The Rendlesham Forest UFO

Did a UFO with flashing colored lights harass a USAF base in England in 1980?

Filed under Aliens & UFOs, Conspiracies

Skeptoid #135
January 06, 2009
Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe
Bookmark and Share

Rendlesham Forest UFO
An F-101C stationed at
RAF Bentwaters
(Photo credit: USAF)

The Sci-Fi Channel calls it the most comprehensive cover-up in the history of Britain. It's often called the most important UFO incident of the 20th century. Imagine, alien spacecraft drifting through the woods on the perimeter of a US Air Force Base in England, shining their colored lights around in plain view of pursuing military security personnel, for three nights in a row. And how did the United Kingdom and the United States react to this obvious threat to their nuclear arsenals? They didn't. There's no wonder the Rendlesham Forest UFO Incident is the one that UFOlogists consider the most frightening.

If you watch the Sci-Fi Channel, the History Channel, the Discovery Channel, or any of the other paranormal TV networks, you've probably heard the popular version of events on those three nights. Here are the significant points:

Two old Royal Air Force airfields, RAF Bentwaters and RAF Woodbridge, are situated just two miles apart near the eastern coast of England. Throughout the cold war they were operated by the United States Air Force. On the night of Christmas Day, December 25, 1980, personnel at the base reported bright UFOs streaking through the sky. Later that night, in the wee hours of December 26, security personnel from RAF Woodbridge entered Rendlesham Forest to investigate some strange, pulsating, colored lights moving through the trees, that they thought at first might be a downed aircraft. Local constables were called and also participated in the observation. Base personnel described the craft they pursued as metal and conical, with a bright red light above and a circle of blue lights below, and suspended in a yellow mist. By daylight, they located a clearing where they thought the strangely lit craft had set down, and found three depressions in the ground in a triangular pattern. The constables were called again and photographed and confirmed the landing site.

Two nights later in the wee hours of December 28, they returned to the site, led by Lt. Colonel Charles Halt, second in command at the base. They brought a radiation detector and recorded high levels of radiation at the landing site, again observed the colored, pulsating lights through the trees, and again pursued them through the forest. Other colored lights were seen flying through the sky. Col. Halt recorded the audio of this pursuit on a microcassette. Two weeks later, after debriefing all of his men who participated, he wrote down the specifics of the episode in a signed memo titled "Unexplained Lights", and sent it in to the British Ministry of Defense. Ever since, the airmen involved claim to have been coerced to change their stories and deny that anything happened, and were threatened with comments like "bullets are cheap."

Wow. That story is really something, isn't it? But even more impressive than the story is the documentation, mainly Col. Halt's audio recording and signed memo. You don't rise to be deputy commander of a United States Air Force base with nuclear weapons if you're a nutcase, and when you're accompanied by local police constables and a number of Air Force security personnel who all file written reports, you don't exactly make up ridiculous stories. There's little doubt that Rendlesham Forest probably has the best, most reliable evidence of any popular UFO story.

Ever since I first heard about the Rendlesham Forest incident, I've been as curious as anyone to know what actually happened. So I decided to begin with the null hypothesis — that nothing extraordinary happened — and then examine each piece of evidence that something extraordinary did happen, individually, on its own merit. I wanted to see if we could find a natural explanation for each piece of evidence: You always have to eliminate terrestrial explanations before you can consider the extraterrestrial.

Let's take it chronologically. The first events were the reported UFO sightings at the base on the night of the 25th and the early hours of the 26th. It turns out that people on the base were not the only people to see this. UFO reports flooded in from all over southern England, as it turned out that night was one of the best on record for dramatic meteors. The first were at 5:20pm and again at 7:20pm over southeastern England. Later at 9pm, the upper stage of a Russian rocket that had launched the Cosmos 749 satellite re-entered and broke up. As reported in the Journal of the British Astronomical Association, 250 people called in and reported a sighting as first six fragments came streaking in, which then broke up into more than 20. Finally, at about 2:45am on the morning of the 26th, a meteor described by witnesses as "bright as the moon" flew overhead with an unusually long duration of 3-4 seconds. The experience of the airmen was described in a letter home written by one of them:

At [about 3am], me and five other guys were walking up a dark path about 2 miles from base... Then we saw a bright light go right over us about 50 feet up and just fly over a field. It was silent.

At the same time on base, a security patrolman was dispatched to check the weapons storage area to see if a "falling star" had hit it. It had not. But it does seem clear that all of the UFO reports from the base are perfectly consistent with known meteor activity on that night. So much for the UFO sightings. Next piece of evidence.

