The Myth of the “Polish Cavalry Charge Against Tanks”

When World War II kicked off with the September 1, 1939 German invasion of Poland, a pernicious, racist myth soon followed: the backwards, poorly-equipped Polish army rolling over at the first blow from the mighty Nazi war machine.

Probably the most famous example of this myth is the so-called “Polish cavalry charge against German tanks.” As the story goes, the Polish army was desperate, gallant, idiotic and relying on Napoleonic era tactics, while the Germans were cool, professional, mechanized and unstoppable. The nadir for the Poles came at the small town of Krojanty, when Polish lancers drew their sabers and rode their horses straight at German tanks, thinking that either the tanks were fake or that the Germans would break and run. Instead, the Germans cut them down, and proceeded to rampage through Poland as the first step toward conquering Europe.

The contributions of Polish soldiers and pilots during the invasion of Poland have been cast aside in favor of the Blitzkrieg mythos. But the truth of what happened in those first days of what became known as the Polish September Campaign is much more complicated than that. And in the process of that truth fading away, history has swallowed a nasty bit of Nazi propaganda.

To begin with, the myth of the Polish cavalry charge against tanks did actually involve an actual Polish cavalry charge. The reason for this is quite simple: in 1939, mechanized warfare existed mostly in theory. Almost every army in Europe, including Germany, still used mounted cavalry for scouting and as mobile infantry. The purpose of these units wasn’t to engage tanks on horseback, but to quickly move to areas where firepower was needed, dismount, and fight the enemy with towed anti-tank guns and small arms.

The aftermath of the actual charge at Krojanty.

The aftermath of the actual charge at Krojanty.

And while the Germans did have a number of tanks operating in Poland, they had yet to perfect the all-powerful Blitzkrieg that’s come to dominate our thinking about German victory. Tactical thinking of the time thought of tanks mostly as infantry support, and that was the role the German army was using them in.

Even when the tank became the dominating mobile force on the battlefield, both the Axis and Allies made extensive use of horses in a number of key roles. Germany had six horse-mounted divisions in its active ranks as late as 1945, and would employ over two million horses in the course of the war. And while the Poles never used horses against tanks, the mighty Soviet Army did. The early days of the German invasion of the USSR saw incompetent and sycophantic commanders throwing masses of horse-riding cavalry against German armor, with horrific results for both man and beast.

All of this is to reinforce the idea that the Poles weren’t “backwards” for employing horse-mounted soldiers – they were perfectly in keeping with the established military doctrine of 1939. Nor was the actual charge at Krojanty “the last cavalry charge in history” as some have suggested.

So what did happen the day “Polish cavalry charged German tanks?” Very little, as it turns out. It was a small skirmish in a campaign that lasted over a month, one battle out of many that only became famous because of the myth that rose up around it.

Only hours after the German invasion, two squadrons of horsemen from the Polish 18th Lancer Regiment caught a German infantry unit in the open near the town of Krojanty. Having the advantage over the unaware and lightly armed infantry, and tasked with delaying the German armored thrust, the Poles swiftly attacked.

Sabers were drawn and the order to charge was given. The 250 Polish horsemen broke up the enemy unit, inflicting 11 dead and 9 wounded on the stunned men of the German 76th Infantry regiment. The Germans panicked, broke ranks and ran for it.

But as the Poles consolidated their position, several German armored cars appeared, opening fire with machine guns and 20 millimeter cannons. The Lancers were caught in the open, just as they had caught the German infantry in the open. In the ensuing melee, about two dozen Polish troops were killed and the rest scattered. Despite the losses, the Lancers had done their job. They had delayed the German advance by several hours and sent panic through their lines – a feat that Polish cavalry would accomplish many other times during the September Campaign through charges against infantry.

It was in the immediate aftermath of the skirmish at Krojanty that the myth of the “charge against tanks” was born. After the Lancers scattered, the Germans retook the area in force, bringing tanks in as reinforcement. At that point, several war correspondents, including Italian journalist Indro Montanelli and the future author of The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer, were escorted onto the battlefield. They were told that the corpses they saw were the result of an attack with horses and lances against the tanks they saw, and breathlessly repeated the story in their papers, playing up the bravery – and foolishness – of the Poles.

The cover of a Hitler Youth magazine from 1939, exploiting the myth of the "charge against tanks."

The cover of a Hitler Youth magazine from 1939, exploiting the myth of the “charge against tanks.”

Shirer especially got caught up in the romantic notion of doomed horsemen charging tanks. He wrote about the charge in his 1941 book Berlin Diary, and embellished it even more in 1959 in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. Despite 20 years having passed, and no evidence ever surfacing to confirm the story, Shirer imbued the incident with an almost Homeric mythos, writing:

“At one point, racing east across the [Polish] Corridor, [The Germans] had been counterattacked by the Pomorska Brigade of Cavalry, and this writer, coming upon the scene a few days later, saw the sickening evidence of the carnage. It was symbolic of the brief Polish campaign.

Horses against tanks! The cavalryman’s long lance against the tank’s long canon! Brave and valiant and foolhardy though they were, the Poles were simply overwhelmed by the German onslaught.”

What Shirer “saw” was only what the Germans had told him happened.

Equally guilty in propagating the “horses against tanks” nonsense was the famed German panzer commander General Heinz Guderian, who wrote in his memoir Panzer Leader,

“[W]e succeeded in totally encircling the enemy on our front in the wooded country north of Schwetz and west of Graudenz. The Polish Pomorska Cavalry Brigade, in ignorance of the nature of our tanks, had charged them with swords and lances and had suffered tremendous losses.”

The myth was later used by the Soviet Union as an example of how Polish officers, who Stalin would order massacred in 1943, were backwards, untrustworthy, uncaring about the fate of their men and useless as combatants.

With respected figures like Shrier and Guderian pumping it up, the myth became an accepted part of World War II lore, even as subsequent writers tore it down as an example of Nazi propaganda. Even as recently as 2009, the British newspaper The Guardian ran an editorial that referred to the bravery and stupidity of the non-existent incident, a mistake they later printed a retraction to correct.

Poland may have fallen to the German invasion, but her troops exacted a heavy price. Nearly 45,000 Germans were killed or wounded. 300 aircraft were destroyed, along with over 12,000 vehicles, including over 1,000 tanks and armored cars. And Polish soldiers, sailors and pilots would make great contributions to the war effort, with as many as 1 in 12 of the British pilots who saved the United Kingdom in 1940 being an exiled Pole.

These sacrifices deserve far more attention than one debunked, racist and incorrect bit of made up history.

About Mike Rothschild

Mike Rothschild is a writer and editor based in Pasadena. He writes about scams, conspiracy theories, hoaxes and pop culture fads. He's also a playwright and screenwriter. Follow him on Twitter at
This entry was posted in History, Urban Legends and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

36 Responses to The Myth of the “Polish Cavalry Charge Against Tanks”

  1. Castielstar says:

    Funny how these stories spread…or don’t, according to where we are in the world. Despite the Guardian (Groaniad) story, I’ve never heard of this growing up, yet I know all about Polish pilots. Maybe the part of UK I’m from took a different slant because I grew up in Lincolnshire, home of lots of airbases even now; Or my grandad serving in the RAF; Or the local Polish community that has been round here since WWII; But I never heard denigratory stories about Poles in WWII like this one. Good to hear it is just stories, blown out of proportion really, because there were a lot of real brave and foolish deeds on all sides – why should any one nation be picked on?

    • Michael says:

      unfortunately UK haven’t appropriately commemorated polish pilots, just after WWII they tried to hide presence of polish pilots fighting for UK.
      Funny thing, those pilots were far more better pilots then rest, Czech’s were also top pilots in this air battel

      • Dave Mills says:

        Even the post-cinematic scroll in, “Battle Of Britain”, attest to the number and proficiencies of the Poles and Czechs who werr instrumental in that campaign.

  2. Walter Clark says:

    Excellent report Mike. The effectiveness of the lesser mechanized over the more mechanized is all over history. Why the more mechanized eventually wins has to do with the ability to win the battle of attrition. If you can afford expensive weapons you can continue to supply weapons of any kind along with 18 year old’s whose parents are paying for the war. But just imagine how far that attrition could go if the good guys used the tactics of WW2 Poles or the Viet Cong.
    There’s two groups of friends that Democrats and Republicans share; financiers and weapons makers. The last thing these statists would consider is how effective gorilla war is as a defense. War establishes the supremacy of the state. Obedience and tax collecting are easy during a war. In peace time preparation for war against a perceived enemy is a good substitute.

  3. Richard Goth says:

    Poland in 1939 had about 150 modern 7TP tanks ( arguably better than German or Russian models), 38 less modern Vickers mark E, and 174 largely obsolete French Renault FT17. Add to that about 200 armored cars. Its ironic that Polish tank development led to a real scare in soviet circles and kicked off the tank race that lead to Germany’s defeat at Kursk.

    I have always been led to believe the Polish failure was due to deploying tanks in “penny packets” following WW1 French and British doctrine. That and losing air superiority at an early stage. The cavalry charge story has always struck me as ridiculous, so its good to finally get a coherent explanation!

  4. Jeff McLennan says:

    Is ‘racist ‘ the correct term to use here? I don’t believe Poles are considered a race by any normal definition. Maybe an ethnicity. Although I guess ‘ethnicist’ doesn’t roll off the tongue.

    • Martin says:

      In the Nazi dogma the Slavs were considered Untermensch, so I think “racism” probably is the correct term. Also don’t fall in to the trap of thinking that white (or black or Asian, or Middle Eastern or etc.) people are all the same race. Same species, yes; same race, no.

  5. Douglas says:

    German tanks with lances, keep in mind why this isn’t necessarily as foolhardy and ridiculous as it might seem today:

    1) The Poles were highly over-confident as to the true German armed might. They believed that reports that their own military attache, observing the Luftwaffe formations flying overhead on Hitler’s B-Day, were flying the same aircraft over and over again, repainting different unit markings each time. They believed anecdotes that only one of three Bf109s and Ju88s actually had engines, and of those that could fly, their engines would seize up after only a few hours flight time. They believed that the Panzerwaffe was also a sham, employing wooden mockups mounted on trucks to inflate their numbers (which HAD been used in exercise which Polish officers, observing war gammes per the 1934 non-agression treaty, reported on). To suppose that a brave Polish officer charged a German Panzer I on horseback, using his lance to reveal the sham, is believable.

    2) The Poles did resist bitterly and even handed the Germans some setbacks, notably (a) at the Battle of the Bzura and (b) when the Panzers reached the outskirts of Warsaw on Sep 8, 1939, they were stopped cold by hurriedly improvised anti-tank ditches and gun positions, which resulted in the loss of 40 German tanks that day. Their doom was in fact sealed by the Soviet invasion on Sep 17, 1939, which although relatively few Polish forces were left to oppose them, denied a “Carpathian Redoubt” which the Poles hoped to make a stand until the UK and France could get into the war.

    3) The Polish Air Force was not caught on the ground and largely destroyed on the outset of the German attack. They were simply outnumbered and their planes largely outclassed, though they gave great account of themselves against the Luftwaffe. In fact, many Polish pilots would serve in the RAF (No. 303 “Koziusco” squadron) and the Soviet V-VS and further harry the Luftwaffe.

    4) The Poles were doomed not only by being outnumbered (the German High Command knew that it would take weeks for the French to effectively mobilize, so they could leave but a token screening force in the West and fully commit to subduing Poland) but also by their insistence on defending their frontiers, especially in the “Corridor” and in Silesia. It’s true that these were economically valuable areas, but staging fully a third of their army in and near the Corridor practically invited encirclement from a massive pincer movement from Silesia and East Prussia. Also, analysts agree that what is commonly considered “Blitzkrieg” was not truly employed in this campaign. Though German armor would play a role, a decisve factor in the German victory was the punishing effect of their artillery, which the Polish deployment played right into.

    5) Considering the contribution that the Poles made alongside the British (three RAF squadrons, Polish Airbrone brigade, Long Range Desert Group to name a few), and even the Soviets (First and Second Polish Armies), we can put to rest any disparagement of the fighting abilities and spirit of the Poles.

  6. Factchecker says:

    In the interest of correctness, which you are right to emphasize, it’s Shirer who wrote The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.

