Code Database

Skeptoid Podcast Skeptoid Podcast   Skeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter

Skeptoid is not responsible for the content of the ads below. Often they are great illustrations of what this episode is examining critically, so feel free to take a look.