The Mystery of STENDEC

What was the significance of this mysterious final transmission of an airliner just before its crash?

Filed under Aliens & UFOs, Urban Legends

Skeptoid #231
November 09, 2010
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Also available in French
Bookmark and Share

STENDEC Lancastrian
Avro Lancastrian
(Public credit: Public domain)

It was a story borne out all too often in the annals of aviation disasters. An aircraft finds itself off-course and in the clouds with zero visibility, and worse, surrounded by mountain peaks that can't be seen. That's what happened on August 2, 1947, in the Andes Mountains of western Argentina. An Avro Lancastrian passenger plane of British South American Airways with 11 people on board struck a mountainside in zero visibility while descending toward what it thought was Chile. All aboard were presumed killed, with the crash not even being confirmed until more than fifty years later when its wreckage was finally found.

By themselves, the basic facts of what happened to British South American Flight CS-59 are tragic but not especially mysterious. The cause of the crash was a controlled flight into terrain. Nothing was broken, nothing was wrong, and it's unlikely the crew even saw the crash coming until the near-vertical cliff near the summit of Tupungato Mountain appeared through the mist. A second later, the Lancastrian was in a billion torn pieces, sliding down the face in an avalanche of its own making. Those pieces began to emerge from the bottom of the glacier, bit by bit, around the year 2000.

The mysterious part is what came over the radio just before the crash. In those days, long distance communication was by Morse code. The crew had been making regular hourly reports of its speed, position, and altitude, and all was well. At 5:41pm, four minutes before their anticipated landing time, the radio operator, Dennis Harmer, sent their ETA as 5:45pm and concluded it with the phrase STENDEC:

The Chilean Air Force ground controller asked him to repeat that, and Harmer sent it twice more, STENDEC, STENDEC.

And that was the last anyone ever heard of Flight CS-59. The mystery of the word STENDEC took its place among the great unsolved cases so beloved in the lore of urban legendry.

The Avro Lancastrian began its life as a British Lancaster bomber in World War II. Lancasters had four Rolls Royce Merlin engines, the front-line combat engine that powered the latest Spitfire and Mustang fighters. With some 5,000 horsepower on tap, Lancastrians were in demand for civilian applications after the war, such as the route over the Andes. The crew and passengers of Flight CS-59 had in fact just crossed the Atlantic from London on board an Avro York, a slightly different variant of the Lancaster; then changed planes to the Lancastrian for the final leg.

The JIAAC (the Argentinian Civil Aviation Accident Investigation Board) found the probable cause of the crash, but only after examining the wreckage upon its 2000 discovery. In CS-59's day, navigation was done by dead reckoning, making time/speed/distance calculations, as there were no radio beacons to help determine position. Flying east to west across South America, a plane must fight the jet stream head on. If the jet stream is faster than expected, dead reckoning calculations will lead you to believe that you've gone further than you actually have. Flight CS-59 had been in the air long enough to clear the Andes, and with no visual cues, began its descent into Chile, down into the clouds. Unfortunately, they descended right into a collision course with Tupungato. Once they entered its wind shadow, they fell victim to a phenomenon called a lee wave, part of which involves a downdraft over the face of the mountain, and at that point a crash became unavoidable. Without visibility, they almost certainly never saw it coming, and couldn't have done anything about it even if they had. These are precisely the same conditions that caused the 1972 crash of the Uruguayan Rugby team that inspired the book and movie Alive.

CS-59's crew were all experienced Royal Air Force pilots who had flown against the Germans in World War II. The pilot, Reginald Cook, had flown more than 90 combat missions. Cook's first officer Norman Hilton-Cook and second officer Donald Checklin each had over 2,000 flight hours. Dennis Harmer had served as a radio operator for three years during the war, and for over 600 hours for the airline. Among the crew, they had some 30 crossings of the Andes Mountains, though this was Cook's first time as captain.

Certainly such a crew would have been aware of the jet stream and lee waves, but none had ever negotiated the Andes before without an experienced captain. Although the cause of the crash was navigational error coupled with pilot error, the crew did about as well as anyone could have done, given the technology of the time, and the weather conditions nature thrust them into.

But the 2000 finding of the true cause of the crash has not stemmed the speculation about what significance STENDEC had. Theories even extended to UFOs, with some people proposing the cryptic message must have been some kind of warning about the plane's abduction by a giant alien craft. Even aviation medical experts have gotten into the fray, suggesting that the crew may have been suffering from hypoxia. Lancastrians were not pressurized but the crew did wear oxygen masks, and perhaps Harmer was not wearing his or it had malfunctioned. But if this was the reason for his garbled transmission, it seems unlikely that he could have repeated it verbatim, twice, when asked by the Chilean controller.

All kinds of people have made all kinds of guesses about what STENDEC might have meant. None of them are very convincing. Most interesting is that the letters are an anagram of DESCENT, and Flight CS-59 was certainly on its descent. Did Harmer simply miskey the letters of DESCENT? It seems to be quite a stretch that such an experienced operator would have made the exact same extreme misspelling three times in a row. Moreover, it would have been a totally random place in the transmission to throw in this word. Nobody ever did that.

It's also been proposed that Harmer miskeyed the Aircraft's name, which was Star Dust (all of British South American Airways' aircraft were given two-word names beginning with Star). This possible misspelling has been a popular theory, so much so that most stories you'll find about Flight CS-59 are titled The Mystery of the Star Dust or some such thing. However, in reality, nobody at the time ever referred to the aircraft or the flight by the unofficial name painted on it by the airline. Probably the crew was scarcely even aware of the plane's name. In radio transmissions of the day, planes were only ever addressed by registration number, in this case G-AGWH. And, once again, it would have been completely random and uncalled for to tack the plane's name onto the end of a routine transmission.

Most other theories are that STENDEC was an acronym of the first letters of words in some sentence, and various nominations have been proposed. None of them make sense, because no radio operator would ever communicate in such a way, and certainly not repeat it twice more when told that it was not understood.

One fairly bad match is "Santiago tower, now descending entering cloud", which is true but no sane radio operator should expect such an acronym to be understood. Another is "Star Dust tank empty no diesel expecting crash", which has five problems: Harmer would not have identified the aircraft by its unofficial name; Star Dust was two words, not one; Merlin engines do not burn diesel; the plane was not low on fuel; and Harmer was experienced enough to know there would be no reasonable expectation of anyone comprehending such an acronym.

Morse code experts have searched for a solution within the subtleties of hand-keyed code. There is an attention-getting signal consisting of three dots followed by a dash:

...and these are the same as STENDEC's first two letters, except that they have a space. Listen for the short space between the dots and the dash:

Morse code also uses something called prosigns, which are two letters run together without a space. The prosign AR, which means "End of message", sounds like this:

...and that's the same as STENDEC's final two letters, except that, again, they have a short space after the first dot:

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

So, theoretically, STENDEC could mean ATTENTION - END - END OF MESSAGE. Now, this sounds fairly reasonable. And it could be, except that it wouldn't make much sense for Harmer to send this. STENDEC followed his transmission of their estimated arrival time, so it would be rather strange for him to insert the ATTENTION signal in the middle of a message. Similarly, it would be redundant to say END and then transmit END OF MESSAGE. None of Harmer's other transmissions from the flight did this, and no radio operators of the day ever did, so far as I could find. I think we can call this the best effort from the Morse code experts, and it shows that there is probably not a good answer to STENDEC to be found within the imperfections of hand keying.

Is it really necessary to assign some profound significance to STENDEC? What about all the other meaningless, garbled, or unclear radio transmissions that happen every day, that nobody remembers because they're not followed by a fatal crash? I've flown a lot, and I think every time I go up I hear someone say something I can't make out. I've no reason to suspect it was any different in the days of Morse code. Who knows what Harmer meant to say? Most likely, he was about to continue with what would have been a meaningful transmission when it was cut short by the crash. Most of these guys were in their twenties and Harmer could have even just been horsing around. The bottom line is that the cause of the crash had nothing to do with anything Harmer sent or didn't send on the radio. It would have crashed anyway, and chances are that if Harmer had lived five minutes longer he and the Chilean air traffic controller would have connected a little better, and the miscommunication never would have been remembered.

I see no reason to link the miskeyed, misread, or made-up transmission with the crash. The only thing connecting them is that they happened within a few minutes of each other, but the crash is simply not missing any explanations requiring an interpretation of STENDEC. Consider it an unsolved little tidbit from history, but one whose significance is almost certainly limited to the interest it holds as a puzzle.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2010 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Dinkins, R. & J. "CW Operating Aids." AC6V's Amateur Radio & DX Reference Guide. Rod Dinkins & Jeff Dinkins, AC6V, 17 Jan. 2008. Web. 29 Oct. 2010. <http://www.ac6v.com/morseaids.htm>

Editors. "Lost plane found in Andes." BBC News. British Broadcasting Corporation, 26 Jan. 2000. Web. 29 Oct. 2010. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/618829.stm>

NOVA Online. "1947 Official Accident Report." Vanished! Teacher's Guide and Resources. WGBH Science Unit, 30 Jan. 2001. Web. 28 Oct. 2010. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/vanished/sten_report.html>

Rayner, J. Star Dust Falling: The Story of the Plane that Vanished. New York: Doubleday, 2002.

Ruffin, S. Aviation's Most Wanted: The Top 10 Book of Winged Wonders, Lucky Landings. Herndon: Brassey's, 2005. 26.

