Jack the Ripper and the Mystery of the Smoking Gun

JacktheRipper1888Did you hear? Jack the Ripper was finally identified recently! Or maybe not. The press very quickly dismantled the claims about Aaron Kosminski, whose DNA was most recently said to make him definitely, absolutely the Ripper. For sure.

These sorts of bold declarations of “smoking gun” evidence for the identity of the Ripper come along every now and then, usually with a book in tow. The identity of the notorious Victorian London serial killer has long intrigued historians. Kosminski is just the most recent to make the news. In honor of this newest attempt to solve the great Victorian murder mystery, I thought it might be fun to look at a few of these “definitive” suspects identified over the years, just to see the company Kosminski has been placed in.

The Royal Conspiracy

In 1976, Stephen Knight published Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution. You may not have heard of this book, but you’ve probably encountered the story. The Final Solution first popularized the Royal Conspiracy, which says that “Jack the Ripper” was in fact an elaborate series of staged murders undertaken by the Freemasons to hide a royal scandal. Sir William Gull, the Royal surgeon, is the man accused of actually committing the killings in Knight’s book, with an associate helping.

Far from being the “final solution,” Knight’s book is actually an almost comical pastiche of anomaly hunting, pattern recognition, and special pleading about existing evidence and the lack of the same. It’s also rooted in the story told by Joseph Gorman, who later told the Times of London that he’d made the whole story up. You’d think that this would be fatal to the story, but by the time Gorman confessed the theory had taken on a life of its own. The idea of a Royal Conspiracy still has its adherents today. It has also become the darling of mystery and horror writers, who love to use the Royal Conspiracy in novels, movies, and comic books.

The Killer’s Diary


In the mid-1990s, James Maybrick skyrocketed to prominence in the Ripper case. Prior to 1993 Maybrick was best known as the victim in an 1889 poisoning case, but Shirley Harrison’s 1993 book The Diary of Jack the Ripper turned Maybrick into a violent killer looking to take out punitive revenge on women because his wife was cheating on him. The diary is exactly the kind of diary you’d expect a deranged serial killer to keep: full of clear references to the Ripper killings and written in increasingly erratic and violent rhetoric.

If it were authentic it would be a damning piece of evidence, but there are several suspicious things about it. For one thing, the first 20 pages were torn out and page 21 conveniently picks up right as Maybrick is about to start his epic killing spree. Then there’s the fact that Michael Barrett, who first brought the Diary to the public, has claimed that he forged the diary, only to retract his claims later. Harrison stands by her book, though, and has even written a second book which claims Maybrick committed murders in Texas.

The Maniacal Author

One of the stranger suspects ever to emerge is Lewis Carroll — yes, the celebrated children’s author who wrote Alice in Wonderland. Richard Wallace’s 1996 book Jack the Ripper: Light-Hearted Fiend, argues that Carroll lived a Jekyll and Hyde life: quiet Oxford don by day, enraged, misogynist killer by night. Wallace’s argument is mostly message-hunting in Carroll’s more nonsensical works. He engages in some word-replacement and anagram shenanigans worthy of the Bible Code to build his theory, and then tries to tie the “discovered” messages to events in the Ripper story. Not surprisingly, his book is filled with a lot of implication and very little fact.

The Painter Theory

In 2003, mystery novelist Patricia Cornwall wrote Jack the Ripper: Portrait of a Serial Killer, which laid blame on Walter Sickert, an English painter. The Sickert theory is actually spawned from The Final Solution; he was the man from whom Gorman claimed to have heard the story of the Royal Conspiracy, and over the years Sickert was viewed as a suspect. Cornwall’s case makes use of a lot of art criticism and some mtDNA evidence taken from the envelope of one of the Jack the Ripper letters. The mtDNA evidence has come under scrutiny though; not only does it carry all the problems usually associated with testing century-old DNA that hasn’t been kept in a clean room, but it also came from a letter generally regarded as a hoax, one of many sent during the time of the Ripper crimes. Cornwall stands by her suspect, of course.

The Impossible Dream

So, who’s Jack the Ripper? Is it Gull? Maybrick? Carroll? Sickert? Any of the twenty-some-odd suspects listed on Casebook: Jack the Ripper, the online clearinghouse for Ripper theories? We just don’t know.

Further, so-called Ripperologists can’ t even agree on some of the basic facts about the crimes. For example, how many women did Jack the Ripper kill? If you’re passingly familiar with the Ripper case you might answer “5” because that is the most commonly attributed number. But Casebook: Jack the Ripper catalogs thirteen other women who have been attributed to the Ripper by one theory or another. In fact, when the first “canonical” victim was murdered the press were already connecting her death to the violent deaths of two other women whom Ripperologists now routinely dismiss (unless it suits their particular theory). And even the five “canonical” victims have been disputed. So did Jack the Ripper kill three women? Five? A dozen? It all depends on which suspect you’re trying to implicate.

Here’s another one: Did Jack the Ripper have anatomical knowledge or training? If your suspect is Sir William Gull, then of course he did! Only someone with anatomical knowledge could have made those cuts. If your suspect is Aaron Kosminski, then of course he didn’t! No surgeon would have made such sloppy and random cuts. The truth is that even police at the time couldn’t agree on the degree to which the killer possessed any anatomical training.

Or consider this: what if there never was a single killer? Author Peter Turnbull has argued that the media and police were keen to connect disparate and only superficially similar killings to the machinations of one “Whitechapel fiend,” and that the Ripper may have been made of hype, hysteria, and copycat killings. Is it possible that Jack the Ripper was nothing more than an invention? It’s not impossible to discount, given what we don’t know.

Honestly, the most reasonable position to take is this one: We will likely never know the true identity of Jack the Ripper. Our information on the murders is woefully incomplete and over a century has passed since the last attributed killing. The crime scenes have all been paved over; the existing police files have all been pored over; and every known fact has been scrutinized. The idea of a “smoking gun” in the case of Jack the Ripper is compelling, but it’s also unrealistic. Maybe in some forgotten chest in some old London attic,there is a smoking gun: a diary, a confessional letter, or a bloody knife. But as each year passes without such evidence coming to light, every claim to have found the suspect becomes more and more … well, suspect.

About Alison Hudson

Alison is a writer and educator living near Ann Arbor, MI. She blogs regularly about skepticism, games, and the transgender experience.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Jack the Ripper and the Mystery of the Smoking Gun

  1. But there has never been DNA evidence before, surely that makes this different?

    • Alison Hudson says:

      Patricia Cornwall claimed DNA evidence for her suspect as well, lifted off the licked glue of a Ripper letter’s envelope. And if you take a look at the media links in the first paragraph, you’ll see a pretty thorough dissecting of the reasons this DNA evidence is far from definitive (including questionable provenance of the shawl). And even if it were definitively Kosminski’s, it’s just semen. All it would prove is that he had sex with Eddowes before she died. And not even necessarily on the same day; the residents of Whitechapel weren’t all about doing their laundry every night in modern washing machines ;). Not to mention getting into the whole “the Ripper didn’t have sex with his victims” thing …

  2. William J Granger says:

    It’s “pored” over, not “poured” over. Interesting article though.

  3. Working in a Cop Shop says:

    From the information available it seems clear that Patricia Cornwall identified the writer of the Jack the Ripper letters. There is no definitive evidence that the letter writer and the murderer were the same man. Law enforcement at the time suspected that the letter writer was not the killer and no additonal information has been found to refute that.

    Michael Douglas (FBI profiler specialist, author of Mind Hunter) characterizes the killer as a disorganized personality (the frenzy displayed in the crime scenes supports no other interpretation.) The individual identified by Ms. Cornwall is of a much more organized mental set. With the information Ms. Cornwall presents I believe it is very possible that he was a serial killer of a much different character than the so-called Jack the Ripper, extremely organized, secret, complicated, and possessed of a vindictive hatred for “nice” girls like his wife whom he passionately despised. Ms. Cornwall details the deaths of middle/upper-middle class young women who were found in pieces (or just a few pieces were found.) Her subject sought all manner of low company and associated with prostitutes in a comradely (though not sexual) fashion.

    There is too little concrete data to solidly identify Jack the Ripper on this end of history and no chance that any can be developed in the future. That particular sadistic (cannibal?) predator will likely remain anonymous forever.

    • Alison Hudson says:

      Well to be more accurate, Cornwall may have identified one of the authors of some of the letters. There were many hoax letters writter in many different hands, some of them practically contradictory.

      • Working in a Cop Shop says:

        True, I did overstate that.

        Patricia Cornwall did some fine research and may have identified *one* of the authors of *some* of the Jack the Ripper letters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *