Oilgae: Poised to Replace Fossil Fuels?

Image Courtesy of US Dept of Energy

As I write this, the price of crude oil is a little over $92 a barrel.  In my neck of the woods,rural PA, gas is about $3.75 a gallon.  The last time I filled up the fuel oil tank at my house it cost me more than my first car.  Fossil based fuels are ex-pen-sive.  Algae might just be a replacement for those diminishing fossil fuels.  Algae based biofuels do not have the same ethical concerns as first generation biofuels (such as ethanol derived from corn) because algae are not a food resource   It can be turned into biodiesel, biogasoline, methane, jet fuel and it can even be engineered to produce pure hydrogen. Let’s look at how this simple slime may help keep us on the move for generations to come.

Sky high oil prices, along with competing demands between other biofuel sources and the fact that there is just not enough used french fry oil to go around, have sparked a renewed interest in the development of oil from algae.  This is also sometimes known as “oilgae” or algaculture (the farming of algae).  There are several eco-friendly upsides to using algae as a fuel source.  First of all, algaculture does not affect fresh water sources.  It utilizes waste water and/or sea water on land that is not suitable for traditional agriculture.  The algae used in the process are, of course, biodegradable so one doesn’t have to worry too much about a spill.

Algae is packed with energy.  Real energy and not the woo-woo kind.  It can yield from 10 to 100 times more energy per unit area than other second generation biofuels made from non-food crops like reeds and wild grasses.  As a point of comparison, one biofuels company states that algae can produce more oil in an area the size of a two car garage than a football field sized plot of soybeans.  This is owing to the fact that almost the entire organism uses sunlight to make lipids (fatty acids) or oil.  The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that if fuel from algae were to replace all of the petroleum based fuels in the United States it would require 15,000 square miles of land to produce.  This is less than one-seventh of the area used to harvest corn in the U.S. in 2000.

Algal fuels have additional climate benefits above and beyond that of first generation biofuels. Algae capture two pounds of CO2 in each pound of algae produced.  If waste CO2 from emissions of a coal-fired power plant is pumped into algae-culture systems, algal biofuel production can have the added benefit of CO2 recycling, i.e. converting waste CO2 into a useable form of energy.  Finally, algal fuels produce valuable co-products, such as nutritional supplements and animal feed which may be able to offset some of the processing costs.

Why don’t we jump right on this?  Like most things in life it comes down to money.  Current production methods are prohibitively expensive.  While the Department of Energy estimates $8 per gallon after scale-up of current technologies, the Navy recently paid $425 per gallon in an algal fuel purchase.  The cost of farming algae as a biofuel must be cut by about 90 percent if it is to become commercially viable and reduce pressure on food prices, according to research by Dutch scientists.  Opinions differ over how far and how fast these costs will decrease, but the Department of Energy estimates “many years.”  According to the head of the Algal Biomass Organization, algae fuel can reach price parity with oil in 2018 if granted production tax credits.

So, there you go.  Algae is and has been in the running as one of the best bets out there to replace fossil fuels.  Just how big a role it will play, no one knows at this time.  If you would like to know more about oilgae, please click here.  The oilgae website has everything you’d care to know (and more) about making biofuel from algae.  There is even an oilgae club to join if you are so inclined.

About Guy McCardle

Guy McCardle is an American science writer and skeptic. He is a certified Infection Prevention Specialist and served proudly as a Captain in the Army Medical Corps during Operation Iraqi Freedom. A devoted father and husband, he offers his unique viewpoints regarding science and the public interest.

4 Responses to Oilgae: Poised to Replace Fossil Fuels?

  1. This is one of those things that we have to do badly before we can do it well; more specifically, inefficiently before we can do it efficiently. But we’ll never get there if we don’t take the unpleasant first steps.

  2. Henk v in the "bat cave" says:

    Great piece on algal based fuels. Great comment by Brian as well. I’ll add that every emerging technology always has a lot of spin off applications.

    Honing other technological application by their adoption into new technologies will pay for these applications. Its just a pity for the developers of this technology wont be harvesting the mula from what some bright person down the track makes of this application.

    Clearly governmental partnership is required for fledgling technologies and technologies that are abused by business by lack of initial codes of practices.

    A good example of good governance of technologies and spin off would be nuclear power.

    The US armed forces now proudly boasts @7000 power reactor years without incident.

    I hardly think any technological development is “unpleasant” in its early years with regard to funding and outcome. Sure, its risky for investors.

  3. Guy McCardle says:

    Thanks Henk. I really think this shows lots of promise in the future.

  4. Henk v in the sports centre says:

    Craig Venter historically has been talking about “GME” micro organisms for similar applications (ie methane generation) and obvious further chemical engineering.

    I do note that in your diagram the energy resources produced in the process have been limited to just biodiesel. There are obvious resources that can be obtained other than just this resource (sugars, alcohols and raw combustibles with the waste stream available to processing as sewage can be {and is now elsewhere} for fuels generation, bio remediation and stock feed).

    This method can be described as a renewable and stand alone with the possibility of wastes (intractable or with disposal issues reused in other energy applications).

    None of what I have stated is truly visionary, its achievable and to some extent is now.

    My realist hat on; we need just a bit more than partial fuel replacement for energy security of any nation (let alone the USA). The efficiency of solar to diesel is small when compared to the ease of mining and the resistance of the general public to technology that replaces or ameliorates highly polluting technologies such as coal and oil.

    I’ll put my cynical hat on and state here and now that its obvious that someone will take offense to technology driven environmentalism and campaign against such applications for 20 or so years. Please let it not be over a reference issue.

    Farnarckling?

Leave a Reply