Taylor, M. Jane's Encyclopedia of Aviation, Volume 2. New York: Crescent Books, 1980. 257.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Mystery of STENDEC." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 9 Nov 2010. Web. 18 May 2013. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4231>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 59 comments

s,t,e,n,d,e,c
STalled ENgine,DECending

dermot hutton, derry, northern ireland
September 21, 2012 2:49pm

Nope, as far as science goes its done and dusted Macky. The Bermuda triangle is just an area where ships of many descriptions have dissapeared. Nothing to do with UFO's strange denizens or madness induced pilots (of all stripes).

I think you continual attribution since that utter garble in your posts concerning the LHC after your deliberate reposted rant from Macky.stringpuller's rant earlier in the year.

Lets face it, you cant blame me for your personality disorder (too lazy to learn and research further prior to posting a view) for my flagrant lampooning of your hilarious posts.

Hows the etheric? Must be very shiny by now old bean.

Mud (Dr Syd), sin city, NSW, OZ
October 05, 2012 10:34pm

http://www.ntskeptics.org/2010/2010december/december2010.pdf

North Texas Skeptics come up with a less spooky explanation that seems plausible to some extent. Ignoring spaces in the morse code, and anticipating an error by the wireless operator in Santiago, the message is interpreted as reading: "VALP" an apparent calm, repeated attempt to contact the Valparaiso airport which the crew believed was nearer to them upon realising that they were off course.

Gray, South Africa
October 09, 2012 2:33am

STENDEC - as an ex RAF wireless operator we all developed a rather bad habit of improper keying by extending dashes - you could identify certain operators quite by the keying habit. The Lancaster key was notorious for being "stiff"
The message simply meant ST ETA 2 (minutes) END (AR) when you send "ETA" it is understood that the next character will be a number hence only the first 2 dots of the number 2 will be sent i.e
2 = ..--- so you only send .. it was
always thepractice to end with AR
Remember, the crew believed they were only a couple of minutes from Santiago which had the code ST
This would make the message a very simple and logical one to send given the brief time left before landing, and would be so easy to repeat.

DUNCAN STUART, Vancouver BC
March 19, 2013 11:44pm

Search Team Engage Near Descent of Engine Controller

Craig Donaldson, england
April 11, 2013 8:39am

The only fresh possibility that is remotely plausible is a date; ie: saturday/sunday the tenth of december. Seems worth a mention although i concede it seems highly unlikely that was what he meant to convey.

Gary Weston, london,england
April 19, 2013 4:54pm

Morse code is just a series of dots ,dashes and spaces ( ..//.. //..) etc alternative translation with spaces changed 'ETA 17.45 vesp '. looks like it was just an operator error .

Patrick Hodges, East London
April 23, 2013 2:47pm

Worst episode by far, if you have nothing new to add to the topic or nothing to say, don't make a podcast about it. There is not a single word int his entire episode that adds to or explains anything about the topic, completely worthless.

Reader, Vancouver
May 02, 2013 1:11am

Your comment was very useful and informative, Reader, Vancouver. Thanks very much.

Darren, Liverpool, UK
May 02, 2013 3:13am

Darren, clearly you arent a bird watcher...the issue is about failure and an entirely appropriate subject for skeptoid..

Sure, folk who do not love the air traffic may see this skeptoid as trivial.

This is about the air disaster and the inventiveness of many interpretations of one single last message.

Surely that is much more worthy than say...reading something into an entire natural stellar signal or the inability to retrospectively check instrumentation such as the wow signal?

No, both are skeptoid worthy.

Mud, Sin City
May 02, 2013 8:16am

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 0 + 3 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Polybius: Video Game of Death
Skeptoid #362, May 14 2013
Read | Listen (11:27)
 
The 16 Personalities of Sybil
Skeptoid #361, May 7 2013
Read | Listen (11:50)
 
Lincoln Kennedy Myths
Skeptoid #360, Apr 30 2013
Read | Listen (11:07)
 
Cupping for the Cure
Skeptoid #359, Apr 23 2013
Read | Listen (10:38)
 
Listener Feedback: Aliens and UFOs
Skeptoid #358, Apr 16 2013
Read | Listen (10:02)
 
Newest
#1 -
8 Spooky Places, and Why They're Like That
Read | Listen
#2 -
Skinwalkers
Read | Listen
#3 -
The Suicide Dogs of Overtoun Bridge
Read | Listen
#4 -
Student Questions: Food Woo and Iron Man at the Airport
Read | Listen
#5 -
Negative Calorie Food Myths
Read | Listen
#6 -
Listener Feedback: That Darned Science
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Loch Ness Monster
Read | Listen
#8 -
Area 51 Facts and Fiction
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS  
 
 


"Nuclear Energy"
inFact with Brian Dunning



Support Skeptoid
Join today and become
a part of this.