Airmen at the east end of RAF Woodbridge went into the forest to investigate a strange, pulsing, colored light that they suspected might be a downed aircraft. We have the signed statements of the three men who went into the forest, SSgt. Penniston and Airmen Cabansag and Burroughs, as well as that of their superior, Lt. Buran. At this point it's important to know the geography of the area. Heading east from the east gate of RAF Woodbridge, there is about one mile of forest, followed by an open farmer's field several acres in size. At the far end of that field is a farmhouse. A little more than 5 miles beyond that sits the Orfordness lighthouse, in a direct line of sight.

Although the three men stayed together, their reports are dramatically different. Penniston and Burroughs reported moving lights of different colors, that they felt came from a mechanical object with a red light on top and blue lights below surrounded by a yellow haze. They even drew pictures of it in their reports, but Penniston's illustration of their best view of it shows it partially obscured by trees and well off in the distance to the east. Burroughs' drawing of the object is based on Penniston's description, as Burroughs himself only reported seeing lights. Cabansag, however, reported that the only light they saw after actually leaving the base was the one that all three men eventually identified as a lighthouse or beacon beyond the farmhouse. Cabansag reported that the yellow haze had simply been the glow from the farmhouse lights. Once they reached the field, they turned around and returned to base without further incident.

A further problem with Burroughs' and Penniston's stories is that they have grown substantially over time, particularly Penniston's. In more recent TV interviews, they've both claimed that they saw the craft fly up out of the trees and fly around. Penniston has also unveiled a notebook which he claims he wrote during their forest chase, which he displayed on a 2003 Sci-Fi Channel documentary. Its times and dates are wrong, and Burroughs has stated that Penniston did not make any notes during the episode and would not have had time to even if he'd wanted. Penniston's story has also expanded to include a 45 minute personal walkaround inspection of the object during which he took a whole roll of photographs (seized by the the Air Force, of course), which from the written statements of all three men, is a clear fabrication.

Only Cabansag's version of events, that there was a single pulsing light later determined to be a distant beacon or lighthouse, describes events that all three men agreed on, and is consistent with the statements of others. For example, A1C Chris Arnold, who placed the call to the police and waited at the end of the access road, gave this description in a 1997 interview:

There was absolutely nothing in the woods. We could see lights in the distance and it appeared unusual as it was a sweeping light, (we did not know about the lighthouse on the coast at the time). We also saw some strange colored lights in the distance but were unable to determine what they were... Contrary to what some people assert, at the time almost none of us knew there was a lighthouse at Orford Ness. Remember, the vast majority of folks involved were young people, 19, 20, 25 years old. Consequently it wasn't something most of the troops were cognizant of. That's one reason the lights appeared interesting or out of the ordinary to some people.

Police constables responding to Arnold's call of "unusual lights in the sky" did arrive on the scene while Penniston, Cabansag, and Burroughs were still in the forest. Here is the report they filed:

Air traffic control West Drayton checked. No knowledge of aircraft. Reports received of aerial phenomena over southern England during the night. Only lights visible this area was from Orford light house. Search made of area - negative.

So much for unusual lights or strange flying craft reported by the airmen in the forest on the first night.

Next morning, some of the men found what they believed to be site of where Penniston's craft must have touched down. It was a clearing with three depressions in the ground, possibly made by landing pads. Again the police were called. The police report stated:

There were three marks in the area which did not follow a set pattern. The impressions made by the marks were of no depth and could have been made by an animal.

Forestry Commission worker Vince Thurkettle, who lived less than a mile away, was also present at the examination of the landing site. Astronomer Ian Ridpath, who has a fantastic web site about the event (and check out this YouTube video of his original BBC report here), interviewed Thurkettle about the impressions and the reported burn marks on the surrounding trees:

He recognized them as rabbit diggings, several months old and covered with a layer of fallen pine needles... The "burn marks" on the trees were axe cuts in the bark, made by the foresters themselves as a sign that the trees were ready to be felled.

So much for the landing site.

It was two nights later that Col. Halt decided to take the investigation into his own hands (contrary to the popular telling that says there were events on three nights in a row, there are no reported events on the second night). Halt properly armed himself with a Geiger counter and an audio recorder (Download the complete 17-minute recording here), and took some men to examine the landing site and the strange lights. It's been reported that Halt found radiation levels at the landing site ten times higher than normal background levels:

Col. Halt: "Up to seven tenths? Or seven units, let's call it, on the point five scale."