  7. Michael says:

    Western Europe don’t know anything about Polish contribution during WWII.
    We suffer the most but we fought till last end.
    Most of you don’t know that except Nazi Germany we had to fight with far more dangerous enemy – Soviet Russia. Every grands tell you that soviets were much more likely to behave like barbarian, even comparing to nazi germans ‘achievements’.
    Soviets have done more bad things to our nation than Germans.

  8. kazvorpal says:

    Let’s be real, here. Like several other states in Europe, the Polish military WAS backward. And so was the corrupt, post-coup government. It fell behind most other countries in the region in military organization, as well as in many other ways.

    The Polish military had been politicized, was more a means of bribing cronies who owned military contract suppliers than anything else. It was, therefore, less advanced than not only the Germans and Soviets, but even France’s absurdly aggrandized defensive line.

    The entire formation of the Polish State, from 1914-1938, was a joke. It really did fall behind its neighbors, and deserved to with the kind of corrupt government it had.

    What’s worse, it actually ACTED like a European power, trying to bully neighboring states…but this really just emphasized how weak it was. It had neither a free enough society to, say, have a threatening militia or powerful economy to supply a strong military, nor an effective government that could produce adequate defense by any other means.

    So while there were other countries with some cavalry, while the case may be overstated popularly, Poland WAS behind to an embarrassing degree, and their cavalry WAS a symptom of that.

    • astra says:

      Well, your reply is very biased. It has more to do with politicizing than trying to give a balanced historical opinion. I’m far from claiming that Poland was an ideal country between the wars, but your comment is simply thoughtless and rude.
      First, compare the size of the French and British army in 1940, their equipment measured with the number of troops, tanks, planes, their economic potential and the lenght of their defensive battle in 1940 to the length of the fight that the Poles gave in 1939 given their military potential. To add more to it, in September 1939 Poland was invaded by the soviet army which, at that time, was the Germany’s ally. You are apparently unaware of the historical background. Poland regained independence in 1918, fought war against the Bolshevik state in 1920 and did not have too much time to consolidate and build democracy in such a short time, trying to recover from over one hundred years of being partitioned among 3 hostile countries, building their country from scratch, starting to develop the economy, agriculture, legal system infrastructure etc. Poland was left alone, and had to struggle to remain independent, being threatened by to hostile countries (natzi and communist) which were posing a serious military threat. In such a short time, Poland did really well, but unfortunately, wasn’t given more time to develop.
      And besides, in the period between the wars, all European states had problems after the trauma of the first World War, including corruption and serious social unrest, governmental crises etc. (see the history of Weimar Republic).
      I’m pretty sure you could have found better examples of ‘bullying’ in many other places around Europe, both to the east and to the west of the Polish boarder. I don’t know if they acted like an European power. They just tried to be independent.
      You are so conceited and big-headed. You talk a lot, but in fact you have very little to say.
      And your ‘let’s be real’ sounds like a good joke. Just clunky manipulation. Your comment boarders on sheer ignorance. Think what you write. You praise Nazis and communist, the most dehumanized systems (saying :It really did fall behind its neighbours, and deserved to) and deprecate the nation which tried to oppose them, contrary to the western superpowers who allowed Hitler to do what he wanted without any consequences, leading by that to the most disastrous war in the history of human kind.

      • Jake says:

        Astra, what you say about Poland is true.

        This guy above you “Kazvorpal” indeed sounds like he has an Anti-Polish Bias.

        The accomplishments of Poles in WWII has been suppressed in most of the media and Hollywood. Like the key role Poles had in winning the “Battle of Britain” (with Squadron 303) and in decoding the German Enigma code….despite the anti-Polish movie “Imitation Game” which gave ZERO credit to the Poles and only credit to the British (who got their decoding Enigma info from the Poles)

        • Noah Dillon says:

          Wait, just because The Imitation Game doesn’t mention that one of the scientists working on Enigma (in Britain) was Polish or of Polish extraction or whatever, that doesn’t mean that they’re anti-Polish. They don’t mention what the main characters ate for breakfast. That doesn’t mean that Hollywood is anti-eggs-and-coffee. Hollywood’s job is to make movies that people will pay high prices to see, not to sing the praises of Poland. Poland has a film industry that’s made a lot of great movies. Why does it have to be the job of other countries to tell Poland’s stories?

          • Olekk says:

            I know there are more reliable sources but just to quote Wikipedia:

            “[…] German military messages enciphered on the Enigma machine were first broken by the Polish Cipher Bureau, beginning in December 1932. This success was a result of efforts by three Polish cryptologists, Marian Rejewski, Jerzy Różycki and Henryk Zygalski, working for Polish military intelligence. Rejewski reverse-engineered the device, using theoretical mathematics and material supplied by French military intelligence. Subsequently the three mathematicians designed mechanical devices for breaking Enigma ciphers, including the cryptologic bomb. […]
            On 25 July 1939, in Warsaw, the Poles initiated French and British military intelligence representatives into their Enigma-decryption techniques and equipment, including Zygalski sheets and the cryptologic bomb, and promised each delegation a Polish-reconstructed Enigma. The demonstration represented a vital basis for the later British continuation and effort.[…]”

            So the real issue here is not that some Polish guy was working on Enigma (in Britain) and wasn’t mentioned (if there was one) but that 3 Polish guys who cracked the code (in Poland) and built the working decrypting machine and gave it to Britain – wasn’t even mentioned.

          • Noah Dillon says:

            That still doesn’t mean that Hollywood has an anti-Polish bias or that Poland’s accomplishments are suppressed. Just because something isn’t widely known doesn’t mean that it’s actively suppressed or that people withhold that information out of animus. And citing the plot of a Hollywood movie doesn’t say anything at all about the wider culture, since usually Hollywood leaves a lot of details out, changes around the order of events, makes up fake B plots, and other techniques used in the service of storytelling over the interests of historical accuracy.

          • Olekk says:

            But I do think that Poland’s accomplishments are suppressed. There was a few movies about cracking Enigma code and if there was any Pole involved he was shown as a villain. So, how else would you call it? For me the choises are: ignorance or ill will.
            It’s like there was movies about how great French writer created “Hamlet” and “Romeo and Juliet” and Shakespeare’s name was erase from the common knowledge or stories about space exploriation where involvement of the USA was reduced to sabotaging work of the Russians. For British people and US-citizens it would be at best annoying.
            If you make a historic movie I expect you to have the historic facts right. Otherwise your movie will become propaganda.
            And back to Enigma, it is not so difficult to find Polish contibution – use Google and read the first article.
            I get that the story in “The Imitation Game” is about Turing and his work by Enigma and I don’t expect Hollywood to sacrifice precious movie time, money, cast someone and build whole plot around something so “insignificant” as Polish involvement, but one or two sentences should be possible.

            I’m not suprised that Polish side of the WW2 story isn’t commonly known because Poland lost the war. Polish people couldn’t tell they story to the west by being on the wrong side of the iron curtain and couldn’t tell they story to the east as well because this could cause very unpleasnt consequences for people trying to do that. Therefore Polish history was told by Polish enemies who claimed that Poles are stupid, backward and unworthy of having independence. After all, what worth are people, who think that charging with cavalry against tanks is a very good idea?

          • Noah Dillon says:

            I would call it ignored, not suppressed. Think about how movies work: you have to find a hero and tell a story about him. In a historical narrative it’s usually easier if the character is already somewhat known to your audience and is also an English speaker. Americans are way more willing to see a story about an American or a Britton than they are a Pole. That’s not the studios’ fault. They have to make a product people want to pay money for. And people trying to go see cheesy historical dramas aren’t suppressing a part of the story they don’t know about.

            I understand your frustration, but there’s definitely not an anti-Polish bias in America. We don’t (as a nation) think about Poland. We haven’t really cared about Poland since the Cold War. It’s not animus. It’s just lack of interest.

            DO NOT EVER EXPECT HOLLYWOOD MOVIES TO TRY TO GET FACTS RIGHT. Even beyond the involvement of Polish codebreakers, there are, as I understand it, a lot of factual problems with “The Imitation Game.” Hollywood’s interest is in getting people to pay to watch a movie, not in historical scholarship. If you want accuracy, read a book by a historian. If you want entertainment, go to the movies. They cannot and will not do the same things. And as annoying as it is, you can’t expect them to care enough to draw a detailed or accurate picture of those events, or any others.

