QED 2016 in Manchester: A Complete Success

Last weekend I attended the QED (Question Explore Discover) conference in Manchester, UK. It was the sixth installment of this very successful skeptical conference. It was the first I’ve attended, and I regret only one thing: that I didn’t go to the previous ones. It was an absolute blast, a weekend full of skepticism and science together with 650 like-minded colleagues.

opengraph

Describing the program in a detailed fashion wouldn’t do it justice, especially since there were sometimes as many as five events being held simultaneously. It was difficult to choose at times. Luckily, I’ve been informed by one of the organizers that the talks in the main hall will be put online soon, and a few podcasts who recorded live shows at the conference—including Cognitive Dissonance, God Awful Movies, InKredulous, and Skeptics with a K—are already beginning to post their live shows online, too.

What impressed me most was the sheer breadth of skeptical topics—from a panel on paranormal investigations to a magic workshop, from skeptical (and nonsensical) movies to investigative journalism, without forgetting interesting talks about futurology, sex science, and bogus bomb detectors. And that’s just a small sample. There were speakers from all over Europe, the US (Captain Disillusion) and Australia (Dr. Karl Kruszelnicki).

650 people ... a complete success!

650 people: a complete success! Photo courtesy of the author.

It is clear for me that there is no such thing as the skeptic, and neither is there the subject with which a skeptically minded person is occupied. It’s a big tent, and anyone can specialize (or not) in a topic they are most interested in. It was therefore good to see that ample place was given for workshops and panels on how to organize skeptical activism, Skeptics in the Pub, etc. And of course, conversations about what to do and how in trying to spread the critical thinking continued well into the night at the bar. Because that, too, is part of the value of such an event: the informal exchanges and getting to know new people.

20161016_110829785_ios

Feeling really small. Luckily it was a Beuchet chair illusion, created by Richard Wiseman of Quirkology. Photo courtesy Steve.

Personally, my goal was to meet several of my favorite podcasters (Cognitive Dissonance, Inkredulous), meet Dr. Karl (a long-time favorite of mine, whom I have blogged about before) and reconnect with skeptical friends from around the continent. I can honestly say that it was a complete success on all three points and, even more than that, I met a lot of interesting people, learned a lot, and laughed quite a bit, too. We even sang during the Saturday evening entertainment!

Panel on paranormal investigations

Panel on paranormal investigations, Hayley Stevens, Deborah Hyde, Caroline Watts, Susan Blackmore. Photo courtesy of the author.

Chris Hofstadter, an attendee, remarked to me how much more this event is focused on sharing and participating, and not on “celebrities.” It’s true, it’s quite easy to walk up to one of your heroes and start a conversation about skepticism, science or even beer. When Dr. Karl sat next me during a talk, I was absolutely flabbergasted by the open and respectful conversation we had (during the break!).

20161015_121832020_ios

Tom and Cecil being their foulmouthed selves in a live podcast of Cognitive Dissonance, because that too is skepticism. Photo courtesy of the author.

In part, it’s exactly this type of mutual respect and willingness to learn from one another, without the celebrity barrier, that makes big events like QED a success. It serves to charge up one’s batteries and go out back into the world to make a difference. I cannot thank the organizers of QED enough, along with all the conference’s volunteers, by the way, for doing such a great job and making these exchanges possible. I’m quite certain from now on to mark QED on my calendar for the years to come.

About Bruno Van de Casteele

Philosopher by education, IT'er by trade. Allround Armchair Skeptic, History Enthusiast, Father of Three. Twitter @brunovdc Personal website: www.puam.be
This entry was posted in Cool Stuff, Events and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to QED 2016 in Manchester: A Complete Success

  1. luckylarrysilverstein says:

    INTELLIGENT DESIGN? YOU JUDGE!

    I LOVE TOM CAT!

    TOM CAT TRUMPS TRUMP

    WHETHER YOU

    ARE A CREATIONIST OR AN EVOLUTIONIST,

    THE FACT IS:TOM CAT GRABS PUSSY!

    Do male cats have spikes on their penis?

    When mating, the male cat would bite the female cat at the scruff at the neck. Uninformed people would believe that the pain caused by the male cat’s teeth is what makes the female cat scream and paw at the male cat. Female cats scream not because of the male’s bite. What causes female cats to scream is the withdrawal of the tom cat’s penis. Male cats have spikes on their penis. Female cats scream bloody murder because of the pain caused by the spikes that rake the female cat’s vaginal walls. The withdrawal of the cat’s spiked or barbed penis will trigger ovulation.

    A male cat’s reproductive tract consists of the scrotum, the two testicles, prostate glands, two bulbourethral glands, the vas deferens and the penis. Kids would often ask parents if cats have penis because the penis of cats are not easily visible. A sheath of skin called prepuce completely covers the cat’s penis. The penis can protrude from the sheath when the cat licks and grooms. The tip of a cat’s penis is called glans. This glans has a band of about 120 to 150 horny projections.

    The spikes on the cat’s penis play an important role in feline reproduction. Female cats are induced ovulators. This means that cats would not ovulate unless mated or unless manually stimulated. When cats mate, the male cat holds the female immobile by biting the scruff of the neck. This is one way of inducing the female cat to ovulate. The withdrawal of the penis will cause the spikes to rake against the vaginal walls. This causes the female cat to scream. The scraping of the vaginal walls also induces the female cat to ovulate.

    NOW THAT’S WHAT I CALL A PUSSY GRABBER!

    Meow

  2. mudguts says:

    Hmmm.. I take a 7 and a half..

    I suppose the plus side is; conspiracists all are finely suited to labelling jam jars..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *