What's the most important thing about Skeptoid? Natural Hygiene: Health Without Medicine (or Wisdom)Skeptoid #28 |
|
||||||
Today we're going to flush our entire medicine cabinet down the toilet and try "natural hygiene," the practice of improving our health by avoiding medical care.
The hypotheses behind natural hygiene suggest that modern medicine and vaccinations are harmful to the body, and that viruses, bacteria, and germs are not harmful. Basically, take everything that modern science has taught us about the human body, turn it upside down and backwards, and there is your natural hygiene. However they do recognize one fact of biology, and that's that the human body has the power to heal itself. But they don't really understand what this means: They believe that the only way a human body can be healed is on its own, without medical care. For example, if you have an infected wound, natural hygiene suggests that a shot of penicillin will actually make things worse. In fact, such wound care as this can sometimes be the only thing that will save your life. Many practitioners do bend their own rules in cases of trauma or emergency care, ackowledging that medical care is actually helpful in an emergency. It's the rest of time, normal wellness or treatment of chronic illness or disease, where they believe medical care is counterproductive.
The human body does have amazing recuperative powers. Its immune system is powerful and sophisticated. Every day, someone's immune system manages to overcome some disease that's usually fatal. And it's these relatively few lucky victories that always get all the attention. When a person who doesn't understand medicine reads in the National Enquirer that someone overcame cancer while trying natural hygiene, it's natural to assume a causal relationship. In fact, as we know from medical history, more people who treat their cancer will survive than those who don't. It's the exceptions that make the headlines, and comprise the bulk of the anecdotal evidence supporting natural hygiene.
When a practitioner of natural hygiene cuts his finger and sees it heal, he attributes this to his natural hygiene lifestyle. Really this is just the body's normal process. If he'd put on some Neosporin and a band-aid, it probably would have healed quicker and with less risk of infection.
Prior to 100 years ago, you were actually better off not going to the doctor if you became ill. The doctor was likely to bleed you, or induce vomiting, in order to balance your humors. Illness was thought to be caused by an imbalance in the four basic humors: blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile. Needless to say, this level of treatment didn't get you very far. You were just as likely to die from infection caused by the bloodletting incisions.
Since then, with the advent of modern medicine and a century of its development, we've doubled the average life expectancy in the Western world from under 40 to almost 80. Most of this gain in average life expectancy has come from reductions of infant mortality and early childhood illnesses. Generally, if you can survive early childhood, you have a good chance of reaching middle age or even older.
Modern-day non-civilized native tribes, who lack access to modern medicine and are the only groups currently practicing natural hygiene in large numbers, have an average life expectancy of just 34 years at birth. But this doesn't mean that everyone drops dead at 35, like some jungle version of Logan's Run. Those lucky enough to survive into their teen years have an average life expectancy of almost 60. What this means is that natural hygiene practitioners are at greatest risk of death during infancy and early childhood. Without innoculations and infant care, many children die and bring down the whole average.
Modern Western practitioners of natural hygiene are people who make the choice sometime during healthy adulthood. This means that they have generally already received their innoculations at an early age, and it obviously means that they already survived infancy and early childhood. So, doing nothing else, and having already been brought into adulthood through modern medical care, their human genes already provide them quite a long lifespan. In fact, since infant mortality brings down the whole average for everyone, an adult's life expectancy is already higher than the average life expectancy. This simple mathematical curiosity accounts for the fact that natural hygiene practitioners can generally claim to live longer than average. However, if they were required to place their bets just before childbirth instead of 20 years later, their average would be no higher than the general population, and probably less since they will not accept treatment for later stage illnesses like heart disease and cancer.
Natural hygiene practitioners do follow some very good health practices. They generally don't smoke or drink alcohol excessively, and they often follow a healthy low-calorie diet. These are all great practices, but they can be followed by anyone. You don't need to add the weird element of shunning healthcare to enjoy the benefits of these simple healthy choices.
Do you or someone you know practice natural hygiene? If so, we'd love to hear from you. Please come to Skeptoid.com and post your experience in the forum.
 |
References
© 2009 Skeptoid.com
Discuss!
5 most recent comments | Show all 14 comments
Remember, you should always read with skepticism the comments of anyone too lame to put their real name & city.
hygiene is a somewhat important part of the human body your hygiene cann affect your social,mental, and physical actions. if you smelll really bad nobody would wanna be next to you becuae u smell. if you can smell your self and you know you stink that can put you in a depression mode to where you feel like you don't wanna do anything which can affect your physical actions. MR D STILL ROCKS
ed allen, Estacada,Oregon
November 03, 2008 9:49am
A perfect storm of psychological and physiological factors led to the onset of acute and rapidly progressing "Rheumatoid Arthritis" at age 25. I got to the point I could hardly move. After I could no longer remain in denial, I got on the full range of super-drugs to suppress the symptoms, and could function, but was still dis-eased, and I could feel it. I saw a natural hygenist, Dr. Paul Goldberg, in GA. After one summer of deep rest, sunshine and mostly vegetables (absolutely no sugar), I tapered off my medication and now have been symptom-free and drug-free for 3 months. I agree completely with Dr Bosco, above. My own body presents extraordinary evidence for his extraordinary claim.
Dawn, Chicago
December 08, 2008 11:50am
No it does not Dawn. While I do not want to belittle your pain, it is merely an anecdote that you want to pass off as extraordinary.
My mom has rheumatoid arthritis. In all likelihood I am going to get it before I turn 60. I can tell you this much symptoms go away and come back in random intervals. They will never go away until the day you die. The only thing that ever worked for her was Remicaid.
Well, that phrase, "I still feel diseased" means nothing. That is purely subjective phrase that could be applied to anything. I felt better after I slept on these rocks, so the rocks must have caused it.
Now what would fulfill the extraordinary part of your claim is if your natural hygienist tries the same remedy on a thousand people and then have them tested 3 times to see if there is any improvement.
Until that happens, your example is nothing more than the placebo effect.
Joseph Furguson, Brawley Ca
December 22, 2008 7:39am
It's interesting that the reason the government won't back any natural hygiene is because it hasn't been "tested." I find that interesting because we have millions if not billions of dollars going to cancer research and people are more than willing to test the latest drug. Why haven't we seen any exclusive testing by the government of Natural Hygiene. And if they have, where are the apparent obvious results of these tests. Why is it so hard to find information on the internet about the government testing Natural Hygiene. People say that its dangerous and that 6 people died in five years at Herbert Shelton's school of natural hygiene. Wow only 6. I think that's pretty impressive compared to the death rate of those put on chemo-therapy or other supposed "cures." If its so dangerous lets see some government backed tests that prove it. I would probably be inclined to pass natural hygiene off as quackery if I hadn't met someone who had been drastically affected by it. I lived with a friend in australia who was a practitioner and he himself had suffered from a rare form of mouth cancer because the doctors were not aware of the dangers of the combination of different types of asthma inhalers. After a hard battle and the implementation of natural hygiene he is well and enjoying life. Shouldn't one case be enough to look into it? I mean if one person responded well to a new cancer medication, wouldn't everyone want to look into it?
Sam, Lynchburg Va
January 05, 2009 8:40pm
Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:
You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.
Join the Skeptalk email discussion list.
What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?
![[Valid RSS]](/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=small}
I DO NOT believe in "natural hygiene" for healing everything, i believe that using modern medicine is needed at certain points but not for every little thing. people who never use medicine when they can clearly tell they are sick and are not healing aren't too bright (i am sorry if this offends you) but it is what i believe:/
Edward Otey, Estacada,Oregon
November 03, 2008 9:48am