            I agree with you: a line of explanatory dialogue probably could have made some gesture at fixing the problem. But that’s gotta compete with some uplifting, fake, invented B plot that the writers crammed into the script.

            I really think that the best thing that you can do is use your interest/passion/knowledge to make this kind of stuff known, rather than being annoyed at Hollywood for being predictably lazy.

  9. Brian says:

    It’s interesting to note that the cavalry charge legend clearly found takers in post-war Poland too. The one cinematic “reproduction” I’ve encountered can be found in a film made by the great Polish director Andrzej Wajda called “Lotna” made in 1959. The eponymous “hero” of the film is a magnificent white charger which nevertheless brings bad luck to each of its successive riders during the 1939 campaign. Quite early in the film the cavalry regiment Lotna serves in very effectively charges a convoy of German lorries making mincemeat of the infantry riding in them- but then hit a clutch of tanks. Clearly this is based on a version of what happened at Krojanty.

    Obviously the film was made under the post-war Communist regime which had its own agendas in depicting what happened in 1939 (the Soviet invasion of what was then eastern Poland never rated a mention…) but Wajda was hardly a Communist lackey, as his later works show. While there are some jibes at bone headed cavalrymen (interestingly the most naive statements are put in the mouths of common soldiers, not officers) the film broke a taboo by depicting the officers of the pre-war Army as brave and patriotic men doing their duty against overwhelming odds. It’s an intriguing work and its take on the “last charge” myth throws an interesting light on how it was perceived in Poland twenty years after the event

    • Miro'sLaw says:

      Wajda wasn’t a communist, he was rather an opportunist I suspect. Wajda was shifting together with the system. You see, in communism you couldn’t have been someone if you hadn’t co-operated. Wajda proved it when he joined an anti-government movement made of post-communists and a number of pseudo-oppositionists from the Solidarnosc after the 2015 general election in Poland.

  10. Luke says:

    You were careful to state that these words were not your own “the Polish army was desperate, gallant, idiotic and relying on Napoleonic era tactics, while the Germans were cool, professional, mechanized and unstoppable”, however re-posting someone else’s words makes you equally ignorant.

    Were we desperate? Yes, the nazi powerhouse shows up at your doorstep unannounced. Our troops aren’t mobilized and properly allocated to respond to the threat and even if they were we would still not have been able to stop them.

    Desperate times call for desperate measures and most Polish people do not stand down when faced with tyranny. If you question the intelligence, resolve, bravery and integrity of the Polish you should maybe meet some Poles perhaps even go visit the country.

    I’m not a big history buff but what I do know about history is that it’s written by the victors.

    If two men break down your door and walk into your house unexpected both with guns and all you have is a kitchen knife what do you do? You are outnumbered and outgunned, but if you do nothing your wive and daughter will get raped and perhaps you will all get killed. Do you roll the dice and cross your fingers that everything will be okay or do you take action and grab that kitchen knife. I would not call that action gallant or idiotic. Perhaps you would, but then again you aren’t Polish.

  11. Terence says:

    As a very young boy, I was taken by my parents when they went to visit my father’s Polish friends in the then “DP” (Displaced Persons) camp at Stover, in Devon. I grew up with the background knowledge of what the Poles and the Czechs (amongst the servicemen of other conquered countries) had done, and also the story of “calvary against tanks” of the battle for Poland.

    Many years later, in 1967, I was with my Regiment in Libya, and we were, pro temp, living in the RAF air base at El Adem. One of the station officers, in charge of RAF rescue and survival training was Polish. He was known to all as Ziggy (as his Polish name was apparently considered unpronouncable in full!).

    He had been a Polish cavalry officer, had excaped to the UK, and joined the British Army. He served in North Africa, and perhaps with the LRDG or other similar units, because he became an expert in desert navigation and survival. Post-war this expertise was put to good use when he transferred to the RAF, and that is where I met him. We used our mess contact to good effect and I and my colleagues learned a great deal from him.

    Of course, I asked him about the cavalry charge story. He somewhat wyrly told me his story. Yes, his, and other units did charge towards the attacking German armour, but this was in no way a counter attack, being a response to the order to break out of the encirclement and to attempt to regroup out of contact.

    He was dismissive- putting it politely- of the later German claims of their superiority and Polish miltary stupidity. It was, in fact, a very sensible tactical response to the situation. Their mobility and speed, coupled with the mass assault through- not into- the German lines meant that a great number of cavalrymen escaped, many to fight later with the UK throughout the Second World War.

    It is a source of sorrow to me that the survivors could not return to the country for which they had fought so gallantly. But I have passed my little first hand experience to my own children, as my Father passed it to me.

  12. you guys were great because you thought in the war

  13. Southeuropean says:

    Dear Europeans. The fact that many nations survived till nowadays is certainly not because ones were always rightful and the others were not. The Polish state was for long time competative with its great neighbors. They fought for the Ukranian stepes for centuries with Russians and the Rusini-ukranians. Even more, I believe that the Polish were the first who besieged the Russian capital of Novgorod. The Ribentrop-Molotov pact is a shame fo Europe,but need to mention that Poland also had a pact with Hitler for taking land out of Chehoslovakia. And that is also a shame for Europe. Besides that, Poland still has an apetite for the Luzhice Sorbs in Germany to present them as Polish. That is not right,since they are the succesors of the great middeval Polabian state. Still, the Polish gave the most sacrifice in WW2, and that is after the casualties of the Russians. And also, the masacre of Catine forest goes to the darkest memories of the Europeans…those officers refused to be traitors.Maybe this only reason makes the Polish heroes.

  14. Alan Tomalty says:

    One of the posters is still under the misinformed opinion that the Germans lost the Kursk tank battle. Russian propaganda to this day carries on that myth. If you google the story you will get the correct facts. The battle wasn’t one battle and of the many tank battles in the area at the time Germany won as many as the Russians did and inflicted more damage on the Russian tanks than Germany suffered until Hitler gave the order to retreat (He called off Operation Citadel because he was more scared of his new western front in Sicily and eventually Italy. Hitler did this caused he learned of the Allied invasion of Sicily and lost his courage to continue the fight against the Russians using the tanks that he had on the eastern front. He pulled some of the German units elsewhere. So in the end it was Hitlers loss of will to fight the Russians even though in cases like Stalingrad he refused to retreat his infantry and let them be captured. Hitler was a very erratic and illogical commander and was hated by almost every German general for his incompetence.

  15. rob says:

    But….the Poles did not grab the half of Czechoslovakia like Germans & Russians did. They took ZAOLZIE: was inhabited mainly by Poles It was the territory about 800 km². So what is the purpose of comparison with the Ribbentrop -Molotov Pact (?)

  16. rob says:

    …like Germans & Russians did in case of Poland (they took half of the country: +/- fifty fifty)

  17. Edmund Zygowski says:

    I have heard enough negativety regarding the Polish cavalry in this artile . There are always 2 sides to any story and it always seems to be the enemy telling thier side of things. My father told me many stories of his exploits fighting in 7 countries in WW2 and some of the stories have been varified by people who knew him. I have no reason to doubt his word .My father was a cavalry officer and a gentleman and his older brother Janek was also in the cavalry and a gentleman also. I have heard it first hand from both of them that they did charge the German panzer tanks on 2 occasions and survived the onslaught .My father also told me that they carried hand grenades that were made into bolaroes that they threw around the gun barrel of the tank and several tanks were taken out of action with that method. Many of the cavalry were gunned down before they followed through . They were elite soldiers
    ,young brave and willing to die for thier country that was being invaded by the Natzis. They were there on the battlefield ,you were not !

  18. historicus says:

    Not once in the tale of the fiendish German conquest of innocent little Poland do I read that when it crossed the 1919 border, the Wehrmacht was reclaiming Silesia, Pomerania, Westphalia, East Prussia, and other German territory seized after her army laid down its arms in 1918, accepting the Armistice’s promises of a fair treatment that never materialized. In the process it liberated a million and half Germans who had been systematically brutalized by the ethnocentric Pan-Slavist military junta that overthrew the Polish republic in 1926.

    Demonizing Germany has been a major sport in the English-speaking world since Bismarck, in western Europe since the Caesars found themselves unable to conquer the “barbarians” whose culture was every bit as sophisticated, and a good deal less imperialistic, than their own. Actions that any reasonable observer would classify as self-defense are instantly condemned as aggression. An entire ethnic group is condemned as inhuman monsters or gullible fools.

    The purely local border dispute between Germany and Poland was transformed into humanity’s most destructive war solely because of British and French meddling. German expatriates had convinced the British that a declaration of war would cause a German revolution against Hitler. British planners also assumed that a shooting war, if it came, would be a repeat of the trench warfare stalemate of the Great War, and the Royal Navy could once again starve Germany into submission. Neither assumption proved true – the startlingly effective new technique of Blitzkrieg caught everyone by surprise. Ironically, Germany’s ferociously aggressive defense did ultimately bring about the collapse of both empires. To everyone’s surprise the war greatly expanded the totalitarian empire of Joseph Stalin, who brilliantly exploited the unprecedented opportunity these mad rivalries dropped into his lap, and furthered the global ambitions of an increasingly militaristic United States.

    But the war did accomplish what French leader Clemenceau hoped for in 1919 when he said, “there are twenty million Germans too many”, the merciless slaughter of more than a quarter of all Europeans of German heritage.

  19. Macht says:

    It’s still being repeated in literature to this day. The book 3,000 Years of War by Dwight Jon Zimmerman, published in 2012, cites the cavalry charge against tanks and even claims there are photographs of it.

  20. Mike Johnson says:

    Excellent article and certainly correct. Poland had over 800 tanks at rhe start of the war and the notion that they didn’t know what a tank was is ridiculous. We view things from OUR perspective in time. We have to remember this was only 30 years since the end of the frontier in America and folklore and legend was very much alive and well. When a great commander like Guderian made comments as he did it was commonplace at the time to embellish as well as propagandize events. The Nazi propaganda machine is well known and falsified films of barbaric Russians raping beautiful German speaking Prussians and others are evidence of the mindset of the day. Only AFTER the war progressed and information became scrutinized did this mindset of fantasy and myth give way to hard fact and reality.

  21. Mike Johnson says:

    …..It should also be noted that the Polish army destroyed a divison’s amount of panzers and at least 25% of the german aircraft used in the campaign. This is why the “Phony War” began and it took 8 months for the Germans to refit and re-arm.

  22. TPP says:

    Mike, thank you for the clarification. My reading is that Hitler was very afraid of attacking Poland (big army and so he sided briefly with the Russians). He would not stay at Wawel Castle as it gave him the creeps.

    No one’s army was as great as the Germans in WWII; actually not even ours. One of the great armies of all time. That is not to say all of the soldiers fighting and dying against the evilest of empires and cults should not earn our praise. If the British and French allies would have entered the fight in the beginning the whole story would have been different. Maybe not so much for Poland and her Jewish citizens but for many other millions.

    We hate Hilter but we also are grateful because if not for him the excellent German generals would have really prosecuted and stretched out the awful war.

    Mike, I guess I should say, dziekuje bardzo!! 🙂

    • Alexandria Nick says:

      Poland was hosed, no two ways about it. But I will always blame everything that’s happened since 1939 in world history square on the French. Had they not duped the Poles about a diplomatic solution, the brief stoppage in mobilization wouldn’t have occurred and the Germans run headlong into a fully prepared Poland instead of one that was just 70% mobilized. That would have offered much stiffer resistance and pinned down even more of the German’s frontal aviation. Perhaps even long enough for intelligence to determine that nearly the entire Luftwaffe was committed to the East. And for them to realize there was no way for them to quickly move over anything from the East when 40 French divisions slammed into just 22 German divisions in the Saar. Instead of the week long “we don’t know what the hell we’re doing they might bomb Paris!!!!” Saar Offensive we really had. If France and Britain had nutted up in 1939, not a single aspect of the world would be recognizable to us.

  23. JOHN LUJAN says:

    I read this in William Shirer’s book years ago. I didn’t realize it was being taught in American schools into the 1990s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *