Killing Faith: Deconstructionist Christians
Is proving the Bible really doing the work of God?
Filed under Natural History, Religion
| Skeptoid #12 December 07, 2006 Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe Also available in Japanese |
|
By Brian Dunning, Skeptoid Podcast
Episode 12, December 07, 2006
http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4012
Today we're going to take a leap of faith into a soft cushion, to see what happens when proven knowledge makes faith irrelevant.
There is a profound contradiction rising in the world of religion. Proponents of various religious dogma such as Creationism, Noah's Flood, and Revelations have taken a disturbing turn. They are crippling their own religion by attempting to do scientific research in an effort to prove their religious claims, thus directly attacking their religion's central pillar: faith.
Abraham is regarded as the father of faith among most of the world's people, including Muslims, Christians, and Jews. He earned this title through demonstrating the mightiest act of all: being willing to sacrifice his own son Isaac, indeed with the dagger poised above his head ready to fall. Isaac was saved when God sent an angel at the last second to put a stop to it, who told Abraham that he'd proven his faith. It was an act that very few among us could have duplicated; I certainly wouldn't have done it. For this reason, Abraham is rightly exalted. It was truly an act of heroic faith.
Consider this question: If Abraham had known that God would intervene at the last second to spare Isaac, would his act have been as heroic?
Theological tradition tells us no, it would not have. The reason the Abraham story is important is that it's the supreme demonstration of faith. Abraham raised his dagger fully intending to kill his beloved Isaac, all for his faith in God. He felt every ounce of the unimaginable anguish. Could you have brought the dagger down and plunged it into your own child? Achieving this level of faith is the essential goal of all Christians, and for that matter, it is for Muslims and Jews as well. Faith is the absolute pillar of religion.
Now let's turn the clock forward a few thousand years and see where the faithful are today. Surprisingly, I see a lot of them doing the equivalent of asking questions before raising the dagger. Questions like "Can you please prove to me that the angel's going to intervene?" Can you show me the scientific evidence that proves Intelligent Design? Can you please prove to me that Moses parted the Red Sea?
The Associates for Biblical Research (abr.christiananswers.net) publishes a quarterly PDF document called "Bible & Spade". It's all about archaeological projects throughout the middle east that they say supports the Biblical record. The current issue offers evidence from Egypt on the location of the Exodus crossing of the Red Sea. They have an exhaustive mission statement page, in which they state and restate their belief that the Bible is absolutely and literally a correct and true historical document. It is "infallible, inerrant and authoritative". Their purpose also includes "Edifying the Christian Church by encouraging a deeper knowledge of, greater appreciation for, and stronger faith in the Bible through knowledge and correct interpretation of the findings from archaeology and science." In short, they are all about proving the Bible is true through archaeology. They call this "encouraging stronger faith in the Bible". Encouraging faith through proof. They want to force us to believe it.
Maybe my dictionary is out of date, but faith and proof are oil and water. Faith needs no proof, and in the presence of proof, faith becomes irrelevant. Faith means to believe without proof; indeed, it means to believe in spite of evidence to the contrary. Where is the heroic faith in believing in something that's proven right before your eyes? That's hardly a demonstration worthy of Abraham. To seek to marginalize the element of faith by showing supporting evidence, is to seek to undermine the whole basis of the religion.
We see the same thing happening in any of the numerous groups seeking to find Noah's Ark on Mt. Ararat in Turkey. On some of their web sites you'll find tremendous amounts of information about how a wooden ark could have survived 6000 odd years, how it could get so high on the mountain when there's not enough water on the planet to do it, exactly where it's located in the satellite photographs, exactly how two of every animal could fit on one ark, what its dimensions are and where and how it was built, and so forth. But nowhere did I find an explanation of why it's important that it be found. To my way of thinking, even if you're of the mindset that Noah's flood was simply a literal account of an incident and not a meaningful allegory, then allowing it to be found, thus proving the story, would be more likely to be on Satan's agenda than on God's. Why would God want to marginalize faith? I can think of every reason why Satan would want to do this, but not God.
Is proving the Bible really doing the work of God?
Abraham's faith did not need the crutch of supporting scientific evidence that God is real, nor would he have made much of an impression upon God if he'd had such. I challenge Christians who are true believers to stick with their faith, and to hold their faith to be (if I may borrow the terms) "infallible, inerrant, and authoritative". Or, if you want to use what science tells us instead, then admit that you're no longer keeping your faith in the infallibity of the Bible. You cannot do both. A true Christian must question their fellow believers who attempt to erode faith through the application of science to scripture. If faith is not enough to support religion on its own, then faith has already been killed.
© 2006 Skeptoid Media, Inc.
References & Further Reading
Anonymous. The Bible (King James Version). Various: Various, 2006. Genesis Chapter 22.
Corbin, B.J. The Explorers Of Ararat: And the Search for Noah's Ark. Online: Great Commission Illustrated (GCI) Books, 2009. 73-108.
Hoitenga, D.J., Jr. Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: an Introduction to Reformed Epistemology. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1991.
Moberly, R. W. L. The Bible, Theology, and Faith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Rosenberg, David. Abraham: the first historical biography. New York: Basic Books, 2006. 40-45.
Shorto, R. Descartes' Bones: a Skeletal History of the Conflict Between Faith and Reason. New York: Doubleday, 2008.
Reference this article:
Dunning, B.
"Killing Faith: Deconstructionist Christians." Skeptoid Podcast. Skeptoid Media, Inc.,
7 Dec 2006. Web.
21 May 2013. <http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4012>
Discuss!
10 most recent comments | Show all 252 comments
Phi, was your father or grandfather a preacher ??
vesey, washington
May 12, 2011 6:01pm
"(bit like psychology)"
Except the methods of psychology are under the same controls and standards as any other science.
Your own dogma is a better example Phi. You give us only your "experience" (read fables and stories) as evidence, with no supporting evidence other than your ideology or personal taste, resorting to idealised charicatures of those you criticise (those would be your "false idols" and "paragons"). Take for example the way you try to portray the Cognitive Sciences: Philosophy, Psychology and the likes are protrayed not as objective fields of study but as oppossing views to your own, with morality and ethos imposed upon them to fit your world view, while a happier fantasy of Organic Farming is pushed as perfect, ignoring the practical failings of the real world, with your opinion that the food is better (a personal taste to anybody else) being cited as evidence of their nutritional superiority (with out bothering to prove they are nutritionally different, that organic pesticides are less poisonous than other kinds, etc.
As much as you dislike Christian philosophy, you can not deny you have a Philosophy of your own, that shares the same flaws as the world views you refuse to tolerate.
Tolerance of others, by the way, being one of the things most philosophies tend to agree on as moral.
Tom H, Kent
May 13, 2011 9:59am
My faith is in God, and not in the Bible!
Proving the Bible by these means you have mentioned is pointless and silly, IMO.
Debby, Auckland New Zealand
April 28, 2012 8:25pm
Is it really true that without faith there is no religion? I was raised a non-believer, my father being a cristian hater mason. I grew with no god in my mind, and felt it was sheer stupidity to even consider its existence. But then I went studying physics, and little by little, discovered that things were not that easy. I finally got to understand -under my own terms, of course- that sustaining the inexistence of god was -and is- first of all a demonstration of ignorance. There are many ways you can guide yourself to this conclusion, but it's not the purpose of these words. There is no loss in knowing, better than believing. When you know, God becomes greater and greater, because there is no limit for knowledge. I guess that's where faith still keeps stepping in. Religions need to evolve, just as humans do. If they don't, they will disappear sooner or later. But anyhow, I'm not worried about religion's survival itself, as truth is what should drive them, even when I can accept that truth can be seen differently as centuries go by. It's truth what we should pursue, not the rigid stability of the stories we have been told.
Ronald, Santiago
May 30, 2012 6:31am
In my opinion the problems & shortcomings experienced by many Faithful seekers of knowledge stem from how their institutions inform their research.
A scientist will take a theory & test it to exhaustion.Only when he/she is satisfied of it's validity will he/she put forward a conclusion to his peers.
regretably fundamentalists are expected to work the other way round by starting with an "undeniable " conclusion and then humoured by their mother church in their "search for truth" so long as they do not rock the Ark
BTW why is it mother church, and not father ?
hopefultom, Bolton, GB
May 31, 2012 12:29pm
Phi: that was only true of one car. The Morgan reverse trike was a lovely piece of work and didn't fall over. It, however, had length problems--a 4 wheeled car the same size had much more capacity, and for the same capacity was much smaller.
Paul, Canberra
July 21, 2012 5:15pm
I think the more important question is why a supposed loving and merciful God would ask anyone to perform infanticide. Why wouldn't an all-knowing god already know the extent of Abraham's faith? The believers don't seem to care that none of it makes sense. It scares them to think about it too much ... they're afraid they'll go to hell. Another one of the cruel tricks by the merciful god-father. (Not to mention disease, hurricanes, sunami's, famine, etc.)
Good grief people! Try to remember that you have brains.
Mimi McMouth, Anaconda, MT
November 19, 2012 6:45pm
The marginalization of faith can be temporary, both individually and culturally. Need, and convenience sway thoughts regarding faith.
bedlamb, Armpit, NV
November 30, 2012 6:04pm
Why did this happen?
"On the evening of that day, the first day of the week, the doors being locked where the disciples were for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood among them and said to them, “Peace be with you.” When he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. Then the disciples were glad when they saw the Lord. Jesus said to them again, “Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I am sending you.” And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld.” Now Thomas, one of the Twelve, called the Twin, was not with them when Jesus came. So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them, “Unless I see in his hands the mark of the nails, and place my finger into the mark of the nails, and place my hand into his side, I will never believe.” Eight days later, his disciples were inside again, and Thomas was with them. Although the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here, and see my hands; and put out your hand, and place it in my side. Do not disbelieve, but believe.” Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.” (quoted from the gospel according to John 20:19-29)
anotherworldview, Peoria, IL
April 06, 2013 8:31pm
Make a comment about this episode of Skeptoid (please try to keep it brief & to the point). Anyone can post:
You can also discuss this episode in the Skeptoid Forum, hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation, or join the Skeptalk email discussion list.
What's the most important thing about Skeptoid?









Bearing in mind that dictionaries are based on the use of a word in context one is bound to find one of the definitions will fit the religious view. Dictionaries do not so much define what words are but what they are used to represent. The longer Oxford dictionary will quote you what it sees as significant uses and dates them.
Faith therefore in the religious view is more about loyalty than reality - the connection runs "faith - fide - fidelity" much in the same way that the word "true" can also mean "loyal" and is derived from the German meaning "loyalty" instead of from "Wahrheit" which perhaps comes closer to meaning "truth."
So it is quite correct to say that the Christian meaning of faith - as defined in "Hebrews" is a specific and not a "universal" meaning
Christianity first opposed sensible reason in the story of Thomas who had the sense to check if a fraud was being perpetrated and was admonished for it. The consequences of this story are disastrous and tragic, and deeply embedded in the western psyche and history. Nazism was a faith based doctrine not a rational one. The mind had been set up for it through two thousand years of Christian "faith" that taught people lies become truths when one is loyal to them.
(bit like psychology)
phi, Sydney
April 21, 2011 5:18pm