He used a standard issue AN-PDR 27 Survey Meter, which detects beta and gamma radiation. The highest level reported by Col. Halt on his audio tape, "seven tenths", corresponded to .07 milliroentgens per hour, just at the lowest reading on the bottom range of the meter, the "point five scale". The UK's National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) told Ian Ridpath that levels between .05 and .1 mR/h were normal background levels; however, this particular meter was designed to measure much higher levels of radiation and so it was "not credible" to establish a level of only ten times normal background. So much for Col. Halt's radiation.

And then they observed the mysterious colored light flashing through the trees:

Col. Halt: "You just saw a light? Where? Slow down. Where?"
Unidentified: "Right on this position here. Straight ahead, in between the trees – there it is again. Watch – straight ahead, off my flashlight there, sir. There it is."
Col. Halt: "I see it, too. What is it?"
Unidentified: "We don’t know, sir."
Col. Halt: "It’s a strange, small red light."

Every lighthouse has a published interval at which it flashes. This is how sea captains are able to identify which light they're seeing. The Orfordness lighthouse has an interval of 5 seconds. Now listen to the same exchange again; I've added a beep at exactly five second intervals:

$2/mo $5/mo $10/mo One time

Although several times during the tape Col. Halt calls the light red, he is contradicted by his men who say it's yellow. In photographs of the 1980 light taken before it was replaced, it did indeed look orange. Even the new light, which is mercury vapor discharge and therefore whiter and bluer than the original incandescent, appears distinctly red in photographs and video when viewed from Rendlesham forest.

Col. Halt, having been in the area longer than most of the young servicemen, did know about the lighthouse; but he didn't think this light could be it because it was coming from the east. Col. Halt believed the lighthouse was to the southeast. This is true from RAF Bentwaters, where Halt was from. But the chase through the forest proceeded due east from RAF Woodbridge — two miles south of Bentwaters — and from there, unknown to Col. Halt, Orfordness lighthouse is indeed due east.

Col. Halt: "We've passed the farmer's house and are crossing the next field and now we have multiple sightings of up to five lights with a similar shape and all but they seem to be steady now rather than a pulsating or glow with a red flash."

Five steady lights glowing red. The Orfordness Transmitting Station is just two miles up the coast from the lighthouse, and features five tall radio towers topped with red lights. Col. Halt's thoroughness was commendable, but even he can be mistaken. Without exception, everything he reported on his audiotape and in his written memo has a perfectly rational and unremarkable explanation.

And with that, we're nearly out of evidence to examine. All that remains is the tale that the men were debriefed and ordered never to mention the event, and warned that "bullets are cheap". Well, as we've seen on television, the men all talk quite freely about it, and even Col. Halt says that to this day nobody has ever debriefed him. So this appears to be just another dramatic invention for television, perhaps from one of the men who have expanded their stories over the years.

When you examine each piece of evidence separately on its own merit, you avoid the trap of pattern matching and finding correlations where none exist. The meteors had nothing to do with the lighthouse or the rabbit diggings, but when you hear all three stories told together, it's easy to conclude (as did the airmen) that the light overhead became an alien spacecraft in the forest. Always remember: Separate pieces of poor evidence don't aggregate together into a single piece of good evidence. You can stack cowpies as high as you want, but they won't turn into a bar of gold.

Follow me on Twitter @BrianDunning.

Brian Dunning

© 2009 Skeptoid Media, Inc. Copyright information

References & Further Reading

Army. Radiac Set AN/PDR-27. Washingon, DC: United States Army, 1952. 12.

BBC. "Rendlesham - UFO Hoax." BBC Inside Out. BBC, 30 Jun. 2003. Web. 16 Jan. 2010. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham_ufos.shtml>

Kelly, Lynne. The Skeptics Guide to the Paranormal. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 2004. Pages 198-201.

Radford, B. "UFO Cover-Up? Britain's Roswell Event Missing from Released Files." Life's Little Mysteries. Tech Media Network, 4 Mar. 2011. Web. 6 Jul. 2012. <http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/1172-missing-ufo-files.html>

Ridpath, Ian. "The Rendlesham Forest UFO Case." IanRidpath.com. Ian Ridpath, 1 Jun. 2009. Web. 16 Jan. 2010. <http://www.ianridpath.com/ufo/rendlesham.htm>

Rutkowski, C. A World of UFO's. Toronto: Canada Council for the Arts, 2008. 27-32.

Reference this article:
Dunning, B. "The Rendlesham Forest UFO." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc., 6 Jan 2009. Web. 23 Apr 2014. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4135>

Discuss!

10 most recent comments | Show all 102 comments

Probably time travellers and/or from a parallel dimension; obviously from a (very) far more advanced civilisation than ours.

That's why they can come in and out of our world at will. They don't need to cross the vast expanse of space to get to us. Just a short hop through a portal (if you will) to say 'hi' every now and then to set we human beings - at our current low level of technological and spiritual advancement, comparatively speaking - off on a typical collision course between the believers and the skeptics.

To the believers here, as long as you maintain objectivity throughout and be able to separate the wheat from the chaff whenever you come across such sensational stories (with a salt shaker handy, of course), you should be fine.

To the skeptics......get a life, people.

God Bless us all...

James, Singapore
November 20, 2013 6:22pm

No mention is made of the 2003 claim by USAF Security Policeman Kevin Conde (www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series3/rendlesham_ufos.shtml)that he had played a prank on a colleague who was on duty at the east gate, and was known for 'seeing things'. He drove his patrol car around in the fog with the red and blue emergency lights on and flashing the spotlight in the air. Although he himself cannot be sure this is the origin of the story - he is not sure of the dates - he points out his prank could easily have been copied.
I always try to look for the most obvious explanation for an unexplained event - in this case aliens from outer space, or a bored guard playing a prank on a colleague...
Some people refuse to accept the obvious or more likely explanation, even when the evidence is right in front of them - just look at the crop circle enthusiasts who refused to accept they were man-made even when the perpetrators came forward and demonstrated how they had made them.

Adrian, Southampton, UK
November 20, 2013 6:33pm

Adrian.
Now this is a new one, claiming it was a "prank" by another Security Police personnel.

While people in the military have been known to pull some doozies of pranks though the years this is NOT ONE OF THOSE for the following reasons.

1. This is a NUCLEAR WEAPONS base.
These by far are the deadliest weapons on earth. With some of the most stringent security in the military.

2. The military personnel chosen to guard these weapons are some of the most highly trained, screened, and cleared in the air force.

3. While they have a sense of humor. It STOPS DEAD WHEN ON GUARD DUTY.
Humor like suggested is STOPPED COLD due to the fact given the nuclear weapons and the tension of the cold war a "joke" can quickly spin out of control.
With consequences that could turn deadly.

I can say given the above points ANYONE who would even try such a "prank" around NUCLEAR WEAPON storage area would quickly find themselves in the stockade not wondering if they would stay in the military but how much time they may face in PRISON.

Again I point out the debunkers here seem to base most of their "proof" on saying they take anyone, put them on a plane, then the first day hand them a rifle and have them guard nuclear weapons.

Really do some research on those who guard nuclear weapons (popular science had a great article on it).

I think you see how silly these "debunkers" are.

Eric, Northern IL USA
December 05, 2013 1:11am

adrian-wow you've convinced me! Some guy riding around with flashing lights and shining spot light into sky... that surely could explain someone seeing an object and a few feet in front of him and being able to walk around said object... Aslo happening on different occaisions... that really is a convincing arguement.

Levin (I could be wrong) I think the old bald guy is saying, "If you can't believe an eyewitness, you know you won't believe a blogger, so why lie and insinuate you'd believe a blogger w/ a decent explanation?" I don't think he ever referred to ridpath as a blogger. his reference was to himself. at least that's how I read him

marco, spokane
December 08, 2013 1:02pm

"...two U.S. Air Force air traffic controllers who were on duty at the RAF Bentwaters tower during the week in question, and they variously confirmed tracking on radar a UFO that covered 120 miles in 12 seconds, did a sharp right-angle turn and, finally, hovered outside their window. It was spherical and dull orange in color." (Comment made on this page in 2009) - How does one explain this? No serious, how does one/can some one explain this? It could not be a meteor tracked because they would be too far for radar to detect and could not be Russian or lighthouse.

That new graphical revamp of such ufo is attempted to be depicted in the new "Paranormal Witness" finale. Everyone ones visuals right? The frame of reference can be imagined (do not take it as completely what they saw; because I have not heard the witnesses approve or disapprove such cgi), therefore bringing us closer to what they may have seen.

So again, what is the physics behind what the air traffic controllers saw? No mention of that in the debunking.

To bring this story down, you must bring it ALL down.

Very truly yours,

Skeptic

Tense, Central Florida
December 09, 2013 10:54pm

What about the light being shun down into the weapon's dump?

Spene, Surrey
December 23, 2013 9:32am

hmmmm, you didn't mention that Penniston received the binary code which he later had uncoded, and that he saw a U.S insignia on the craft leading him to believe the craft was from the future. Throwing something out here...could the aliens, specifically the grays, be drones from the future? They have no sex organs, ears or much of a mouth, only the big eyes. ( camera? ). Could we have ruined future genes by nuclear war and future humans are here to genetically improve their present? Just something to wonder.

sheryl, michigan
December 30, 2013 9:38pm

I will make the following confessions in honor of Brian's insistence on objective analysis of data:

1. I believe in UFOs because I have seen one.

2. I do not believe in extraterrestrial visitors or invasions (insufficient data.)

3. I believe that many many people have seen UFOs.

4. I do not believe that these people have seen extraterrestrials (insufficient data.)

5.I do not rule out the possibility of extraterrestrial life, but I have not encountered anything to convince me that there are aliens hanging out here (insufficient data.)

6. Telling the truth does not make an observer automatically correct in the conclusions drawn from the observed phenomena.

7. I believe truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense.

8. Based on belief #6 and #7 I do not accept most of the reports of extraterrestrial contacts are proof of extraterrestrial contact especially where such reports answer all the questions.

I have thoroughly enjoyed all of the programs about Rendlesham as wells as other UFO sightings, crop circles, magnetic sinks and vorticies, etc. but the supporters and the debunkers alike appear to me be suffering from confabulation psychosis (compulsive fabrication of data to support or refute a claim of extraterrestrial activity.)

I stand firmly with the folks who want more *facts* to confirm or refute the true nature of UFO sightings.

Swampwitch, Gainesville Fl
January 19, 2014 4:31am

What about the light beam that shone down at their feet from the craft that Col. Halt mentions on his recording? You conveniently left that out Brian. How do you explain that? What did the lighthouse light reflect off a tree and then a cloud to land at their feet?

Patto, Melb Australia
April 06, 2014 8:47pm

Dear Brian,
Don't be daft, the men said they walk right up to a craft and touched it. Sgt. Penniston's drawing shows a geometrically structured craft, and you can see his writing implement shaking out of control as he tries to copy the symbols on it; and on the tape you can hear Halt describing how the thing was shooting beams of light down to the ground, some right at his feet. As to the lights that Halt sees as red and others see them as yellow, these same shifts of color are commonly reported in UFO sightings - anyway red and yellow are at the same end of the spectrum, and Halt says right on the tape that he sees the yellow, too. They were witnessing something that would have required an ability to manipulate or defy the laws of physics as we understand them - you expect it to look steady like some light bulb? Come on !

Carla Contini, Baltimore, MD
April 09, 2014 6:14pm

Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:

Your Name:
City/Location:
Comment:
characters left. Discuss the issues - personal attacks against other commenters, posts containing advertisements or links to commercial services, nonsense, and other useless posts will be deleted.
Answer 1 + 2 =

You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.

What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?

Support Skeptoid
 
Skeptoid host, Brian Dunning
Skeptoid is hosted
and produced by
Brian Dunning


Newest
Your Body's Energy Fields
Skeptoid #411, Apr 22 2014
Read | Listen (12:50)
 
The Black Eyed Kids
Skeptoid #410, Apr 15 2014
Read | Listen (11:18)
 
Oil Pulling
Skeptoid #409, Apr 8 2014
Read | Listen (12:24)
 
Skeptoid Media is a 501(c)(3) Public Charity
Apr 4 2014
Listen (1:13)
 
15 Phreaky Phobias
Skeptoid #408, Apr 1 2014
Read | Listen (12:44)
 
Newest
#1 -
Listener Feedback: Alternative Medicine
Read | Listen
#2 -
The JFK Assassination
Read | Listen
#3 -
Asking the Socratic Questions
Read | Listen
#4 -
5 False Arguments for Raw Milk
Read | Listen
#5 -
The Vanishing Village of Angikuni Lake
Read | Listen
#6 -
The Riddle of the L-8 Blimp
Read | Listen
#7 -
The Secrets of MKULTRA
Read | Listen
#8 -
Who Discovered the New World?
Read | Listen

Recent Comments...

[Valid RSS]

  Skeptoid PodcastSkeptoid on Facebook   Skeptoid on Twitter   Brian Dunning on Google+   Skeptoid RSS

Members Portal

 
 


"How to Tell if Global Warming Is Real"
inFact with Brian Dunning


Support Skeptoid